End-to-end IT Refund for Thoraipakkam it corridor residential and retail establishments — with a documented, audit-ready process
Thoraipakkam it services and e-commerce units around OMR Toll Plaza — qualified review, a 7-year workpaper archive and fixed fees from day one. Call 9566-068-468.
A Section 143(1) intimation is the CPC processing order computing total income, tax, interest and refund / demand. It must be issued within nine months from the end of the financial year in which the return was filed (post Finance Act 2021). The intimation is rectifiable under Section 154 within four years from the end of the financial year of the intimation.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert IT Refund in Thoraipakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Each Section 143(1) intimation for Thoraipakkam clients is reviewed column-by-column — TDS, advance tax, SA tax, Section 89 relief, Section 90 / 91 FTC and Chapter VI-A deductions reconciled to the return claim before any rectification is filed.
Form 26AS, AIS and TIS are reconciled deductor-by-deductor for Thoraipakkam clients. PAN errors in deductor's TDS return are identified and pursued through Section 154 rectification with the original Form 16 / 16A as evidence.
Every Section 154 rectification is filed well within the four-year limitation under Section 154(7) from the end of the FY of the order. Six-month disposal under Section 154(8) is tracked till the rectification order is passed.
Section 245(2) prior intimations are replied within the 21-day statutory window for Thoraipakkam clients. Where the underlying demand is stayed, paid or wrongly computed, the response is filed with documentary proof and the AO is required to dispose of it in writing.
Section 244A interest is computed at 0.5% per month or part thereof under Rule 119A — from 1 April of the AY (prepaid taxes) or date of SA tax payment till date of refund. Section 244A(1A) additional 3% per annum on appellate refunds is claimed expressly.
Where refund is withheld under Section 241A during Section 143(2) scrutiny, the AO's recorded reasons are examined for whether they establish prejudice to revenue. Unsupported withholdings are challenged through representations and, where warranted, writ proceedings.
Every Income Tax Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the cluster of it services, e-commerce, residential businesses that defines Thoraipakkam's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Perungudi and Sholinganallur and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Thoraipakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Thoraipakkam: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Filed on the e-filing portal under Services > Rectification to correct an intimation that mis-stated tax credit, denied a deduction or omitted advance-tax payment
Manual application to the jurisdictional authority establishing genuine hardship; supported by reasons explaining the delay and proof of the underlying excess-tax payment
Filed on the e-filing portal under Pending Actions > Response to Outstanding Demand; permits agree, agree-partly or disagree with supporting documents
Escalation channel for refunds determined under Section 143(1) but not credited; raises a ticket against the jurisdictional Pr. CIT and the CPC
Captures the deductor-wise and challan-wise breakdown of tax credit claimed; ties to Form 26AS and AIS for summary processing reconciliation
Captures salary, one house property, other-source income and refund claim for resident individuals not having business income; Schedule TDS and Schedule TCS feed the refund computation
Used by salaried persons with capital gains, foreign assets, multiple house properties or income exceeding the SAHAJ thresholds; Schedule TDS-1, TDS-2 and TCS feed the refund determination
Captures business and profession income including partner-of-firm income; Schedule TDS-2 covers non-salary TDS; Schedule BP feeds the computation underlying the refund
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961 establishes the foundational right to a refund. It is to be noted that any person who satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him, or on his behalf, or treated as paid by him for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year is entitled to a refund of the excess. The entitlement is statutory and not discretionary; the role of the Assessing Officer is to verify, not to grant ex gratia.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 239 provides that every claim for refund under Chapter XIX shall be made by furnishing a return of income in accordance with the provisions of Section 139. The earlier requirement of filing a separate Form 30 stood substituted by the Finance Act 2019 — the return itself is treated as the refund claim. The limitation period is governed by Section 139 — for original returns up to the due date under sub-section (1), and for delayed claims through the updated-return route under sub-section (8A) where eligible. Refund claims outside these timelines require condonation under Section 119(2)(b).
