TDS Notice Reply for it services units around Chromepet Railway Station, Chromepet — with WhatsApp-first document intake
Handling TDS Notice Reply for Chromepet and Tambaram clients with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 201(1A) levies interest at two rates: (i) 1% per month or part of month from the date on which tax was deductible to the date on which it is actually deducted (short / non-deduction); and (ii) 1.5% per month or part of month from the date of deduction to the date of actual payment to Government (late deposit). Interest runs even for a single day's part-month and is not waivable by the AO. Computation is automatic in TRACES Justification Report.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert TDS Notice Reply in Chromepet — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Justification Report (PDF + CSV) is downloaded on day one and every row — challan, deductee, section, default head — is keyed to the appropriate remedy: Online Correction C-1 to C-9, Default Rectification Request, Form 26A, or substantive reply with case law citation.
Where the deductee has filed return and paid tax, Form 26A is filed online through TRACES with our partner Chartered Accountant signing Annexure A on DSC. Default head under Section 201(1) drops to NIL; only Section 201(1A) interest survives — saving the deductor full principal.
Pre-01-Jun-2015 quarter 234E fees are challenged citing Fatehraj Singhvi & Ors v. UoI [2016] 73 taxmann.com 252 (Kar HC) — Section 200A(1)(c) was inserted only w.e.f. 01-Jun-2015. CPC-TDS / ITAT benches across India follow this ratio. Multi-lakh fee demands wiped out for Chromepet clients.
Each interest row in the Justification Report is recomputed manually — date-deductible, date-deducted, date-deposited audited against challans and books. Form 26A truncation up to deductee return-date applied to the 1% leg. Average interest reduction: 35% to 60%.
Once Form 26A is accepted on TRACES, the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) is invoked in the deductor's Section 143(3) assessment to defeat the 30% expense disallowance — Form 26A pulls double duty for Chromepet clients.
Our team handles every Online Correction category — C-1 challan correction, C-2 add challan, C-3 personal info, C-4 salary detail, C-5 deductee detail, C-6 row movement, C-7 PAN-Aadhaar, C-8 add challan with row, C-9 PAN correction. Conso File downloaded, corrected, validated through FVU and uploaded same day.
Every TDS Notice Reply engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Chromepet Suburban Railway and feeder routes connecting Chromepet to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Chromepet clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Chromepet, the cluster of it services, education, engineering businesses that defines Chromepet's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Chromepet: On the ground in Chromepet, for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Consolidated tax credit statement reflecting tax deducted, tax collected, advance and self-assessment tax paid, refunds and high-value transactions, accessed via the e-filing portal.
Issued to collectees by the collector under Section 206C(5), downloaded from TRACES, evidencing the amount collected and deposited.
Used to deposit tax deducted at source and tax collected at source to the credit of the Central Government, with separate codes for company and non-company deductees.
Filed by the recipient to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) to obtain a certificate for nil or lower deduction where the recipient's estimated tax liability so justifies.
Prescribed form for filing the first appeal against an intimation under Section 200A or an order under Section 201, accompanied by grounds, statement of facts and prescribed fee.
Prescribed form for filing the second appeal before the ITAT against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 250, with cross-objections under Section 253(4) where applicable.
Downloaded by the deductor from TRACES, used as the source dataset for preparing online or offline corrections to an earlier-filed quarterly statement.
Auto-generated PDF and CSV report listing default heads — short payment, short deduction, late deduction, late payment, interest and fee — against a processed quarterly statement.
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200 of the Income-tax Act 1961 casts an obligation upon every person deducting any sum in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B to pay the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government, within the prescribed time and in the prescribed mode. It is to be noted that the obligation is fastened on the deductor in his capacity as an agent of the revenue, and the deposit is a precondition for the deductee being entitled to the corresponding credit. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 30 prescribes seven days from the end of the month of deduction, except for March deductions where the cut-off is the thirtieth day of April.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where a person who is required to deduct tax fails to deduct, or, having deducted, fails to pay the whole or any part of the tax to the credit of the Central Government, he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. The first proviso, inserted with effect from the first day of July 2012, carves out a relief — the deductor shall not be deemed in default if the deductee has furnished a return under Section 139, has taken the receipt into the computation of total income and paid the tax due, and the deductor furnishes a certificate in Form 26A from an accountant.
