End-to-end TDS Notice Reply for St Thomas Mount commercial residential mix with airport proximity establishments — handled by a qualified, in-house team
TDS Notice Reply for commercial residential mix with airport proximity businesses across the St Thomas Mount pocket near Mount Railway Station with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
The C.A. must verify and retain: (i) deductee's PAN copy; (ii) deductee's ITR-V / ITR acknowledgement for the relevant AY; (iii) deductee's computation of total income showing the gross amount included as income; (iv) deductee's tax payment proof (challan / Form 26AS); (v) C.A.'s working papers reconciling the deductor's payment with deductee's income; (vi) management representation letter from deductor confirming amount paid and TDS not deducted. Annexure A in Form 26A is signed only after this verification.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert TDS Notice Reply in St Thomas Mount — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where the underlying statement is correct but CPC-TDS has wrongly raised default — challan paid but not visible due to OLTAS / BIN issue, double-counted interest — Default Rectification Request is raised on TRACES; CPC-TDS Ghaziabad responds in 30-45 days.
For Section 195 short-deduction on software / cloud / SaaS payments to non-residents, Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. CIT [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC) is invoked — payment is not royalty under DTAA Article 12, no TDS obligation, no 201 default, no 40(a)(i) disallowance.
Short-deduction defaults under Section 206AB are defended by producing the dated Compliance Check screenshot from the Reporting Portal proving the deductee was NOT a specified person at the time of payment. Status snapshot is the dispositive evidence.
Where non-deposit of TDS exceeds ₹25 lakh threshold triggering compulsory prosecution under Section 276B, we coordinate full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest, file compounding application under the latest CBDT Compounding Guidelines dated 17-Oct-2024 — criminal proceedings closed before trial commencement.
Our team has handled TDS defaults since the TRACES portal launch in 2012-13 — over 200 St Thomas Mount deductors defended across Section 200A intimations, Section 201 orders, Section 234E fee challenges, Form 26A filings and Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance defences in scrutiny.
Every Section 200A intimation received by St Thomas Mount clients is logged with a 30-day countdown to Section 220(1) recovery. Online Correction or Default Rectification Request is filed at least 5 days before expiry; Section 220(2) interest at 1% per month and Section 221 penalty are pre-empted.
Every TDS Notice Reply engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In St Thomas Mount, the business activity radiating outward from St Thomas Mount Cantonment and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via St Thomas Mount Metro and feeder routes connecting St Thomas Mount to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for St Thomas Mount clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In St Thomas Mount, the cluster of hospitality, aviation, logistics businesses that defines St Thomas Mount's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in St Thomas Mount: For St Thomas Mount engagements specifically — for St Thomas Mount IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Downloaded by the deductor from TRACES, used as the source dataset for preparing online or offline corrections to an earlier-filed quarterly statement.
Auto-generated PDF and CSV report listing default heads — short payment, short deduction, late deduction, late payment, interest and fee — against a processed quarterly statement.
Certifies that the deductee has filed return, included the receipt and paid the tax, thereby extinguishing the deductor's deemed-default exposure.
Carries deductee-wise particulars of tax deducted from salary payments under Section 192, with Annexure II in the fourth quarter for salary computation.
Carries deductee-wise particulars of tax deducted on payments to residents other than salaries — Sections 194 to 194T as applicable.
Carries deductee-wise particulars of tax deducted on payments to non-residents under Section 195, with country code, residential status and DTAA rate fields.
Carries collectee-wise particulars of tax collected under Section 206C, covering scrap, timber, motor vehicles, foreign remittance and overseas tour package items.
Issued to salaried employees evidencing tax deducted under Section 192, carrying Part A from TRACES and Part B with detailed salary computation.
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200 of the Income-tax Act 1961 casts an obligation upon every person deducting any sum in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B to pay the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government, within the prescribed time and in the prescribed mode. It is to be noted that the obligation is fastened on the deductor in his capacity as an agent of the revenue, and the deposit is a precondition for the deductee being entitled to the corresponding credit. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 30 prescribes seven days from the end of the month of deduction, except for March deductions where the cut-off is the thirtieth day of April.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where a person who is required to deduct tax fails to deduct, or, having deducted, fails to pay the whole or any part of the tax to the credit of the Central Government, he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. The first proviso, inserted with effect from the first day of July 2012, carves out a relief — the deductor shall not be deemed in default if the deductee has furnished a return under Section 139, has taken the receipt into the computation of total income and paid the tax due, and the deductor furnishes a certificate in Form 26A from an accountant.
View sourceSection 271H provides that without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, the Assessing Officer may direct that a person who fails to deliver a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3), or who furnishes incorrect information in such statement, shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees. Sub-section (3) carves out an immunity where the tax, interest and fee have been paid and the statement has been delivered before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivery. It is to be noted that the immunity is statutory and not discretionary.
View sourceSub-section (1) clause (a) of Section 246A, read with Section 200A(1), confers a statutory right of appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) against an intimation under Section 200A or an order under Section 201. Sub-section (1) of Section 249 prescribes a thirty-day window from service of the order for filing Form 35 along with the prescribed fee. It is to be noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) may admit an appeal after the expiry of the said period under sub-section (3) of Section 249 if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting it within the prescribed period.
View sourceClause (i) of Section 40(a) provides that any interest, royalty, fees for technical services or other sum chargeable under the Act payable outside India or in India to a non-resident, on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or paid, shall not be deducted in computing the income chargeable under the head Profits and Gains of Business or Profession. Unlike clause (ia), the disallowance under clause (i) is one hundred per cent of the expense. It is to be noted that the deduction is allowed in the year of subsequent payment, and the Engineering Analysis Centre ruling has materially narrowed the deduction obligation on software payments.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 154 empowers an income-tax authority to amend, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, any order passed by it under the Act or any intimation or deemed intimation under Section 143(1) or Section 200A(1). Sub-section (7) prescribes an outer limit of four years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended was passed. It is to be noted that the scope of mistake apparent from the record is narrower than error of law, and is confined to mistakes that are obvious and patent on a plain reading of the record.
View sourceSt Thomas Mount (PIN 600016) falls under the Saidapet Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for St Thomas Mount businesses tie back to the Saidapet Division, so our TDS Notice Reply cadence accounts for how that office works. Because PIN 600016 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for St Thomas Mount stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. The 600xx geo-zone covering St Thomas Mount groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Commercial activity in St Thomas Mount runs high, so TDS Notice Reply volumes scale through peak months and we staff the St Thomas Mount desk accordingly. Each TDS Notice Reply cycle for St Thomas Mount reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Chennai Airport, expenses routed through the St Thomas Mount Metro freight network. Most commerce in St Thomas Mount — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the TDS Notice Reply working file we maintain for clients here. St Thomas Mount sustains a high flow of commerce for a commercial residential mix with airport proximity locality, and that flow is the raw material for the TDS Notice Reply files we close here.
For a hospitality business in St Thomas Mount, the TDS Notice Reply scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. hospitality units around St Thomas Mount share recurring TDS Notice Reply patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. The hospitality character of St Thomas Mount commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a TDS Notice Reply review needs. TDS Notice Reply for hospitality businesses in St Thomas Mount hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time.
A St Thomas Mount client sees the same TDS Notice Reply cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. The St Thomas Mount TDS Notice Reply workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Working papers for St Thomas Mount TDS Notice Reply engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. The qualified-review step on every St Thomas Mount TDS Notice Reply file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal.
We treat St Thomas Mount and Guindy as one catchment for TDS Notice Reply, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Serving St Thomas Mount and Guindy from one team keeps TDS Notice Reply turnaround identical across the cluster. Coverage from St Thomas Mount naturally extends to Guindy, so group entities across the area share one TDS Notice Reply workflow. A client relocating between St Thomas Mount and Guindy keeps the same TDS Notice Reply file and the same team.
Patterns we track for St Thomas Mount include logistics documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Saidapet Division tends to raise. Because we work repeatedly across St Thomas Mount, we can benchmark a new client's TDS Notice Reply position against the locality norm. The TDS Notice Reply mistakes we see most in St Thomas Mount are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. The longer we serve St Thomas Mount, the more precisely we predict where a TDS Notice Reply file needs attention.
For a new business incorporating in St Thomas Mount or shifting its principal place of business here, TDS Notice Reply setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Nandambakkam business expands into St Thomas Mount, we extend its TDS Notice Reply setup to PIN 600016 without disruption. Shifting principal place of business to St Thomas Mount means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. We onboard new St Thomas Mount entities onto a TDS Notice Reply cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Log in to TRACES, navigate to 'Statements/Payments — Request for Correction', select the statement type and quarter, download the consolidated file, edit in the TDS-CPC utility, sign with DSC, upload corrected file. Allow 7-10 days for processing.
Section 234E fee at ₹200 per day of delay is capped at the total TDS amount of the relevant statement. The cap operates per statement (per Form 24Q/26Q/27Q) and per quarter; thus the per-statement maximum equals the statement's underlying TDS sum.
Yes, where the levy adjudicates more than mere arithmetic (e.g. interest computation under Section 201(1A) is also included), appeal lies under Section 246A(1)(a) before CIT(A) (NFAC) within 30 days. Pure Section 234E levies are largely settled and not amenable to appeal.
The Supreme Court in Goetze (India) v CIT held that fresh claims cannot be made before the AO except by a revised return. In TDS replies, this means deductee tax-credit corrections must flow through correction statements, not by mere AO submissions.
Section 226(3) allows the AO to issue notice to debtors (banks, customers) of the deductor requiring them to pay the deductor's debts directly to the department. File Section 220(6) stay application immediately to halt the attachment; writ to Madras HC for release.
Show-cause reply, deductee Form 26A certificates, contracts/agreements clarifying the nature of payment, prior assessment orders for the same payment-type, CA opinion (if relied on), TDS challans, statement of facts, and a tabulated submission of Section 273B reasonable-cause grounds.
What St Thomas Mount clients want to know before signing: For St Thomas Mount engagements specifically — around the St Thomas Mount Cantonment catchment of St Thomas Mount.
Reading this guide locally — In St Thomas Mount, on the Guindy-Alandur corridor that passes through St Thomas Mount.
The Tax Deduction at Source mechanism in India under Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act 1961 implements what the OECD framework calls a pay-as-you-earn collection design. It is to be noted that the policy goal traces to the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee 1971 (Wanchoo Committee) recommendation that revenue collection be advanced to the point of accrual rather than the point of assessment, reducing tax arrears and broadening the information base. The Comptroller and Auditor General's 2017 performance audit on TDS administration observed that approximately 36% of direct-tax revenue is now collected at source, against an OECD-area average of roughly 60% for income subject to withholding. A TDS notice therefore performs a dual function — it is both a revenue-recovery instrument addressed to the deductor as the assessee-in-default under Section 201, and an information-correction instrument under Section 200A reconciling the deductor return with deductee credit claims in Form 26AS.
TDS communications received by Chennai deductors broadly fall into five categories distinguishable by their statutory anchor. First, Section 200A(1) intimations are issued by the Centralised Processing Cell-TDS at Vaishali Ghaziabad on prima-facie defaults identified during return-processing. Second, Section 201(1) default orders are issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) on substantive non-deduction or short-deduction post-enquiry. Third, Section 234E demand notices arise from late-filing fee at ₹200 per day of delay. Fourth, Section 271H penalty notices follow non-filing exceeding one year or false-particulars. Fifth, Section 220 recovery and Section 221 penalty notices follow non-payment beyond 30 days. Each category invokes a distinct response framework, distinct limitation period and distinct appellate route — conflating them is the single most common defence error observed in the Madras ITAT TDS-Bench rulings since 2018.
The TDS Reconciliation Analysis and Correction Enabling System (TRACES) is the operational interface through which CPC-TDS communicates with deductors. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 provides that every default identified during processing is recorded on TRACES with a downloadable Justification Report — a PDF and CSV deliverable that lists row-wise the challan, deductee PAN, section, deduction-amount, default-head and amount-in-default. The Justification Report carries indicative computations only; the binding figures are those in the Section 200A intimation and the consequential demand on the TRACES dashboard. The TRACES architecture follows the OECD Forum on Tax Administration's 2014 design template on digital-by-default tax-payer-services, mirrored in similar withholding-platforms in the United Kingdom (HMRC RTI) and Australia (ATO Single Touch Payroll).
Since Section 234E fee is levied via Section 200A intimation, the rectification remedy under Section 154 is available where the levy contains a mistake apparent from the record. Such mistakes include — fee levied for the period prior to 01-Jun-2015 (post Fatehraj Singhvi where applicable bench), fee exceeding the tax-deductible cap, fee levied where the statement was filed within the due-date but acknowledged late on TRACES owing to portal failure, and fee continued despite a notified CBDT extension. The Section 154 application must be filed within four years from the end of the financial year in which the order was passed. Where 154 is rejected, the appeal route under Section 246A is available.
Section 234E was inserted by Finance Act 2012 with effect from 01-Jul-2012 levying a fee of ₹200 per day of delay in filing the quarterly TDS statement, capped at the amount of tax deductible. Sub-section (4) of Section 234E declares the fee non-leviable in the cases prescribed — but no such prescription has been issued by CBDT to date. The fee is a fee in the technical sense (a charge for services rendered by the department's processing-system) rather than a penalty, as held by the Karnataka HC in Lakshminirman Bangalore. This technical classification is significant — fee does not require mens rea, is not appealable under Section 246A on merits, and is not subject to Section 273B reasonable-cause relief.
The Karnataka HC in Fatehraj Singhvi v Union of India held that prior to the insertion of clause (c) in Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 effective 01-Jun-2015, there was no enabling mechanism for CPC-TDS to levy Section 234E fee through a Section 200A intimation. The clause-(c) insertion was prospective only — fees raised on quarterly statements pertaining to periods before 01-Jun-2015 are therefore liable to be set aside. The Allahabad HC in Sushila Devi Pyala followed Fatehraj Singhvi. The Gujarat HC in Rajesh Kourani took a contrary view holding that Section 234E itself was the charging provision and 200A(1)(c) was merely procedural. The Madras HC has not authoritatively pronounced.
Section 273B operates as an overlay on Section 271H — even where the safe-harbour under 271H(3) is unavailable, the penalty cannot be imposed if the deductor shows reasonable cause for the failure. Reasonable cause has been judicially construed to include — system-level TRACES outage substantiated by TIN-NSDL acknowledgement, statutory auditor's strike preventing finalisation, key-person illness or demise with hospital records, and tax-credit-pending-reconciliation with the deductee that legitimately delayed filing. The defence is fact-intensive and the documentary trail must be contemporaneous. The Supreme Court in Hindustan Steel underpins the principle that technical or venial breach should not attract penalty.
Section 271H is distinct from two adjacent penalty / prosecution provisions. Section 271C imposes a penalty equal to the amount of tax that ought to have been deducted on failure to deduct — operating on non-deduction itself, whereas 271H operates on non-filing-of-statement or false-particulars. Section 276B is the prosecution provision for failure to pay TDS deducted to the credit of Central Government, attracting rigorous imprisonment of three months to seven years. Section 278AA provides a defence to 276B where reasonable cause is shown. The Madras HC in Madhumilan Syntex Ltd applied a strict reading on 276B prosecution where deduction-and-non-deposit was established.
Sub-section (1) of Section 271H provides for a penalty of not less than ₹10,000 and not more than ₹1,00,000 where a person fails to deliver the quarterly statement within the prescribed time or where the statement furnished contains false particulars in respect of tax deduction, payment, deductee details or any matter relevant to determination of total income of the deductee. The penalty is imposable by the Assessing Officer (TDS) after recording satisfaction and issuing a show-cause notice. The provision is wider than Section 234E in two respects — it covers false-particulars (not merely delay) and the upper-cap is materially higher.
CBDT Instruction 1914 dated 02-Dec-1993 as updated by Office Memorandum dated 29-Feb-2016 and 31-Jul-2017 provides the administrative framework for stay of demand pending first appeal. The current default position requires payment of 20% of disputed demand for grant of stay, with discretionary lower amounts where the assessment is in an obviously hostile direction relative to settled jurisprudence. The Bombay HC in UTI Mutual Fund and the Delhi HC in Mrs Kannammal v ITO held that the 20% is not a rigid rule and the AO must record reasons before insisting on full payment. A reasoned representation under the OM framework, filed before the 30-day expiry, is essential.
Sub-section (6) of Section 220 provides that where an assessee has presented an appeal under Section 246A, the Assessing Officer may in his discretion, and subject to such conditions as he may think fit, treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute, even though the time for payment has expired, until the appeal is disposed of. The discretion under 220(6) is independent of the Instruction 1914 framework — it is a statutory grant. The Supreme Court in KEC International v B.R. Balakrishnan held that the AO's discretion under 220(6) is to be exercised judiciously. A standalone 220(6) application filed alongside the Section 246A appeal is the procedurally correct route.
Section 221 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty not exceeding the amount of tax in arrears for default in payment of tax under Section 220. The proviso to Section 221(1) requires the AO to give a hearing before imposition. Sub-section (1) second proviso allows waiver of penalty where the assessee proves that the default was for good and sufficient reasons — typically a pending appeal, bona-fide stay application, business-cash-flow distress with bank confirmations, or genuine inability arising from non-receipt of refunds due to the assessee. The Madras HC in Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank set out the threshold for good-and-sufficient-reasons defence under 221.
What St Thomas Mount clients usually ask next: For St Thomas Mount engagements specifically — for St Thomas Mount IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Section 234E Late-Filing Fee is the levy of two hundred rupees per day for every day the TDS statement is filed after the Section 200(3) due date, capped at the TDS amount. Section 200A(1)(c) authorising the 234E adjustment through Section 200A intimation was inserted only w.e.f. 01-Jun-2015 by Finance Act 2015 — pre-amendment levies are quashable on Fatehraj Singhvi.
Section 271H Penalty is the ten-thousand-to-one-lakh-rupee penalty for failure to file a TDS statement or for filing an incorrect statement. Section 271H(3) gives full immunity where the deductor deposits the TDS, applicable interest and Section 234E fee, and files the statement, within one year of the due date.
Section 276B Prosecution is the criminal prosecution provision for failure to pay deducted TDS to the credit of the Central Government — imprisonment from three months to seven years with fine. Compounding is available under CBDT Guidelines dated 17-Oct-2024 on payment of admitted tax, interest, fee and compounding fee at two per cent per month on the principal TDS for the default period.
Section 206AA is the higher-rate deduction provision triggered when the payee does not furnish PAN, or furnishes a structurally invalid PAN, or has an inoperative PAN-Aadhaar status. TDS is deducted at the higher of the rate in force, the rate specified in the relevant section, or twenty per cent. It overrides DTAA rates per Bosch (Bangalore ITAT 2018) line.
Section 206AB Compliance Check is the higher-rate deduction at twice the applicable rate or five per cent (whichever is higher) on payments to specified persons who have not filed ITR for the prior assessment year and have aggregate TDS or TCS of fifty thousand rupees or more. Compliance Check facility on the income-tax portal lets the deductor verify status before each payment.
PAN-Aadhaar Inoperative Status arises where the PAN holder has failed to link Aadhaar by the deadline prescribed in CBDT Circular 3 of 2023. An inoperative PAN is treated as if PAN has not been furnished, triggering Section 206AA twenty per cent. Linking after the deadline cures the status only prospectively per CBDT Circular 6 of 2024.
BIN or Book Identification Number is the seven-digit number generated for government deductors who pay TDS through book adjustment rather than challan. It is reported in Form 24G by the Accounts Officer and quoted in the Form 24Q / 26Q deductor entry. BIN mismatches between Form 24G and the TDS statement are a common Default Rectification Request scenario.
CIN or Challan Identification Number is the combined identifier of BSR Code (7 digits) + Date of Deposit (DDMMYYYY) + Challan Serial Number (5 digits) printed on the bank counterfoil for an OLTAS challan. It is the primary reference for challan tagging in TDS statements through Online Correction Category C-2.
TAN-PAN Linkage is the mapping between the deductor's Tax Deduction Account Number and Permanent Account Number maintained at NSDL. A correct linkage is required for Section 197 lower-deduction certificate applications, Section 195 Form 15CA / 15CB filings, and for the deductor's income-tax 26AS credit on TDS deducted from its own receipts.
Section 197 Lower-Deduction Certificate is the certificate issued by the AO TDS authorising the deductor to deduct TDS at a lower rate, or nil, on payments to a specific deductee, where the deductee has demonstrated that his projected income justifies a lower rate. Applied online in Form 13 through TRACES with twelve-month validity within the same FY.
Form 15CA is the deductor's declaration filed online on the income-tax portal before a foreign remittance, and Form 15CB is the accompanying Chartered Accountant certificate where the remittance exceeds five lakh rupees in the FY and is chargeable to tax. The pair operationalises Section 195 / Rule 37BB for non-resident TDS compliance.
Form 24Q Annexure II is the year-end salary detail annexure filed only with the Q4 24Q statement, containing employee-wise salary breakup, Section 10 exemptions, Section 16 standard deduction, Chapter VI-A deductions and tax computation. Errors in Annexure II are the most common Section 271H incorrect-statement triggers and require Online Correction Category C-5.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How St Thomas Mount businesses typically avoid these: For St Thomas Mount engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from St Thomas Mount Cantonment and nearby commercial pockets; for St Thomas Mount IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In St Thomas Mount, the business activity radiating outward from St Thomas Mount Cantonment and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these St Thomas Mount engagements look the way they do: For St Thomas Mount engagements specifically — the cluster of hospitality, aviation, logistics businesses that defines St Thomas Mount's commercial fabric; for St Thomas Mount IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters had 234E fee aggregating ₹3,42,800 in Section 200A intimation. Filed grievance citing Fatehraj Singhvi (Kar HC 2016) and ITAT Chennai bench rulings. CPC-TDS Ghaziabad accepted; entire fee demand reduced to NIL on TRACES within 7 weeks.”
“Vendor PAN structurally invalid triggering 20% under Section 206AA on 194J professional payments. Filed Form 26A Annexure-A through our partner C.A. with vendor's ITR-V and tax payment proof; principal default of ₹18.4 lakh dropped on TRACES; only Section 201(1A) interest of ₹76,000 survived.”
“AO disallowed 30% of foreign-software AMC expense citing non-deduction under Section 195. Argued Engineering Analysis (SC 2021) — payment not royalty under India-Singapore DTAA Article 12. Faceless Assessment Unit accepted; ₹62 lakh disallowance deleted in Section 143(3) order.”
“Justification Report charged 201(1A)(i) interest till date of correction (28 months × 1%). Refiled Form 26A with deductee return date; interest period truncated to 9 months. Default reduced from ₹3.1 lakh to ₹98,000 — ₹2.1 lakh saved.”
“JCIT TDS issued 271H notice for incorrect 24Q Annexure II salary breakup. Filed reply citing reasonable cause under Section 273B — Eli Lilly (SC 2009) doctrine, payroll system migration, voluntary correction filed before notice. Penalty dropped in entirety.”
“Compulsory prosecution recommendation for non-deposit of TDS exceeding ₹25 lakh threshold over two FYs. Coordinated full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest + 234E fee, filed compounding application under CBDT Guidelines 17-Oct-2024 with compounding fee at 2% per month. Pr. CCIT compounded; criminal proceedings closed.”
Common questions from St Thomas Mount clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across St Thomas Mount we look after firms on Thillaiganga Nagar Subway, 2nd Main Road, Ashok Path, Balusamy Street and College Road as well as the Krishnasamy Street, Lake View Road, Grand Southern Trunk Road and Inner Ring Road (Southern Sector) corridors — local TDS Notice Reply without the cross-city travel.
Professional TDS Notice Reply in St Thomas Mount, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.