TDS Notice Reply delivery for manufacturing and auto components firms across Ambattur — on fixed, transparent fees
Handling TDS Notice Reply for Ambattur and Padi clients with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 276B prescribes rigorous imprisonment from 3 months to 7 years and fine where a person fails to pay to the credit of Central Government the tax deducted at source. CBDT Instruction F. No. 285/90/2013-IT(Inv.V) dated 24-Apr-2008 (modified time to time) sets a non-deposit threshold of ₹25 lakh for compulsory prosecution; below ₹25 lakh, the Pr. CCIT / CCIT may compound under Section 279(2). Recent prosecutions have surged since FY 2019-20 — defence is to deposit the TDS + 1.5% interest before the show-cause and apply for compounding.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert TDS Notice Reply in Ambattur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Each interest row in the Justification Report is recomputed manually — date-deductible, date-deducted, date-deposited audited against challans and books. Form 26A truncation up to deductee return-date applied to the 1% leg. Average interest reduction: 35% to 60%.
Once Form 26A is accepted on TRACES, the second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) is invoked in the deductor's Section 143(3) assessment to defeat the 30% expense disallowance — Form 26A pulls double duty for Ambattur clients.
Our team handles every Online Correction category — C-1 challan correction, C-2 add challan, C-3 personal info, C-4 salary detail, C-5 deductee detail, C-6 row movement, C-7 PAN-Aadhaar, C-8 add challan with row, C-9 PAN correction. Conso File downloaded, corrected, validated through FVU and uploaded same day.
Where the underlying statement is correct but CPC-TDS has wrongly raised default — challan paid but not visible due to OLTAS / BIN issue, double-counted interest — Default Rectification Request is raised on TRACES; CPC-TDS Ghaziabad responds in 30-45 days.
For Section 195 short-deduction on software / cloud / SaaS payments to non-residents, Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence v. CIT [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC) is invoked — payment is not royalty under DTAA Article 12, no TDS obligation, no 201 default, no 40(a)(i) disallowance.
Short-deduction defaults under Section 206AB are defended by producing the dated Compliance Check screenshot from the Reporting Portal proving the deductee was NOT a specified person at the time of payment. Status snapshot is the dispositive evidence.
Every TDS Notice Reply engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Ambattur businesses operate where the dense engineering auto-component and packaging ecosystem of the Ambattur Industrial Estate operating across SIDCO and CMDA-developed sectors, and with arterial connectivity via MTH Road the Chennai Bypass Padi Flyover and the Ambattur-Korattur corridor.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Ambattur clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Ambattur businesses operate where the cluster of heavy manufacturing plants ancillary engineering units and warehousing operations along MTH Road and Red Hills Road.
Deadline pressure points we see in Ambattur: On the ground in Ambattur, for Ambattur SME manufacturers managing complex GST input-tax-credit and inter-state compliance footprints.
Consolidated tax credit statement reflecting tax deducted, tax collected, advance and self-assessment tax paid, refunds and high-value transactions, accessed via the e-filing portal.
Issued to collectees by the collector under Section 206C(5), downloaded from TRACES, evidencing the amount collected and deposited.
Used to deposit tax deducted at source and tax collected at source to the credit of the Central Government, with separate codes for company and non-company deductees.
Filed by the recipient to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) to obtain a certificate for nil or lower deduction where the recipient's estimated tax liability so justifies.
Prescribed form for filing the first appeal against an intimation under Section 200A or an order under Section 201, accompanied by grounds, statement of facts and prescribed fee.
Prescribed form for filing the second appeal before the ITAT against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 250, with cross-objections under Section 253(4) where applicable.
Downloaded by the deductor from TRACES, used as the source dataset for preparing online or offline corrections to an earlier-filed quarterly statement.
Auto-generated PDF and CSV report listing default heads — short payment, short deduction, late deduction, late payment, interest and fee — against a processed quarterly statement.
