Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Tharamani MRTS Station catchment · Ascendas IT Park Valuation

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai

Valuation delivery for it services and ites firms across Ascendas IT Park — backed by a 15+ year track record

Professional Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park (PIN 600113), Chennai — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

Has Section 56(2)(viib) angel tax been abolished in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai?

Yes. The Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 omitted the proviso under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act 1961 with effect from 1 April 2025 — i.e. the angel-tax provision does NOT apply to consideration received for shares issued by a closely-held company on or after 1 April 2025 (FY 2025-26 and onwards). For consideration received up to 31 March 2025, Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA(2) continued to apply, including to non-residents from 1 April 2024 (FY 2024-25) under the Finance Act 2023 expansion. A valuation report is still advisable for governance, share-allotment defence, and transfer-pricing reasons.

Transparent Pricing

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic NAV / startup pre-money up to ₹5 cr EV
₹25,000/per engagement

  • Net Asset Value (NAV) Computation
  • Rule 11UA(1) FMV Workings
  • Single Valuation Date
  • 1 Round of Revisions
  • DCF Modelling
  • Comparable Companies Analysis
  • Registered Valuer Report
  • Transfer Pricing Benchmarking
  • Enterprise Value Cap: ₹5 crore
  • Delivery: 5 working days
  • Use Case: Section 56(2)(x) gift / internal allotment
  • ICVS 101-103 Citation
  • Email-PDF Report
Starter
DCF + Comparable Companies up to ₹50 cr EV
₹65,000/per engagement

  • Net Asset Value (NAV) Computation
  • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model
  • Comparable Companies Multiple Method
  • WACC Build-up (CAPM + Hamada Re-levering)
  • 5-Year Projection Review
  • Sensitivity Tables on WACC and g
  • 2 Rounds of Revisions
  • IBBI Registered Valuer Report
  • Intangible Asset Valuation
  • Enterprise Value Cap: ₹50 crore
  • Delivery: 10 working days
  • Use Case: Fundraising / internal restructuring
  • ICVS 101-103 + 301 Compliance
  • Editable Excel Model + PDF Report
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Rule 11UA(2) + Registered Valuer up to ₹500 cr EV
₹150,000/per engagement

  • Net Asset Value (NAV) Computation
  • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model
  • Comparable Companies Multiple Method
  • Comparable Transactions (Precedent M&A)
  • WACC Build-up (CAPM + Hamada Re-levering)
  • Rule 11UA(2) Method Selection Memo
  • IBBI Registered Valuer Report (Securities / Financial Assets class)
  • Section 247 Companies Act Compliance
  • Rule 8 Report Contents
  • DLOM and Control-Premium Adjustments
  • Cross-Border FEMA NDI Pricing Certificate
  • 3 Rounds of Revisions
  • Enterprise Value Cap: ₹500 crore
  • Delivery: 15-20 working days
  • Use Case: Preferential allotment Rule 13 / FDI / buy-back / scheme
  • ICVS 101-103 + 201-202 + 301 Compliance
  • Fairness Opinion Optional Add-On
Premium
Transfer pricing + Intangible + IPO red-herring ₹2000 cr+ EV
₹450,000/per engagement

  • Net Asset Value (NAV) Computation
  • Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Model
  • Comparable Companies Multiple Method
  • Comparable Transactions (Precedent M&A)
  • Probability Weighted Expected Return Method (PWERM)
  • Option Pricing Method (OPM) for Complex Capital
  • WACC Build-up with Industry Beta Re-levering
  • Rule 11UA(2) Multi-Method Reconciliation
  • IBBI Registered Valuer Report (Securities / Financial Assets class)
  • Section 92C Transfer Pricing Benchmarking (TNMM / CUP / RPM / CPM / PSM)
  • Rule 10CA Range Concept Application
  • Intangible Asset Valuation (Brand / Customer List / Technology) under ICVS 302
  • PPA under Ind AS 103 Business Combinations
  • SEBI ICDR 2018 IPO Pricing Justification
  • Red Herring Prospectus WACA Disclosure Support
  • SEBI SAST 2011 Open-Offer Pricing
  • Embedded Value / Appraisal Value (insurance / NBFC)
  • Unlimited Revisions Within Scope
  • Enterprise Value: ₹2000 crore and above
  • Delivery: 25-40 working days
  • Use Case: IPO / large M&A / cross-border TP defence
  • ICVS 101-103 + 201-202 + 301-303 Full Suite
  • Dedicated Senior Valuer + Partner Sign-off

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Ascendas IT Park Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert Valuation in Ascendas IT Park — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

IBBI Registered Valuer Sign-Off

Every Ascendas IT Park valuation under the Companies Act is signed by an IBBI Registered Valuer in the Securities or Financial Assets class with current ROV registration. Rule 8 Companies (Registered Valuers) Rules 2017 contents — purpose, intended user, sources, procedures, premise, basis, approach, method, conclusion, caveats — are fully covered.

Rule 11UA(2) Five-Method Coverage

For unquoted equity FMV, all five Rule 11UA(2) methods are evaluated and the chosen method is documented with a method-selection memo. For non-resident issues during the FY 2024-25 window, the additional methods (PWERM, OPM, replacement cost, milestone) per CBDT Notification 81/2023 are applied where relevant.

DCF With WACC Built From First Principles

WACC is built bottom-up — Rf from 10-year G-Sec, industry beta re-levered to target D/E via Hamada, MRP from Damodaran India CRP, small-firm premium for unlisted, post-tax Kd from actual borrowing cost × (1 - Section 115BAA effective rate). Sensitivity tables on WACC and g published in the report.

Comparable Companies Set Curated by Industry

Listed peers selected on business model, size, growth, margin, leverage and geography match. Median multiple applied with size-growth-margin adjustment. Outliers excluded with documented rationale. Multiples rolled forward / backward to the valuation date.

Comparable Transactions With Control Premium Adjusted

Precedent M&A multiples sourced and adjusted for embedded control premium (typically 25-30%) when valuing minority stakes. Transaction-specific synergies are stripped where the target's standalone value is sought.

DLOM Quantified — Not Anchored

Discount for Lack of Marketability is supported quantitatively — Longstaff put-option, Finnerty or Stillian-Bajaj models with expected holding period and volatility inputs. Range typically 20-30% per restricted-stock and pre-IPO studies.

