GST Audit Support for residential units around Kovur Bus Stop, Kovur Porur — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
Kovur Porur residential and retail units around Kovur Lake with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Kovur Porur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Kovur Porur client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Kovur Porur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Kovur Lake and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Kovur Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Kovur Porur to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Kovur Porur clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Kovur Porur businesses operate where the cluster of residential, retail, it services businesses that defines Kovur Porur's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Kovur Porur: Where Kovur Porur differs: for the professional and salaried population of Kovur Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (2) of Section 66 provides that the direction under sub-section (1) shall be issued in Form GST ADT-03 as prescribed under Rule 102. The nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant is named by the Commissioner; the registered person does not have a right to choose the auditor. It is to be noted that this is materially different from the statutory audit framework under the Companies Act where the management appoints the auditor.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceSub-section (4) of Section 65 prescribes that the audit shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit. The proviso permits the Commissioner, where satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within three months for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend the period by a further period not exceeding six months. The expression date of commencement is defined in the Explanation to mean the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Kovur Porur carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0289, 80.1497, which map each submission back to this locality. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600122, understanding the Saidapet Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Kovur Porur (PIN 600122) falls under the Saidapet Division of the Chennai West, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Every Kovur Porur engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600122, the Saidapet Division, and the coordinates 13.0289, 80.1497 that anchor the locality.
Most commerce in Kovur Porur — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Kovur Porur reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Kovur Bus Stop, expenses routed through the Kovur Bus Stop freight network. The businesses clustered around Kovur Bus Stop in Kovur Porur drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. The residential growth pocket mix of Kovur Porur shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of residential activity and the commercial pulse around Kovur Bus Stop.
We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for small trade firms near Kovur Porur to know where the department usually probes. A small trade operator in Kovur Porur gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. The business mix in Kovur Porur centres on small trade, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. The small trade character of Kovur Porur commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.
Document intake for Kovur Porur clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. Working papers for Kovur Porur GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. From the first GST Audit Support cycle, a Kovur Porur engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later. Fixed-fee scoping means a Kovur Porur business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
We treat Kovur Porur and Manapakkam as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Coverage from Kovur Porur naturally extends to Manapakkam, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. From the same Kovur Porur team we also serve Manapakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Group companies spread across Kovur Porur and Manapakkam consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.
Common patterns in the Saidapet Division give Kovur Porur businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Each engagement in Kovur Porur adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Kovur Porur are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Because we work repeatedly across Kovur Porur, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm.
A startup setting up near Kovur Lake in Kovur Porur gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Saidapet Division from day one. First-time GST Audit Support for a Kovur Porur business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. Incorporating in Kovur Porur comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. New small trade ventures in Kovur Porur lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Kovur Porur businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Kovur Porur prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Kovur Porur businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Union of India v Bharti Airtel of the Supreme Court recognises the right to rectification of bona fide errors in GSTR-3B. The ratio is invoked at audit stage to seek directions for portal-blocked corrections through DRC-03 where the succeeding-period route under Section 39(9) has lapsed.
Tvl Diya Agencies v State Tax Officer holds that supplier-side default cannot mechanically defeat recipient credit without enquiry into the supplier and a finding on the recipient's bona fides. The ratio is widely relied upon in audit replies and ADT-02 defences in {{area_name}}.
Madras High Court routinely entertains Article 226 writs where ADT-01 or ADT-02 shows want of recorded reasons or overlap with an earlier audit on the same period. Reliance is placed on GKN Driveshafts and Kranti Associates discipline for speaking-order foundation.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B against credit appearing in GSTR-2A or static GSTR-2B for the financial year. It is the most common audit-checkpoint and variances must be supported by supplier-wise documentation at audit.
No. The Gujarat High Court in Aap and Co v Union of India holds that GSTR-3B is a return of self-assessment and a mere tabular variance against GSTR-1 does not establish suppression. Independent enquiry into underlying invoices is required before adverse findings.
The e-invoice IRN log generated on the Invoice Registration Portal is reconciled against GSTR-1 outward supplies for entities above the Notification 10/2023-Central Tax threshold. Audit teams test cancellation-window slippages, credit-note IRNs and auto-population deltas between IRP and GSTN.
What Kovur Porur clients want to know before signing: Where Kovur Porur differs: around the Kovur Lake catchment of Kovur Porur.
