End-to-end GST Audit Support for Karambakkam residential commercial mix establishments — on fixed, transparent fees
Karambakkam residential and retail units around Karambakkam Junction with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.
ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Karambakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Karambakkam businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Karambakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Karambakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Karambakkam Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Karambakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Karambakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Karambakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Karambakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Karambakkam: Where Karambakkam differs: for the professional and salaried population of Karambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (4) of Section 65 prescribes that the audit shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit. The proviso permits the Commissioner, where satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within three months for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend the period by a further period not exceeding six months. The expression date of commencement is defined in the Explanation to mean the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 102 prescribes Form GST ADT-03 for the direction by the proper officer to the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner under Section 66. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-04 for communication of findings of the special audit to the registered person. It is to be noted that ADT-04 is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.
View sourceSub-section (2) of Section 66 provides that the direction under sub-section (1) shall be issued in Form GST ADT-03 as prescribed under Rule 102. The nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant is named by the Commissioner; the registered person does not have a right to choose the auditor. It is to be noted that this is materially different from the statutory audit framework under the Companies Act where the management appoints the auditor.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Karambakkam carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0386, 80.1733, which map each submission back to this locality. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Karambakkam businesses tie back to the Saidapet Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600116, understanding the Saidapet Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Statutory correspondence for Karambakkam businesses routes through the Saidapet Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start.
Freight and foot traffic from the Karambakkam Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Karambakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential commercial mix pocket. Commercial activity in Karambakkam runs medium, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Karambakkam desk accordingly. Working in Karambakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to Arcot Road and the Karambakkam Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Document pickup near Arcot Road is a same-hour errand for our Karambakkam engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects.
The restaurants character of Karambakkam commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs. The restaurants firms we serve in Karambakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. GST Audit Support for restaurants businesses in Karambakkam hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for restaurants firms near Karambakkam to know where the department usually probes.
Document intake for Karambakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. The qualified-review step on every Karambakkam GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Turnaround for Karambakkam GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Working papers for Karambakkam GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer.
We treat Karambakkam and Iyyappanthangal as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Proximity to Iyyappanthangal means a Karambakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Serving Karambakkam and Iyyappanthangal from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. GST Audit Support clients in Iyyappanthangal are handled by the same practitioners who run our Karambakkam desk.
Common patterns in the Saidapet Division give Karambakkam businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Because we work repeatedly across Karambakkam, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Karambakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Over several cycles in Karambakkam, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.
When a Valasaravakkam business expands into Karambakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600116 without disruption. A startup setting up near Karambakkam Junction in Karambakkam gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Saidapet Division from day one. Relocating a registered office into Karambakkam (PIN 600116) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. Incorporating in Karambakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Karambakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Karambakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Karambakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit the audit report within ninety days. The period is extendable by another ninety days on application by the auditor or on the department's own motion for sufficient reasons.
Under Section 66(5) the Commissioner determines and discharges the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. The registered person carries no fee burden for the special-audit professional, although internal representation costs remain to the taxpayer's account.
Yes. Beginning the 2020-21 financial year, taxpayers crossing the five-crore aggregate-turnover mark in any year self-certify the reconciliation statement. Earlier external certification by a Chartered Accountant was dispensed with by the Finance Act 2021 amendments to Section 44.
The threshold is aggregate turnover above five crore rupees in the financial year, applied PAN-wise across all GSTINs. Persons below this threshold are not required to file GSTR-9C even where GSTR-9 filing is otherwise compulsory for them.
GSTR-9 along with GSTR-9C where applicable is due by the thirty-first of December following the relevant financial year. Section 44 read with Rule 80 governs the due date, subject to periodic extensions notified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.
Section 35 with Rule 56 obliges the registered person to keep the universe of tax invoices, stock and production registers, ITC workings, output liability schedules, RCM register, e-way bill logs, IRN files, Section 17(5) computations and matched bank statements ready for production.
What Karambakkam clients want to know before signing: Where Karambakkam differs: around the Karambakkam Junction catchment of Karambakkam.
Reading this guide locally — In Karambakkam, on the Valasaravakkam-Porur corridor that passes through Karambakkam.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Rule 56(18) applies to a narrow but high-revenue-risk band of trades — precious metals, precious stones, jewellery — where stock-record granularity is essential because of the high unit-value and pilferage-risk profile. The daily quantity-wise register must capture purity (in carats for gold), weight (in grams or pennyweights), make-charges component, hallmarking certificate references (BIS hallmark unique identification), and customer-wise sale-bill traces. Family-run jewellery businesses in particular often default to consolidated weekly or monthly stock summaries; this gap is the most common audit finding in jewellery-sector Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu. Coordinated compliance with TCS under Section 206C(1F) at 1% on sales above ₹2 lakh adds an income-tax overlay to the stock-records architecture.
