Qualified GST Audit Support for Ramapuram (PIN 600089) and adjacent Manapakkam — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
Ramapuram education and residential units around SRM Easwari Engineering College — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Ramapuram — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Ramapuram businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Ramapuram, the cluster of education, residential, retail businesses that defines Ramapuram's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Manapakkam and Porur and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ramapuram clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Ramapuram, the business activity radiating outward from SRM Easwari Engineering College and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Ramapuram: Where Ramapuram differs: for the professional and salaried population of Ramapuram navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 66 directs the nominee auditor to submit the report to the Assistant Commissioner within ninety days, which may be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the nominee auditor for material and sufficient reasons. It is to be noted that the ceiling on combined period under this provision is one hundred and eighty days.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 102 prescribes Form GST ADT-03 for the direction by the proper officer to the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner under Section 66. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-04 for communication of findings of the special audit to the registered person. It is to be noted that ADT-04 is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.
View sourceSection 74 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation is extended to five years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable. It is to be noted that the higher penalty regime under this provision requires the proper officer to specifically allege and establish one of the three jurisdictional triggers.
View sourceBusinesses registered in Ramapuram share the Chennai West jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Saidapet Division each time. Statutory correspondence for Ramapuram businesses routes through the Saidapet Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Ramapuram businesses tie back to the Saidapet Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. The 600xx geo-zone covering Ramapuram groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Document pickup near SRM Easwari Engineering College is a same-hour errand for our Ramapuram engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Ramapuram sustains a high flow of commerce for a residential education pocket locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Vendors and customers tied to the Ramapuram Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Ramapuram GST Audit Support clients. Working in Ramapuram brings a logistical edge: proximity to SRM Easwari Engineering College and the Ramapuram Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast.
The it services character of Ramapuram commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs. Sector concentration matters: when Ramapuram leans toward it services, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. The it services firms we serve in Ramapuram value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for it services firms near Ramapuram to know where the department usually probes.
The qualified-review step on every Ramapuram GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Document intake for Ramapuram clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. The Ramapuram GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. From the first GST Audit Support cycle, a Ramapuram engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later.
GST Audit Support clients in Nandambakkam are handled by the same practitioners who run our Ramapuram desk. Businesses straddling Ramapuram and Nandambakkam get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. From the same Ramapuram team we also serve Nandambakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Proximity to Nandambakkam means a Ramapuram engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence.
Each engagement in Ramapuram adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. Because we work repeatedly across Ramapuram, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The longer we serve Ramapuram, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Common patterns in the Saidapet Division give Ramapuram businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues.
Relocating a registered office into Ramapuram (PIN 600089) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. New residential ventures in Ramapuram lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Incorporating in Ramapuram comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. We onboard new Ramapuram entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Ramapuram businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Ramapuram prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Ramapuram businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Cross-charge arises where distinct persons under Section 25(4) supply support functions across GSTINs without invoice. At audit, the cost pool is allocated through Rule 28 second proviso open-market value, with revenue-neutrality typically established when the recipient GSTIN avails full ITC.
Audit teams test month-wise D1 and D2 formulae under Rule 42, the annual true-up under Rule 42(2) before September following, and the recomputation against audited exempt-turnover ratios. Short reversal is treated as Section 17(2) violation attracting interest and penalty.
Yes. Section 66(1) permits ordering a special audit at any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act. The threshold satisfaction on incorrect value or abnormal credit must be recorded in writing before issuing ADT-03.
Sub-section (3) of Section 66 mandates a fair hearing before any material drawn from the special audit can be turned against the taxpayer. This pre-decisional opportunity is treated as jurisdictional; breach is routinely cured through Article 226 writ jurisdiction of the Madras High Court.
No. Schedule III to the CGST Act 2017 lists activities or transactions that are treated as neither supply of goods nor services, including services by employees in the course of employment, high-sea sales by endorsement before clearance, and certain other specified transactions.
No. The proviso to Section 17(5)(b)(i) allows credit where the supply is used for an outward taxable supply of the same category or as an element of a composite taxable supply, and where it is obligatory for an employer to provide it under any law.
What Ramapuram clients want to know before signing: Where Ramapuram differs: on the Manapakkam-Porur corridor that passes through Ramapuram.
Reading this guide locally — Across Ramapuram, in the residential education pocket micro-market of Ramapuram.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).
Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.
Section 73(5) of the CGST Act allows the registered person to pay the tax along with interest under Section 50 on the basis of own ascertainment or as ascertained by the proper officer and inform the proper officer of such payment in Form DRC-03 before service of an SCN under Section 73(1). Where the registered person agrees with the ADT-02 findings, voluntary payment under Section 73(5) avoids the SCN cycle entirely and limits the financial impact to tax plus interest, without penalty. Section 73(6) then mandates that no SCN shall be issued in respect of the amount paid. This voluntary-payment route is the preferred audit-closure mechanism for genuine ITC errors, classification mis-applications and minor valuation gaps, and is widely used in practice.
Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.
Form GST ADT-02 is the audit-closure report prescribed under Rule 101(5) of the CGST Rules and Section 65(7) of the CGST Act. Upon completion of the audit, the proper officer is required to issue ADT-02 within thirty days informing the registered person of the findings, the rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 captures the period audited, the audit observations under each verification head (turnover, ITC, refund, classification, rate, valuation), the proper officer's conclusion on each observation, the tax / interest / penalty quantum where applicable, and the rights of the registered person to dispute or accept the findings. The form is the formal closure of the audit cycle and the trigger for the next-stage decision — voluntary DRC-03 payment, SCN under Section 73 or 74, or no-action closure.