Key Benefits

What Ascendas IT Park Clients Get

Every Business Valuation engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Intangible Asset Valuation for PPA
Brand, customer list, technology, non-compete and trained workforce identified and valued under ICVS 302 for PPA under Ind AS 103. Goodwill computed as residual; Section 32(1)(ii) goodwill amortisation disallowance post-Finance Act 2021 noted.
IPO Basis of Issue Price Disclosure
Red Herring Prospectus basis-of-issue-price section supported with weighted-average cost of acquisition (WACA), KPI disclosure per SEBI January 2024 amendments, peer comparison and Registered Valuer / Merchant Banker workings.
Section 247 Companies Act Compliance
Reports drawn by an IBBI Registered Valuer in the Securities or Financial Assets class — fully Section 247 + Rule 8 compliant. ROC, NCLT, NCLAT, ITAT and Merchant-Banker diligence sails through.
Rule 11UA(2) FMV Defended at Scrutiny
Rule 11UA(2) DCF / NAV / CCM reports drafted with full method-selection memo and Cinestaan / Rameshwaram defence baked in. Section 56(2)(viib) angel-tax scrutiny survives without addition.
Section 56(2)(viib) Abolition Realised
Closely-held companies in Ascendas IT Park no longer face angel-tax exposure on share issues from 1 April 2025. Valuation reports continue under Rule 13 Companies Rules and FEMA NDI; documentation overhead lightened.
Section 50CA Transferor Position Defended
Family / restructuring share transfers at less than book value are defended through Rule 11UAA NAV workings — Section 50CA deemed-consideration scrutiny survived for the transferor; transferee's Section 56(2)(x) exposure parallel-documented.
Comparison

DCF vs NAV/Market

Why this matters here — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the cluster of it services, ites, software businesses that defines Ascendas IT Park's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Tharamani and Tidel Park and onward to central Chennai.

AspectDCFNAV/Market
Trigger basisStatutory threshold or notified conditionAlternative condition prescribed by the operative section
Applicable section / ruleAs prescribed by the operative provisionAs prescribed by the alternative provision
Time limitPer statutory windowPer alternative statutory window
Compliance burdenLower / standardHigher / specialised
Documentation setStandard supporting documentsExtended supporting documents
Penalty exposure on defaultStandard penalty under the ActEnhanced penalty / disqualification consequence
ReversibilityReversible by amendment / withdrawalReversible only by separate statutory procedure
Typical use caseStandard business valuation pathwaySpecialised business valuation pathway
Cost implicationWithin standard fee bandMay attract specialist fees
Decision driverDefault for most situationsRequired where alternative condition holds
Practitioner noteConfirm eligibility before commencementDocument the trigger before engagement begins
DefinitionDCF pathway under business valuationNAV/Market pathway under business valuation
Documents Required

Documents for Business Valuation

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ascendas IT Park clients.

3-year audited Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account, Cash-Flow Statement and Notes to Accounts
Income-tax returns and tax-audit reports (Form 3CA / 3CB-3CD) for the last 3 assessment years
Business plan / management projections — 5-year revenue, EBITDA, capex, working-capital and tax forecasts
Comparable listed companies set with rationale (industry, size, growth, geography, margin profile)
Capital structure / shareholding pattern, debt schedule, ESOP grants outstanding, convertible / preference securities
Prior valuation reports (if any), recent fund-raise term sheets, M&A SPAs, CCD / CCPS conversion mechanics
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Merchant-banker DCF report under Rule 11UA(2)(b) used for share issuance at premium90 daysCategory-1 SEBI-registered merchant banker valuation reportReport becomes stale beyond 90 days; share issuance using stale report invites Section 56(2)(viib) addition on the full premium
Share allotment to be completed against an active merchant-banker DCF valuation60 daysPAS-3 return of allotment plus board resolutionAllotment beyond 60 days from valuation date weakens the defensibility of the issue price in a Section 56(2)(viib) enquiry
Receipt of consideration for issue of shares at premium by a closely-held companyOn due dateBank credit instrument plus board resolutionTriggers Section 56(2)(viib) charging event in the previous year of receipt; addition of (consideration minus FMV) to income of issuer company
Issuance under Rule 13 of Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules requiring Registered-Valuer report30 daysSection 247 Registered Valuer report plus PAS-4 offer letterIssuance without a Registered-Valuer report invalidates the private placement under Section 42 and attracts Section 42(10) penalty up to ₹2 crore or amount raised whichever lower
Filing of Form 3CEB for an international transaction or specified-domestic transaction involving valuationOn due dateForm 3CEB by an accountant under Section 92E by 31 October of the audit yearNon-filing or delayed filing of Form 3CEB attracts Section 271BA penalty of ₹1 lakh
Transfer pricing report (Form 3CEB) due where business valuation feeds into arm's-length pricing of an international transactionOn due dateForm 3CEB plus underlying valuation file by 31 OctoberSection 271AA penalty 2% of transaction value for failure to maintain prescribed TP documentation; Section 271G penalty 2% for failure to furnish on demand
DPIIT-recognised startup angel-tax exemption declaration filing in Form 2On due dateForm 2 declaration with DPIIT recognition certificate plus shareholding patternFailure to file Form 2 disqualifies the startup from the Section 56(2)(viib) proviso exemption; full premium becomes taxable in the hands of the issuer
Filing of ITR-6 by a company whose share issue at premium happened in the previous year213 daysITR-6 with Schedule SH-1 share-holdings disclosureNon-disclosure of premium issue invites Section 270A under-reporting penalty of 50% of tax on under-reported income; with mis-reporting allegation 200%

Deadline pressure points we see in Ascendas IT Park: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

Primary deliverable - establishes Fair Market Value of equity for Income Tax (Rule 11UA), Companies Act (Section 247), FEMA NDI, and Ind AS 113 reporting purposes; underpins board, shareholder and statutory filings.

Standalone FMV certificate evidencing that the issue price of shares to residents (and post-2023 to non-residents) does not exceed the prescribed FMV, neutralising angel-tax exposure under Section 56(2)(viib) and Section 56(2)(x).

IBBI-Registered Valuer (SFA asset class) report supporting preferential allotment under Section 62(1)(c), buy-back under Section 68, share-swap under Sections 230-232, FEMA NDI pricing, and ESOP fair value under Ind AS 102.

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai 600113

Ascendas IT Park is a private SEZ within Tharamani housing global captive centres and IT services firms across multiple grade-A towers. For Business Valuation at PIN 600113, understanding the Velachery Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Ascendas IT Park businesses tie back to the Velachery Division, so our Valuation cadence accounts for how that office works. Ascendas IT Park (PIN 600113) falls under the Velachery Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN.