Rule 56(2) of the CGST Rules requires every registered person, other than a person paying tax under Section 10 (composition), to maintain accounts of stock in respect of goods received and supplied — showing opening balance, receipt, supply, goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free sample, and balance of stock including raw materials, finished goods, scrap and wastage. Rule 56(18) imposes a higher-granularity obligation on registered persons dealing in goods of the kinds notified — currently primarily precious metals, precious stones and jewellery — requiring daily quantity-wise and value-wise stock registers. The granularity differential between Rule 56(2) and Rule 56(18) reflects the sector-specific revenue-risk assessment that has been part of Indian indirect-tax administration since pre-GST excise.
Where stock records under Rule 56(2) are incomplete or absent — a common scenario in SME manufacturing and trading — reconstruction during the ADT-01 fifteen-day window is the standard response. The reconstruction sources include purchase invoices and GSTR-2A entries (for inward stock), GSTR-1 outward supplies (for sales), e-way bill data (for stock movements), bank statements (for cash purchases or sales not invoiced through GST channels), and stock-take working papers from the statutory audit under the Companies Act or Section 44AB income tax audit. Reconstruction must be contemporaneous with the original transaction dates; backdated reconstruction is treated as fabrication by the audit team. The Tapas Dutta v UoI line of authority on retrospective records is occasionally invoked, but registered persons should not rely on it as a safe harbour.
The shift to self-certification has not reduced substantive accuracy expectations — Section 47(2) penalty for late filing applies, Section 35(5) (as amended) read with Section 122 attracts penalty for incorrect particulars, and Section 137 imposes personal liability on directors, partners and managers for company offences subject to the proviso on diligence. The signatory's diligence in reviewing the underlying GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C contents is now a personal-liability risk, where previously the CA / CMA certifier's professional liability provided an intermediating layer. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines' principle of taxpayer self-assessment with audit verification is well-served by the self-certification design, but it shifts more responsibility onto the registered person's internal-control architecture.
For registered persons whose aggregate turnover is between ₹2 crore and ₹5 crore (where GSTR-9 is optional under Notification 47/2019-CT and similar; GSTR-9C threshold is above ₹5 crore), the strategic question is whether to file GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C voluntarily. Voluntary filing provides a contemporaneous reconciliation record that strengthens the audit-defence position; non-filing leaves the audit team to compute reconciliation themselves from primary records, often less favourably. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh and 53rd meetings have periodically rationalised these thresholds; the Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged annual-return-as-integrating-layer architecture that the current threshold-based structure has partially diluted.
Notification 29/2021-CT and the Finance Act 2021 substitution of Section 35(5) shifted GSTR-9C from CA / CMA attested certification to self-certification by the registered person, effective from financial year 2020-21 onwards. The reconciliation statement now bears the signature of the registered person or the authorised signatory; the previous Part B CA-CMA certification has been dropped. The substantive contents of GSTR-9C — Part A (reconciliation between audited financial statements and GSTR-9, covering turnover Table 5, taxable value Table 7, tax payable Table 9, ITC Tables 12-14) and Part B (auditor certification, now omitted) — are otherwise broadly retained. The threshold for GSTR-9C continues to be aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, per Notification 16/2022-CT.
In practice, Section 65 audit findings escalate to Section 67 inspection where the audit team identifies indicators of deliberate evasion — fake invoicing patterns, circular trading rings, ITC claimed against suppliers whose registrations are cancelled or who have nil GSTR-3B filings (Suncraft Energy and downstream judicial line), classification mis-applications that appear deliberate. The escalation is not automatic; the proper officer must form a fresh reason-to-believe under Section 67(1) and record reasons. The Pradeep Goyal (Supreme Court on DIN — Document Identification Number for tax notices) framework requires the inspection authorisation to bear a valid DIN, failing which the action is voidable. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO principle on opportunity-of-being-heard before invasive action is occasionally invoked but its application in the Section 67 context is restricted.