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200 of the Income-tax Act 1961 casts an obligation upon every person deducting any sum in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XVII-B to pay the sum so deducted to the credit of the Central Government, within the prescribed time and in the prescribed mode. It is to be noted that the obligation is fastened on the deductor in his capacity as an agent of the revenue, and the deposit is a precondition for the deductee being entitled to the corresponding credit. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 30 prescribes seven days from the end of the month of deduction, except for March deductions where the cut-off is the thirtieth day of April.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where a person who is required to deduct tax fails to deduct, or, having deducted, fails to pay the whole or any part of the tax to the credit of the Central Government, he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of such tax. The first proviso, inserted with effect from the first day of July 2012, carves out a relief — the deductor shall not be deemed in default if the deductee has furnished a return under Section 139, has taken the receipt into the computation of total income and paid the tax due, and the deductor furnishes a certificate in Form 26A from an accountant.
View sourceSection 271H provides that without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, the Assessing Officer may direct that a person who fails to deliver a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3), or who furnishes incorrect information in such statement, shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees. Sub-section (3) carves out an immunity where the tax, interest and fee have been paid and the statement has been delivered before the expiry of one year from the time prescribed for delivery. It is to be noted that the immunity is statutory and not discretionary.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 220 empowers the Assessing Officer, in his discretion, to treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute, on such conditions as he thinks fit to impose, where an appeal under Section 246A is pending. It is to be noted that the Central Board of Direct Taxes has, through Instruction 1914 dated the second day of December 1993 read with the Office Memorandum dated the thirty-first day of July 2017, prescribed a twenty per cent pre-deposit norm as the ordinary condition. The discretion is reviewable by the Principal Commissioner under sub-section (6A).
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 201, as substituted by the Finance Act 2014 and amended by the Finance Act 2022, provides that no order under sub-section (1) shall be passed at any time after the expiry of seven years from the end of the financial year in which payment is made or credit is given, or two years from the end of the financial year in which the correction statement is delivered, whichever is later. It is to be noted that the seven-year outer ceiling, extended from six years by the Finance Act 2022, applies to all pending and future proceedings, subject to the saving provision in the Explanation.
View sourceSub-section (2) of Section 220 provides that if the amount specified in the notice of demand under Section 156 is not paid within the period of thirty days, the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at one per cent for every month or part of a month from the day immediately following the end of that period. It is to be noted that this interest is in addition to the interest already computed under Section 201(1A) up to the date of the demand notice, and the two streams are not mutually exclusive. The Board has clarified in Circular 334 of 1982 that interest under sub-section (2) is automatic and not discretionary.
View sourceAmbattur (PIN 600053) falls under the Ambattur Division of the Chennai North, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Ambattur Division of the Chennai North handles Ambattur filings and approvals. Records we prepare for Ambattur carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.1143, 80.1548, which map each submission back to this locality. For TDS Notice Reply at PIN 600053, understanding the Ambattur Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process.
Most commerce in Ambattur — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the TDS Notice Reply working file we maintain for clients here. Ambattur reads as a industrial residential mixed pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around Ambattur Lake and fed by the Ambattur Bus Terminus corridor. Commercial activity in Ambattur runs high, so TDS Notice Reply volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Ambattur desk accordingly. The industrial residential mixed mix of Ambattur shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of retail activity and the commercial pulse around Ambattur Lake.
We have closed enough TDS Notice Reply files for manufacturing firms near Ambattur to know where the department usually probes. For a manufacturing business in Ambattur, the TDS Notice Reply scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Sector concentration matters: when Ambattur leans toward manufacturing, the TDS Notice Reply risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. TDS Notice Reply for manufacturing businesses in Ambattur hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time.
Document intake for Ambattur clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a TDS Notice Reply engagement. Turnaround for Ambattur TDS Notice Reply is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Every TDS Notice Reply file we open for Ambattur is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Our Ambattur TDS Notice Reply process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
From the same Ambattur team we also serve Avadi and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. A client relocating between Ambattur and Avadi keeps the same TDS Notice Reply file and the same team. Coverage from Ambattur naturally extends to Avadi, so group entities across the area share one TDS Notice Reply workflow. Group companies spread across Ambattur and Avadi consolidate their TDS Notice Reply under one engagement with us.
Patterns we track for Ambattur include manufacturing documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Ambattur Division tends to raise. Sector signals in Ambattur — seasonal manufacturing swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule TDS Notice Reply work. Each engagement in Ambattur adds to a record of what the Chennai North jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next TDS Notice Reply file. Because we work repeatedly across Ambattur, we can benchmark a new client's TDS Notice Reply position against the locality norm.