View sourceSection 241A, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, empowers the Assessing Officer to withhold the refund determined under Section 143(1) where the case has been selected for scrutiny under sub-section (2) of Section 143, if the grant of refund is likely to adversely affect the revenue. It is to be noted that the withholding requires the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and reasons in writing must be recorded. The provision is a check on automatic refund release where a scrutiny addition is reasonably anticipated, and the assessee retains the remedy under Section 244A for interest on any refund eventually granted.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 244A provides for simple interest at one-half of one percent per month, or part of a month, on the amount of refund. Clause (a) covers refunds arising from any tax collected at source, advance tax or self-assessment tax — interest runs from the first day of April of the assessment year to the date on which the refund is granted, provided the return is furnished within the time prescribed under Section 139(1). Clause (aa) was inserted by the Finance Act 2016 to address refunds out of self-assessment tax, running interest from the date of furnishing of return or date of payment, whichever is later. Clause (b) covers other refunds, with interest from the date of payment of tax.
View sourceSection 245 permits the Assessing Officer, Refund Banker or the Centralised Processing Centre, in lieu of payment of the refund, to set off the amount to be refunded against the sum which remains payable under the Act by the person to whom the refund is due. The first proviso requires an intimation in writing to such person of the action proposed, and the person must be given an opportunity to respond before the adjustment is made. The fifteen-day window for response is administered through Annexure E intimations issued by the CPC. Stale or stayed demands are not eligible for adjustment.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 143 prescribes the summary processing under which a refund is ordinarily determined. After the prima-facie adjustments listed in clauses (a) to (d) of the proviso, where the tax credit and self-assessment payments exceed the tax payable on the computed total income, the excess is refundable and an intimation under sub-section (1) is issued. The intimation must be sent before the expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the return was furnished. Failure to issue the intimation within the time limit converts the return acknowledgement itself into an intimation under sub-section (1).
View sourceThoraipakkam is a key OMR IT-corridor locality with strong residential growth, IT campuses, e-commerce sellers and supporting hospitality and retail. GST clients are typically IT services, e-commerce sellers (Section 52 TCS), retail and small services. Because PIN 600097 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Thoraipakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Statutory correspondence for Thoraipakkam businesses routes through the Mylapore Division, so we align every Income Tax Refund engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Every Thoraipakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600097, the Mylapore Division, and the coordinates 12.9381, 80.2390 that anchor the locality.
Thoraipakkam reads as a it corridor residential and retail pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around OMR Toll Plaza and fed by the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop corridor. Vendors and customers tied to the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Thoraipakkam Income Tax Refund clients. Working in Thoraipakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to OMR Toll Plaza and the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Commercial activity in Thoraipakkam runs high, so IT Refund volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Thoraipakkam desk accordingly.
The e-commerce firms we serve in Thoraipakkam value a IT Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. For a e-commerce business in Thoraipakkam, the Income Tax Refund scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. We have closed enough Income Tax Refund files for e-commerce firms near Thoraipakkam to know where the department usually probes. Because Thoraipakkam hosts a cluster of e-commerce businesses, we benchmark each new Income Tax Refund engagement against patterns we already track for the locality.
The Thoraipakkam Income Tax Refund workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Working papers for Thoraipakkam Income Tax Refund engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. A Thoraipakkam client sees the same IT Refund cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Fixed-fee scoping means a Thoraipakkam business knows the Income Tax Refund cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
Serving Thoraipakkam and Sholinganallur from one team keeps Income Tax Refund turnaround identical across the cluster. Businesses straddling Thoraipakkam and Sholinganallur get a single IT Refund point of contact rather than two. Proximity to Sholinganallur means a Thoraipakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. We treat Thoraipakkam and Sholinganallur as one catchment for Income Tax Refund, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.
Over several cycles in Thoraipakkam, the recurring Income Tax Refund issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Sector signals in Thoraipakkam — seasonal retail swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule IT Refund work. Each engagement in Thoraipakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next IT Refund file. Recurring gaps in Thoraipakkam retail records are the first thing our Income Tax Refund review closes out.