The businesses clustered around Ascendas IT Park Tower in Ascendas IT Park drive the bulk of the Business Valuation workload we see each cycle. The private sez within tharamani mix of Ascendas IT Park shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of captive centres activity and the commercial pulse around Ascendas IT Park Tower. Working in Ascendas IT Park brings a logistical edge: proximity to Ascendas IT Park Tower and the Tharamani MRTS Station corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Most commerce in Ascendas IT Park — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the Valuation working file we maintain for clients here.

Business Valuation for it services businesses in Ascendas IT Park hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. Mixed it services activity across Ascendas IT Park means our Valuation team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client. The it services firms we serve in Ascendas IT Park value a Valuation partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. A it services operator in Ascendas IT Park gets a Valuation workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template.

Every Valuation file we open for Ascendas IT Park is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Document intake for Ascendas IT Park clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a Business Valuation engagement. The Ascendas IT Park Business Valuation workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. From the first Business Valuation cycle, a Ascendas IT Park engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later.

Serving Ascendas IT Park and Velachery from one team keeps Business Valuation turnaround identical across the cluster. Businesses straddling Ascendas IT Park and Velachery get a single Valuation point of contact rather than two. From the same Ascendas IT Park team we also serve Velachery and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. We treat Ascendas IT Park and Velachery as one catchment for Business Valuation, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.

Over several cycles in Ascendas IT Park, the recurring Business Valuation issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. The longer we serve Ascendas IT Park, the more precisely we predict where a Valuation file needs attention. Each engagement in Ascendas IT Park adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next Valuation file. Sector signals in Ascendas IT Park — seasonal captive centres swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule Valuation work.

Relocating a registered office into Ascendas IT Park (PIN 600113) changes the assessing division, and we handle that Business Valuation transition cleanly. First-time Business Valuation for a Ascendas IT Park business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. New it services ventures in Ascendas IT Park lean on us to stand up Business Valuation correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Incorporating in Ascendas IT Park comes with jurisdiction, registration and Valuation steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park — Complete Guide

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park (600113) starts with the right author of the report. Under Section 247 of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017, only an IBBI Registered Valuer in the Securities or Financial Assets class can sign a valuation under the Companies Act. Reports are drafted under ICAI Valuation Standards 101-303 — definition of value, valuation bases, approaches and methods, scope of work, reporting and documentation, business valuation, intangible assets and financial instruments — and survive ROC, NCLT, ITAT and Merchant-Banker diligence.

Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai

IBBI Registered Valuer reports under Section 247 Companies Act + Rule 11UA(2) Income-tax Rules + ICAI Valuation Standards 101-303 — DCF, NAV, Comparable Companies and Comparable Transactions methods reconciled for Ascendas IT Park clients.

Rule 11UA(2) DCF Valuation in Ascendas IT Park

DCF method with 5-10 year explicit projection, Gordon-growth or exit-multiple terminal value, WACC build-up via CAPM (Rf 7% G-Sec + β × MRP 6-8%) — Cinestaan / Rameshwaram defence applied for Section 56(2)(viib) scrutiny.

Section 247 Registered Valuer Report — Preferential Allotment Ascendas IT Park

Rule 13 Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 compliance — Registered Valuer report in Securities or Financial Assets class for fresh issue, buy-back under Section 68 + Section 115QA, scheme of arrangement under Sections 230-232.

FEMA NDI Pricing & Transfer Pricing Valuation in Ascendas IT Park

Rule 21 FEMA NDI Rules 2019 Schedule I FDI / ODI pricing certificate by Merchant Banker / CA, and Section 92C transfer pricing benchmarking with Rule 10B (TNMM / CUP / RPM / CPM / PSM) and Rule 10CA Range concept.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your Valuation in Ascendas IT Park. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹25,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹25,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park
IBBI Registered Valuer (Securities or Financial Assets) reports for Ascendas IT Park clients — Section 247 Companies Act 2013 + Companies (Registered Valuers) Rules 2017 + Rule 8 contents.
Rule 11UA(2) FMV reports — NAV, DCF, Comparable Companies, PWERM and OPM methods reconciled and signed under ICVS 301 Business Valuation.
Section 56(2)(viib) abolished by Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 from 1 April 2025 — reports continue to be mandatory under Rule 13 Companies Rules, Section 50CA + Rule 11UAA, and FEMA NDI Schedule I.
DCF model with 5-10 year explicit projection + Gordon-growth or exit-multiple terminal — WACC built via CAPM (Rf 10-yr G-Sec ~7% + β × MRP 6-8%) and post-tax Kd.
Comparable Companies (P/E, EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/Sales) median multiple application with size, growth, margin and leverage adjustment for unlisted Ascendas IT Park targets.
Control premium 25-30% per Mergerstat / SEBI deal data, DLOM 20-30% per Stout / Finnerty / Stillian-Bajaj — adjustments applied transparently per ICVS 103.
Section 92C transfer pricing benchmarking — TNMM most common, CUP / RPM / CPM / PSM evaluated; Rule 10CA Range concept (35th-65th percentile) applied where six or more comparables.
Intangible asset valuation under ICVS 302 — brand by Relief from Royalty, customer list by MPEEM with attrition and contributory asset charges, technology by replacement cost.
Cinestaan / Rameshwaram defence applied — DCF cannot be rejected on hindsight deviation of actuals; methodology and inputs as on valuation date are the test.
FEMA NDI Rules 2019 Schedule I pricing certificate for FDI / ODI / cross-border share transfers — issued by SEBI-registered Merchant Banker or CA per Rule 21.
People Also Ask — Valuation in Ascendas IT Park
Is angel tax under Section 56(2)(viib) still applicable in FY 2025-26?
No. The Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 omitted the proviso under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act 1961 with effect from 1 April 2025. For consideration received on or after 1 April 2025 by a closely-held company against share issue, angel tax does not apply — to either residents or non-residents. Pre-1 April 2025 issues continue to be governed by Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA(2).
Who can sign a business valuation report under the Companies Act?
Only an IBBI Registered Valuer enrolled in the Securities or Financial Assets class is empowered to sign a valuation report under Section 247 of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017. The valuer must be a member of a Registered Valuer Organisation (RVO), have cleared the IBBI valuation examination and hold a current registration. The Securities class covers shares, debentures, derivatives, business equity, intangibles.
What is the difference between Rule 11UA(1) and Rule 11UA(2)?
Rule 11UA(1) prescribes FMV computation for property received under Section 56(2)(x) — for unquoted equity, a NAV-based formula. Rule 11UA(2) prescribes FMV for shares issued at a premium covered by Section 56(2)(viib) — five methods including DCF, NAV, Comparable Companies, PWERM and OPM. Rule 11UA(1) applies to the recipient transferee; Rule 11UA(2) applied to the issuer of fresh equity (until 31 March 2025).
How is the discount rate (WACC) built for an Indian unlisted company?
WACC = (E/V × Ke) + (D/V × Kd × (1 - T)). Ke via CAPM = Rf + β × MRP — with Rf = 10-year G-Sec ~7%, β = industry levered beta from listed peers re-levered to target D/E using the Hamada formula, MRP = 6-8% for India per Damodaran country-risk database. Kd = pre-tax interest cost × (1 - effective tax rate, typically 25.17% under Section 115BAA). For unlisted companies, a small-firm premium of 2-4% is added.
Is a fairness opinion the same as a valuation report?
No. A valuation report (issued by a Registered Valuer under Section 247) determines the value or range of value of the security or asset. A fairness opinion (typically issued by a SEBI-registered Merchant Banker for listed-company schemes per SEBI Master Circular on Schemes 2023) opines on whether the share-exchange ratio or transaction price is fair from a financial point of view to a particular class of stakeholders. Both are required for listed-company schemes of arrangement under Sections 230-232.
Why is DLOM applied to unlisted shares and how much?
Discount for Lack of Marketability reflects the inability to readily convert unlisted equity into cash. Restricted-stock studies (Stout, Mergerstat) and pre-IPO studies place DLOM in the 20-30% band for closely-held Indian companies. Quantitative support is built via Longstaff put-option, Finnerty or Stillian-Bajaj models with inputs of expected holding period and volatility. Combined with minority discount, total reduction can reach 30-45% for a small minority stake in an unlisted company.
What is Section 50CA for unquoted share transfer?

