GST Audit Support delivery for it services and residential firms across Manapakkam — and a zero-penalty filing record
Professional GST Audit Support in Manapakkam (PIN 600125), Chennai — transparent scope, no surprises, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Call 9566-068-468.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles ITC as per GSTR-2A/2B with ITC availed in GSTR-3B. Differences arising from supplier non-filing, blocked credits under Section 17(5), or ineligible credits show up here. Audit teams scrutinise Table 8 to question wrongly availed ITC under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement) where the difference is unexplained.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Manapakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Manapakkam businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Manapakkam, the cluster of it services, residential, retail businesses that defines Manapakkam's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Porur and Ramapuram and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Manapakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Manapakkam, the business activity radiating outward from DLF IT Park and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Manapakkam: On the ground in Manapakkam, for Manapakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 65 provides that the registered person shall be informed by way of a notice not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit. The notice is issued in Form GST ADT-01 as prescribed under Rule 101(2). It is to be noted that the fifteen-working-day window is a substantive procedural safeguard; commencement of audit proceedings without compliance with this timeline is a jurisdictional infirmity that may be agitated under Article 226.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 66 directs the nominee auditor to submit the report to the Assistant Commissioner within ninety days, which may be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the nominee auditor for material and sufficient reasons. It is to be noted that the ceiling on combined period under this provision is one hundred and eighty days.
View sourceSub-section (4) of Section 65 prescribes that the audit shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit. The proviso permits the Commissioner, where satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within three months for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend the period by a further period not exceeding six months. The expression date of commencement is defined in the Explanation to mean the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later.
View sourceWe keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Saidapet Division of the Chennai West handles Manapakkam filings and approvals. Manapakkam (PIN 600125) falls under the Saidapet Division of the Chennai West, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Every Manapakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600125, the Saidapet Division, and the coordinates 13.0186, 80.1717 that anchor the locality. The 600xx geo-zone covering Manapakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Manapakkam reads as a residential commercial mix supporting dlf sez pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around DLF IT Park and fed by the Manapakkam Bus Stop corridor. Working in Manapakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to DLF IT Park and the Manapakkam Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. The businesses clustered around DLF IT Park in Manapakkam drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. Freight and foot traffic from the Manapakkam Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Manapakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential commercial mix supporting dlf sez pocket.
Because Manapakkam hosts a cluster of retail businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. Sector concentration matters: when Manapakkam leans toward retail, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. Mixed retail activity across Manapakkam means our GST Audit Support team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client. The retail character of Manapakkam commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.
A Manapakkam client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Fixed-fee scoping means a Manapakkam business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement. The Manapakkam GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Document intake for Manapakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement.
GST Audit Support clients in Ramapuram are handled by the same practitioners who run our Manapakkam desk. Coverage from Manapakkam naturally extends to Ramapuram, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. Businesses straddling Manapakkam and Ramapuram get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. Group companies spread across Manapakkam and Ramapuram consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.
Sector signals in Manapakkam — seasonal residential swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Manapakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Over several cycles in Manapakkam, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Patterns we track for Manapakkam include residential documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Saidapet Division tends to raise.
When a Nandambakkam business expands into Manapakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600125 without disruption. New retail ventures in Manapakkam lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. For a new business incorporating in Manapakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. Shifting principal place of business to Manapakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai West, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Manapakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Manapakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Manapakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Yes. A written request citing genuine reasons such as auditor unavailability, partner illness or pendency of board records reconciliation is generally accommodated by the proper officer, provided the rescheduling does not breach the three-month completion window under Section 65(4).
Yes. The e-way bill register under Rule 138 is reconciled with outward supplies in GSTR-1 and inward consignment receipts. Audit teams flag Part-B late generation, validity-period breaches and consignor-consignee GSTIN mismatches as potential Section 129 exposures.
Non-production attracts best-judgement reconstruction by the proper officer, Section 125 general penalty up to twenty-five thousand rupees, and adverse inference under the Indian Evidence Act principles. Section 70 summons may also be issued requiring personal attendance with records.
An Article 226 writ before the Madras High Court is maintainable against an ADT-01 notice where the notice lacks jurisdictional foundation, overlaps with an earlier audit on the same period without fresh material, or violates the speaking-order discipline recognised in Kranti Associates and GKN Driveshafts.
ADT-02 records the audit conclusions. If the taxpayer does not voluntarily discharge through Form DRC-03, demand is crystallised by way of a show-cause notice in Form DRC-01 invoking Section 73 or 74 as the case may be, and eventually a DRC-07 adjudication order.
Yes. The CBIC Single Interface for Facilitation by Tax Authorities framework coordinates Central and State audits to avoid duplication on the same GSTIN-period. The audit by one authority generally bars audit by the other for the same period absent fresh material.