A startup setting up near MMDA Industrial Estate in Ambattur gets a TDS Notice Reply foundation built for the Ambattur Division from day one. When a Padi business expands into Ambattur, we extend its TDS Notice Reply setup to PIN 600053 without disruption. For a new business incorporating in Ambattur or shifting its principal place of business here, TDS Notice Reply setup is one of the first things to get right. Shifting principal place of business to Ambattur means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai North, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end.
The Supreme Court in CIT v Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages P Ltd held that once the deductee has paid the tax on the income, the deductor cannot be treated as an assessee-in-default for the same amount. Form 26A operationalises this principle under Rule 31ACB.
The Supreme Court in GE India Technology Centre v CIT held that Section 195 TDS obligation arises only where the sum payable is chargeable to tax in India. If the income is not chargeable under domestic law or under a DTAA, no Section 195 deduction is required.
Section 234E is compensatory in character, not penal. The Karnataka HC in Fatheraj Singhvi and the Bombay HC in Rashmikant Kundalia have upheld its constitutionality. The fee is automatic at ₹200 per day capped at the TDS amount of the statement.
Generally no. Section 234E is treated as automatic and not amenable to Section 273B reasonable-cause defence. Limited relief may be available for TRACES system-downtime periods or for the pre-1 June 2015 window where Section 200A had no enabling clause for the levy.
There is no specific outer limit for filing correction statements; however, practically, corrections should be filed before assessment becomes time-barred at the deductee's end and within the Section 200A intimation response window of 30 days for system-flagged defects.
Section 234E late-filing fee at ₹200 per day applies, capped at the TDS amount. Where delay exceeds one year or particulars are inaccurate, Section 271H penalty of ₹10,000 to ₹1,00,000 may also be levied. Section 273B reasonable-cause defence is available.
What Ambattur clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Ambattur, in the heavy industrial belt of Ambattur in north Chennai.
Reading this guide locally — Ambattur businesses operate where across Ambattur's SIDCO Industrial Estate Padi and Pattaravakkam industrial clusters.
The TDS Reconciliation Analysis and Correction Enabling System (TRACES) is the operational interface through which CPC-TDS communicates with deductors. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 31A of the Income Tax Rules 1962 provides that every default identified during processing is recorded on TRACES with a downloadable Justification Report — a PDF and CSV deliverable that lists row-wise the challan, deductee PAN, section, deduction-amount, default-head and amount-in-default. The Justification Report carries indicative computations only; the binding figures are those in the Section 200A intimation and the consequential demand on the TRACES dashboard. The TRACES architecture follows the OECD Forum on Tax Administration's 2014 design template on digital-by-default tax-payer-services, mirrored in similar withholding-platforms in the United Kingdom (HMRC RTI) and Australia (ATO Single Touch Payroll).
The Indian TDS-default framework is more punitive than comparable OECD jurisdictions on the interest-rate and disallowance dimensions. Section 201(1A) charges interest at 1% per month on non-deduction and 1.5% per month on deduction-not-deposited — i.e. an effective annualised 12% and 18%. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines do not directly cover income-tax withholding, but the comparable HMRC PAYE-default interest in the United Kingdom is benchmarked against the Bank of England base rate plus 2.5 percentage points, currently in the 7-8% range. Australia's ATO general interest charge sits at 11.36%. The disallowance dimension is uniquely Indian — Section 40(a)(ia) disallows 30% of the expenditure (and 100% for non-resident payments under 40(a)(i)) in the deductor's own income, with no comparable provision in major OECD systems where withholding default is treated purely as a separate collection matter.
The Tax Deduction at Source mechanism in India under Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act 1961 implements what the OECD framework calls a pay-as-you-earn collection design. It is to be noted that the policy goal traces to the Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee 1971 (Wanchoo Committee) recommendation that revenue collection be advanced to the point of accrual rather than the point of assessment, reducing tax arrears and broadening the information base. The Comptroller and Auditor General's 2017 performance audit on TDS administration observed that approximately 36% of direct-tax revenue is now collected at source, against an OECD-area average of roughly 60% for income subject to withholding. A TDS notice therefore performs a dual function — it is both a revenue-recovery instrument addressed to the deductor as the assessee-in-default under Section 201, and an information-correction instrument under Section 200A reconciling the deductor return with deductee credit claims in Form 26AS.