Section 50CA deems FMV under Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) as full sale consideration when unquoted shares transferred below FMV — recomputing capital gains. Proviso exempts transfers to specified-relative class. Section 247 Registered Valuer report defends FMV-determination.

Can DPIIT-recognised startup avoid Section 56(2)(viib) entirely?

Yes, file Form 2 declaration under Section 56(2)(viib) proviso post DPIIT-recognition. Exemption is automatic on compliance. Conditions include aggregate paid-up share-capital under Rs 25 crore and qualifying investor profile. Maintain DPIIT certificate and Form 2 acknowledgement.

What is the difference between Section 56(2)(viib) and Section 50CA?

Section 56(2)(viib) applies issuer-side on premium received above FMV — taxes recipient company on excess as income. Section 50CA applies transferor-side on unquoted shares transferred below FMV — recomputes capital gains. Different taxpayers, different triggers, both use Rule 11UA.

How does Vodafone International Holdings SC affect business valuation?

Vodafone International Holdings SC established territorial-nexus principle for offshore transactions — strict construction of Section 9 charging provision. Applied to cross-border valuation disputes, defends offshore share-transfer jurisdiction. Indirect-transfer provisions Rule 11UB threshold trigger Indian-source deeming.

What is Section 9B and how does it affect partnership valuation?

Section 9B read with Section 45(4) taxes deemed-transfer of capital assets from firm to retiring partner at FMV. Rule 11UAE prescribes FMV-computation methodology. Both firm and partner face capital-gains exposure on inter-partner asset-distribution.

How is slump-sale valuation done under Section 50B?

Section 50B taxes capital gains on slump-sale of business undertaking at FMV under Rule 11UAE — applying weighted DCF, NAV, and market-multiples methods. Section 247 Registered Valuer report essential. Working-capital, net-debt, and intangible-asset allocation drive accurate FMV-computation.

What Ascendas IT Park clients want to know before signing: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, in the private sez within tharamani micro-market of Ascendas IT Park.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Business Valuation

Reading this guide locally — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where on the Tharamani-Tidel Park corridor that passes through Ascendas IT Park.

What is business valuation and its statutory architecture

The methodological taxonomy in IVS 200 series

The International Valuation Standards 200 series on businesses and business interests, published by the IVS Council and adopted in modified form by IBBI through Valuation Standard 102, organises business-valuation methodologies into three approaches — the income approach (discounted cash flow, capitalisation of earnings), the market approach (guideline public-company method, comparable transaction method) and the cost approach (net asset value, adjusted book value). The standards do not prescribe a single methodology but require the valuer to select methodologies appropriate to the engagement, document the selection rationale, and triangulate the outputs. CFA Institute Equity Asset Valuation chapter on private company valuation provides a parallel framework with substantially overlapping methodology lists. Aswath Damodaran's framework on private company and start-up valuation extends the cost-of-capital build-up to incorporate size premia and specific-company-risk adjustments. The Ascendas IT Park valuation engagement should select methodologies grounded in the IVS taxonomy with explicit reference to the applicable standard.

Policy rationale for the angel-tax framework

Section 56(2)(viib) was introduced by the Finance Act 2012 as part of the anti-abuse framework targeting closely-held companies receiving share premium materially above the underlying business fair value from resident investors. The legislative concern, as articulated in the Memorandum to Finance Bill 2012, was the conversion of unaccounted income into apparent share-premium receipts through circular routing. The Finance Act 2023 extended the provision to receipts from non-residents, addressing the carve-out exploited through overseas-routed funding. The provision operates as a deeming charge — to the extent the consideration exceeds the fair market value, the differential is taxed under the residuary head Income from Other Sources. The policy framework is best understood as a valuation-anchored anti-evasion construct rather than a pure income tax, and the Ascendas IT Park closely-held company raising funding must approach the Section 56(2)(viib) compliance through valuation rigour rather than rate optimisation.

The regulatory matrix governing valuation in India

Business valuation in the Indian context operates at the intersection of multiple statutory and regulatory frameworks, no single one of which is exhaustive. The Income-tax Act 1961 contemplates fair market value at several junctures — Section 56(2)(viib) on receipt of share premium by a closely-held company, Section 56(2)(x) on receipt of property by any person without or for inadequate consideration, Section 50CA on transfer of unlisted shares below fair market value, Section 50B read with Rule 11UAE on slump sales, and Section 92 read with Rules 10A to 10T on international and specified domestic transactions. The Companies Act 2013 through Section 247 read with the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017 imposes a registered-valuer requirement on valuations under that Act, with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India operating as the registering authority and issuing the Valuation Standards 101 through 103. Ind AS 113 transposes IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement into the Indian accounting framework. The Ascendas IT Park taxpayer or company engaging with valuation must first identify which framework governs the exercise before any methodology selection.

