the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
Professional GST Audit Support in Tharamani (PIN 600113), Chennai with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Tharamani — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Tharamani businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Tharamani, the business activity radiating outward from IIT Madras Research Park and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Tharamani Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Tharamani to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Tharamani clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Tharamani, the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Tharamani: Where Tharamani differs: for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view
Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored
Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC
Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 65 requires the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to inform the registered person within thirty days of the findings, the registered person's rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. The communication is issued in Form GST ADT-02. It is to be noted that the thirty-day window is mandatory and starts on the date of conclusion of audit, not the date of the audit report.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 102 prescribes Form GST ADT-03 for the direction by the proper officer to the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner under Section 66. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-04 for communication of findings of the special audit to the registered person. It is to be noted that ADT-04 is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Tharamani carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9842, 80.2461, which map each submission back to this locality. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600113, understanding the Velachery Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Tharamani businesses tie back to the Velachery Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Statutory correspondence for Tharamani businesses routes through the Velachery Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start.
The it corridor anchor with research institutions mix of Tharamani shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of it services activity and the commercial pulse around CSIR-CLRI. Tharamani sustains a high flow of commerce for a it corridor anchor with research institutions locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Tharamani reads as a it corridor anchor with research institutions pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around CSIR-CLRI and fed by the Tharamani Bus Stop corridor. Document pickup near CSIR-CLRI is a same-hour errand for our Tharamani engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects.
The business mix in Tharamani centres on residential, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. For a residential business in Tharamani, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Sector concentration matters: when Tharamani leans toward residential, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. Because Tharamani hosts a cluster of residential businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality.
Fixed-fee scoping means a Tharamani business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement. Working papers for Tharamani GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Turnaround for Tharamani GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. The Tharamani GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you.
Serving Tharamani and Velachery from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. Proximity to Velachery means a Tharamani engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Businesses straddling Tharamani and Velachery get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. Group companies spread across Tharamani and Velachery consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.
Patterns we track for Tharamani include it services documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Velachery Division tends to raise. Each engagement in Tharamani adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The longer we serve Tharamani, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Because we work repeatedly across Tharamani, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm.
For a new business incorporating in Tharamani or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. Shifting principal place of business to Tharamani means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. First-time GST Audit Support for a Tharamani business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. When a Tidel Park business expands into Tharamani, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600113 without disruption.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Tharamani businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Tharamani prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Tharamani businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B against credit appearing in GSTR-2A or static GSTR-2B for the financial year. It is the most common audit-checkpoint and variances must be supported by supplier-wise documentation at audit.
No. The Gujarat High Court in Aap and Co v Union of India holds that GSTR-3B is a return of self-assessment and a mere tabular variance against GSTR-1 does not establish suppression. Independent enquiry into underlying invoices is required before adverse findings.
The e-invoice IRN log generated on the Invoice Registration Portal is reconciled against GSTR-1 outward supplies for entities above the Notification 10/2023-Central Tax threshold. Audit teams test cancellation-window slippages, credit-note IRNs and auto-population deltas between IRP and GSTN.
Yes. Reverse charge under Section 9(3) on advocate fees, goods-transport agency services, security services and director payments, and under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act on import of services, is reconstructed from purchase ledgers and bank statements at audit.
Cross-charge arises where distinct persons under Section 25(4) supply support functions across GSTINs without invoice. At audit, the cost pool is allocated through Rule 28 second proviso open-market value, with revenue-neutrality typically established when the recipient GSTIN avails full ITC.
Audit teams test month-wise D1 and D2 formulae under Rule 42, the annual true-up under Rule 42(2) before September following, and the recomputation against audited exempt-turnover ratios. Short reversal is treated as Section 17(2) violation attracting interest and penalty.
What Tharamani clients want to know before signing: Where Tharamani differs: around the IIT Madras Research Park catchment of Tharamani.
Reading this guide locally — In Tharamani, around the IIT Madras Research Park catchment of Tharamani.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.