View sourceSection 271H provides that without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, the Assessing Officer may direct that a person who fails to deliver a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3), or who furnishes incorrect information in such statement, shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees. Sub-section (3) carves out an immunity where the tax, interest and fee have been paid and the statement has been delivered before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivery. It is to be noted that the immunity is statutory and not discretionary.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 201, as substituted by the Finance Act 2014 and amended by the Finance Act 2022, provides that no order under sub-section (1) shall be passed at any time after the expiry of seven years from the end of the financial year in which payment is made or credit is given, or two years from the end of the financial year in which the correction statement is delivered, whichever is later. It is to be noted that the seven-year outer ceiling, extended from six years by the Finance Act 2022, applies to all pending and future proceedings, subject to the saving provision in the Explanation.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 220 provides that any amount specified as payable in a notice of demand under Section 156 shall be paid within thirty days of the service of the notice at the place and to the person mentioned in the notice. The Assessing Officer may, with the previous approval of the Joint Commissioner, reduce this period to less than thirty days where it is detrimental to revenue to allow the full period. It is to be noted that an intimation under Section 200A is itself deemed to be a notice of demand under Section 156 by virtue of sub-section (1A) of that section.
View sourceSection 234E, inserted by the Finance Act 2012 with effect from the first day of July 2012, levies a fee of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement under Section 200(3) or under the proviso to Section 206C(3) continues. The fee shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. It is to be noted that sub-section (1)(c) of Section 200A, which authorises the computation of this fee in the processing intimation, was inserted only with effect from the first day of June 2015 — the prospective operation of which has been read down in several High Court rulings.
View sourceChromepet (PIN 600044) falls under the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Chromepet is anchored by the Madras Institute of Technology (MIT) and a growing IT/engineering business cluster along GST Road. The locality has a strong residential base of working professionals. GST clients include software services, education-related businesses and small engineering vendors. Businesses registered in Chromepet share the Chennai South jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Tambaram Division each time. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Chromepet businesses tie back to the Tambaram Division, so our TDS Notice Reply cadence accounts for how that office works.
Most commerce in Chromepet — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the TDS Notice Reply working file we maintain for clients here. Freight and foot traffic from the Chromepet Suburban Railway hub pull steady daily commerce through Chromepet, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this education it residential corridor pocket. Commercial activity in Chromepet runs high, so TDS Notice Reply volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Chromepet desk accordingly. Document pickup near Madras Institute of Technology is a same-hour errand for our Chromepet engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects.
For a retail business in Chromepet, the TDS Notice Reply scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. TDS Notice Reply for retail businesses in Chromepet hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. The business mix in Chromepet centres on retail, and that sector carries its own TDS Notice Reply quirks we plan for in advance. We have closed enough TDS Notice Reply files for retail firms near Chromepet to know where the department usually probes.
A Chromepet client sees the same TDS Notice Reply cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Turnaround for Chromepet TDS Notice Reply is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Document intake for Chromepet clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a TDS Notice Reply engagement. Our Chromepet TDS Notice Reply process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
Coverage from Chromepet naturally extends to Hasthinapuram, so group entities across the area share one TDS Notice Reply workflow. Serving Chromepet and Hasthinapuram from one team keeps TDS Notice Reply turnaround identical across the cluster. Proximity to Hasthinapuram means a Chromepet engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. TDS Notice Reply clients in Hasthinapuram are handled by the same practitioners who run our Chromepet desk.