Relocating a registered office into Thoraipakkam (PIN 600097) changes the assessing division, and we handle that Income Tax Refund transition cleanly. First-time Income Tax Refund for a Thoraipakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. New e-commerce ventures in Thoraipakkam lean on us to stand up Income Tax Refund correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Incorporating in Thoraipakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and IT Refund steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.
Refund processing, Section 154 rectification, Section 245 set-off reply and Section 244A interest claim for Thoraipakkam taxpayers handled by qualified professionals through CPC Bengaluru and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
A dedicated refund consultant in Thoraipakkam reviews the Section 143(1) intimation, reconciles Form 26AS and AIS, files Section 154 rectification within 4 years, and computes Section 244A interest at 0.5% per month from 1 April of the AY.
Section 245(2) prior intimations are replied within the 21-day window in Thoraipakkam, and Section 241A withholding orders during scrutiny are challenged where the recorded reasons do not establish revenue prejudice.
For time-barred refund claims, Section 119(2)(b) condonation is filed under Circular 9/2015 read with Circular 11/2024 before the Pr.CCIT / CCIT / Pr.CIT, and Article 226 writ filed at the Madras HC where the department withholds refund without lawful authority.
Yes, under Section 241A where Section 143(2) scrutiny is pending, the AO may withhold refund with recorded reasons and approval of the Principal Commissioner; without these formalities the withholding is liable to be quashed by writ.
Log in to the e-filing portal at incometax.gov.in, navigate to 'Services then Know Your Refund Status' or check the same in your registered email; the NSDL refund tracker at tin.tin.nsdl.com also reflects the status.
Respond within the 30-day Section 245(1) proviso window on the e-filing portal disputing the demand with supporting documents; where the demand is stayed, deleted by appeal, or time-barred, a writ before Madras HC quashes the adjustment.
No — Section 139(8A) updated returns can only be filed where additional tax liability arises; refund claims cannot be made through ITR-U; refund claims need a return under Section 139(1) or 139(4) or condonation under Section 119(2)(b).
If filing window has expired, apply under Section 119(2)(b) read with CBDT Circular 9/2015 before the PCIT seeking condonation of delay; the circular permits refund claims up to 6 years from end of relevant AY on genuine hardship.
Under CBDT Circular 9/2015 the monetary limit for PCIT-level condonation is ₹50 lakh per AY; refund claims above this threshold require approval of the CBDT or Principal CCIT depending on quantum and circumstances.
What Thoraipakkam clients want to know before signing: Closer to Thoraipakkam, on the Perungudi-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Thoraipakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where on the Perungudi-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Thoraipakkam.
Section 238 prescribes who is entitled to make the refund claim. Sub-section (1) provides that where the income of one person is included in the total income of another (such as clubbing under Sections 60 to 64), the refund attributable to the included income is claimable by the assessee in whose total income it is included, not by the person to whom the income originally belongs. Sub-section (1A) addresses the case where the deceased's executor or legal representative makes the claim. Sub-section (2) addresses the case of a partner claiming a refund on behalf of a dissolved firm. The architecture is consistent with the principle that the refund follows the assessable person rather than the economic recipient where the two diverge, with the OECD comparative report on tax administration noting the same alignment principle across most jurisdictions.
The OECD Tax Administration 2023 comparative report places the Indian refund framework within the broader category of self-assessment regimes with automated processing. The United States Internal Revenue Service operates a similar Section 6402 framework with the comparable refund-set-off mechanism against outstanding federal debt. The United Kingdom HMRC framework under the Taxes Management Act 1970 Section 59B operates a narrower self-assessment scope, with refunds processed substantially through the PAYE adjustment mechanism rather than separate refund applications. The Australian Taxation Office automated refund-processing system, integrated with the pre-fill architecture, represents a leading comparator for the Indian Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru, with the Easwar Committee 2016 report on tax simplification referencing the Australian model as the design benchmark for the Indian CPC operational architecture.