The Commissioner determines the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant under Section 66(4) based on rates broadly aligned with the ICAI and ICMAI minimum recommended scales for special-audit work. The registered person typically has no direct say in either the selection of the CA/CMA or the remuneration determination — both are administrative decisions of the Commissioner. Challenges to ADT-03 cost-recovery are rare in practice and usually focus on the underlying Section 66 nomination itself rather than the quantum. Where the Section 66 nomination was procedurally infirm (no Commissioner approval, no opportunity of being heard, no recorded reasons), the consequential ADT-03 cost-recovery similarly becomes vulnerable in writ proceedings. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents this cost-recovery pattern as common across jurisdictions that use specialist-audit tiers.
Once ADT-03 is served, the cost-recovery amount becomes payable within the timeline specified in the form (typically thirty days). Non-payment triggers Section 79 of the CGST Act — the Government dues recovery framework — which empowers the proper officer to recover the amount through modes including deduction from any amount due to the registered person, sale of any movable or immovable property, attachment of bank accounts under Section 83 provisional attachment, and recovery as land revenue arrears. The registered person can apply for instalment-payment under Section 80 read with Rule 158 where genuine financial hardship exists; the Commissioner has discretion to allow up to twenty-four monthly instalments subject to interest under Section 50.
In practice, ADT-03 cost-recovery determinations issued by Tamil Nadu Commissionerates have ranged from modest amounts (₹50,000-₹2 lakh for limited-scope special audits) to substantial amounts (₹10 lakh and above for multi-year complex audits involving multiple GSTINs). The pattern correlates with the audit-scope — broad valuation or ITC-eligibility audits at large multi-State entities typically yield higher cost-recovery quantums. Registered persons under Section 66 nomination are well-advised to engage with the CA/CMA on a documented scope-limitation memorandum to control the quantum; reasonableness of the determination is reviewable in writ jurisdiction though the threshold for interference is high.
What Ramapuram clients usually ask next: Where Ramapuram differs: for the professional and salaried population of Ramapuram navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
ADT-04 is the communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66. It carries the observations of the nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant and the officer's view, and is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.
Nominee auditor is the chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner under Section 66 to conduct the special audit. The registered person does not have a right to choose the nominee. The remuneration of the nominee is determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination is final.
Aggregate turnover is defined in clause (6) of Section 2 of the CGST Act and means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies, exempt supplies, exports of goods or services and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, computed on an all-India basis. The turnover threshold for GSTR-9C self-certification is computed on this basis.
GSTR-9 is the consolidated annual return prescribed under Section 44 read with Rule 80(1). It captures outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands or refunds for the financial year. GSTR-9 is the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored.
GSTR-9C is the self-certified reconciliation statement prescribed under Rule 80(3) reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles tax paid and input tax credit. The threshold for applicability is aggregate turnover exceeding five crore rupees during the financial year.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 captures the reconciliation between ITC available as per GSTR-2A or 2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B. The difference under Table 8D is a frequent audit observation track. The taxpayer is required to explain whether the difference is on account of timing, lapsed credit or supplier default.
Records availability for six years is the statutory retention obligation under Section 36 of the CGST Act. Every registered person required to maintain books of account under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal.
Reconciliation gap on Table 8 is a frequent finding in GST audit. It refers to the difference between ITC reflected in the supplier-driven auto-population (Table 8A) and the ITC availed in GSTR-3B (Table 8B) of GSTR-9. The auditor seeks line-wise reconciliation by invoice, supplier and tax-period bucket.
Adverse audit finding is an observation recorded by the proper officer in the audit notes under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 or in the communication under ADT-02 that points to short payment of tax, erroneous refund, or wrongly availed input tax credit. It is the precursor to action under Section 73 or Section 74.
Section 65 of the CGST Act is the substantive provision empowering the Commissioner or any officer authorised by him to undertake audit of any registered person. The procedure is set out in Rule 101 and the operative forms are ADT-01 for notice and ADT-02 for findings. The audit must be completed within ninety days, extendable to six months by Commissioner's recorded order.
Section 66 of the CGST Act is the special audit provision. The officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, with prior approval of the Commissioner, may direct the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner. The procedure is set out in Rule 102.
Section 35 of the CGST Act is the records-maintenance provision. Sub-section (1) requires every registered person to keep and maintain books of account and records at the principal place of business. Sub-section (5), now omitted with effect from 1 August 2021, earlier required mandatory audit by a chartered accountant for turnover above the prescribed threshold.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Ramapuram businesses typically avoid these: Where Ramapuram differs: the cluster of education, residential, retail businesses that defines Ramapuram's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Ramapuram navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Ramapuram, the cluster of education, residential, retail businesses that defines Ramapuram's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Ramapuram engagements look the way they do: Where Ramapuram differs: the business activity radiating outward from SRM Easwari Engineering College and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Ramapuram navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Ramapuram clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
From Ramapuram Main Road, Sri Devi Kuppam Main Road, Valluvar Road, Valluvar Salai and 1st Cross Main Road through to 1st Main Road, 1st main road, 2nd Main Road and Arcot Road, our team covers GST Audit Support for businesses right across Ramapuram and its main commercial roads.
Professional GST Audit Support in Ramapuram, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.