Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Chennai West · Saidapet Division · Ramachandra Nagar Porur GST Audit Support

GST Audit Support for Ramachandra Nagar Porur (PIN 600116)

Qualified GST Audit Support for Ramachandra Nagar Porur (PIN 600116) and adjacent Porur — and a zero-penalty filing record

GST Audit Support for Ramachandra Nagar Porur firms under Chennai West (Saidapet Division) with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

What is the role of Rule 101 in GST audit in Ramachandra Nagar Porur, Chennai?

Rule 101 of the CGST Rules operationalises Section 65. Rule 101(2) prescribes ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance, Rule 101(3) covers verification of records and returns at the audit, Rule 101(4) sets out audit completion within 3 months extendable to 6 months, and Rule 101(5) requires findings communication via ADT-02 and closure via ADT-04.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Ramachandra Nagar Porur Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

Section 66 Special Audit Coordination

Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).

6-Year Records Retention Maintained

All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.

Section 107 First Appeal Filed

Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.

15+ Years Chennai Audit Experience

Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.

ADT-01 Notice Handled End-to-End

Every ADT-01 notice received by a Ramachandra Nagar Porur client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.

On-Site Audit Representation

For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.

Key Benefits

What Ramachandra Nagar Porur Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Litigation-Ready Documentary File
Audit working papers, reconciliation sheets, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register and case-law citations retained for 7 years — supporting both the immediate audit and any future Section 107 or Tribunal appeal.
Natural Justice Procedural Defences
15 working days notice under Rule 101(2), 3-month audit completion under Rule 101(4), 30-day DRC-06 reply window under Section 73/74 — every procedural timeline tracked. Procedural lapses by department challenged.
Multi-State GSTIN Audit Coordination
For Ramachandra Nagar Porur headquartered businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu, GSTIN-wise records produced at the principal place of business — joint CGST + SGST audit handled under one engagement.
GSTR-9C Self-Certification Without Surprises
For Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses above ₹5 crore turnover, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 prepared and self-certified well before 31 December — no Table 8 mismatch, no HSN summary gap.
Confidential Audit Defence
Audit working papers, ADT-02 findings and reconciliation evidence stored under access-controlled channels. Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients' audit data is never shared with third parties or used for cross-marketing.
Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Sri Ramachandra Medical College and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Porur Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Ramachandra Nagar Porur to the rest of Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses operate where the cluster of healthcare, education, residential businesses that defines Ramachandra Nagar Porur's commercial fabric.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Annual return due date for the financial year under audit2190 daysRecords retention obligationBooks of account and records must be retained for seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return; extends further if appeal, revision or proceeding is pending
ADT-02 closure with no demandOn due dateNo further form — file the ADT-02 in recordsClosure of departmental audit for the period covered; subsequent re-audit barred unless fresh material under Section 67 emerges
Draft adverse observation by audit officer (pre-ADT-02)15 daysWritten submission and voluntary DRC-03Practical pre-ADT-02 window in which the registered person can cure the observation through written reply, additional records or voluntary payment under Section 73(5) to avoid penalty on the conceded portion.

Deadline pressure points we see in Ramachandra Nagar Porur: Closer to Ramachandra Nagar Porur, for the professional and salaried population of Ramachandra Nagar Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
DRC-06Reply to show cause notice

Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing

Within the time allowed in the SCN, generally thirty days Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-07Summary of order

Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation

Issued along with the detailed adjudication order Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
APL-01First appeal to Appellate Authority

Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details

Within three months from the date of communication of the order; condonable by a further one month Common Portal (taxpayer) — addressed to Appellate Authority
RFD-01Refund application

Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order

Within two years from the relevant date under Section 54 Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-1Statement of outward supplies

Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow

11th of the next month (monthly) or 13th of the month following the quarter (QRMP) Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-3BSummary return

Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches

20th / 22nd / 24th of the next month based on State and turnover slab Common Portal (taxpayer)
GST ADT-01Notice for conduct of audit

Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available

Not less than fifteen working days prior to conduct of audit Jurisdictional proper officer not below the rank prescribed

GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur, Chennai 600116

Ramachandra Nagar Porur (PIN 600116) falls under the Saidapet Division of the Chennai West, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses tie back to the Saidapet Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Because PIN 600116 sits inside the Chennai West jurisdiction, the handling office for Ramachandra Nagar Porur stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Statutory correspondence for Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses routes through the Saidapet Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start.