Form GST ADT-02 is the audit-closure report prescribed under Rule 101(5) of the CGST Rules and Section 65(7) of the CGST Act. Upon completion of the audit, the proper officer is required to issue ADT-02 within thirty days informing the registered person of the findings, the rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 captures the period audited, the audit observations under each verification head (turnover, ITC, refund, classification, rate, valuation), the proper officer's conclusion on each observation, the tax / interest / penalty quantum where applicable, and the rights of the registered person to dispute or accept the findings. The form is the formal closure of the audit cycle and the trigger for the next-stage decision — voluntary DRC-03 payment, SCN under Section 73 or 74, or no-action closure.
ADT-02 audit observations are structured around the verification heads — turnover under Section 9 read with Section 7, taxable value under Section 15, rate of tax under the rate notifications, ITC under Sections 16 to 21, refund under Sections 54 and 55, and miscellaneous compliance. Each observation typically includes the audit team's working, the discrepancy quantum, the section / rule under which the proposed addition is framed, and the proper officer's reasoning. The Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on reasoned orders applies — the proper officer's reasoning must engage with the registered person's explanations and cannot be a mechanical reproduction of audit-team working. Where reasoning is absent or perfunctory, the registered person has stronger grounds in subsequent Section 73 / 74 proceedings or in a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226.
Once ADT-03 is served, the cost-recovery amount becomes payable within the timeline specified in the form (typically thirty days). Non-payment triggers Section 79 of the CGST Act — the Government dues recovery framework — which empowers the proper officer to recover the amount through modes including deduction from any amount due to the registered person, sale of any movable or immovable property, attachment of bank accounts under Section 83 provisional attachment, and recovery as land revenue arrears. The registered person can apply for instalment-payment under Section 80 read with Rule 158 where genuine financial hardship exists; the Commissioner has discretion to allow up to twenty-four monthly instalments subject to interest under Section 50.
In practice, ADT-03 cost-recovery determinations issued by Tamil Nadu Commissionerates have ranged from modest amounts (₹50,000-₹2 lakh for limited-scope special audits) to substantial amounts (₹10 lakh and above for multi-year complex audits involving multiple GSTINs). The pattern correlates with the audit-scope — broad valuation or ITC-eligibility audits at large multi-State entities typically yield higher cost-recovery quantums. Registered persons under Section 66 nomination are well-advised to engage with the CA/CMA on a documented scope-limitation memorandum to control the quantum; reasonableness of the determination is reviewable in writ jurisdiction though the threshold for interference is high.
Form GST ADT-03 is the cost-recovery determination notice under Rule 102 of the CGST Rules read with Section 66(4) of the CGST Act. Section 66(4) provides that the expenses of the examination and audit of records under Section 66, including remuneration payable to the Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner; ADT-03 is the form through which this determination is communicated to the registered person, and the amount becomes payable as a Government dues recovery under Section 79. The Rule 102 framework was added to provide procedural clarity on the cost-recovery mechanism; comparative pre-GST excise (Section 14A Central Excise Act, since omitted) and service tax (Section 72A Finance Act 1994) had similar cost-recovery features.
Rule 56 of the CGST Rules elaborates the records to be maintained under Section 35 — accounts of goods or services received and supplied, stock of goods (with opening balance, receipt, supply, goods lost stolen destroyed written off or disposed of by way of gift or free sample, balance), particulars of ITC availed, output tax payable and paid, names and complete addresses of suppliers and customers, complete addresses of premises where goods are stored including goods stored during transit, monthly production accounts (for manufacturers) showing quantitative details of raw materials and goods produced, and accounts of advances received and paid. Rule 57 provides for maintenance through electronic means with prescribed safeguards. Rule 58 covers transporter, owner and operator of warehouse records. The records-architecture is granular and audit teams systematically map registered-person records against the Rule 56 schema during Section 65 audits.
Failure to maintain accounts and records as prescribed under Section 35 read with Rule 56 attracts consequences under multiple provisions. Section 35(6) empowers the proper officer to determine the tax payable on the goods or services or both not accounted for as if such goods or services or both had been supplied by such person, and the provisions of Sections 73 or 74 shall apply for determination of such tax. Section 122 provides for penalty for various offences including failure to maintain records — up to ₹10,000 or the amount of tax evaded, whichever is higher. The audit team's working assumption in cases of inadequate records is that the burden shifts to the registered person to demonstrate the correctness of declared turnover and ITC; this evidentiary shift is the most material consequence in practice.
The GST retention framework operates alongside the Income Tax Act Section 44AA requirement to maintain books of account for specified professions and businesses (with retention under Rule 6F for six years), and the Companies Act 2013 Section 128 requirement for books of account preservation for at least eight years preceding the current year. The longest applicable horizon governs — for a company carrying on a taxable supply business, the effective records-retention period is the Companies Act eight-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines recommend a minimum retention of five years tied to the audit-period limitation, which the Indian GST framework comfortably exceeds. Coordinated retention policies across GST, income tax and Companies Act dimensions are the typical compliance design at well-run enterprises.
What Tharamani clients usually ask next: Where Tharamani differs: for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Section 67 search is the enforcement-track action distinct from departmental audit. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, with reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise in writing any officer to inspect places of business and seize goods or documents.
Best-judgment assessment is the framework under Section 62 or Section 63 by which the proper officer, where a registered person fails to furnish returns or where an unregistered person is liable, assesses the tax liability to the best of his judgment. Audit non-cooperation can be a trigger for invoking Section 62.
Aggregate of demands captures the total tax, interest and penalty proposed in DRC-01 or confirmed in DRC-07 arising from audit observations. The aggregate determines the appellate forum, the pre-deposit obligation under Section 107(6) and the merits of pursuing rectification under Section 161.
Pre-deposit under sub-section (6) of Section 107 is the mandatory deposit of ten percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, subject to a maximum of twenty crore rupees, required for the appeal to be maintainable before the Appellate Authority. The pre-deposit is in addition to admitted tax, interest, fine and penalty.
First appeal under sub-section (1) of Section 107 lies before the Appellate Authority against any decision or order passed under the CGST Act by an adjudicating authority. The appeal must be filed within three months from the date of communication of the order, condonable by a further one month on sufficient cause.
Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is the remedy for any error apparent on the face of record in any decision, order, notice, certificate or any other document. Rectification may be undertaken suo motu by the authority or on application by the registered person within three months of the document.
ITC reversal is the substantive consequence of an audit observation that input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised. Reversal is effected through Table 4(B) of GSTR-3B with interest under Section 50(3) and, in some cases, penalty under Section 73(9) or 74(9) depending on the nature of the lapse.
Interest under Section 50 is the statutory consequence of delayed payment of tax or wrong availment and utilisation of input tax credit. Sub-section (1) prescribes interest at the rate of eighteen percent per annum on delayed payment, and sub-section (3) prescribes interest at the rate of twenty-four percent for wrongful utilisation of ITC.
Personal hearing under sub-section (4) of Section 75 is the opportunity granted by the proper officer or appellate authority to the registered person to present his case orally. Three adjournments at the option of the person sought to be heard are permitted on sufficient cause. Denial of personal hearing is a procedural infirmity.
Cross-examination is the right of the registered person, as part of the opportunity of being heard, to examine the witnesses or officers whose statements are relied on against him in adjudication. The right is sought through a written application during personal hearing. Denial is a recognised ground in first appeal under Section 107.
Reasons to believe is the jurisdictional threshold under sub-section (1) of Section 67 for inspection, search and seizure, and is invoked also in the special-audit context. The reasons must be recorded in writing and must rest on tangible material; subjective satisfaction without material is open to challenge.
Commissioner approval is the substantive condition for invoking special audit under sub-section (1) of Section 66. The proposing officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner must obtain prior approval of the Commissioner before issuing the direction in ADT-03. Approval without recorded reasons is open to challenge.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Tharamani businesses typically avoid these: Where Tharamani differs: the business activity radiating outward from IIT Madras Research Park and nearby commercial pockets. We see for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Tharamani, the business activity radiating outward from IIT Madras Research Park and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Tharamani engagements look the way they do: Where Tharamani differs: the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric. We see for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Tharamani clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Tharamani are spread right across the locality — along 4th Main Road, Dr MGR Main Road, Dr. Muthulakshmi Road, Kalki Krishnamurty Road and Lattice Bridge, and through the Old Mahapalipuram Road, Rajiv Gandhi IT Expressway, Rajiv Gandhi Salai and Taramani Link Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Tharamani, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.