Because we work repeatedly across Chromepet, we can benchmark a new client's TDS Notice Reply position against the locality norm. The TDS Notice Reply mistakes we see most in Chromepet are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Common patterns in the Tambaram Division give Chromepet businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt TDS Notice Reply issues. Over several cycles in Chromepet, the recurring TDS Notice Reply issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.
For a new business incorporating in Chromepet or shifting its principal place of business here, TDS Notice Reply setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Tambaram business expands into Chromepet, we extend its TDS Notice Reply setup to PIN 600044 without disruption. Incorporating in Chromepet comes with jurisdiction, registration and TDS Notice Reply steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. We onboard new Chromepet entities onto a TDS Notice Reply cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Section 234E is compensatory in character, not penal. The Karnataka HC in Fatheraj Singhvi and the Bombay HC in Rashmikant Kundalia have upheld its constitutionality. The fee is automatic at ₹200 per day capped at the TDS amount of the statement.
Generally no. Section 234E is treated as automatic and not amenable to Section 273B reasonable-cause defence. Limited relief may be available for TRACES system-downtime periods or for the pre-1 June 2015 window where Section 200A had no enabling clause for the levy.
There is no specific outer limit for filing correction statements; however, practically, corrections should be filed before assessment becomes time-barred at the deductee's end and within the Section 200A intimation response window of 30 days for system-flagged defects.
Section 234E late-filing fee at ₹200 per day applies, capped at the TDS amount. Where delay exceeds one year or particulars are inaccurate, Section 271H penalty of ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000 may also be levied. Section 273B reasonable-cause defence is available.
The second proviso to Section 271H exempts penalty where (i) TDS has been deposited within the prescribed time, (ii) Section 234E late-filing fee has been paid, and (iii) the statement is filed before one year from the original due date. All three conditions must be met cumulatively.
File appeal under Section 246A within 30 days; simultaneously file Section 220(6) stay application before the AO citing the CBDT 20 per cent pre-deposit benchmark. Pay 20 per cent within the stay-application window and pursue appeal on merits before CIT(A) (NFAC).
What Chromepet clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Chromepet, on the Tambaram-Pallavaram corridor that passes through Chromepet.
Reading this guide locally — In Chromepet, in the education-it residential corridor micro-market of Chromepet.
The TDS Reconciliation Analysis and Correction Enabling System (TRACES) is the operational interface through which CPC-TDS communicates with deductors. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 provides that every default identified during processing is recorded on TRACES with a downloadable Justification Report — a PDF and CSV deliverable that lists row-wise the challan, deductee PAN, section, deduction-amount, default-head and amount-in-default. The Justification Report carries indicative computations only; the binding figures are those in the Section 200A intimation and the consequential demand on the TRACES dashboard. The TRACES architecture follows the OECD Forum on Tax Administration's 2014 design template on digital-by-default tax-payer-services, mirrored in similar withholding-platforms in the United Kingdom (HMRC RTI) and Australia (ATO Single Touch Payroll).
The Indian TDS-default framework is more punitive than comparable OECD jurisdictions on the interest-rate and disallowance dimensions. Section 201(1A) charges interest at 1% per month on non-deduction and 1.5% per month on deduction-not-deposited — i.e. an effective annualised 12% and 18%. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines do not directly cover income-tax withholding, but the comparable HMRC PAYE-default interest in the United Kingdom is benchmarked against the Bank of England base rate plus 2.5 percentage points, currently in the 7-8% range. Australia's ATO general interest charge sits at 11.36%. The disallowance dimension is uniquely Indian — Section 40(a)(ia) disallows 30% of the expenditure (and 100% for non-resident payments under 40(a)(i)) in the deductor's own income, with no comparable provision in major OECD systems where withholding default is treated purely as a separate collection matter.