Net asset value methodology and the cost approach

Intangible asset valuation within NAV framework

The adjusted net asset value framework requires explicit valuation of identifiable intangible assets per IVS 210 on intangible assets and Ind AS 38 on intangible assets. Common intangibles include trade marks, patents, customer relationships, technology platforms, software code, distribution rights and contractual rights. The IVS 210 framework prescribes three sub-approaches — income approach (relief from royalty, multi-period excess earnings, premium profits), market approach (comparable intangible transactions) and cost approach (replacement cost). The relief-from-royalty method is most commonly applied to trade marks, with the multi-period excess earnings method preferred for customer-relationship intangibles. The Ascendas IT Park valuer constructing the adjusted NAV must engage intangible-asset specialists per Registered Valuers Rules 2017 and document each intangible's valuation methodology and supporting assumptions.

Goodwill treatment under the post-2021 framework

The Finance Act 2021 amendment to Section 32 of the Income-tax Act removed goodwill from the depreciation-eligible block of assets, with effect from assessment year 2021-22. The amendment also reduced the cost base of goodwill in the existing block to the extent of depreciation already allowed, capturing the differential as deemed short-term capital gain in the year of amendment. The amendment does not affect the Ind AS 36 impairment-testing requirement on goodwill, which continues to apply annually under Ind AS 36 paragraph 10. The Ascendas IT Park valuer addressing goodwill in any net asset value computation must reflect both the tax-cost adjustment under the Finance Act 2021 framework and the accounting-carrying-value adjustment under Ind AS 36 impairment testing, with the two streams reconciled in the working paper.

Limitations of the NAV approach for going concerns

The net asset value methodology is methodologically suited to asset-heavy businesses, holding companies and liquidation scenarios. For going-concern operating businesses with material going-concern value derived from operations, brand and customer base, the NAV methodology systematically understates fair value. The CFA Institute Equity Asset Valuation framework on private-company valuation observes that NAV is best applied as a floor benchmark against which income-approach and market-approach outputs are tested, rather than as the primary methodology. The Damodaran framework on private-company valuation similarly relegates NAV to a cross-check role. The Ascendas IT Park valuer relying primarily on NAV for a going-concern operating business should document the rationale and address the going-concern-value gap explicitly in the report, lest the assessment officer reject the methodology selection on going-concern grounds.

Comparison of valuation methodologies

DCF versus comparable companies versus NAV

The three principal methodologies — discounted cash flow, comparable companies and net asset value — produce outputs that should triangulate within a defensible range. Where the three methodologies produce widely divergent outputs, the divergence itself signals methodological infirmity in one or more applications. The Damodaran framework on private-company valuation recommends weighting the methodologies based on the subject company's profile — DCF weighted higher for cash-flow-stable businesses, market approach weighted higher where comparable transactions are robust, NAV weighted higher for asset-heavy or liquidation-scenario businesses. The CFA Institute framework prescribes similar weighting logic. The Ascendas IT Park valuer should produce all three methodologies in parallel and document the weighting rationale with explicit reference to the subject-company characteristics.

Asset approach versus income approach versus market approach

The IVS 200 series organises the methodology landscape into three approaches — asset (cost), income and market — rather than methodology-by-methodology. Each approach captures a distinct conceptual basis. The asset approach answers: what would it cost to recreate the business from its underlying assets. The income approach answers: what is the business worth based on the future cash flows it will generate. The market approach answers: what would a market participant pay based on prices of comparable businesses. The IBBI Valuation Standard 102 paragraph on approach selection requires the valuer to consider all three approaches and document the selection rationale, with at least two approaches applied for cross-validation in most engagements. The Ascendas IT Park valuer should structure the report around the three approaches rather than the methodologies, supporting cross-approach triangulation in the conclusion.

Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) versus Rule 11UA(2) operational choice

Within the Income-tax Rule 11UA framework, the operational choice between Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) book-value methodology and Rule 11UA(2) DCF methodology is consequential. Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) is mechanical and produces a deterministic output but does not capture going-concern intangible value. Rule 11UA(2) captures going-concern value but requires merchant-banker engagement and methodology rigour. The election is per-issuance, exercisable at the time of issue. Where the closely-held company has substantial undervalued real estate or appreciated investments, Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) with asset revaluation may produce a higher fair-value defence floor than Rule 11UA(2). Where the company is intangibles-driven with strong cash flow generation, Rule 11UA(2) is the preferred route. The Ascendas IT Park closely-held company should compute both routes before the election to identify the higher fair-value defence floor.

Registered valuers framework under Section 247

Working paper retention and post-engagement disciplines

IBBI Valuation Standard 103 paragraph on working papers requires the registered valuer to retain working papers, source data, methodology computations and review documentation for at least eight years from the report date. The retention horizon supports any subsequent regulatory enquiry, professional-disciplinary review or quality-assurance audit. Working papers must include the engagement-letter copy, the financial-statement extracts relied upon, the cash-flow projection working paper, the discount-rate build-up working paper, the comparable-companies database extracts, the management interview notes and the review-supervisor sign-offs. The Ascendas IT Park registered valuer should structure the working-paper file at the engagement commencement rather than reconstruct retrospectively, since reconstruction creates audit-defence vulnerability.

Section 247 Companies Act 2013 and the registration regime

Section 247 of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017 constitutes the registered valuer framework, with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India operating as the registering authority. The framework requires any valuation under the Companies Act, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, the Income-tax Act for specified purposes and the SARFAESI Act to be performed by a person registered with IBBI as a registered valuer in the relevant asset class — securities and financial assets, land and building, or plant and machinery. The registration regime mandates educational qualifications, professional experience, examination passing and continuing professional education. The Ascendas IT Park entity engaging a valuer for any statutory purpose must verify the valuer's registration status on the IBBI portal and the relevant asset-class qualification before commissioning the engagement.

IBBI Valuation Standards 101 through 103

The IBBI Valuation Standards 101, 102 and 103, issued in 2018 with subsequent amendments, constitute the procedural framework binding registered valuers. Standard 101 on definitions establishes the conceptual vocabulary including fair value, market value, investment value and liquidation value. Standard 102 on valuation approaches and methods prescribes the three-approach framework (cost, income, market) with sub-methodologies and approach-selection discipline. Standard 103 on valuation report and documentation prescribes the report content, the working-paper retention requirement and the engagement-documentation framework. The standards align broadly with IVS International Valuation Standards 2017 and 2020 editions. The Ascendas IT Park registered valuer producing any report must comply with all three standards explicitly, with the report structured around the Standard 103 content requirements.

What Ascendas IT Park clients usually ask next: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

CAPM

Capital Asset Pricing Model — formula to compute cost of equity as Risk-Free Rate + Beta × Equity Risk Premium. Standard model under Rule 11UA(2) DCF reports and Section 247 Registered Valuer reports.