What Manapakkam clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Manapakkam, in the residential commercial mix supporting dlf sez micro-market of Manapakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Across Manapakkam, on the Porur-Ramapuram corridor that passes through Manapakkam.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Where the audit-team recommends Section 74 framing, the registered person's defence focuses on the four elements — fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade tax. The Supreme Court's pre-GST jurisprudence on similar language in Central Excise (Pushpam Pharmaceuticals v CCE) and Service Tax (CCE v Mehta and Co) emphasised that mere non-payment or non-disclosure does not amount to suppression with intent; positive indicators of intent are needed. Bona-fide classification errors, computational mistakes, and reasonable interpretation differences are not suppression. Where the SCN frames the case under Section 74, the response should systematically address each of the four elements and rely on the documentary trail showing bona-fide compliance attempts. Pradeep Goyal (DIN requirement) and Kranti Associates (reasoned order) provide procedural safeguards.
Section 73(10) provides that the order under Section 73 shall be issued within three years from the due date for furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid or short paid or input tax credit wrongly availed relates; the SCN must be issued at least three months before that date (Section 73(2)). Section 74(10) provides corresponding five-year limitation. For FY 2017-18 GSTR-9 (annual return due 31 December 2018, extended dates apply), the Section 73 limitation expired in late 2021-22 (extended through various Notifications including 9/2023-CT to 31 December 2023 and further), and Section 74 limitation extends to mid-2024 onwards. Audit findings escalated beyond limitation are barred; the registered person should systematically test limitation as part of the SCN defence.
Where the Section 73 or 74 adjudication order under DRC-07 is adverse, the registered person's first appeal lies under Section 107 of the CGST Act before the Joint or Additional Commissioner (Appeals) within three months from the date of communication of the order, extendable by one month for sufficient cause. Pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount under Section 107(6) is the gateway requirement. Second appeal lies under Section 112 before the GST Appellate Tribunal (now operational with Principal Bench at New Delhi and State / Area Benches notified); the Section 112 pre-deposit is an additional 20% (cumulative 30%). Beyond the Tribunal, appeal lies to the High Court under Section 117 on questions of law, and to the Supreme Court under Section 118. Writ remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court is available for jurisdictional infirmities at any stage.
The single most common Section 65 audit finding is ITC mismatch — ITC claimed in GSTR-3B Table 4(A) exceeding ITC available in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B for the corresponding tax period. The post-2019 regulatory tightening — Rule 36(4) initially capping un-uploaded ITC at 20%, then 10%, then 5% (Notification 75/2019-CT, 49/2019-CT, 94/2020-CT trajectory), then Section 16(2)(aa) mandating GSTR-2B as the eligibility baseline (Notification 39/2021-CT effective 1 January 2022) — has progressively tightened the mismatch tolerance to nil. Audit findings on FY 2020-21 onwards typically computes the mismatch quarter-wise; the registered person's defence rests on vendor-wise reconciliation, vendor follow-up correspondence, and the Suncraft Energy bona-fide-buyer principle where applicable.
The second-most-common audit finding is missed reverse-charge — supplies where the recipient is liable to pay tax under Section 9(3) (notified categories — GTA without forward-charge election, legal services, sponsorship, services by directors, etc.) or Section 9(4) (supplies from unregistered to registered persons in notified categories for real-estate developers under Notification 07/2019-CT(R) read with 03/2019-CT(R)). Section 31(3)(f) requires the recipient to issue a self-invoice; many registered persons miss this step. The audit-team computes the missed output liability under reverse-charge, the corresponding ITC eligibility (subject to time-limit under Section 16(4)), and the interest under Section 50. Voluntary disclosure via DRC-03 is the standard close-out.
The third-recurrent audit finding is classification and rate-of-tax. The GST rate structure across the rate notifications (Notification 01/2017-CT(R) and amendments, Notification 11/2017-CT(R) for services) contains thousands of HSN-and-SAC line items with rates from nil to 28%; classification borderlines are inherent. Audit-team challenges typically focus on: dual-rate items (5%/12%/18% pharmaceutical formulations, footwear, restaurants), composite versus mixed supplies under Section 8 (where the principal-supply classification determines the rate), and works-contract versus pure services classification. The Section 97 Advance Ruling mechanism offers a forward-looking certainty path; for historical classifications, the response is to cite the CBIC circulars (e.g. Circular 164/20/2021-GST on services classification clarifications) and contemporaneous trade-practice evidence.
For high-stake audits (multi-year audits, Section 66 special audit nominations, audits of multi-State enterprises), a mock audit by an independent reviewer — typically a former tax-department officer or a senior Chartered Accountant with audit-defence experience — is a useful preparation step. The mock auditor replicates the audit-team's risk-engine-driven interrogation, identifies weak documentary positions, and recommends remedial steps. The cost of mock audits is justified where the potential audit exposure (tax plus interest plus penalty) materially exceeds the mock-audit fee. Comparative income-tax practice has long used mock-audits for high-stake Section 143(3) scrutiny assessments and Section 142(2A) special audits; the GST extension of this practice is recent but growing.
Upon receipt of Form ADT-01, the registered person's first task in the fifteen-day window is structured document marshalling. The recommended sequence is: (i) compile the full year's GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, GSTR-2A / 2B downloads; (ii) compile GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C with the underlying reconciliation working papers; (iii) compile sales register, purchase register and stock register from the accounting system; (iv) compile bank statements and cash-book extracts; (v) compile e-way bill summaries; (vi) compile reverse-charge self-invoice register under Section 31(3)(f); (vii) compile Rule 42 / 43 ITC apportionment working papers; (viii) compile statutory audit and tax audit reports for the corresponding financial year. This structured marshalling enables the audit team to verify systematically and shortens the audit cycle materially.
Before the audit-team's arrival, the registered person should conduct an internal reconciliation walkthrough — replicating the audit-team's likely interrogation map. The walkthrough should cover: GSTR-1 outward supply versus books turnover; GSTR-3B Table 3.1 versus GSTR-1 invoice-summary; GSTR-3B Table 4(A) ITC claimed versus GSTR-2A / 2B vendor uploads; GSTR-9 Tables 4 to 8 versus GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B aggregates; GSTR-9C Tables 5, 7, 9, 12 to 14 versus audited financial statements. Any variance identified at the walkthrough is an opportunity for voluntary DRC-03 payment before the audit-team formalises it; voluntary disclosure during the walkthrough phase typically attracts no penalty under Section 73(5) read with Section 73(6).
What Manapakkam clients usually ask next: On the ground in Manapakkam, for Manapakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Outward supply reconciliation is the comparison of turnover declared in GSTR-1, turnover declared in GSTR-3B, turnover declared in GSTR-9 and turnover as per audited financial statements. The reconciliation is the focal table of GSTR-9C and is a recurring audit observation area.
Sub-clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the CGST Act conditions input tax credit on the details of the invoice or debit note being furnished by the supplier in GSTR-1 and communicated to the recipient. Departmental audit observations under this provision typically address ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in GSTR-2B.
Sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the CGST Act lists blocked credits — motor vehicles below thirteen-seater capacity, food and beverages, club membership, works contract for immovable property and others. Audit observations on Section 17(5) frequently require itemised reconciliation of ITC against the negative list.
Reverse charge audit is the subset of audit observations examining whether tax has been correctly paid by the recipient under sub-section (3) or (4) of Section 9 on notified supplies — goods transport agency, advocate services, sponsorship and others. The audit also tests whether ITC on RCM-paid tax has been availed only after payment of tax.
Composition audit is the audit of taxpayers paying tax under Section 10 of the CGST Act. The audit verifies turnover slabs, prohibited supplies (inter-State, e-commerce, ice-cream, pan masala, tobacco), maintenance of CMP filings and the rate of composition applied. CMP-08 quarterly statements and GSTR-4 annual return are the principal documents.
E-invoice audit examines compliance with the e-invoicing framework notified under sub-rule (4) of Rule 48 for taxpayers with aggregate turnover above the prescribed threshold. The audit traces invoice reference number (IRN), QR-code generation and reporting on the Invoice Registration Portal across the audited financial periods.
E-way bill audit is the examination of e-way bills generated under sub-rule (1) of Rule 138 for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees. Audit observations typically address mismatches between e-way bill data, tax invoice data and GSTR-1 outward supply declarations.
Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.
Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.
Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.
ADT-01 is the statutory intimation of audit issued by the proper officer at least fifteen working days before the date on which the audit is proposed to commence, specifying the period, place and the documents required to be made available.
ADT-02 is the form in which the proper officer communicates the audit findings, rights and obligations to the registered person within thirty days of completion of the audit; observations in ADT-02 typically feed into a subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 demand notice if tax has not been voluntarily paid.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Manapakkam businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Manapakkam, the cluster of it services, residential, retail businesses that defines Manapakkam's commercial fabric; for Manapakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Manapakkam, the cluster of it services, residential, retail businesses that defines Manapakkam's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Manapakkam engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Manapakkam, the business activity radiating outward from DLF IT Park and nearby commercial pockets; for Manapakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Manapakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Manapakkam, from Poothapedu Road, River View Road, road to Manapakkam, 14th Cross Street and 15th Cross Street to the 16th Cross Street, Mount - Poonamallee - Avadi Road, Manapakkam Main Road and 1st Main Road commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.
Professional GST Audit Support in Manapakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.