Professional GST Audit Support for Ascendas IT Park businesses near Ascendas IT Park Tower — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
GST Audit Support for it services businesses in Ascendas IT Park near Ascendas IT Park Tower with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Ascendas IT Park — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).
All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Tharamani MRTS Station and feeder routes connecting Ascendas IT Park to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ascendas IT Park clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the cluster of it services, ites, software businesses that defines Ascendas IT Park's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Ascendas IT Park: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSection 73 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Sub-section (1) requires the proper officer to issue a show-cause notice at least three months prior to the time-limit specified for issuance of order under sub-section (10). It is to be noted that post-audit adjudication frequently routes through Section 73 unless suppression is alleged.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 65 requires the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to inform the registered person within thirty days of the findings, the registered person's rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. The communication is issued in Form GST ADT-02. It is to be noted that the thirty-day window is mandatory and starts on the date of conclusion of audit, not the date of the audit report.
View sourceAscendas IT Park (PIN 600113) falls under the Velachery Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Because PIN 600113 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Ascendas IT Park stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Records we prepare for Ascendas IT Park carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9866, 80.2511, which map each submission back to this locality. Ascendas IT Park is a private SEZ within Tharamani housing global captive centres and IT services firms across multiple grade-A towers.
The private sez within tharamani mix of Ascendas IT Park shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of software activity and the commercial pulse around ITPC Chennai. Freight and foot traffic from the Tharamani MRTS Station hub pull steady daily commerce through Ascendas IT Park, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this private sez within tharamani pocket. Commercial activity in Ascendas IT Park runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Ascendas IT Park desk accordingly. Working in Ascendas IT Park brings a logistical edge: proximity to ITPC Chennai and the Tharamani MRTS Station corridor keeps physical document handling fast.
We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for ites firms near Ascendas IT Park to know where the department usually probes. For a ites business in Ascendas IT Park, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. GST Audit Support for ites businesses in Ascendas IT Park hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. Sector concentration matters: when Ascendas IT Park leans toward ites, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle.
Turnaround for Ascendas IT Park GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. From the first GST Audit Support cycle, a Ascendas IT Park engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later. Working papers for Ascendas IT Park GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Ascendas IT Park is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years.
Serving Ascendas IT Park and Tharamani from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. GST Audit Support clients in Tharamani are handled by the same practitioners who run our Ascendas IT Park desk. We treat Ascendas IT Park and Tharamani as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Group companies spread across Ascendas IT Park and Tharamani consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.
Common patterns in the Velachery Division give Ascendas IT Park businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Over several cycles in Ascendas IT Park, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Ascendas IT Park are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Because we work repeatedly across Ascendas IT Park, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm.
Incorporating in Ascendas IT Park comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. New ites ventures in Ascendas IT Park lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. A startup setting up near Ascendas IT Park Tower in Ascendas IT Park gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Velachery Division from day one. Relocating a registered office into Ascendas IT Park (PIN 600113) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Ascendas IT Park businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Ascendas IT Park prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Ascendas IT Park businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Form ADT-03 is the order issued under Section 66(1) directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct a special audit. It is an order, not a notice, and the nominated professional then conducts the audit on the department's behalf.
Section 65(4) requires completion within three months from the date of commencement. The Commissioner may extend the period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing, taking the outer limit to nine months in extended cases.
Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit the audit report within ninety days. The period is extendable by another ninety days on application by the auditor or on the department's own motion for sufficient reasons.
Under Section 66(5) the Commissioner determines and discharges the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. The registered person carries no fee burden for the special-audit professional, although internal representation costs remain to the taxpayer's account.
Yes. Beginning the 2020-21 financial year, taxpayers crossing the five-crore aggregate-turnover mark in any year self-certify the reconciliation statement. Earlier external certification by a Chartered Accountant was dispensed with by the Finance Act 2021 amendments to Section 44.
The threshold is aggregate turnover above five crore rupees in the financial year, applied PAN-wise across all GSTINs. Persons below this threshold are not required to file GSTR-9C even where GSTR-9 filing is otherwise compulsory for them.
What Ascendas IT Park clients want to know before signing: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, on the Tharamani-Tidel Park corridor that passes through Ascendas IT Park.
Reading this guide locally — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where on the Tharamani-Tidel Park corridor that passes through Ascendas IT Park.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
In practice, Section 65 audit findings escalate to Section 67 inspection where the audit team identifies indicators of deliberate evasion — fake invoicing patterns, circular trading rings, ITC claimed against suppliers whose registrations are cancelled or who have nil GSTR-3B filings (Suncraft Energy and downstream judicial line), classification mis-applications that appear deliberate. The escalation is not automatic; the proper officer must form a fresh reason-to-believe under Section 67(1) and record reasons. The Pradeep Goyal (Supreme Court on DIN — Document Identification Number for tax notices) framework requires the inspection authorisation to bear a valid DIN, failing which the action is voidable. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO principle on opportunity-of-being-heard before invasive action is occasionally invoked but its application in the Section 67 context is restricted.
Section 67(2) requires that search and seizure shall be carried out in the manner prescribed under Rule 139; provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 relating to search and seizure apply mutatis mutandis (Section 67(10)). Section 67(7) provides that goods so seized shall be returned within six months extendable by six months for sufficient reasons. Section 67(8) preserves the registered person's right to make copies of the seized documents. The procedural safeguards exist; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration recommends similar safeguards as part of the taxpayer-rights framework. In practice, the Bharti Airtel v UoI and Suncraft Energy v Asst Commissioner lines of authority have shaped the procedural-fairness review of Section 67 actions in writ jurisdiction before the Madras High Court and other High Courts.
Pre-GST, the Central Excise Act Section 14 provided summons power, Section 18 search power, and Section 12F seizure power. Service tax under the Finance Act 1994 had similar provisions under Sections 82 (search) and 73 (recovery). The GST framework consolidates these into Section 67 with unified procedural architecture. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged a single-window enforcement architecture replacing the fragmented pre-GST regime; Section 67 substantively delivers that design. Comparative OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise that enforcement powers should be calibrated to the gravity of the suspected evasion, and the Indian framework's reason-to-believe-plus-Joint-Commissioner-rank gating mechanism aligns with that principle.
Where audit findings are not addressed through voluntary DRC-03 payment, the proper officer issues a Show Cause Notice — DRC-01 under Section 73(1) for cases not involving fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, and under Section 74(1) for cases involving any of those elements. The framing choice has material consequences. Section 73 attracts penalty of 10% of tax or ₹10,000 whichever is higher (Section 73(9)), with no penalty if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 73(8). Section 74 attracts penalty of 100% of tax (Section 74(9)), with reduced penalty of 25% if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 74(8) and 50% within thirty days of order. The extended-period limitation of five years (versus three years under Section 73) is the other material difference.
Where the audit-team recommends Section 74 framing, the registered person's defence focuses on the four elements — fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade tax. The Supreme Court's pre-GST jurisprudence on similar language in Central Excise (Pushpam Pharmaceuticals v CCE) and Service Tax (CCE v Mehta and Co) emphasised that mere non-payment or non-disclosure does not amount to suppression with intent; positive indicators of intent are needed. Bona-fide classification errors, computational mistakes, and reasonable interpretation differences are not suppression. Where the SCN frames the case under Section 74, the response should systematically address each of the four elements and rely on the documentary trail showing bona-fide compliance attempts. Pradeep Goyal (DIN requirement) and Kranti Associates (reasoned order) provide procedural safeguards.
Section 73(10) provides that the order under Section 73 shall be issued within three years from the due date for furnishing of annual return for the financial year to which the tax not paid or short paid or input tax credit wrongly availed relates; the SCN must be issued at least three months before that date (Section 73(2)). Section 74(10) provides corresponding five-year limitation. For FY 2017-18 GSTR-9 (annual return due 31 December 2018, extended dates apply), the Section 73 limitation expired in late 2021-22 (extended through various Notifications including 9/2023-CT to 31 December 2023 and further), and Section 74 limitation extends to mid-2024 onwards. Audit findings escalated beyond limitation are barred; the registered person should systematically test limitation as part of the SCN defence.
Place-of-supply errors are the fourth common finding — typically where the registered person charged CGST/SGST (intra-State) when the place of supply under Sections 10 to 13 IGST Act was inter-State (requiring IGST), or vice versa. Section 77 of the CGST Act provides a corrective mechanism — where tax was paid under one head but is actually payable under another, the wrongly-paid tax can be claimed as refund and the correctly-payable tax should be paid; the registered person is not penalised, only interest under Section 50 may apply. Audit teams sometimes overlook Section 77 and compute full short-payment additions; citing Section 77 with documented evidence of the corresponding refund-eligible head closes the issue at audit stage.
The single most common Section 65 audit finding is ITC mismatch — ITC claimed in GSTR-3B Table 4(A) exceeding ITC available in GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B for the corresponding tax period. The post-2019 regulatory tightening — Rule 36(4) initially capping un-uploaded ITC at 20%, then 10%, then 5% (Notification 75/2019-CT, 49/2019-CT, 94/2020-CT trajectory), then Section 16(2)(aa) mandating GSTR-2B as the eligibility baseline (Notification 39/2021-CT effective 1 January 2022) — has progressively tightened the mismatch tolerance to nil. Audit findings on FY 2020-21 onwards typically computes the mismatch quarter-wise; the registered person's defence rests on vendor-wise reconciliation, vendor follow-up correspondence, and the Suncraft Energy bona-fide-buyer principle where applicable.
The second-most-common audit finding is missed reverse-charge — supplies where the recipient is liable to pay tax under Section 9(3) (notified categories — GTA without forward-charge election, legal services, sponsorship, services by directors, etc.) or Section 9(4) (supplies from unregistered to registered persons in notified categories for real-estate developers under Notification 07/2019-CT(R) read with 03/2019-CT(R)). Section 31(3)(f) requires the recipient to issue a self-invoice; many registered persons miss this step. The audit-team computes the missed output liability under reverse-charge, the corresponding ITC eligibility (subject to time-limit under Section 16(4)), and the interest under Section 50. Voluntary disclosure via DRC-03 is the standard close-out.
What Ascendas IT Park clients usually ask next: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.
Adverse audit finding is an observation recorded by the proper officer in the audit notes under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 or in the communication under ADT-02 that points to short payment of tax, erroneous refund, or wrongly availed input tax credit. It is the precursor to action under Section 73 or Section 74.
Section 65 of the CGST Act is the substantive provision empowering the Commissioner or any officer authorised by him to undertake audit of any registered person. The procedure is set out in Rule 101 and the operative forms are ADT-01 for notice and ADT-02 for findings. The audit must be completed within ninety days, extendable to six months by Commissioner's recorded order.
Section 66 of the CGST Act is the special audit provision. The officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, with prior approval of the Commissioner, may direct the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner. The procedure is set out in Rule 102.
Section 35 of the CGST Act is the records-maintenance provision. Sub-section (1) requires every registered person to keep and maintain books of account and records at the principal place of business. Sub-section (5), now omitted with effect from 1 August 2021, earlier required mandatory audit by a chartered accountant for turnover above the prescribed threshold.
Section 36 of the CGST Act is the records-retention provision. Every registered person required to maintain accounts under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year pertaining to the records. Pending appeal or revision extends the retention period.
Section 67 of the CGST Act is the inspection, search and seizure provision. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, where he has reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit has been wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise inspection of places of business. Section 67 is a distinct enforcement track and is not the same as the audit jurisdiction under Section 65.
Section 73 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Order under sub-section (10) may be passed within three years from the due date of annual return; SCN at least three months prior.
Section 74 of the CGST Act governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation extends to five years from the due date of the annual return. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable.
Rule 101 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for audit under Section 65. Sub-rule (1) provides that the audit period shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) deals with discrepancy notes and sub-rule (5) prescribes Form ADT-02 for communication of findings.
Rule 102 of the CGST Rules prescribes the procedure for special audit under Section 66. Sub-rule (1) prescribes Form ADT-03 for the direction to the registered person, and sub-rule (2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of the findings of the special audit to the registered person.
Place of audit is governed by sub-section (2) of Section 65 which permits the audit to be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The choice rests with the department; the registered person does not have a unilateral right to require off-site audit.
Date of commencement of audit is defined in the Explanation to sub-section (4) of Section 65. It is the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. The ninety-day completion clock runs from this date.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Ascendas IT Park businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Ascendas IT Park businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Ascendas IT Park engagements look the way they do: Closer to Ascendas IT Park, the business activity radiating outward from Ascendas IT Park Tower and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Ascendas IT Park units balancing production cycles with monthly GST and quarterly TDS compliance.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Ascendas IT Park clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Ascendas IT Park we look after firms on South Avenue, Taramani Link Road, Thiruvalluvar Road, Thiruvalluvar Salai and West Avenue Road as well as the 4th Main Road, Dr MGR Main Road, 22nd Street and East Coast Road corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.
Professional GST Audit Support in Ascendas IT Park, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.