Reading this guide locally — Kovur Porur businesses operate where on the Porur-Mugalivakkam corridor that passes through Kovur Porur.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Where the Section 73 or 74 adjudication order under DRC-07 is adverse, the registered person's first appeal lies under Section 107 of the CGST Act before the Joint or Additional Commissioner (Appeals) within three months from the date of communication of the order, extendable by one month for sufficient cause. Pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount under Section 107(6) is the gateway requirement. Second appeal lies under Section 112 before the GST Appellate Tribunal (now operational with Principal Bench at New Delhi and State / Area Benches notified); the Section 112 pre-deposit is an additional 20% (cumulative 30%). Beyond the Tribunal, appeal lies to the High Court under Section 117 on questions of law, and to the Supreme Court under Section 118. Writ remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court is available for jurisdictional infirmities at any stage.
Where audit findings are not addressed through voluntary DRC-03 payment, the proper officer issues a Show Cause Notice — DRC-01 under Section 73(1) for cases not involving fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, and under Section 74(1) for cases involving any of those elements. The framing choice has material consequences. Section 73 attracts penalty of 10% of tax or ₹10,000 whichever is higher (Section 73(9)), with no penalty if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 73(8). Section 74 attracts penalty of 100% of tax (Section 74(9)), with reduced penalty of 25% if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 74(8) and 50% within thirty days of order. The extended-period limitation of five years (versus three years under Section 73) is the other material difference.
Where the audit-team recommends Section 74 framing, the registered person's defence focuses on the four elements — fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade tax. The Supreme Court's pre-GST jurisprudence on similar language in Central Excise (Pushpam Pharmaceuticals v CCE) and Service Tax (CCE v Mehta and Co) emphasised that mere non-payment or non-disclosure does not amount to suppression with intent; positive indicators of intent are needed. Bona-fide classification errors, computational mistakes, and reasonable interpretation differences are not suppression. Where the SCN frames the case under Section 74, the response should systematically address each of the four elements and rely on the documentary trail showing bona-fide compliance attempts. Pradeep Goyal (DIN requirement) and Kranti Associates (reasoned order) provide procedural safeguards.
The third-recurrent audit finding is classification and rate-of-tax. The GST rate structure across the rate notifications (Notification 01/2017-CT(R) and amendments, Notification 11/2017-CT(R) for services) contains thousands of HSN-and-SAC line items with rates from nil to 28%; classification borderlines are inherent. Audit-team challenges typically focus on: dual-rate items (5%/12%/18% pharmaceutical formulations, footwear, restaurants), composite versus mixed supplies under Section 8 (where the principal-supply classification determines the rate), and works-contract versus pure services classification. The Section 97 Advance Ruling mechanism offers a forward-looking certainty path; for historical classifications, the response is to cite the CBIC circulars (e.g. Circular 164/20/2021-GST on services classification clarifications) and contemporaneous trade-practice evidence.
Place-of-supply errors are the fourth common finding — typically where the registered person charged CGST/SGST (intra-State) when the place of supply under Sections 10 to 13 IGST Act was inter-State (requiring IGST), or vice versa. Section 77 of the CGST Act provides a corrective mechanism — where tax was paid under one head but is actually payable under another, the wrongly-paid tax can be claimed as refund and the correctly-payable tax should be paid; the registered person is not penalised, only interest under Section 50 may apply. Audit teams sometimes overlook Section 77 and compute full short-payment additions; citing Section 77 with documented evidence of the corresponding refund-eligible head closes the issue at audit stage.
The single most common Section 65 audit finding is ITC mismatch — ITC claimed in GSTR-3B Table 4(A) exceeding ITC available in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B for the corresponding tax period. The post-2019 regulatory tightening — Rule 36(4) initially capping un-uploaded ITC at 20%, then 10%, then 5% (Notification 75/2019-CT, 49/2019-CT, 94/2020-CT trajectory), then Section 16(2)(aa) mandating GSTR-2B as the eligibility baseline (Notification 39/2021-CT effective 1 January 2022) — has progressively tightened the mismatch tolerance to nil. Audit findings on FY 2020-21 onwards typically computes the mismatch quarter-wise; the registered person's defence rests on vendor-wise reconciliation, vendor follow-up correspondence, and the Suncraft Energy bona-fide-buyer principle where applicable.
Before the audit-team's arrival, the registered person should conduct an internal reconciliation walkthrough — replicating the audit-team's likely interrogation map. The walkthrough should cover: GSTR-1 outward supply versus books turnover; GSTR-3B Table 3.1 versus GSTR-1 invoice-summary; GSTR-3B Table 4(A) ITC claimed versus GSTR-2A / 2B vendor uploads; GSTR-9 Tables 4 to 8 versus GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B aggregates; GSTR-9C Tables 5, 7, 9, 12 to 14 versus audited financial statements. Any variance identified at the walkthrough is an opportunity for voluntary DRC-03 payment before the audit-team formalises it; voluntary disclosure during the walkthrough phase typically attracts no penalty under Section 73(5) read with Section 73(6).