The Tax Deduction at Source mechanism in India under Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act 1961 implements what the OECD framework calls a pay-as-you-earn collection design. It is to be noted that the policy goal traces to the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee 1971 (Wanchoo Committee) recommendation that revenue collection be advanced to the point of accrual rather than the point of assessment, reducing tax arrears and broadening the information base. The Comptroller and Auditor General's 2017 performance audit on TDS administration observed that approximately 36% of direct-tax revenue is now collected at source, against an OECD-area average of roughly 60% for income subject to withholding. A TDS notice therefore performs a dual function — it is both a revenue-recovery instrument addressed to the deductor as the assessee-in-default under Section 201, and an information-correction instrument under Section 200A reconciling the deductor return with deductee credit claims in Form 26AS.
The appeal to ITAT is filed in Form 36 prescribed under Rule 47 along with two paper-books containing the order appealed against, the grounds of appeal, the statement of facts and supporting documents. The limitation is 60 days from the date of service of the order under sub-section (3) of Section 253. The appeal fee under sub-section (6) ranges from ₹500 (income up to ₹1 lakh) to ₹10,000 (above ₹2 lakh) plus 1% of assessed-income capped at ₹10,000. Sub-section (5) empowers ITAT to admit a delayed appeal where sufficient cause is shown — Collector Land Acquisition v Mst Katiji applies.
Sub-section (1) of Section 260A provides an appeal to the High Court from an order of ITAT where a substantial question of law arises. The Madras HC, exercising jurisdiction over Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, is the appellate forum for ITAT Chennai-Bench orders. The limitation is 120 days from the date of receipt of the order. The Supreme Court has further appellate jurisdiction under Section 261 on grant of certificate by the HC or on special leave under Article 136. The Madras HC in CIT v Sundaram Finance Distribution Ltd and CIT v Shriram Capital have set out the substantial-question-of-law threshold in TDS-default contexts.
Sub-section (2A) of Section 254 (the operational provision for ITAT proceedings) empowers ITAT to grant a stay of demand for an initial period of 180 days extendable on cause shown. The Supreme Court in Pepsi Foods Ltd v Asst CIT (2021) struck down the third proviso to 254(2A) — which had limited the extension power to 365 days even where the delay was not attributable to the assessee — as arbitrary and violative of Article 14. The current position is that ITAT can extend stay beyond 365 days where the delay is not attributable to the assessee, restoring substantial justice. The stay order must record reasons under 254(2A) first proviso.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200A provides that where a statement of tax deducted at source has been made by any person under Section 200, such statement shall be processed by computing — clause (a) tax deductible, clause (b) interest under Section 201(1A) up to the date of processing, and clause (c) fee under Section 234E. The intimation thereafter sets out the sum payable or refundable. It is to be noted that Section 200A is a summary-processing provision — the Bombay High Court in Vodafone Cellular Ltd v ACIT clarified that prima-facie adjustments alone are permissible at this stage; substantive disputes on chargeability or rate must be addressed under Section 201 read with Section 156. The one-year limitation under Section 200A(2) — earlier provision — was relaxed to a longer window post Finance Act 2022 amendments.
Sub-section (3) of Section 200A read with Rule 31A(5) provides for the deductor to file a correction statement. The TRACES Online Correction module supports nine correction-types — C-1 personal information, C-2 challan correction, C-3 challan addition, C-4 movement of deductees, C-5 PAN correction, C-6 PAN correction with verification, C-7 add-modify deductee, C-8 challan-deductee re-mapping, and C-9 lower-deduction-certificate update. Where the default is a data-mismatch (challan unmapped, deductee PAN typo, BIN error) the Online Correction route closes the default without merits-engagement. Where the default is substantive — under-rate, mis-section, non-chargeability — the reply must be filed on merits under the linked Section 154 rectification framework or by appeal under Section 246A.