The appeal to ITAT is filed in Form 36 prescribed under Rule 47 along with two paper-books containing the order appealed against, the grounds of appeal, the statement of facts and supporting documents. The limitation is 60 days from the date of service of the order under sub-section (3) of Section 253. The appeal fee under sub-section (6) ranges from ₹500 (income up to ₹1 lakh) to ₹10,000 (above ₹2 lakh) plus 1% of assessed-income capped at ₹10,000. Sub-section (5) empowers ITAT to admit a delayed appeal where sufficient cause is shown — Collector Land Acquisition v Mst Katiji applies.
Sub-section (1) of Section 260A provides an appeal to the High Court from an order of ITAT where a substantial question of law arises. The Madras HC, exercising jurisdiction over Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, is the appellate forum for ITAT Chennai-Bench orders. The limitation is 120 days from the date of receipt of the order. The Supreme Court has further appellate jurisdiction under Section 261 on grant of certificate by the HC or on special leave under Article 136. The Madras HC in CIT v Sundaram Finance Distribution Ltd and CIT v Shriram Capital have set out the substantial-question-of-law threshold in TDS-default contexts.
Sub-section (2A) of Section 254 (the operational provision for ITAT proceedings) empowers ITAT to grant a stay of demand for an initial period of 180 days extendable on cause shown. The Supreme Court in Pepsi Foods Ltd v Asst CIT (2021) struck down the third proviso to 254(2A) — which had limited the extension power to 365 days even where the delay was not attributable to the assessee — as arbitrary and violative of Article 14. The current position is that ITAT can extend stay beyond 365 days where the delay is not attributable to the assessee, restoring substantial justice. The stay order must record reasons under 254(2A) first proviso.
Sub-section (1) of Section 200A provides that where a statement of tax deducted at source has been made by any person under Section 200, such statement shall be processed by computing — clause (a) tax deductible, clause (b) interest under Section 201(1A) up to the date of processing, and clause (c) fee under Section 234E. The intimation thereafter sets out the sum payable or refundable. It is to be noted that Section 200A is a summary-processing provision — the Bombay High Court in Vodafone Cellular Ltd v ACIT clarified that prima-facie adjustments alone are permissible at this stage; substantive disputes on chargeability or rate must be addressed under Section 201 read with Section 156. The one-year limitation under Section 200A(2) — earlier provision — was relaxed to a longer window post Finance Act 2022 amendments.
Sub-section (3) of Section 200A read with Rule 31A(5) provides for the deductor to file a correction statement. The TRACES Online Correction module supports nine correction-types — C-1 personal information, C-2 challan correction, C-3 challan addition, C-4 movement of deductees, C-5 PAN correction, C-6 PAN correction with verification, C-7 add-modify deductee, C-8 challan-deductee re-mapping, and C-9 lower-deduction-certificate update. Where the default is a data-mismatch (challan unmapped, deductee PAN typo, BIN error) the Online Correction route closes the default without merits-engagement. Where the default is substantive — under-rate, mis-section, non-chargeability — the reply must be filed on merits under the linked Section 154 rectification framework or by appeal under Section 246A.
The boundary between Section 200A and Section 201 is jurisprudentially significant. Section 200A is a return-processing summary provision used by CPC-TDS; Section 201 is a quasi-assessment provision that requires the Assessing Officer (TDS) to record satisfaction that the deductor is in default. The Karnataka High Court in Fatehraj Singhvi held that Section 234E fees could not be charged via Section 200A intimation for pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters since the enabling clause (Section 200A(1)(c)) was inserted with effect from that date. The Allahabad HC and Mumbai ITAT followed this view, while the Gujarat HC in Rajesh Kourani took the opposite view. The unsettled position requires deductors to assess their bench-preference before contesting older quarters.