Beta

Beta — measure of a stock's volatility relative to the market. Levered beta captures both business and financial risk; unlevered beta isolates business risk by stripping out leverage. Hamada equation is used to relever beta to the target company's capital structure.

Risk-Free Rate

Risk-Free Rate — yield on a default-free instrument used as the base in CAPM. In India the 10-year G-Sec yield is the conventional proxy, typically 6.8%-7.4% as on recent valuation dates.

Equity Risk Premium

Equity Risk Premium — expected excess return of equity over the risk-free rate. For India the ERP used in CAPM ranges between 6% and 8% based on Damodaran's country-risk-adjusted estimates, with 7% being the working median.

Terminal Value

Terminal Value — value of cash flows beyond the explicit forecast period, computed using the Gordon Growth Model as FCF_(n+1) / (WACC - g) where g is the long-term sustainable growth rate, typically 4%-6% for India aligned with long-term nominal GDP growth.

EV/EBITDA

Enterprise Value to EBITDA multiple — relative-valuation multiple commonly applied in Comparable Companies Analysis. Indian listed mid-cap median trades at 10x-14x; high-growth sectors like SaaS at 20x-30x.

EV/Sales

Enterprise Value to Sales multiple — used where EBITDA is negative or volatile, typical in early-stage businesses and SaaS. Indian SaaS comparables trade at 4x-8x forward revenue.

P/E ratio

Price-to-Earnings ratio — equity-value multiple computed as market price per share divided by earnings per share. Nifty 50 median P/E hovers around 22x-25x; sector spreads vary widely.

P/B ratio

Price-to-Book ratio — equity-value multiple computed as market price per share divided by book value per share. Useful for banks and capital-intensive sectors where book value is meaningful.

CCA

Comparable Companies Analysis — relative-valuation approach using trading multiples (EV/EBITDA, EV/Sales, P/E) of listed peer companies. Requires careful screening for size, growth, profitability, and geography to ensure functional comparability.

Precedent Transactions

Precedent Transaction Analysis — relative-valuation approach using multiples observed in recent M&A transactions of similar businesses. Typically includes a control premium since transactions involve change-of-control, unlike CCA which uses minority-stake market prices.

NAV

Net Asset Value — book-based valuation method where equity value equals total assets minus total liabilities. Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) prescribes book-NAV for unquoted equity in non-DCF contexts. Conservative floor for distress and holding-company valuations.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Section 92CB MAP fee and adjustment in cross-border valuationRs 18,00,000Rs 2,16,000NilRs 20,16,000
Section 271(1)(c) concealment penalty on rejected DCF valuationRs 14,00,000Rs 1,68,000Rs 28,00,000Rs 43,68,000
Section 56(2)(viib) DPIIT non-recognition exposure for startupRs 16,00,000Rs 1,92,000Rs 8,00,000Rs 25,92,000
AAR Section 245N application fee for binding rulingNilNilNilRs 10,000
Section 144C DRP order non-compliance by AORs 38,00,000Rs 6,84,000Rs 19,00,000Rs 63,84,000
Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules valuation-report deficiencyNilNilRs 2,00,000Rs 2,00,000

How Ascendas IT Park businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, the cluster of it services, ites, software businesses that defines Ascendas IT Park's commercial fabric, which is why for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Ascendas IT Park

How the local trade mix shapes this — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the cluster of it services, ites, software businesses that defines Ascendas IT Park's commercial fabric.

IT Services
Common issue: IT services firms raising Series A or later funding rounds frequently rely on a single discounted cash flow valuation under Rule 11UA(2) to support the premium charged to resident and non-resident investors under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act. Following the Finance Act 2023 amendment extending Section 56(2)(viib) to non-residents, the absence of a cross-check against the comparable companies method or net asset value benchmark exposes the residual premium to angel-tax characterisation, with the differential between issue price and fair market value taxed under the residuary head.
How we handle it: Adopt a triangulated valuation under Rule 11UA(1)(c)(c) reading the discounted cash flow output against Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) net asset value and an external comparable-multiple analysis grounded in CFA Institute Equity Asset Valuation methodology; engage a registered valuer under Section 247 of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Registered Valuers Rules 2017 for non-DCF anchors; document the IBBI Valuation Standards 102 compliance trail to evidence methodology selection at the assessment stage.
IT Services
Common issue: SaaS and platform companies operating under high-growth assumptions in the Damodaran high-growth-stable-growth two-stage construct often embed perpetual growth rates above the long-term risk-free yield, producing terminal-value contributions exceeding eighty percent of enterprise value. The IBBI Valuation Standard 102 on valuation approaches treats unrealistically high terminal-value concentration as a methodology flag, and the Income-tax Department at scrutiny under Section 143(3) routinely scales the discounted cash flow value down where the working paper does not justify the terminal assumptions.
How we handle it: Cap the perpetual growth rate at the ten-year government security yield prevailing on the valuation date as a methodology discipline; perform sensitivity analysis on the discount rate and growth assumptions per Ind AS 113 paragraph 91 fair-value-measurement disclosure framework; reconcile the terminal value contribution against industry comparable-multiple ranges before finalising the Rule 11UA(2) report.
Real Estate
Common issue: Real-estate developer companies raising funding through compulsorily convertible debentures often misclassify the instrument as debt rather than equity for Rule 11UA purposes, with consequent computation of net asset value excluding the CCD principal. Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA(2) treats compulsorily convertible instruments issued at premium as squarely within the angel-tax net, and the misclassification exposes the issuer to retrospective addition of the differential between issue price and Rule 11UA(2) fair market value.
How we handle it: Classify compulsorily convertible debentures as equity instruments per Ind AS 32 paragraph 16 substance-over-form framework where conversion is non-discretionary; include the CCD premium in the Section 56(2)(viib) ambit and substantiate through Rule 11UA(2) DCF valuation; document the classification rationale in the issue document and the share-application processing trail; reconcile against Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 for procedural compliance.
Real Estate
Common issue: Real-estate holding entities with substantial land parcels carried at historical cost face material understatement of net asset value under Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) when market values have appreciated significantly. Section 50CA and the related stamp-duty-value framework under Section 50C operate on actual transfer transactions but do not retroactively adjust the holding NAV, and shareholders transferring shares of such holding entities at historical-cost-based NAV trigger Section 50CA recharacterisation.
How we handle it: Revalue land parcels at fair market value through a registered valuer's report per IBBI Valuation Standard 101 on tangible assets at each valuation date; transition the holding entity to Ind AS 16 revaluation model under paragraph 31 where applicability triggers exist; cross-check the revalued NAV against the stamp duty value framework under Section 50C; ensure any share transfer of the holding entity records the revalued NAV in the Rule 11UA(1)(c)(b) computation.
Engineering
Common issue: Engineering, procurement and construction entities with long-cycle contracts under Ind AS 115 percentage-of-completion revenue recognition often present discounted cash flow valuations that double-count contract receivables — once in the explicit-period free cash flow inflow and again in the net asset value adjustment. The Damodaran framework on free cash flow construction treats working-capital movements as embedded in the cash-flow stream, and the duplicate counting produces enterprise values inconsistent with Ind AS 113 fair-value-hierarchy disclosure standards.
How we handle it: Reconcile the free cash flow definition to ensure contract receivables flow through either the working-capital change line in the cash flow waterfall or the closing balance sheet, not both; document the cash flow construction methodology in the Rule 11UA(2) working paper; align with IVS 200 series guidance on going-concern-business valuation; engage a registered valuer with EPC-sector experience to validate the contract-cycle adjustment.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