The boundary between Section 200A and Section 201 is jurisprudentially significant. Section 200A is a return-processing summary provision used by CPC-TDS; Section 201 is a quasi-assessment provision that requires the Assessing Officer (TDS) to record satisfaction that the deductor is in default. The Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi held that Section 234E fees could not be charged via Section 200A intimation for pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters since the enabling clause (Section 200A(1)(c)) was inserted with effect from that date. The Allahabad HC and Mumbai ITAT followed this view, while the Gujarat HC in Rajesh Kourani took the opposite view. The unsettled position requires deductors to assess their bench-preference before contesting older quarters.
Section 201 distinguishes — though not always explicitly — between non-deduction (no TDS deducted at all), short-deduction (TDS deducted at a rate or amount lower than what was required), late-deduction (TDS deducted after the prescribed time), and non-deposit (TDS deducted but not deposited with the exchequer). The interest-rate under Section 201(1A) is 1% per month for non-deduction and short-deduction, and 1.5% per month for the deduction-not-deposited category. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) attaches only to non-deduction and non-deposit categories — short-deduction by rate does not invite disallowance per the Calcutta High Court ruling in S.K. Tekriwal, since-followed by multiple benches.
Sub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where any person, including the principal officer of a company, who is required to deduct tax at source does not deduct, or after such deduction fails to pay, the whole or any part of the tax, such person shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of the tax. The Supreme Court in CIT v Eli Lilly & Co India observed that the deeming fiction operates only when there is a primary failure on the part of the deductor — a benign deductor who has acted on a reasonable interpretation of the law cannot be visited with the deemed-default tag. The proviso to Section 201(1) inserted by Finance Act 2012 carves out a relief where the deductee has filed return and paid tax — operationalised through Form 26A.
Form 26A is the operational vehicle for the first proviso to Section 201(1). It requires a chartered accountant in practice to certify that the deductee has — first, included the relevant payment in computing taxable income in the return filed under Section 139, second, paid the tax on the income, and third, furnished the deductor a declaration to this effect. The Form is filed by the deductor through the TRACES portal with the chartered accountant signing Annexure A on Digital Signature Certificate. On acceptance, the Section 201(1) principal-default head is reduced to NIL but the Section 201(1A) interest survives. The Mumbai ITAT in JDS Apparels held that Form 26A is a complete remedy on the principal head.
What Chromepet clients usually ask next: On the ground in Chromepet, for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Annexure A of Form 26A is the certificate furnished by a chartered accountant in practice, certifying the substantive compliance of the deductee — return-filing, inclusion of receipt and payment of tax. Signed with a Digital Signature Certificate and uploaded through TRACES, Annexure A is the operative document for the first-proviso relief.
Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages ratio is the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages [2007] 293 ITR 226, holding that no recovery can be made from the deductor under Section 201(1) where the deductee has paid the tax on the receipt. The ratio is now codified in the first proviso to Section 201(1).
Fatehraj Singhvi ratio is the principle laid down by the Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi v. Union of India [2016] 73 taxmann.com 252, holding that the Centralised Processing Cell had no statutory mandate to levy Section 234E fee in intimations for quarters ending before the first day of June 2015 — when clause (c) of Section 200A(1) was inserted.
Engineering Analysis Centre ratio is the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. Commissioner of Income-tax [2021] 432 ITR 471, holding that payments for shrink-wrapped software and end-user licences to non-residents are not royalty under Article 12 of Indian double-taxation treaties, and Section 195 obligations do not attach.
Article 226 Writ Remedy is the constitutional remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to invoke the writ jurisdiction of the jurisdictional High Court. Writ relief against a TDS demand is exceptional, available only where the order is without jurisdiction, suffers gross procedural unfairness, or the alternate statutory remedy is shown to be inadequate.
Section 246A First Appeal is the statutory appellate remedy before the Commissioner (Appeals) — National Faceless Appeal Centre under the Faceless Appeal Scheme — against an intimation under Section 200A, an order under Section 201, a penalty order under Section 271H or Section 271C, and other listed orders. The appeal is filed in Form 35 within thirty days.
Section 253 Second Appeal is the statutory appellate remedy before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal against an order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 250 or an order under Section 263, among others. The appeal is filed in Form 36 within sixty days. Cross-objections by the respondent are permitted under sub-section (4) within thirty days of notice.
Section 276B Prosecution is the prosecution provision applicable to a person who fails to pay to the credit of the Central Government the tax deducted under Chapter XVII-B. The offence is punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than three months but extendable to seven years, along with fine. Compounding is available under Section 279(2).
Section 279(2) Compounding is the discretionary administrative remedy under which the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner may compound an offence under Chapter XXII, including Section 276B, on payment of compounding charges as per the CBDT guidelines dated the seventeenth day of October 2024. Compounding shields the deductor from criminal trial.
Form 16 Issuance is the obligation of every employer to furnish to the employee, by the fifteenth day of June of the financial year following the year of deduction, a certificate of tax deducted from salary under Section 192. The certificate carries Part A from TRACES with TAN-verified deposit details and Part B with detailed salary computation.
Form 16A Issuance is the obligation of every deductor to furnish a certificate of tax deducted on non-salary payments to the deductee within fifteen days of the due date for furnishing the quarterly statement. The certificate is downloaded from TRACES with a verifiable certificate number which the deductee uses for reconciliation against Form 26AS.
Form 26AS Reconciliation is the cross-verification exercise undertaken by the deductee to confirm that tax deducted on its receipts is reflected in the consolidated annual tax statement maintained under Rule 31AB and Section 285BB. Mismatches typically arise from incorrect permanent account number quoting or unfiled quarterly statements.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Chromepet businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets; for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Chromepet engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Chromepet, the business activity radiating outward from Madras Institute of Technology and nearby commercial pockets; for Chromepet IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters had 234E fee aggregating ₹3,42,800 in Section 200A intimation. Filed grievance citing Fatehraj Singhvi (Kar HC 2016) and ITAT Chennai bench rulings. CPC-TDS Ghaziabad accepted; entire fee demand reduced to NIL on TRACES within 7 weeks.”
“Vendor PAN structurally invalid triggering 20% under Section 206AA on 194J professional payments. Filed Form 26A Annexure-A through our partner C.A. with vendor's ITR-V and tax payment proof; principal default of ₹18.4 lakh dropped on TRACES; only Section 201(1A) interest of ₹76,000 survived.”
“AO disallowed 30% of foreign-software AMC expense citing non-deduction under Section 195. Argued Engineering Analysis (SC 2021) — payment not royalty under India-Singapore DTAA Article 12. Faceless Assessment Unit accepted; ₹62 lakh disallowance deleted in Section 143(3) order.”
“Justification Report charged 201(1A)(i) interest till date of correction (28 months × 1%). Refiled Form 26A with deductee return date; interest period truncated to 9 months. Default reduced from ₹3.1 lakh to ₹98,000 — ₹2.1 lakh saved.”
“JCIT TDS issued 271H notice for incorrect 24Q Annexure II salary breakup. Filed reply citing reasonable cause under Section 273B — Eli Lilly (SC 2009) doctrine, payroll system migration, voluntary correction filed before notice. Penalty dropped in entirety.”
“Compulsory prosecution recommendation for non-deposit of TDS exceeding ₹25 lakh threshold over two FYs. Coordinated full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest + 234E fee, filed compounding application under CBDT Guidelines 17-Oct-2024 with compounding fee at 2% per month. Pr. CCIT compounded; criminal proceedings closed.”
Common questions from Chromepet clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our TDS Notice Reply clients in Chromepet are spread right across the locality — along NSR Road, Naidu Shop Road, Nehru street, PTC Workshop Street and Periyar Street, and through the Grand Southern Trunk Road, Pallavaram - Thoraipakkam Road, Tiruneermalai Main Road and CLC Works Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional TDS Notice Reply in Chromepet, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.