An income tax refund arises under Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961, which provides that where any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess. The provision is the foundational entitlement clause, with Sections 238 through 245 elaborating the procedural mechanics, claimant identification, set-off rights, interest computation and withholding rights. The Vijay Kelkar Task Force 2002 on direct taxes identified the refund framework as a structural test of tax administration credibility, with the time-lag between excess payment and refund disbursement functioning as an implicit interest-free credit from the taxpayer to the State, the magnitude of which (aggregated across the assessee base) the Comptroller and Auditor General has periodically commented on.
Refund-related mistakes addressable through Section 154 rectification include arithmetic errors in the refund computation (such as gross tax addition mistakes), omission of TDS credit appearing in Form 26AS but not credited in the Section 143(1) intimation, omission of advance tax challan credit, omission of Chapter VI-A deduction claimed in the return but not allowed in processing, Section 87A rebate omission, and Section 89(1) relief omission where Form 10E was filed but not given effect. Each category corresponds to a documented mistake apparent from the record, justifying the Section 154 rectification route rather than the Section 246A appellate route. The rectification refund accrues Section 244A interest from the date of the original return filing, restoring the taxpayer's economic position.
The Section 154 rectification application operates through the e-filing portal under Services then Rectification. The taxpayer selects the assessment year, the order being rectified (typically the Section 143(1) intimation), the rectification reason from the predefined dropdown (taxpayer correction, TDS mismatch, return data correction or any other reason), and uploads the supporting documentation. The application is routed to the Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru where the rectification is processed under the Section 154 framework. Where the rectification is granted, the consequential refund intimation is issued through the e-filing portal worklist, with the refund disbursement following the standard reissue mechanics. The taxpayer's response window to any Section 154-related communication is thirty days from the intimation date.
Where the Section 154 rectification application is denied by the CPC or the Assessing Officer, the taxpayer has multiple subsequent remedies. First, a second Section 154 rectification application addressing the specific grounds of denial, provided the four-year outer limit has not expired. Second, an appeal under Section 246A to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) against the Section 154 order within thirty days of the order. Third, a writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 where the rectification denial reflects mechanical reasoning or an absence of consideration of the apparent-mistake criterion. The layered remedies provide the structural safeguard against arbitrary denial, with the appellate route being the principal channel for substantive merit-based reconsideration.
Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act 1961 empowers the Central Board of Direct Taxes to authorise income-tax authorities to admit applications or claims for refund or relief after the expiry of the relevant statutory period, where genuine hardship to the taxpayer is established. The provision operates as the residual safety valve for taxpayers who, for reasons beyond their control, missed the Section 139(1) original-return-filing window, the Section 139(4) belated-return-filing window, or the Section 139(5) revised-return-filing window. The CBDT through Circular 9/2015 dated 9 June 2015 (subsequently updated by Circular 13/2023 dated 26 July 2023) prescribed the operational framework for processing condonation applications, including the monetary-jurisdiction tiers and the documentation requirements.
The CBDT Circular 9/2015 (as updated) prescribes the monetary-jurisdiction tiers for condonation applications. Applications involving refund claims up to ten lakh rupees are disposed of by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax with territorial jurisdiction over the applicant's PAN. Applications between ten lakh and fifty lakh rupees are disposed of by the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax. Applications above fifty lakh rupees are disposed of by the Central Board of Direct Taxes itself. The tiered framework ensures appropriate decision-making authority commensurate with the financial stake, while maintaining accessibility for smaller-quantum applications at the field-formation level. The disposal timeline prescribed in the circular is six months from the application filing, though operational pendency may extend this in practice.
The Section 119(2)(b) condonation application requires comprehensive documentation establishing the genuine hardship that prevented the timely claim. Typical substantiation includes medical records where illness prevented timely action, evidence of incorrect professional advice where the taxpayer was misled, evidence of natural calamity or other force majeure events, and evidence of late receipt of foreign-source-income certificates or Form 16 from a defunct employer. The CBDT Circular 9/2015 paragraph 5 emphasises that the test is genuine hardship, not mere inconvenience or oversight, with the substantiation requirement calibrated accordingly. The application is filed before the jurisdictional authority based on the monetary tier, with the supporting documentation organised in a coherent narrative that addresses the genuine-hardship test directly.