Section 201 distinguishes — though not always explicitly — between non-deduction (no TDS deducted at all), short-deduction (TDS deducted at a rate or amount lower than what was required), late-deduction (TDS deducted after the prescribed time), and non-deposit (TDS deducted but not deposited with the exchequer). The interest-rate under Section 201(1A) is 1% per month for non-deduction and short-deduction, and 1.5% per month for the deduction-not-deposited category. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) attaches only to non-deduction and non-deposit categories — short-deduction by rate does not invite disallowance per the Calcutta High Court ruling in S.K. Tekriwal, since-followed by multiple benches.
Sub-section (1) of Section 201 provides that where any person, including the principal officer of a company, who is required to deduct tax at source does not deduct, or after such deduction fails to pay, the whole or any part of the tax, such person shall be deemed to be an assessee in default in respect of the tax. The Supreme Court in CIT v Eli Lilly & Co India observed that the deeming fiction operates only when there is a primary failure on the part of the deductor — a benign deductor who has acted on a reasonable interpretation of the law cannot be visited with the deemed-default tag. The proviso to Section 201(1) inserted by Finance Act 2012 carves out a relief where the deductee has filed return and paid tax — operationalised through Form 26A.
Form 26A is the operational vehicle for the first proviso to Section 201(1). It requires a chartered accountant in practice to certify that the deductee has — first, included the relevant payment in computing taxable income in the return filed under Section 139, second, paid the tax on the income, and third, furnished the deductor a declaration to this effect. The Form is filed by the deductor through the TRACES portal with the chartered accountant signing Annexure A on Digital Signature Certificate. On acceptance, the Section 201(1) principal-default head is reduced to NIL but the Section 201(1A) interest survives. The Mumbai ITAT in JDS Apparels held that Form 26A is a complete remedy on the principal head.
What Ambattur clients usually ask next: On the ground in Ambattur, for Ambattur SME manufacturers managing complex GST input-tax-credit and inter-state compliance footprints.
Pre-deposit Norm is the administrative requirement under the Central Board of Direct Taxes Instruction 1914 dated the second day of December 1993, as modified by the Office Memorandum dated the thirty-first day of July 2017, that ordinarily twenty per cent of the disputed demand be deposited as a condition for stay under Section 220(6) pending first appeal.
Quarter of Deduction is the calendar quarter — April-June, July-September, October-December or January-March — to which a deduction relates, determined by the earlier of the date of credit or the date of payment under Section 200(1). Misallocation of a deduction across quarters is a common driver of short-payment defaults in the Justification Report.
Justification Report is the line-by-line default register downloadable from TRACES (Defaults > Justification Report Download) showing every short-payment, short-deduction, late-payment and 234E entry against the deductor's filed statement. It comes in PDF summary and CSV deductee-wise form, both required for a complete Section 200A reply.
Conso File is the consolidated TDS statement file generated by TRACES that combines the original and all correction statements filed for a particular Form Type, Financial Year and Quarter. It is the input file for any further Online Correction and must be downloaded from Statements > Request for Conso File before any C-1 to C-9 correction is initiated.
Online Correction Category C-3 on TRACES is the PAN Correction category used to amend deductee PAN entries in a filed TDS statement without re-uploading the entire return. It is the workhorse correction for Section 206AA short-deduction defaults caused by structurally invalid PAN or inoperative PAN-Aadhaar status.
Default Rectification Request or DRR is raised on TRACES against an erroneous default flagged by CPC-TDS where the underlying statement is already correct — typically challan-paid-but-not-visible due to BIN mismatch, OLTAS sync delay, or system computation errors. Unlike Online Correction, no fresh statement is filed; only the default tag is rectified.
Form 26A Annexure-A is the Chartered Accountant certificate filed online through TRACES under Rule 31ACB read with the first proviso to Section 201(1) certifying that the resident payee has filed his Section 139 return, taken the receipt into account and paid the tax. It wipes out principal short-deduction default but Section 201(1A)(i) interest survives.
Section 201(1A)(i) Interest is the one per cent per month interest charged from the date tax was deductible to the date it was actually deducted, payable by a deductor who has failed to deduct TDS. It survives even after Form 26A relief and runs until the deductee's return-filing date per the proviso to the sub-section.