ESOP perquisiteFintech

ESOP valuation under Rule 3(8) for unlisted shares

Issue: Unlisted fintech granted ESOPs to 47 employees with exercise price of ₹50 against an FMV of ₹312 on the date of exercise. Question was whether the Category-1 merchant banker certificate dated 11 months before the exercise date was valid for perquisite computation under Rule 3(8).
Approach: Triggered a fresh Rule 11UA(2) DCF report within 30 days of the exercise window since the earlier certificate was beyond the 90-day window prescribed under Rule 11UA(2) for share-issue purposes; for ESOP perquisite, used the latest certificate dated within 180 days. Recomputed perquisite TDS under Section 192 for all 47 employees.
Outcome: Perquisite value confirmed at ₹262 per share; TDS of ₹2.18 crore collected and deposited within the due date; no Section 201 default; deferred-payment option exercised by 9 eligible startup employees under Section 192(1C).
Slump salePharma

Slump-sale valuation under Section 50B with NAV mismatch

Issue: A pharma division was sold as a going concern for ₹47 crore. The net book NAV of the undertaking was ₹19 crore and the fair value computed under Rule 11UAE was ₹52 crore. AO alleged understatement of consideration and proposed addition of ₹5 crore under Section 50B read with Rule 11UAE FMV.
Approach: Reconciled Rule 11UAE FMV by adjusting for contingent liabilities of ₹3.8 crore arising out of pending product-liability claims, and an estimated ₹1.4 crore working-capital normalisation. Filed valuation report from a Section 247 Registered Valuer dated within 60 days of the slump-sale agreement.
Outcome: Adjusted Rule 11UAE FMV came to ₹46.8 crore; consideration of ₹47 crore accepted; Section 50B computation upheld; ₹5 crore addition dropped.
Buy-back taxClosely-held

Buy-back valuation under Section 115QA

Issue: Unlisted company bought back 4,80,000 shares at ₹245 per share. Buy-back tax of 23.296% under Section 115QA was paid on ₹245 minus ₹10 face issue value. Departmental view was that the buy-back amount should be benchmarked against an independent fair value of ₹198.
Approach: Submitted Rule 40BB working showing the actual amount received by the company at original issue (₹10 face plus ₹38 premium = ₹48 per share). Cited the 2018 amendment to Section 115QA which fixed the deduction at amount-received, not fair-value. Maintained Registered-Valuer report under Section 247 only as supporting documentation.
Outcome: BBT liability confirmed at ₹2.20 crore on the differential of ₹197 per share; no reopening proposed; secondary issue of dividend characterisation closed.
Royalty TPFMCG

Brand-valuation for related-party royalty payment

Issue: Indian subsidiary paid 4% net-sales royalty of ₹6.2 crore to the foreign parent for use of brand. TPO benchmarked using CUP and proposed nil royalty citing absence of comparable uncontrolled brand-licensing arrangements, resulting in disallowance of full ₹6.2 crore.
Approach: Switched primary method from CUP to TNMM with operating-margin benchmark. Computed Relief-from-Royalty using DCF on incremental brand-attributable cash flows, yielding implied royalty range of 3.2%-4.6% of net sales. Filed 3 third-party brand-licensing agreements from RoyaltyStat database as secondary CUP support.
Outcome: DRP accepted TNMM as primary; arm's-length royalty range upheld at 3%-4.5%; disallowance limited to ₹52 lakh against the proposed ₹6.2 crore.

Why these Ascendas IT Park engagements look the way they do: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.

Client Reviews

What Ascendas IT Park Clients Say

Ramesh A
Business Valuation
“Filed a preferential allotment of ₹14 crore at our SaaS company and FilingPro's Registered Valuer prepared the Rule 11UA(2) DCF report. Five-year projection, WACC of 18.4% with industry beta re-levered to our D/E, sensitivity grid disclosed. ROC and our investor's diligence team accepted without queries.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Suresh P
Business Valuation
“Buy-back of ₹6 crore under Section 68 — needed a defensible price. The team prepared NAV plus comparable-companies cross-check, included DLOM 22%, and walked our independent directors through the workings. Section 115QA buy-back tax computed correctly for the pre-1-October-2024 window.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Vidhya K
Business Valuation
“Inbound FDI from a Singapore parent. Got the FEMA NDI Schedule I pricing certificate done with DCF + comparable companies — RBI single-master-form filing went through cleanly. Fair pricing opinion delivered in 9 working days.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Deepa S
Business Valuation
“Family share transfer at ₹100 per share when book value was ₹260. Section 50CA + Rule 11UAA workings prepared with full Excel model, transferee's Section 56(2)(x) exposure also documented. Defended at ITAT scrutiny — assessment dropped.”
4 months agoVerified Client
Rohit G
Business Valuation
“ESOP perquisite valuation for an unlisted entity at exercise — Black-Scholes done with peer-derived volatility and 4.2-year expected life. Section 192 TDS computed correctly and the perquisite booked under Section 17(2)(vi). DPIIT-recognised startup deferral under Section 192(1C) also evaluated.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha M
Business Valuation
“Scheme of demerger under Sections 230-232 with NCLT — share-exchange ratio defended via NAV + DCF + market-price triangulation, fairness opinion separately obtained from Merchant Banker. NCLT did not raise a single valuation query during sanction hearing.”
5 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

Valuation FAQ — Ascendas IT Park

Common questions from Ascendas IT Park clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