Section 67(2) requires that search and seizure shall be carried out in the manner prescribed under Rule 139; provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 relating to search and seizure apply mutatis mutandis (Section 67(10)). Section 67(7) provides that goods so seized shall be returned within six months extendable by six months for sufficient reasons. Section 67(8) preserves the registered person's right to make copies of the seized documents. The procedural safeguards exist; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration recommends similar safeguards as part of the taxpayer-rights framework. In practice, the Bharti Airtel v UoI and Suncraft Energy v Asst Commissioner lines of authority have shaped the procedural-fairness review of Section 67 actions in writ jurisdiction before the Madras High Court and other High Courts.
Pre-GST, the Central Excise Act Section 14 provided summons power, Section 18 search power, and Section 12F seizure power. Service tax under the Finance Act 1994 had similar provisions under Sections 82 (search) and 73 (recovery). The GST framework consolidates these into Section 67 with unified procedural architecture. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged a single-window enforcement architecture replacing the fragmented pre-GST regime; Section 67 substantively delivers that design. Comparative OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise that enforcement powers should be calibrated to the gravity of the suspected evasion, and the Indian framework's reason-to-believe-plus-Joint-Commissioner-rank gating mechanism aligns with that principle.
What Karambakkam clients usually ask next: Where Karambakkam differs: for the professional and salaried population of Karambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Reconciliation statement is the document filed in Form GSTR-9C reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles the tax payable as per the financial statement with the tax declared in the annual return and the input tax credit availed with the credit reflected in books.
DRC-01A is the pre-show-cause-notice intimation prescribed under sub-rule (1A) of Rule 142. Part A is the officer's quantification of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; Part B is the registered person's reply or acceptance. DRC-01A is the principal off-ramp before formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation prescribed under sub-rule (2) and (3) of Rule 142. It is filed where the registered person makes voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or 74(5). DRC-03 is the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal adjudication.
Section 73(5) deposit is the voluntary payment made by the registered person, on his own ascertainment or on ascertainment by the proper officer, before issuance of a show-cause notice. The deposit, when made along with applicable interest under Section 50, results in no penalty being leviable under Section 73(9).
Audit jurisdiction refers to the statutory authority of the Commissioner under sub-section (1) of Section 65 to authorise any officer to undertake audit of a registered person. Authorisation may be by general or specific order. A challenge to audit jurisdiction is typically agitated at the threshold under Article 226 before the High Court.
Section 67 search is the enforcement-track action distinct from departmental audit. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, with reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise in writing any officer to inspect places of business and seize goods or documents.
Best-judgment assessment is the framework under Section 62 or Section 63 by which the proper officer, where a registered person fails to furnish returns or where an unregistered person is liable, assesses the tax liability to the best of his judgment. Audit non-cooperation can be a trigger for invoking Section 62.
Aggregate of demands captures the total tax, interest and penalty proposed in DRC-01 or confirmed in DRC-07 arising from audit observations. The aggregate determines the appellate forum, the pre-deposit obligation under Section 107(6) and the merits of pursuing rectification under Section 161.
Pre-deposit under sub-section (6) of Section 107 is the mandatory deposit of ten percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, subject to a maximum of twenty crore rupees, required for the appeal to be maintainable before the Appellate Authority. The pre-deposit is in addition to admitted tax, interest, fine and penalty.
First appeal under sub-section (1) of Section 107 lies before the Appellate Authority against any decision or order passed under the CGST Act by an adjudicating authority. The appeal must be filed within three months from the date of communication of the order, condonable by a further one month on sufficient cause.
Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is the remedy for any error apparent on the face of record in any decision, order, notice, certificate or any other document. Rectification may be undertaken suo motu by the authority or on application by the registered person within three months of the document.
ITC reversal is the substantive consequence of an audit observation that input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised. Reversal is effected through Table 4(B) of GSTR-3B with interest under Section 50(3) and, in some cases, penalty under Section 73(9) or 74(9) depending on the nature of the lapse.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Karambakkam businesses typically avoid these: Where Karambakkam differs: the business activity radiating outward from Karambakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Karambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Karambakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Karambakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Karambakkam engagements look the way they do: Where Karambakkam differs: the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Karambakkam's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Karambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Karambakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Karambakkam are spread right across the locality — along Kaikanakuppam VOC Street, Ramapuram Main Road, Sri Devi Kuppam Main Road, 1st Cross Main Road and 1st Main Road, and through the 1st main road, 2nd Main Road, 3rd Main Road and 7th Cross Street business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Karambakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.