Section 201(1A)(ii) Interest is the one-and-a-half per cent per month interest charged from the date of deduction to the date of deposit, payable by a deductor who deducted TDS but failed to deposit it on time. It is not relieved by Form 26A since the deductor has admitted holding government money and remains payable in full.
Section 234E Late-Filing Fee is the levy of two hundred rupees per day for every day the TDS statement is filed after the Section 200(3) due date, capped at the TDS amount. Section 200A(1)(c) authorising the 234E adjustment through Section 200A intimation was inserted only w.e.f. 01-Jun-2015 by Finance Act 2015 — pre-amendment levies are quashable on Fatehraj Singhvi.
Section 271H Penalty is the ten-thousand-to-one-lakh-rupee penalty for failure to file a TDS statement or for filing an incorrect statement. Section 271H(3) gives full immunity where the deductor deposits the TDS, applicable interest and Section 234E fee, and files the statement, within one year of the due date.
Section 276B Prosecution is the criminal prosecution provision for failure to pay deducted TDS to the credit of the Central Government — imprisonment from three months to seven years with fine. Compounding is available under CBDT Guidelines dated 17-Oct-2024 on payment of admitted tax, interest, fee and compounding fee at two per cent per month on the principal TDS for the default period.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Ambattur businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Ambattur, the dense engineering auto-component and packaging ecosystem of the Ambattur Industrial Estate operating across SIDCO and CMDA-developed sectors; for Ambattur SME manufacturers managing complex GST input-tax-credit and inter-state compliance footprints.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Ambattur businesses operate where Ambattur's mix of SME manufacturers logistics operators and supporting workforce housing across Venkatapuram Kallikuppam Pudur and Anand Nagar.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Ambattur engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Ambattur, Ambattur's mix of SME manufacturers logistics operators and supporting workforce housing across Venkatapuram Kallikuppam Pudur and Anand Nagar; for Ambattur SME manufacturers managing complex GST input-tax-credit and inter-state compliance footprints.
“Pre-01-Jun-2015 quarters had 234E fee aggregating ₹3,42,800 in Section 200A intimation. Filed grievance citing Fatehraj Singhvi (Kar HC 2016) and ITAT Chennai bench rulings. CPC-TDS Ghaziabad accepted; entire fee demand reduced to NIL on TRACES within 7 weeks.”
“Vendor PAN structurally invalid triggering 20% under Section 206AA on 194J professional payments. Filed Form 26A Annexure-A through our partner C.A. with vendor's ITR-V and tax payment proof; principal default of ₹18.4 lakh dropped on TRACES; only Section 201(1A) interest of ₹76,000 survived.”
“AO disallowed 30% of foreign-software AMC expense citing non-deduction under Section 195. Argued Engineering Analysis (SC 2021) — payment not royalty under India-Singapore DTAA Article 12. Faceless Assessment Unit accepted; ₹62 lakh disallowance deleted in Section 143(3) order.”
“Justification Report charged 201(1A)(i) interest till date of correction (28 months × 1%). Refiled Form 26A with deductee return date; interest period truncated to 9 months. Default reduced from ₹3.1 lakh to ₹98,000 — ₹2.1 lakh saved.”
“JCIT TDS issued 271H notice for incorrect 24Q Annexure II salary breakup. Filed reply citing reasonable cause under Section 273B — Eli Lilly (SC 2009) doctrine, payroll system migration, voluntary correction filed before notice. Penalty dropped in entirety.”
“Compulsory prosecution recommendation for non-deposit of TDS exceeding ₹25 lakh threshold over two FYs. Coordinated full deposit of TDS + 1.5% interest + 234E fee, filed compounding application under CBDT Guidelines 17-Oct-2024 with compounding fee at 2% per month. Pr. CCIT compounded; criminal proceedings closed.”
Common questions from Ambattur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our TDS Notice Reply clients in Ambattur are spread right across the locality — along Pattaravakkam Bridge, Vanagaram - Ambathur - Puzhal Road, Kalli Kuppam Road (KKRoad), Karukku Main Road and North Park Street, and through the 1st Main Road, Anna Road, Bazaar Street and Chozhambedu Main Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional TDS Notice Reply in Ambattur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.