For audits of even moderate complexity, engagement of a representation counsel — a Chartered Accountant with GST practice depth, or a tax advocate for procedural-rights-heavy cases — is the standard professional practice. The counsel's role is to mediate communication with the audit team, draft formal responses to audit observations, attend personal hearings, and prepare voluntary-disclosure computations where applicable. The Section 116 representation framework under the CGST Act permits authorised representatives — relatives, employees, advocates, Chartered Accountants, Cost Accountants, and Company Secretaries — to appear before the proper officer. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents counsel-engagement as a standard taxpayer-rights practice across mature tax jurisdictions.
For high-stake audits (multi-year audits, Section 66 special audit nominations, audits of multi-State enterprises), a mock audit by an independent reviewer — typically a former tax-department officer or a senior Chartered Accountant with audit-defence experience — is a useful preparation step. The mock auditor replicates the audit-team's risk-engine-driven interrogation, identifies weak documentary positions, and recommends remedial steps. The cost of mock audits is justified where the potential audit exposure (tax plus interest plus penalty) materially exceeds the mock-audit fee. Comparative income-tax practice has long used mock-audits for high-stake Section 143(3) scrutiny assessments and Section 142(2A) special audits; the GST extension of this practice is recent but growing.
What Kovur Porur clients usually ask next: Where Kovur Porur differs: for the professional and salaried population of Kovur Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Period of audit under sub-rule (1) of Rule 101 shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. A multi-year audit is permissible where the audit notice in ADT-01 specifies the periods covered. The earliest period audited typically corresponds to records retention horizon under Section 36.
Audit notes are the contemporaneous record maintained by the proper officer during the conduct of audit under Rule 101. Discrepancies recorded in the audit notes are communicated to the registered person under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 with an opportunity to reply before the findings are crystallised in ADT-02.
Discrepancy memo is the informal communication, contemplated under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101, by which the proper officer informs the registered person of observations recorded during audit. The registered person files a written reply with supporting reconciliations before ADT-02 is issued.
Books of account refer to the records required to be maintained under sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the CGST Act — accounts of production or manufacture, inward and outward supply, stock, ITC availed, output tax payable and paid. Maintenance at the principal place of business is the default; additional places require records of the additional location.
Records retention under Section 36 is the obligation to preserve books of account and other records until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal of the proceeding.
Self-certification under Rule 80(3) is the framework that, with effect from 1 August 2021, replaced mandatory audit by a chartered accountant or cost accountant for GSTR-9C. The registered person self-certifies the reconciliation statement; the substantive content of GSTR-9C continues to be governed by the form.
Reconciliation statement is the document filed in Form GSTR-9C reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles the tax payable as per the financial statement with the tax declared in the annual return and the input tax credit availed with the credit reflected in books.
DRC-01A is the pre-show-cause-notice intimation prescribed under sub-rule (1A) of Rule 142. Part A is the officer's quantification of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; Part B is the registered person's reply or acceptance. DRC-01A is the principal off-ramp before formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation prescribed under sub-rule (2) and (3) of Rule 142. It is filed where the registered person makes voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or 74(5). DRC-03 is the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal adjudication.
Section 73(5) deposit is the voluntary payment made by the registered person, on his own ascertainment or on ascertainment by the proper officer, before issuance of a show-cause notice. The deposit, when made along with applicable interest under Section 50, results in no penalty being leviable under Section 73(9).
Audit jurisdiction refers to the statutory authority of the Commissioner under sub-section (1) of Section 65 to authorise any officer to undertake audit of a registered person. Authorisation may be by general or specific order. A challenge to audit jurisdiction is typically agitated at the threshold under Article 226 before the High Court.
Section 67 search is the enforcement-track action distinct from departmental audit. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, with reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise in writing any officer to inspect places of business and seize goods or documents.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Kovur Porur businesses typically avoid these: Where Kovur Porur differs: the business activity radiating outward from Kovur Lake and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Kovur Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Kovur Porur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Kovur Lake and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Kovur Porur engagements look the way they do: Where Kovur Porur differs: the business activity radiating outward from Kovur Lake and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Kovur Porur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Kovur Porur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Kovur Porur are spread right across the locality — along Kodambakkam – Sriperumbudur Road, Mount - Poonamallee - Avadi Road, Madha Nagar Main Road, Mount Poonamallee Highway and Mugalivakkam Main Road, and through the Samayapuram Nagar Main Road, 11th Street, 1st Cross Street and 2nd Cross Street business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Kovur Porur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.