The residential pocket near sri ramachandra medical college mix of Ramachandra Nagar Porur shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of healthcare activity and the commercial pulse around Porur Lake. Ramachandra Nagar Porur reads as a residential pocket near sri ramachandra medical college pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around Porur Lake and fed by the Porur Bus Stop corridor. Freight and foot traffic from the Porur Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Ramachandra Nagar Porur, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential pocket near sri ramachandra medical college pocket. Document pickup near Porur Lake is a same-hour errand for our Ramachandra Nagar Porur engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects.

The retail character of Ramachandra Nagar Porur commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs. Mixed retail activity across Ramachandra Nagar Porur means our GST Audit Support team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client. The business mix in Ramachandra Nagar Porur centres on retail, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for retail firms near Ramachandra Nagar Porur to know where the department usually probes.

A Ramachandra Nagar Porur client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. The qualified-review step on every Ramachandra Nagar Porur GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Turnaround for Ramachandra Nagar Porur GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. The Ramachandra Nagar Porur GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you.

Serving Ramachandra Nagar Porur and Mugalivakkam from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. Coverage from Ramachandra Nagar Porur naturally extends to Mugalivakkam, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. From the same Ramachandra Nagar Porur team we also serve Mugalivakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. We treat Ramachandra Nagar Porur and Mugalivakkam as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.

Patterns we track for Ramachandra Nagar Porur include healthcare documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Saidapet Division tends to raise. Because we work repeatedly across Ramachandra Nagar Porur, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Ramachandra Nagar Porur are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Over several cycles in Ramachandra Nagar Porur, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.

Incorporating in Ramachandra Nagar Porur comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. First-time GST Audit Support for a Ramachandra Nagar Porur business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. For a new business incorporating in Ramachandra Nagar Porur or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. We onboard new Ramachandra Nagar Porur entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur — Complete Guide

GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur (600116) is handled end-to-end by qualified professionals at FilingPro — from receipt of ADT-01 notice through on-site audit representation, ADT-02 findings reply and DRC-03 closure. Each engagement reconciles GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books, ties Table 8 of GSTR-9 to GSTR-2B, and reconstructs the RCM register before the audit team arrives at your principal place of business.

GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Ramachandra Nagar Porur — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Ramachandra Nagar Porur prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Ramachandra Nagar Porur

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Ramachandra Nagar Porur — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Is Section 17(5)(b) blocked credit absolute on food-and-beverages?

No. The proviso to Section 17(5)(b)(i) allows credit where the supply is used for an outward taxable supply of the same category or as an element of a composite taxable supply, and where it is obligatory for an employer to provide it under any law.

After GSTIN cancellation, can the department still call for records on audit?

It can. Surrender or cancellation under Section 29 leaves the Section 36 retention duty intact; records for periods running up to the cancellation effective date must remain available for six years from the GSTR-9 due date for that year and can be examined within that window.

What is Form ADT-04?

Form ADT-04 is the order conveying the special audit report to the registered person under Rule 102, marking the conclusion of the Section 66 process. Subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act 2017 if any short payment is established.

Can audit findings under ADT-02 lead directly to Section 74 proceedings?

Yes, but Section 74 requires recorded satisfaction of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Where ADT-02 findings rest on tabular variance alone without these ingredients, the proceedings are vulnerable to downgrade to Section 73 on Kranti Associates speaking-order grounds.

What is the pre-deposit for Section 107 appeal against an audit-led demand?

Section 107(6) requires pre-deposit of ten per cent of the disputed tax leg only. The Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading confines the obligation to disputed tax, leaving interest and penalty components outside the pre-deposit computation.

Can the registered person request rescheduling of an ADT-01 audit visit?

Yes. A written request citing genuine reasons such as auditor unavailability, partner illness or pendency of board records reconciliation is generally accommodated by the proper officer, provided the rescheduling does not breach the three-month completion window under Section 65(4).

What Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients want to know before signing: Closer to Ramachandra Nagar Porur, around the Sri Ramachandra Medical College catchment of Ramachandra Nagar Porur.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses operate where around the Sri Ramachandra Medical College catchment of Ramachandra Nagar Porur.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Representation rights under Section 75

Multiple adjournments and Section 75(5)

Section 75(5) provides that the proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to that person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing; provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. The three-adjournment cap is a calibration between procedural fairness and proceeding-efficiency. In practice, registered persons facing complex audit findings should plan their adjournment requests strategically — use the first adjournment to gather documents, the second for representation-counsel engagement, and reserve the third for final consolidation. Beyond three adjournments, the proper officer is empowered to proceed ex-parte under Section 75(5) and pass the order on best-judgement basis.