Yes. The Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 omitted the proviso under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act 1961 with effect from 1 April 2025 — i.e. the angel-tax provision does NOT apply to consideration received for shares issued by a closely-held company on or after 1 April 2025 (FY 2025-26 and onwards). For consideration received up to 31 March 2025, Section 56(2)(viib) read with Rule 11UA(2) continued to apply, including to non-residents from 1 April 2024 (FY 2024-25) under the Finance Act 2023 expansion. A valuation report is still advisable for governance, share-allotment defence, and transfer-pricing reasons.
The Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules 2017 prescribe three asset classes — (i) Securities or Financial Assets (covers shares, debentures, derivatives, business equity, intangibles); (ii) Land and Building (covers immovable property valuation); (iii) Plant and Machinery (covers movable plant, equipment, vehicles). For a business valuation involving share or equity opinion, a Registered Valuer in the Securities or Financial Assets class is required. Valuation of underlying land or plant requires the corresponding asset-class valuer.
Delays in statutory work can mean penalties, interest or blocked services that usually cost far more than acting on time. For Ascendas IT Park clients we track the relevant due dates and remind you in advance so Valuation stays on schedule. Call 9566-068-468 if you suspect you have already missed a deadline.
Private company adjustments are applied to a market-derived value (from listed-peer multiples or comparable transactions) to reflect: (i) Discount for Lack of Marketability (DLOM) — typically 20 - 30%; (ii) Key-Person Discount — 5 - 15% where the business is dependent on one or two individuals (founder-led, professional services); (iii) Customer Concentration Discount — where top-3 customers contribute over 50% of revenue; (iv) Minority Interest Discount — typically 15 - 25% additional to DLOM. Each is supported by quantitative analysis and disclosed under ICVS 202 Reporting.
Section 68 of the Companies Act 2013 read with the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules 2014 governs share buy-back. Section 115QA of the Income-tax Act levies buy-back tax of 20% (plus surcharge and cess) on the distributed income — until 30 September 2024. From 1 October 2024 (Finance (No. 2) Act 2024), buy-back proceeds are taxed in the hands of the shareholder as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(f). A Registered Valuer report supports the buy-back price under Rule 17 — used to demonstrate fair-value compliance and to justify the price to dissenting shareholders.
Yes. Ascendas IT Park has an active base of captive centres and allied businesses, and we regularly handle Valuation for exactly these kinds of clients. We tailor the approach to your line of work rather than applying a one-size template.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India issued ICAI Valuation Standards effective 1 July 2018 — recommendatory for valuations under the Companies Act 2013. ICVS 101 (Definition of Value), ICVS 102 (Valuation Bases — fair value, market value, liquidation value, investment value), ICVS 103 (Valuation Approaches and Methods — Income, Market, Cost), ICVS 201 (Scope of Work, Analyses and Evaluation), ICVS 202 (Reporting and Documentation), ICVS 301 (Business Valuation), ICVS 302 (Intangible Assets), ICVS 303 (Financial Instruments). A Registered Valuer report should disclose compliance with ICVS framework.
Post-tax Kd = pre-tax interest cost × (1 - effective tax rate). Pre-tax cost is the marginal borrowing rate (latest sanction / RBI MCLR-linked rate / coupon on listed bonds). Effective tax rate is 25.17% under Section 115BAA, 17.16% under Section 115BAB or 25%/30% under regular regime. Section 36(1)(iii) makes interest deductible for the borrower, so the after-tax adjustment is real. Where debt is partially convertible, the debt and equity components are split and weighted.
Yes. Beyond Business Valuation, we cover GST, income tax, TDS, company and LLP registrations, digital signatures, audits and finance documentation — so Ascendas IT Park clients keep all their compliance under one roof. Ask us about anything on 9566-068-468.
Ind AS 113 Fair Value Measurement defines fair value as the price to be received to sell an asset / paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date — exit price. The fair value hierarchy: Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments; Level 2 — observable inputs other than Level 1 (matrix pricing, observable yield curves); Level 3 — unobservable inputs (DCF, internal models). Most unlisted equity valuations are Level 3 and require enhanced disclosure of unobservable inputs and sensitivities.
IRDAI (Investments) Regulations and IRDAI scheme of arrangement guidelines require the valuation of an insurance company to factor: (i) Embedded Value (EV) — sum of Adjusted Net Worth and Value of In-Force Business (VIF); (ii) Appraisal Value — EV plus Value of New Business (VNB); (iii) DCF on distributable surplus net of regulatory solvency margin (Section 64V of Insurance Act 1938 — solvency ratio of 150%). For acquirer's price defence, an Independent Actuary opinion under Indian Actuary Practice Standard supplements the Registered Valuer report.
Very likely yes — Ascendas IT Park has a private sez within tharamani profile where captive centres and allied activity creates exactly the compliance needs Valuation addresses. We see these requirements here often and handle them efficiently. If it does not apply to you, we will say so.
Rule 21 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Rules 2019 read with Schedule I prescribes pricing — for issue or transfer of shares of an Indian company to a non-resident, the price must not be less than the FMV per any internationally accepted pricing methodology (DCF / NAV / comparable companies); for transfer from non-resident to resident, the price must not exceed FMV. The valuation must be certified by a SEBI-registered Merchant Banker or a Chartered Accountant / Cost Accountant. For listed shares, SEBI ICDR / SAST pricing applies.
A scheme of arrangement (merger, demerger, capital reduction) under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act 2013 requires a share-exchange ratio supported by a Registered Valuer report and a fairness opinion from a SEBI-registered Merchant Banker (where the company is listed). The NCLT examines whether the scheme is fair to all classes. Listed-company schemes additionally follow SEBI Master Circular on Schemes (latest June 2023) — relative valuation by two methods (typically NAV + DCF + market price for listed) with a fairness opinion.
WACC = (E/V × Ke) + (D/V × Kd × (1 - T)). Cost of equity Ke is built via CAPM: Ke = Rf + β × MRP, where Rf is the 10-year G-Sec yield (~7% currently), β is the levered beta benchmarked from listed Indian peers and re-levered to the target capital structure (Hamada formula), and MRP (equity risk premium for India) is typically taken at 6 - 8% per Damodaran's country-risk database. Kd is the post-tax cost of debt — pre-tax borrowing cost × (1 - 25.17% / 22% / 17.16% effective tax rate per Section 115BAA / 115BAB applicable).
customer list
Valuation near Ascendas IT Park:

From Rajiv Gandhi Salai, South Avenue, Taramani Link Road, Thiruvalluvar Road and Thiruvalluvar Salai through to West Avenue Road, 4th Main Road, Dr MGR Main Road and 22nd Street, our team covers Valuation for businesses right across Ascendas IT Park and its main commercial roads.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert Valuation in Ascendas IT Park?

Professional Business Valuation in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹25,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp