TDS Notice Reply for film industry units around Kodambakkam High Road, Kodambakkam — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
Professional TDS Notice Reply in Kodambakkam (PIN 600024), Chennai with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 271C levies a penalty equal to the amount of tax not deducted, leviable by a JCIT-rank officer under Section 274. Section 273B insulates the deductor where reasonable cause is shown — bona fide belief on non-applicability, characterisation issue, retrospective amendment, payee's TRC / DTAA claim. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Eli Lilly (2009) 312 ITR 225 held that Section 271C penalty is not automatic; reasonable-cause defence is read into Section 273B for all TDS penalty provisions.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert TDS Notice Reply in Kodambakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Short-deduction defaults under Section 206AB are defended by producing the dated Compliance Check screenshot from the Reporting Portal proving the deductee was NOT a specified person at the time of payment. Status snapshot is the dispositive evidence.
Where non-deposit of TDS exceeds ₹25 lakh threshold triggering compulsory prosecution under Section 276B, we coordinate full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest, file compounding application under the latest CBDT Compounding Guidelines dated 17-Oct-2024 — criminal proceedings closed before trial commencement.
Our team has handled TDS defaults since the TRACES portal launch in 2012-13 — over 200 Kodambakkam deductors defended across Section 200A intimations, Section 201 orders, Section 234E fee challenges, Form 26A filings and Section 40(a)(ia) disallowance defences in scrutiny.
Every Section 200A intimation received by Kodambakkam clients is logged with a 30-day countdown to Section 220(1) recovery. Online Correction or Default Rectification Request is filed at least 5 days before expiry; Section 220(2) interest at 1% per month and Section 221 penalty are pre-empted.
Justification Report (PDF + CSV) is downloaded on day one and every row — challan, deductee, section, default head — is keyed to the appropriate remedy: Online Correction C-1 to C-9, Default Rectification Request, Form 26A, or substantive reply with case law citation.
Where the deductee has filed return and paid tax, Form 26A is filed online through TRACES with our partner Chartered Accountant signing Annexure A on DSC. Default head under Section 201(1) drops to NIL; only Section 201(1A) interest survives — saving the deductor full principal.
Every TDS Notice Reply engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Kodambakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from AVM Studios and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Kodambakkam Suburban Railway and feeder routes connecting Kodambakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Kodambakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Kodambakkam businesses operate where the cluster of film industry, studios, hospitality businesses that defines Kodambakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Kodambakkam: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Kodambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Forms most asked about here — Kodambakkam businesses operate where where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Issued to deductees evidencing tax deducted on payments other than salary, downloaded from TRACES with verifiable certificate-number for credit reconciliation.
Consolidated tax credit statement reflecting tax deducted, tax collected, advance and self-assessment tax paid, refunds and high-value transactions, accessed via the e-filing portal.
Issued to collectees by the collector under Section 206C(5), downloaded from TRACES, evidencing the amount collected and deposited.
Used to deposit tax deducted at source and tax collected at source to the credit of the Central Government, with separate codes for company and non-company deductees.
Filed by the recipient to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) to obtain a certificate for nil or lower deduction where the recipient's estimated tax liability so justifies.
Prescribed form for filing the first appeal against an intimation under Section 200A or an order under Section 201, accompanied by grounds, statement of facts and prescribed fee.
Prescribed form for filing the second appeal before the ITAT against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 250, with cross-objections under Section 253(4) where applicable.
Downloaded by the deductor from TRACES, used as the source dataset for preparing online or offline corrections to an earlier-filed quarterly statement.
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Statutory hooks that bite here — Kodambakkam businesses operate where where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200 of the Income-tax Act 1961 casts an obligation upon every person deducting any sum in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B to pay the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government, within the prescribed time and in the prescribed mode. It is to be noted that the obligation is fastened on the deductor in his capacity as an agent of the revenue, and the deposit is a precondition for the deductee being entitled to the corresponding credit. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 30 prescribes seven days from the end of the month of deduction, except for March deductions where the cut-off is the thirtieth day of April.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where a person who is required to deduct tax fails to deduct, or, having deducted, fails to pay the whole or any part of the tax to the credit of the Central Government, he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. The first proviso, inserted with effect from the first day of July 2012, carves out a relief — the deductor shall not be deemed in default if the deductee has furnished a return under Section 139, has taken the receipt into the computation of total income and paid the tax due, and the deductor furnishes a certificate in Form 26A from an accountant.
View sourceSection 271H provides that without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, the Assessing Officer may direct that a person who fails to deliver a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3), or who furnishes incorrect information in such statement, shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees. Sub-section (3) carves out an immunity where the tax, interest and fee have been paid and the statement has been delivered before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivery. It is to be noted that the immunity is statutory and not discretionary.
View sourceSub-section (1) clause (a) of Section 246A, read with Section 200A(1), confers a statutory right of appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) against an intimation under Section 200A or an order under Section 201. Sub-section (1) of Section 249 prescribes a thirty-day window from service of the order for filing Form 35 along with the prescribed fee. It is to be noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) may admit an appeal after the expiry of the said period under sub-section (3) of Section 249 if sufficient cause is shown for not presenting it within the prescribed period.
View sourceSub-section (1A) of Section 201 prescribes simple interest at one per cent for every month or part of a month from the date on which such tax was deductible to the date on which it is deducted, and at one and one-half per cent for every month or part of a month from the date on which it was deducted to the date on which it is actually paid. It is to be noted that the second proviso truncates the one per cent leg up to the date on which the deductee furnishes the return under Section 139, where the first proviso to sub-section (1) is invoked through Form 26A. Sub-section (1A) is mandatory and not subject to assessing officer discretion.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 201, as substituted by the Finance Act 2014 and amended by the Finance Act 2022, provides that no order under sub-section (1) shall be passed at any time after the expiry of seven years from the end of the financial year in which payment is made or credit is given, or two years from the end of the financial year in which the correction statement is delivered, whichever is later. It is to be noted that the seven-year outer ceiling, extended from six years by the Finance Act 2022, applies to all pending and future proceedings, subject to the saving provision in the Explanation.
View sourceWhich of these bite hardest in Kodambakkam: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Businesses registered in Kodambakkam share the Chennai South jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Saidapet Division each time. Records we prepare for Kodambakkam carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0481, 80.2266, which map each submission back to this locality. For TDS Notice Reply at PIN 600024, understanding the Saidapet Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Because PIN 600024 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Kodambakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles.
Most commerce in Kodambakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the TDS Notice Reply working file we maintain for clients here. Each TDS Notice Reply cycle for Kodambakkam reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near AVM Studios, expenses routed through the Kodambakkam Suburban Railway freight network. The film industry and residential mix of Kodambakkam shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of retail activity and the commercial pulse around AVM Studios. Kodambakkam reads as a film industry and residential pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around AVM Studios and fed by the Kodambakkam Suburban Railway corridor.
The business mix in Kodambakkam centres on hospitality, and that sector carries its own TDS Notice Reply quirks we plan for in advance. For a hospitality business in Kodambakkam, the TDS Notice Reply scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. A hospitality operator in Kodambakkam gets a TDS Notice Reply workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. Sector concentration matters: when Kodambakkam leans toward hospitality, the TDS Notice Reply risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle.
Document intake for Kodambakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a TDS Notice Reply engagement. The qualified-review step on every Kodambakkam TDS Notice Reply file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Our Kodambakkam TDS Notice Reply process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Every TDS Notice Reply file we open for Kodambakkam is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years.
From the same Kodambakkam team we also serve Vadapalani and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Proximity to Vadapalani means a Kodambakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. TDS Notice Reply clients in Vadapalani are handled by the same practitioners who run our Kodambakkam desk. We treat Kodambakkam and Vadapalani as one catchment for TDS Notice Reply, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.
Patterns we track for Kodambakkam include hospitality documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Saidapet Division tends to raise. The TDS Notice Reply mistakes we see most in Kodambakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Over several cycles in Kodambakkam, the recurring TDS Notice Reply issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Sector signals in Kodambakkam — seasonal hospitality swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule TDS Notice Reply work.
Shifting principal place of business to Kodambakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. New studios ventures in Kodambakkam lean on us to stand up TDS Notice Reply correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. For a new business incorporating in Kodambakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, TDS Notice Reply setup is one of the first things to get right. When a T Nagar business expands into Kodambakkam, we extend its TDS Notice Reply setup to PIN 600024 without disruption.
Yes, but with carve-outs. Section 206AA mandates 20 per cent TDS where deductee has no PAN. However Rule 37BC (inserted 24 June 2016) provides relief for non-residents with TRC, Form 10F and alternative identification details; DTAA rate then applies despite no PAN.
Section 273B is a complete defence against most penalty provisions including Sections 271C, 271CA and 271H. Bona fide reliance on opinion, vendor's Form 26A, prolonged illness of finance officer, software lockouts, vendor disputes — all may constitute reasonable cause.
Log in to TRACES, view the default summary, file correction statement for system-level defects, file Section 154 rectification before CPC-TDS for processing errors, file Form 26A for deductee-side relief, and engage a Chennai tax lawyer for Section 201 show-cause replies.
No. The Supreme Court in Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages held that once the deductor's failure has triggered Section 201, the department cannot recover the same amount again from the deductee. Section 201(1A) interest may be recovered from the deductor for the delay.
Short-deduction is deduction at a lower rate than prescribed (e.g. 1 per cent under Section 194C instead of 2 per cent). Late-deduction is deduction after the due date (i.e. after credit or payment, whichever is earlier). Section 201(1A) interest rates differ for each.
After exhausting the CIT(A) and ITAT appeals, file an appeal under Section 260A before Madras HC on substantial questions of law within 120 days of ITAT order. Pure questions of fact are not appealable; jurisdictional issues, limitation, and statutory interpretation are appealable.
What Kodambakkam clients want to know before signing: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — in the film industry and residential micro-market of Kodambakkam; where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Localised for Kodambakkam, Chennai — where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Reading this guide locally — Kodambakkam businesses operate where in the film industry and residential micro-market of Kodambakkam.
The Tax Deduction at Source mechanism in India under Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act 1961 implements what the OECD framework calls a pay-as-you-earn collection design. It is to be noted that the policy goal traces to the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee 1971 (Wanchoo Committee) recommendation that revenue collection be advanced to the point of accrual rather than the point of assessment, reducing tax arrears and broadening the information base. The Comptroller and Auditor General's 2017 performance audit on TDS administration observed that approximately 36% of direct-tax revenue is now collected at source, against an OECD-area average of roughly 60% for income subject to withholding. A TDS notice therefore performs a dual function — it is both a revenue-recovery instrument addressed to the deductor as the assessee-in-default under Section 201, and an information-correction instrument under Section 200A reconciling the deductor return with deductee credit claims in Form 26AS.
TDS communications received by Chennai deductors broadly fall into five categories distinguishable by their statutory anchor. First, Section 200A(1) intimations are issued by the Centralised Processing Cell-TDS at Vaishali Ghaziabad on prima-facie defaults identified during return-processing. Second, Section 201(1) default orders are issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) on substantive non-deduction or short-deduction post-enquiry. Third, Section 234E demand notices arise from late-filing fee at ₹200 per day of delay. Fourth, Section 271H penalty notices follow non-filing exceeding one year or false-particulars. Fifth, Section 220 recovery and Section 221 penalty notices follow non-payment beyond 30 days. Each category invokes a distinct response framework, distinct limitation period and distinct appellate route — conflating them is the single most common defence error observed in the Madras ITAT TDS-Bench rulings since 2018.
The TDS Reconciliation Analysis and Correction Enabling System (TRACES) is the operational interface through which CPC-TDS communicates with deductors. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 provides that every default identified during processing is recorded on TRACES with a downloadable Justification Report — a PDF and CSV deliverable that lists row-wise the challan, deductee PAN, section, deduction-amount, default-head and amount-in-default. The Justification Report carries indicative computations only; the binding figures are those in the Section 200A intimation and the consequential demand on the TRACES dashboard. The TRACES architecture follows the OECD Forum on Tax Administration's 2014 design template on digital-by-default tax-payer-services, mirrored in similar withholding-platforms in the United Kingdom (HMRC RTI) and Australia (ATO Single Touch Payroll).
Section 271H is distinct from two adjacent penalty / prosecution provisions. Section 271C imposes a penalty equal to the amount of tax that ought to have been deducted on failure to deduct — operating on non-deduction itself, whereas 271H operates on non-filing-of-statement or false-particulars. Section 276B is the prosecution provision for failure to pay TDS deducted to the credit of Central Government, attracting rigorous imprisonment of three months to seven years. Section 278AA provides a defence to 276B where reasonable cause is shown. The Madras HC in Madhumilan Syntex Ltd applied a strict reading on 276B prosecution where deduction-and-non-deposit was established.
Sub-section (1) of Section 271H provides for a penalty of not less than ₹10,000 and not more than ₹1,00,000 where a person fails to deliver the quarterly statement within the prescribed time or where the statement furnished contains false particulars in respect of tax deduction, payment, deductee details or any matter relevant to determination of total income of the deductee. The penalty is imposable by the Assessing Officer (TDS) after recording satisfaction and issuing a show-cause notice. The provision is wider than Section 234E in two respects — it covers false-particulars (not merely delay) and the upper-cap is materially higher.
Sub-section (3) of Section 271H provides a safe-harbour — penalty shall not be levied where the deductor proves that — clause (a) the tax deducted along with interest has been paid to the credit of Central Government, and clause (b) the statement has been delivered before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivery. The safe-harbour operates on a cumulative basis — both conditions must be satisfied. The Mumbai ITAT in Saroj Singh ruled that even one-day delay beyond the one-year limit takes the deductor outside the safe-harbour and the penalty becomes leviable, subject only to Section 273B reasonable-cause defence.
Sub-section (6) of Section 220 provides that where an assessee has presented an appeal under Section 246A, the Assessing Officer may in his discretion, and subject to such conditions as he may think fit, treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute, even though the time for payment has expired, until the appeal is disposed of. The discretion under 220(6) is independent of the Instruction 1914 framework — it is a statutory grant. The Supreme Court in KEC International v B.R. Balakrishnan held that the AO's discretion under 220(6) is to be exercised judiciously. A standalone 220(6) application filed alongside the Section 246A appeal is the procedurally correct route.
Section 221 empowers the Assessing Officer to impose a penalty not exceeding the amount of tax in arrears for default in payment of tax under Section 220. The proviso to Section 221(1) requires the AO to give a hearing before imposition. Sub-section (1) second proviso allows waiver of penalty where the assessee proves that the default was for good and sufficient reasons — typically a pending appeal, bona-fide stay application, business-cash-flow distress with bank confirmations, or genuine inability arising from non-receipt of refunds due to the assessee. The Madras HC in Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank set out the threshold for good-and-sufficient-reasons defence under 221.
Sub-section (1) of Section 220 provides that any amount specified as payable in a notice of demand under Section 156 shall be paid within thirty days of the service of the notice at the place and to the person mentioned in the notice. Sub-section (2) provides that on default the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at 1% per month on the amount remaining unpaid. The 30-day clock starts on service of the demand notice, not on the date of the underlying order. Sub-section (3) empowers the Assessing Officer, on application before expiry of 30 days, to extend the period or allow payment in instalments — a power frequently underused by Chennai deductors.
The first proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) permits deduction of the disallowed expenditure in the subsequent year in which the TDS is actually paid. The second proviso, inserted by Finance Act 2012 with effect from 01-Apr-2013, provides that where the deductee has paid tax under Section 201 first proviso (i.e. through Form 26A) the deductor is not deemed to be in assessee-in-default and consequently the 40(a)(ia) disallowance does not attach. The Mumbai ITAT in JDS Apparels and Delhi ITAT in Ansal Land Mark held that Form 26A acceptance simultaneously defeats both 201(1) principal and 40(a)(ia) disallowance.
The Calcutta HC in CIT v S.K. Tekriwal ruled that Section 40(a)(ia) operates only on non-deduction or non-deposit, and not on short-deduction by rate. The reasoning is that the words used in 40(a)(ia) are tax 'is deductible' and 'has not been deducted' — when tax has been deducted at a lower rate, the deduction is incomplete but not absent. The Calcutta HC view was followed by the Karnataka HC in CIT v Three Star Granites and the Madras HC in CIT v PVS Memorial Hospital. The contrary view was taken by the Kerala HC in PVS Memorial Hospital (at trial-court level, since reversed). The Supreme Court has not authoritatively resolved the divergence.
Section 40(a)(i) on non-resident payments carries a steeper disallowance — 100% of the expenditure — and the relief framework is correspondingly narrower. The first proviso to Section 40(a)(i) permits deduction in the subsequent year on actual payment of TDS. The second proviso analogous to 40(a)(ia) covers Form 26A relief but the make-available test for chargeability and the DTAA-rate-cap analysis become central. The Supreme Court in GE India Technology Centre held that Section 195 obligation is triggered only where the payment is chargeable to tax in India under Sections 4, 5 and 9 — non-chargeability defeats both 195 and consequential 40(a)(i).
What Kodambakkam clients usually ask next: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile; for the professional and salaried population of Kodambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Terms you will hear in this area — Kodambakkam businesses operate where where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Section 206AA Higher Rate is the higher-rate deduction obligation triggered where the deductee fails to furnish a valid permanent account number to the deductor. Tax is deducted at the rate prescribed under the relevant section, or at the rate in force, or at twenty per cent — whichever is the highest. Section 206AB extends a parallel scheme for non-filers.
Section 206AB Higher Rate, inserted by the Finance Act 2021, prescribes a higher-rate deduction where the deductee is a specified person — broadly, a person who has not furnished returns for the relevant assessment year preceding the year of deduction and whose aggregate TDS or TCS is fifty thousand rupees or more.
Compliance Check Functionality is the reporting portal utility maintained by the Income-tax Department for the deductor to verify whether a deductee is a specified person under Section 206AB or Section 206CCA. The output furnishes prima facie evidence on which the deductor's higher-rate decision is documented.
Online Correction is the workflow available on the TRACES portal under which a deductor amends a previously filed quarterly statement directly through the portal without uploading a Conso File. Categories cover challan correction, personal information, deductee detail, row movement, permanent account number correction and addition of new challans or rows.
Default Rectification Request is the grievance workflow available on TRACES under which the deductor flags a substantive error in the Section 200A intimation — typically a paid challan not visible due to OLTAS or BIN issues, or duplicate counting of interest — and requests the Centralised Processing Cell — TDS to reprocess the statement.
Online Lodgement of Taxpayer System is the OLTAS database maintained by the Reserve Bank of India and the Tax Information Network, into which all challans deposited at authorised bank counters or through e-payment are uploaded. Challan particulars in the quarterly TDS statement are reconciled against OLTAS during Section 200A processing.
Book Identification Number is the identifier generated where the deductor is a government office paying tax through book adjustment rather than cash deposit through OLTAS. The Book Identification Number replaces the Challan Identification Number in the quarterly statement and is reconciled against the Pay and Accounts Office records.
Annexure A of Form 26A is the certificate furnished by a chartered accountant in practice, certifying the substantive compliance of the deductee — return-filing, inclusion of receipt and payment of tax. Signed with a Digital Signature Certificate and uploaded through TRACES, Annexure A is the operative document for the first-proviso relief.
Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages ratio is the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages [2007] 293 ITR 226, holding that no recovery can be made from the deductor under Section 201(1) where the deductee has paid the tax on the receipt. The ratio is now codified in the first proviso to Section 201(1).
Fatehraj Singhvi ratio is the principle laid down by the Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 73 taxmann.com 252, holding that the Centralised Processing Cell had no statutory mandate to levy Section 234E fee in intimations for quarters ending before the first day of June 2015 — when clause (c) of Section 200A(1) was inserted.
Engineering Analysis Centre ratio is the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. Commissioner of Income-tax [2021] 432 ITR 471, holding that payments for shrink-wrapped software and end-user licences to non-residents are not royalty under Article 12 of Indian double-taxation treaties, and Section 195 obligations do not attach.
Article 226 Writ Remedy is the constitutional remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to invoke the writ jurisdiction of the jurisdictional High Court. Writ relief against a TDS demand is exceptional, available only where the order is without jurisdiction, suffers gross procedural unfairness, or the alternate statutory remedy is shown to be inadequate.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Kodambakkam businesses typically avoid these: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from AVM Studios and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Kodambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Kodambakkam businesses operate where where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile, and the business activity radiating outward from AVM Studios and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
A flavour of cases we handle nearby — Kodambakkam businesses operate where where film industry businesses dominate the local compliance profile.
Why these Kodambakkam engagements look the way they do: For Kodambakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from AVM Studios and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Kodambakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters had 234E fee aggregating ₹3,42,800 in Section 200A intimation. Filed grievance citing Fatehraj Singhvi (Kar HC 2016) and ITAT Chennai bench rulings. CPC-TDS Ghaziabad accepted; entire fee demand reduced to NIL on TRACES within 7 weeks.”
“Vendor PAN structurally invalid triggering 20% under Section 206AA on 194J professional payments. Filed Form 26A Annexure-A through our partner C.A. with vendor's ITR-V and tax payment proof; principal default of ₹18.4 lakh dropped on TRACES; only Section 201(1A) interest of ₹76,000 survived.”
“AO disallowed 30% of foreign-software AMC expense citing non-deduction under Section 195. Argued Engineering Analysis (SC 2021) — payment not royalty under India-Singapore DTAA Article 12. Faceless Assessment Unit accepted; ₹62 lakh disallowance deleted in Section 143(3) order.”
“Justification Report charged 201(1A)(i) interest till date of correction (28 months × 1%). Refiled Form 26A with deductee return date; interest period truncated to 9 months. Default reduced from ₹3.1 lakh to ₹98,000 — ₹2.1 lakh saved.”
“JCIT TDS issued 271H notice for incorrect 24Q Annexure II salary breakup. Filed reply citing reasonable cause under Section 273B — Eli Lilly (SC 2009) doctrine, payroll system migration, voluntary correction filed before notice. Penalty dropped in entirety.”
“Compulsory prosecution recommendation for non-deposit of TDS exceeding ₹25 lakh threshold over two FYs. Coordinated full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest + 234E fee, filed compounding application under CBDT Guidelines 17-Oct-2024 with compounding fee at 2% per month. Pr. CCIT compounded; criminal proceedings closed.”
Common questions from Kodambakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Kodambakkam we look after firms on Brindavan Street Ext, Doraiswamy Road, Doraiswamy Subway, Dr MGR Salai and NSK Salai as well as the Nagerkoyil Sudalaimuthu Krishnan (NSK) Salai, Nagerkoyil Sudalaimuthu Krishnan Salai, 2nd Avenue and 4th Avenue corridors — local TDS Notice Reply without the cross-city travel.
Professional TDS Notice Reply in Kodambakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.