Reasoned order requirement under Section 75(6)

Section 75(6) provides that the proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision. The reasoned-order requirement is a substantive procedural right that traces to the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on natural-justice-derived reasoned orders. Pradeep Goyal v UoI (Supreme Court on DIN — document identification number for all CBIC communications) supplements this by requiring procedural identifiability of the order. The registered person facing an order that does not engage with the response, does not cite the relevant provisions, or merely reproduces the SCN allegations, has strong grounds for either Section 107 first-appeal challenge or Article 226 writ challenge.

Bound-by-appellate-decisions principle under Section 75(11)

Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.

Post-audit options

Voluntary DRC-03 closure

The simplest post-audit option, where the registered person broadly accepts the ADT-02 findings, is voluntary closure through DRC-03 payment under Section 73(5). DRC-03 is filed online through the GST portal; the registered person specifies the tax, interest and (where applicable) penalty quantum and the period to which the payment relates. Section 73(6) bars subsequent SCN on the amount paid. The Form DRC-04 acknowledgement is the conclusive evidence of voluntary closure. This route is widely used in practice — Chennai Commissionerate audit-closure data through the GST Council 53rd meeting briefing materials indicates that over 60% of Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu close through voluntary DRC-03 without progressing to SCN stage.

SCN response and contested adjudication

Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.

Writ remedy before the Madras High Court

Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.

Section 65 departmental audit framework

Powers of the audit team under Section 65(5) and Section 65(6)

Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.

Initiation under Section 65(1) and ADT-01 intimation

Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.

Audit period and frequency under Section 65(2)

Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.

What Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients usually ask next: Closer to Ramachandra Nagar Porur, for the professional and salaried population of Ramachandra Nagar Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Block credit register

Block credit register is the internal ledger maintained by the registered person under good-practice (not statutorily prescribed) listing every input tax credit availed and separately the credits blocked under Section 17(5) categories such as motor vehicles, food and beverages, club memberships and personal consumption, with rationale.

RCM register

RCM register is the internal ledger that tracks every transaction on which tax is payable under reverse charge by the recipient under Section 9(3) or 9(4) read with Notification 13/2017-CT, capturing GTA freight, legal fees, director sitting fees, security services, sponsorship and unregistered supplier purchases above thresholds.

Audit observation cure

Audit observation cure is the corrective workflow undertaken by the practitioner between the draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, by which a substantive demand position is reduced or eliminated through written submission, additional records, judicial precedent application and where appropriate voluntary DRC-03 payment.

Audit closure meeting

Audit closure meeting is the final sitting between the registered person and the audit officer where the contents of the draft ADT-02 are walked through, accepted positions are confirmed for voluntary payment and contested positions are flagged for the formal reply track, ahead of the officer signing and issuing ADT-02.

Principal place mismatch

Principal place mismatch is the practical situation where the registered person's principal place of business as declared in REG-06 differs from the location at which books of account are actually maintained, often resolved at audit commencement by treating the books-location as an additional place of business under Section 65(4) proviso.

Records reconstruction

Records reconstruction is the practitioner-led rebuilding of statutory registers under Rule 56 where the original electronic or physical records have been lost or corrupted, typically sourced from e-invoice portal IRN logs, banked-receipt trails, supplier statements and e-way-bill registers, with the reconstruction methodology disclosed in writing.

Departmental audit

Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the tax authorities under Section 65 of the CGST Act. The Commissioner or any officer authorised by general or specific order undertakes the audit at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The substantive provision is Section 65 and the procedure is set out in Rule 101.

Special audit

Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 of the CGST Act where the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The audit is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.

ADT-01

ADT-01 is the statutory notice issued by the proper officer under sub-section (3) of Section 65 read with sub-rule (2) of Rule 101 informing the registered person of the institution of departmental audit. The notice must be served not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit and carries the period under audit, the place, the date and the records to be made available.

ADT-02

ADT-02 is the audit report under Section 65 communicated by the proper officer to the registered person within thirty days of conclusion of audit. It captures the findings of audit, the rights and obligations of the registered person, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 is the formal closure document of the departmental audit track.

ADT-03

ADT-03 is the direction issued under sub-section (1) of Section 66 read with sub-rule (1) of Rule 102 by which the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, directs the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.

ADT-04

ADT-04 is the communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66. It carries the observations of the nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant and the officer's view, and is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
RCM on advocate fees of ₹14,00,000 under Section 9(3) not discharged across three financial years; audit-detected₹2,52,000₹68,040 (18% over 18 months)₹25,200 (10% of tax under Section 73(9) post-ADT-02)₹3,45,240
Section 17(5) blocked credit on motor vehicles ₹6,00,000 availed for two years; identified at Section 65 audit₹1,08,000₹29,160 (18% over 18 months)₹10,800 (10% of tax under Section 73(9))₹1,47,960
Table 8 GSTR-9 mismatch ₹22,00,000 between GSTR-2A and ITC availed; audit-flagged supplier-default segment₹3,96,000₹1,06,920 (18% over 18 months)₹39,600 (10% under Section 73(9) post-Suncraft defence)₹5,42,520
Section 16(4) outer-date breach on ITC of ₹12,00,000 availed in October following the financial year₹12,00,000 (reversal)₹2,16,000 (18% over 12 months)₹1,20,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹15,36,000
Cross-charge under Section 25(4) of ₹28,00,000 for inter-state support functions missed; audit-detected₹5,04,000 (revenue-neutral after recipient ITC)₹1,36,080 (18% over 18 months)Nil (revenue-neutrality)₹1,36,080
Section 9(4) reverse charge on unregistered purchases not discharged in three pre-Notification 7/2019 periods₹1,40,000₹37,800 (18% over 18 months)₹14,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹1,91,800

How Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Ramachandra Nagar Porur, the business activity radiating outward from Sri Ramachandra Medical College and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Ramachandra Nagar Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Ramachandra Nagar Porur

How the local trade mix shapes this — Ramachandra Nagar Porur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Sri Ramachandra Medical College and nearby commercial pockets.

Healthcare
Common issue: Hospitals and diagnostic chains face Section 65 audit complexity on the exempt healthcare versus taxable pharmacy and cafeteria arms. Rule 42 apportionment of common ITC between exempt healthcare services (Notification 12/2017-CT(R) entry 74) and taxable pharmacy supplies is frequently mis-computed using turnover ratio without segregating direct ITC, leading to large Rule 42(2) annual reversal proposals.
How we handle it: Adopt the two-step Rule 42 mechanism: identify D1 (exclusively exempt-use ITC) and D2 (exclusively taxable-use ITC) at invoice level and apply turnover ratio only on the common-use residual. Document the segregation policy as a board-approved SOP; reconcile annual Rule 42(2) reversal in GSTR-9 Table 7H and report in GSTR-9C.
Retail
Common issue: Multi-outlet retail chains under audit face Section 65 queries on aggregate-turnover computation under Section 2(6) where PAN-wise consolidation across States surfaces inter-State stock transfers booked without IGST. Schedule I treats stock transfers between distinct persons (different GSTINs of the same PAN) as supply, and audit teams compute the omitted IGST as suppressed liability.
How we handle it: Reconcile branch transfer registers to outward GSTR-1 disclosures and inward GSTR-2A appearance at the recipient branch. Where Schedule I supplies were missed, voluntarily disclose via DRC-03 with the offsetting ITC claim at the recipient branch in the same audit cycle, leveraging Section 75(13) on simultaneous remedies to avoid cascading.
Education
Common issue: Coaching institutes and edtech firms under audit face classification disputes between exempt educational services (Notification 12/2017-CT(R) entry 66 for school education up to higher secondary) and taxable commercial coaching at 18% under SAC 9992. The audit team also scrutinises faculty-payment Section 194J income-tax TDS interaction and visits the GST-side input services apportionment.
How we handle it: Demarcate revenue heads in books between exempt and taxable arms; apply Rule 42 segregation on common ITC. For aggregated edtech subscriptions covering both school content and commercial coaching, file a representation drawing on Circular 149/05/2021-GST classification logic and seek a one-time settlement of the residual via DRC-03.
Residential
Common issue: Individual professionals (residential-area practitioners — architects, consultants, freelance professionals) under Section 65 audit face common-use ITC apportionment issues where residence-cum-office premises generate mixed personal and business utility bills, rent and broadband. Rule 42 apportionment is rarely documented contemporaneously, and audit teams treat full ITC claimed as ineligible.
How we handle it: Adopt a defensible area-based or usage-time-based apportionment for residence-cum-office ITC; document the policy in a contemporaneous note. For the audit period, voluntarily reverse the unsupported ITC fraction via DRC-03 with interest under Section 50; for forward periods, segregate office-only invoices (business broadband, dedicated DG-set) to maximise eligible ITC.
Education
Common issue: Edtech aggregators under audit face Section 9(5) e-commerce-operator scrutiny where multiple tutors supply through the platform. Notification 17/2017-CT(R) and subsequent amendments deem the platform liable for specified services; classification gaps between educational and commercial coaching at the platform level surface as suppressed-output exposures.
How we handle it: Demarcate platform revenue between exempt educational services (where applicable under Notification 12/2017-CT(R)) and taxable commercial coaching. For Section 9(5) coverage, confirm whether the specific service falls within the deemed-supplier framework via Circular 167/23/2021-GST and subsequent FAQs; build a CBIC-circular-anchored audit-defence file.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

Section 15(3) discountsConsumer durables

Section 65 audit on Section 15(3) discount treatment defended for a {{area_name}} consumer durables seller

Issue: A consumer durables seller in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on alleged non-deduction of post-supply discounts of approximately twenty-two lakh rupees from taxable value, with a proposed differential tax demand of approximately three lakh ninety-six thousand rupees.
Approach: We mapped each post-supply discount against the Section 15(3)(b) twin condition of pre-supply agreement linkage and recipient ITC reversal proof. Recipient credit-note acknowledgements and the underlying dealership agreement were filed. CBIC Circular 92/11/2019 on discounts and Circular 105/24/2019 (subsequently rescinded) were placed in context.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the discount treatment; the three lakh ninety-six thousand rupee differential was dropped; the dealership agreement clauses were tightened to capture future discount-conditions formally.
Diya AgenciesHardware trading

Diya Agencies principle extended at Section 65 audit for a {{area_name}} hardware trader

Issue: A hardware-trading firm in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit covering two financial years with proposed credit reversal of approximately nine lakh rupees on supplier-side default. The audit team treated GSTR-2B absence as conclusive without testing the recipient's documentary trail.
Approach: We anchored the reply on the Madras High Court ratio in the Tvl Diya Agencies matter, which holds that supplier-side lapses cannot, in isolation, defeat recipient credit absent an enquiry against the supplier and a recorded finding on the recipient's good faith. Supplier-level enquiry trails and banking-channel payment evidence were filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the reversal to seventy-eight thousand rupees relating to two genuinely missing suppliers; the residual eight lakh rupees was preserved; the matter closed within five months without DRC-01.
Section 74 downgradeJewellery

Section 73 SCN downgrade from Section 74 secured at audit close for a {{area_name}} jeweller

Issue: A jeweller in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-02 transitioning into a Section 74 SCN of approximately twenty-six lakh rupees on alleged suppression evidenced by GSTR-1 versus GSTR-3B output variance, without recorded satisfaction of the fraud limb beyond a portal-driven tabular delta.
Approach: We invoked the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan requirement of a speaking foundation for any quasi-judicial action and the GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v ITO framework for testing jurisdictional satisfaction. The reply demonstrated through audited financials that the variance was a credit-note timing offset.
Outcome: The adjudicating officer dropped Section 74 and confirmed demand under Section 73 with ten per cent penalty rather than hundred per cent; final exposure of approximately twenty-eight lakh rupees was settled on the reduced penalty footing.
Rule 42 reversalHealthcare

Section 17(2) common-credit reversal under Rule 42 defended at audit for a {{area_name}} mixed-supply hospital

Issue: A multi-specialty hospital in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit on alleged short reversal under Rule 42 of common credits relating to taxable pharmacy and exempt healthcare supplies, with a proposed reversal of approximately thirteen lakh rupees over a thirty-six-month window.
Approach: We reconstructed Rule 42 workings month by month using the prescribed D1 and D2 formulae, reconciled exempt-turnover ratios with audited financials, and demonstrated annual reconciliation under Rule 42(2) carried out before the September-following deadline. The Madras HC ruling on healthcare exemption under Notification 12/2017-CT(R) Sl 74 was filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the Rule 42 reconciliation; residual reversal of approximately one lakh eight thousand rupees on minor period slippages was paid through DRC-03; the bulk of thirteen lakh rupees was dropped.