Where the Indian deductor has applied the domestic Section 195 rate on a payment to a non-resident who is entitled to a lower treaty rate, the recipient claims the treaty-rate benefit by filing ITR-2 with the Schedule FA, Schedule FSI and Schedule TR disclosures, supported by the Tax Residency Certificate and Form 10F. The Centralised Processing Centre processes the return under the standard Section 143(1) framework with the treaty-rate adjustment, computing the consequential refund. The OECD Model Tax Convention Article 4 residence-tie-breaker rules and the specific treaty provisions on royalties, dividends and interest govern the applicable rate, with the procedural anchor being the certificate-supported Schedule disclosure approach in the recipient's return.
TDS deduction by error arises across multiple scenarios. First, deductor-side application of the wrong section (Section 194J on what should have been a Section 194C contract, or vice versa). Second, deduction on transactions exempt from withholding (such as payment to a recipient holding a valid Section 197 certificate at a lower rate, or to a payee covered by Section 196 governmental exemption). Third, deduction on a payment that does not constitute income in the recipient's hands (such as reimbursement of expenses without a margin component). Fourth, deduction at a rate higher than the treaty rate where the recipient is a non-resident with a valid Tax Residency Certificate. Each scenario corresponds to a refundable excess, recoverable either through the recipient's regular return-filing or through the deductor-side refund mechanism.
The standard route for recovering TDS deducted by error is the recipient's regular return-filing for the assessment year, claiming the excess TDS as credit in Schedule TDS-2 against the actual tax liability on the underlying income. The Section 143(1) processing computes the consequential refund automatically, with disbursement following the standard mechanics. Where the recipient is not otherwise required to file a return (such as a non-resident with no taxable income in India apart from the erroneously deducted payment), the recipient may nevertheless file a voluntary return under Section 139(1) to claim the refund. The return-filing approach is operationally straightforward and is the recommended primary route, with the alternative deductor-side refund mechanism being procedurally more involved.
What Thoraipakkam clients usually ask next: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Section 234D excess refund interest is the interest recoverable from the assessee where a refund granted under Section 143(1) is reduced on regular assessment. The rate is one-half of one percent per month on the excess refund, from the date of grant to the date of regular assessment. The provision balances the Section 244A entitlement of the assessee.
Refund Banker reason codes are the standardised failure codes generated by State Bank of India where the ECS push to the assessee's account fails — examples include 'Account closed', 'Name mismatch', 'Account dormant', 'IFSC obsolete' and 'KYC pending'. Each code maps to a specific cure pathway before the Refund Reissue Request is raised.
Form 16 is the certificate of TDS on salary issued under Section 203 read with Rule 31 by the employer to the employee. Part A covers TDS deposited and challan-wise breakdown drawn from TRACES; Part B covers the salary computation. The Form 16 figures must reconcile with Schedule TDS-1 of the return for the salary-TDS refund to flow.
Form 16A is the certificate of TDS on non-salary payments issued under Section 203 read with Rule 31. It carries the deductor-wise quarterly breakdown drawn from TRACES. Reconciliation with Schedule TDS-2 of the return is the core check before claiming non-salary TDS in the refund computation.
Schedule TR is the schedule in the return capturing tax relief under Section 90, Section 90A or Section 91 for foreign-tax credit. Refunds claimed against foreign-tax credit require Form 67 furnished within the timeline prescribed under Rule 128, failing which the credit is denied at summary processing and the refund quantum is reduced.
Form 67 is the statement of foreign-tax credit furnished under Rule 128. The form must be filed on or before the due date for furnishing the return under Section 139(1). Refunds embedding foreign-tax credit are processed only on the strength of a timely Form 67; late filing draws denial of credit and rectification disputes.
MAT credit is the credit of minimum alternate tax paid by a company under Section 115JB, available for set-off in subsequent years under Section 115JAA when the regular tax exceeds the MAT. Set-off of accumulated MAT credit can result in a refund where the regular tax is reduced post the set-off and earlier advance-tax has been paid.
AMT credit is the credit of alternate minimum tax paid by a non-corporate assessee under Section 115JC, carried forward and set off in a subsequent year when the regular tax exceeds the AMT. The set-off mechanism is analogous to the MAT credit framework and can drive refunds in LLP and partnership cases.
Section 90 relief is the bilateral foreign-tax relief available under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Where the foreign tax paid on doubly-taxed income exceeds the Indian tax on that income, the resident can claim relief in the return; the resulting refund is processed against Form 67 evidencing the foreign-tax payment.
Section 91 unilateral relief is the foreign-tax relief available where India does not have a DTAA with the source country. The relief is the lower of the Indian tax rate and the foreign tax rate, applied on the doubly-taxed income. Refund claims under Section 91 are subjected to closer summary-processing scrutiny on credentials of the foreign tax payment.
Section 199 deems the tax deducted at source as tax paid on behalf of the deductee, allowing credit in the assessment of the deductee. Rule 37BA carries the operational framework. The deeming under Section 199 is the statutory foundation for treating TDS as a refundable credit when in excess of the assessed liability.
Rule 31AB of the Income-tax Rules 1962 prescribes the annual tax credit statement in Form 26AS. The rule was substituted to integrate with TRACES and to include the wider data set introduced under the AIS framework. Rule 31AB is the rule-level anchor for the Form 26AS reconciliation discipline in any refund engagement.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Thoraipakkam businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Thoraipakkam, the cluster of it services, e-commerce, residential businesses that defines Thoraipakkam's commercial fabric, which is why for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the cluster of it services, e-commerce, residential businesses that defines Thoraipakkam's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Thoraipakkam engagements look the way they do: Closer to Thoraipakkam, the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“My AY 2022-23 refund of ₹1.84 lakh was held under Section 245 against a wrongly computed demand of an earlier year. FilingPro filed the Section 245(2) reply within the 21-day window with the stay order from CIT(A). Refund credited within 6 weeks with full Section 244A interest. Surgical work.”
“TDS of ₹47,500 deducted by my tenant did not reflect in Form 26AS because they had quoted my PAN incorrectly. CPC denied the credit in the Section 143(1) intimation. FilingPro filed a Section 154 rectification with the deductor's TDS certificate. Refund recomputed and credited in 11 weeks.”
“My refund kept failing for three reissue attempts because my bank account had become PAN-de-linked after the Aadhaar-PAN deadline. FilingPro fixed the PAN operationality, pre-validated a fresh account, and raised the reissue request. Refund credited the very next cycle.”
“For AY 2017-18 the return was missed. Refund of ₹62,000 was clearly due based on Form 16 TDS. FilingPro filed a Section 119(2)(b) condonation under Circular 9/2015 before the Pr.CIT explaining the bona fide hardship. Condonation was granted, return filed, refund received with interest. Outstanding work.”
“Refund of ₹2.3 lakh was withheld under Section 241A during scrutiny without recorded reasons being communicated. FilingPro filed a writ petition before the Madras HC. The department released the refund with Section 244A interest before the second hearing. Strong professional advocacy.”
“My Section 143(1) intimation showed an addition under Section 143(1)(a)(vi) for an AIS entry that was actually duplicated. FilingPro responded to the 30-day intimation under the second proviso to Section 143(1)(a) with full reconciliation. The adjustment was dropped and the original refund of ₹1.12 lakh was issued.”
Common questions from Thoraipakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Thoraipakkam, from Secretariat Colony Main Road, Subramanya Nagar Street Road, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Bharathiyar Nagar Main Road and Cholaima Nagar Main Road to the Eshwaran Koil Street, Eswaran Kovil Street, Kumaran Kudil Main Road and Pillaiyar Kovil Street commercial pockets, with IT Refund handled end to end.
Professional Income Tax Refund in Thoraipakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.