Why these Ramachandra Nagar Porur engagements look the way they do: Closer to Ramachandra Nagar Porur, the business activity radiating outward from Sri Ramachandra Medical College and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Ramachandra Nagar Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Client Reviews

What Ramachandra Nagar Porur Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Ramachandra Nagar Porur

Common questions from Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

Rule 101 of the CGST Rules operationalises Section 65. Rule 101(2) prescribes ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance, Rule 101(3) covers verification of records and returns at the audit, Rule 101(4) sets out audit completion within 3 months extendable to 6 months, and Rule 101(5) requires findings communication via ADT-02 and closure via ADT-04.
Recurring findings include — ITC mismatch between GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B, Section 17(5) blocked credits wrongly availed (motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships), RCM not paid on advocate fees and GTA, e-way bill missing for consignments above ₹50,000, e-invoice non-compliance for taxpayers above ₹5 crore AATO, HSN summary errors in GSTR-1 Table 12, and Schedule III adjustments not made for related-party transactions.
The exact list depends on your case, but we send a short, plain-English checklist the moment you engage us — no jargon. Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients can share documents as phone photos or scans over WhatsApp on 9566-068-468, and we flag immediately if anything is missing.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
Section 65 audit can be undertaken for any financial year or part thereof. There is no fixed lookback in the section itself, but Section 35(3) mandates record retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — so the practical lookback is 5 to 6 financial years. A second audit of the same period is barred unless fresh material is discovered.
Yes. The first discussion about your GST Audit Support requirement is free — call or WhatsApp 9566-068-468 and we will tell you honestly what is involved, what it costs, and the realistic timeline before you commit to anything.
Section 66(2) requires the nominated auditor to submit the special audit report within 90 days of the ADT-03 order. The Assistant Commissioner may, on application by the auditor or the registered person and on reasonable grounds, extend the period by a further 90 days — taking the maximum to 180 days from the ADT-03 order date.
Yes. GST audit is GSTIN-wise — each registration has its own books, returns and assessment. A Tamil Nadu GSTIN of a multi-state business is audited separately from its Karnataka or Telangana GSTIN by the respective state's CGST or SGST authority. Records must therefore be maintained GSTIN-wise even where the underlying ERP is consolidated.
Not sure whether GST Audit Support applies to you? Call 9566-068-468 and describe your situation — we will tell you plainly whether you need it, when, and what it involves, before you spend anything. Many Ramachandra Nagar Porur enquiries start exactly this way.
ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
Yes. ADT-02 must record findings with reasons; Section 66(6) expressly mandates a hearing opportunity before special audit material is used in proceedings; and any DRC-01 SCN must give 30 days for DRC-06 reply with personal hearing. Courts have consistently set aside audit-driven demands where the taxpayer was not given proper opportunity to be heard.
You can attempt it, but small errors in GST Audit Support often lead to notices, penalties or rejections that cost more to fix than to avoid. For Ramachandra Nagar Porur clients we get it right the first time, which usually works out cheaper and far less stressful.
GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.
Three reconciliations are pivotal — GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B (outward supply consistency), GSTR-3B vs books (turnover and tax payment match), and GSTR-2B vs purchase register vs Table 8 of GSTR-9 (ITC eligibility). Variances are the most common audit findings, so these reconciliations should be prepared in advance and presented to the audit team in a documented format.
Section 66 allows an Assistant Commissioner (not below this rank) with prior approval of the Commissioner to direct a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant — nominated by the Commissioner — to audit a registered person where the officer is of the opinion that the value declared is not correct or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The order is issued in ADT-03 and the auditor's report is submitted within 90 days, extendable by another 90 days.
Yes. The Madras High Court in Tvl. Raja Stores v. Assistant Commissioner (W.P. 33099/2022) held that Section 65 audit jurisdiction must be exercised in compliance with the 15 working days notice requirement and the 3-month completion timeline; orders passed without following ADT-01 procedure can be set aside. Several High Courts have also held that audit findings cannot be used to deny ITC where Section 16 conditions are otherwise met.
GST Audit Support near Ramachandra Nagar Porur:

Our GST Audit Support clients in Ramachandra Nagar Porur are spread right across the locality — along Perumal Koil Street, Poothapedu Road, Samayapuram Nagar Main Road, 11th Street and 1st Cross Street, and through the Chennai Bypass Expressway, Porur Bridge, Arcot Road and Kodambakkam – Sriperumbudur Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur?

Professional GST Audit Support in Ramachandra Nagar Porur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp