Qualified IT Refund for Siruseri (PIN 603103) and adjacent Navalur — handled by a qualified, in-house team
Income Tax Refund for it services businesses in Siruseri near SIPCOT IT Park — qualified review, a 7-year workpaper archive and fixed fees from day one. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 206AA mandates 20% TDS where PAN is not furnished, and Section 206CCA prescribes higher TDS / TCS for non-filers of return. Where the assessee subsequently furnishes PAN and files the return, the higher tax already deducted becomes refundable to the extent it exceeds actual liability. The credit is claimed in the return based on Form 26AS reflection, and refund flows through normal Section 143(1) processing.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert IT Refund in Siruseri — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Refund-reissue requests are filed on incometax.gov.in promptly upon credit failure. Siruseri clients see refund credit in the next CPC disbursement cycle, with multiple reissue attempts where the bank requires fresh validation.
Time-barred refund claims (up to six years from the end of AY) are revived through Section 119(2)(b) condonation petitions before Pr.CCIT / CCIT / Pr.CIT depending on quantum thresholds, with genuine-hardship and bona fide-claim demonstration.
Where CPC Bengaluru does not act within Citizens Charter timelines, e-Nivaran grievance is filed and escalated through CPCITGRC, Income-tax Ombudsman and CBDT representation till the refund is released.
Where refund is wrongfully withheld and statutory remedies are exhausted, Article 226 writ petition is filed at the Madras HC. Siruseri clients have on record successful interim orders directing release with Section 244A interest.
Share your Section 143(1) intimation, Form 26AS, AIS and bank pre-validation screen on WhatsApp at our number — we handle the rest. Siruseri clients work with us entirely remotely from review to refund credit.
Each Section 143(1) intimation for Siruseri clients is reviewed column-by-column — TDS, advance tax, SA tax, Section 89 relief, Section 90 / 91 FTC and Chapter VI-A deductions reconciled to the return claim before any rectification is filed.
Every Income Tax Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Siruseri, the cluster of it services, residential, hospitality businesses that defines Siruseri's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Navalur and Padur and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Siruseri clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Siruseri, the business activity radiating outward from SIPCOT IT Park and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Siruseri: Closer to Siruseri, for Siruseri IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Used by resident individuals, HUFs and firms (other than LLP) with presumptive income up to ₹50 lakh from profession or ₹3 crore from business; refund arises where TDS by clients exceeds the presumptive tax
Captures partnership and LLP income; refund commonly arises from advance-tax overpayment or TDS by clients exceeding the entity-level liability
Captures domestic-company income; refund commonly arises from MAT credit set-off under Section 115JAA or advance-tax overpayment; Schedule TDS feeds the credit pool
Used by entities claiming exemption under Sections 11, 12, 13A, 13B, 10(23C) and similar; refund arises where TDS on interest income or rental income exceeds the entity-level tax after exemption
Filed by the deductor on TRACES to claim refund of tax deducted in excess of liability; supported by an indemnity bond and the CIT(TDS) sanction
Triggered on the e-filing portal after a refund credit failure; requires a pre-validated and EVC-enabled bank account selection from My Bank Account
Standalone refund claim form used prior to the Finance Act 2019 amendment that integrated the refund claim into the return of income; retained for legacy or special-circumstances claims
Filed on the e-filing portal under Services > Rectification to correct an intimation that mis-stated tax credit, denied a deduction or omitted advance-tax payment
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961 establishes the foundational right to a refund. It is to be noted that any person who satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him, or on his behalf, or treated as paid by him for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year is entitled to a refund of the excess. The entitlement is statutory and not discretionary; the role of the Assessing Officer is to verify, not to grant ex gratia.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 239 provides that every claim for refund under Chapter XIX shall be made by furnishing a return of income in accordance with the provisions of Section 139. The earlier requirement of filing a separate Form 30 stood substituted by the Finance Act 2019 — the return itself is treated as the refund claim. The limitation period is governed by Section 139 — for original returns up to the due date under sub-section (1), and for delayed claims through the updated-return route under sub-section (8A) where eligible. Refund claims outside these timelines require condonation under Section 119(2)(b).
View sourceSection 241A, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, empowers the Assessing Officer to withhold the refund determined under Section 143(1) where the case has been selected for scrutiny under sub-section (2) of Section 143, if the grant of refund is likely to adversely affect the revenue. It is to be noted that the withholding requires the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and reasons in writing must be recorded. The provision is a check on automatic refund release where a scrutiny addition is reasonably anticipated, and the assessee retains the remedy under Section 244A for interest on any refund eventually granted.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 244A provides for simple interest at one-half of one percent per month, or part of a month, on the amount of refund. Clause (a) covers refunds arising from any tax collected at source, advance tax or self-assessment tax — interest runs from the first day of April of the assessment year to the date on which the refund is granted, provided the return is furnished within the time prescribed under Section 139(1). Clause (aa) was inserted by the Finance Act 2016 to address refunds out of self-assessment tax, running interest from the date of furnishing of return or date of payment, whichever is later. Clause (b) covers other refunds, with interest from the date of payment of tax.
View sourceSection 245 permits the Assessing Officer, Refund Banker or the Centralised Processing Centre, in lieu of payment of the refund, to set off the amount to be refunded against the sum which remains payable under the Act by the person to whom the refund is due. The first proviso requires an intimation in writing to such person of the action proposed, and the person must be given an opportunity to respond before the adjustment is made. The fifteen-day window for response is administered through Annexure E intimations issued by the CPC. Stale or stayed demands are not eligible for adjustment.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 143 prescribes the summary processing under which a refund is ordinarily determined. After the prima-facie adjustments listed in clauses (a) to (d) of the proviso, where the tax credit and self-assessment payments exceed the tax payable on the computed total income, the excess is refundable and an intimation under sub-section (1) is issued. The intimation must be sent before the expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the return was furnished. Failure to issue the intimation within the time limit converts the return acknowledgement itself into an intimation under sub-section (1).
View sourceThe 603xx geo-zone covering Siruseri groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable. For Income Tax Refund at PIN 603103, understanding the Sholinganallur Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Siruseri hosts the SIPCOT IT Park SEZ along with residential apartments and hotels catering to the OMR IT workforce. Records we prepare for Siruseri carry the geo-zone 603xx tag and coordinates 12.8261, 80.2275, which map each submission back to this locality.
Working in Siruseri brings a logistical edge: proximity to SIPCOT IT Park and the Siruseri Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Document pickup near SIPCOT IT Park is a same-hour errand for our Siruseri engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Most commerce in Siruseri — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the IT Refund working file we maintain for clients here. Freight and foot traffic from the Siruseri Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Siruseri, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this it corridor residential and sez host pocket.
The hospitality firms we serve in Siruseri value a IT Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. Sector concentration matters: when Siruseri leans toward hospitality, the IT Refund risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. hospitality units around Siruseri share recurring IT Refund patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. The business mix in Siruseri centres on hospitality, and that sector carries its own Income Tax Refund quirks we plan for in advance.
Our Siruseri IT Refund process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. We keep a repeatable IT Refund checklist for Siruseri so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. A Siruseri client sees the same IT Refund cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Document intake for Siruseri clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a Income Tax Refund engagement.
Income Tax Refund clients in Padur are handled by the same practitioners who run our Siruseri desk. Coverage from Siruseri naturally extends to Padur, so group entities across the area share one Income Tax Refund workflow. Businesses straddling Siruseri and Padur get a single IT Refund point of contact rather than two. Group companies spread across Siruseri and Padur consolidate their IT Refund under one engagement with us.
Each engagement in Siruseri adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next IT Refund file. The Income Tax Refund mistakes we see most in Siruseri are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Over several cycles in Siruseri, the recurring Income Tax Refund issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Common patterns in the Sholinganallur Division give Siruseri businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt IT Refund issues.
Shifting principal place of business to Siruseri means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. Incorporating in Siruseri comes with jurisdiction, registration and IT Refund steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. For a new business incorporating in Siruseri or shifting its principal place of business here, Income Tax Refund setup is one of the first things to get right. First-time Income Tax Refund for a Siruseri business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
Refund processing, Section 154 rectification, Section 245 set-off reply and Section 244A interest claim for Siruseri taxpayers handled by qualified professionals through CPC Bengaluru and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
A dedicated refund consultant in Siruseri reviews the Section 143(1) intimation, reconciles Form 26AS and AIS, files Section 154 rectification within 4 years, and computes Section 244A interest at 0.5% per month from 1 April of the AY.
Section 245(2) prior intimations are replied within the 21-day window in Siruseri, and Section 241A withholding orders during scrutiny are challenged where the recorded reasons do not establish revenue prejudice.
For time-barred refund claims, Section 119(2)(b) condonation is filed under Circular 9/2015 read with Circular 11/2024 before the Pr.CCIT / CCIT / Pr.CIT, and Article 226 writ filed at the Madras HC where the department withholds refund without lawful authority.
Log in to the e-filing portal at incometax.gov.in, navigate to 'Services then Know Your Refund Status' or check the same in your registered email; the NSDL refund tracker at tin.tin.nsdl.com also reflects the status.
Respond within the 30-day Section 245(1) proviso window on the e-filing portal disputing the demand with supporting documents; where the demand is stayed, deleted by appeal, or time-barred, a writ before Madras HC quashes the adjustment.
No — Section 139(8A) updated returns can only be filed where additional tax liability arises; refund claims cannot be made through ITR-U; refund claims need a return under Section 139(1) or 139(4) or condonation under Section 119(2)(b).
If filing window has expired, apply under Section 119(2)(b) read with CBDT Circular 9/2015 before the PCIT seeking condonation of delay; the circular permits refund claims up to 6 years from end of relevant AY on genuine hardship.
Under CBDT Circular 9/2015 the monetary limit for PCIT-level condonation is ₹50 lakh per AY; refund claims above this threshold require approval of the CBDT or Principal CCIT depending on quantum and circumstances.
Common reductions arise from TDS credit mismatch with Form 26AS, AIS prima-facie adjustment under Section 143(1)(a), denial of Section 80 deductions without uploaded proof, FTC denial for missing Form 67, or arithmetic correction by CPC.
What Siruseri clients want to know before signing: Closer to Siruseri, in the it corridor residential and sez host micro-market of Siruseri.
Reading this guide locally — Across Siruseri, on the Navalur-Padur corridor that passes through Siruseri.
Section 238 prescribes who is entitled to make the refund claim. Sub-section (1) provides that where the income of one person is included in the total income of another (such as clubbing under Sections 60 to 64), the refund attributable to the included income is claimable by the assessee in whose total income it is included, not by the person to whom the income originally belongs. Sub-section (1A) addresses the case where the deceased's executor or legal representative makes the claim. Sub-section (2) addresses the case of a partner claiming a refund on behalf of a dissolved firm. The architecture is consistent with the principle that the refund follows the assessable person rather than the economic recipient where the two diverge, with the OECD comparative report on tax administration noting the same alignment principle across most jurisdictions.
The OECD Tax Administration 2023 comparative report places the Indian refund framework within the broader category of self-assessment regimes with automated processing. The United States Internal Revenue Service operates a similar Section 6402 framework with the comparable refund-set-off mechanism against outstanding federal debt. The United Kingdom HMRC framework under the Taxes Management Act 1970 Section 59B operates a narrower self-assessment scope, with refunds processed substantially through the PAYE adjustment mechanism rather than separate refund applications. The Australian Taxation Office automated refund-processing system, integrated with the pre-fill architecture, represents a leading comparator for the Indian Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru, with the Easwar Committee 2016 report on tax simplification referencing the Australian model as the design benchmark for the Indian CPC operational architecture.
An income tax refund arises under Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961, which provides that where any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess. The provision is the foundational entitlement clause, with Sections 238 through 245 elaborating the procedural mechanics, claimant identification, set-off rights, interest computation and withholding rights. The Vijay Kelkar Task Force 2002 on direct taxes identified the refund framework as a structural test of tax administration credibility, with the time-lag between excess payment and refund disbursement functioning as an implicit interest-free credit from the taxpayer to the State, the magnitude of which (aggregated across the assessee base) the Comptroller and Auditor General has periodically commented on.
The Section 241A withholding requires the Assessing Officer to record reasons in writing for forming the opinion that the refund grant is likely to adversely affect revenue, with the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner of Income-tax. The procedural safeguards are intended to prevent arbitrary withholding, with the taxpayer entitled to receive a copy of the withholding intimation. The Madras High Court and Bombay High Court have both, in writ jurisdiction under Article 226, addressed challenges to Section 241A withholding orders where the reasons recorded fall short of the adverse-revenue threshold, with the courts setting aside mechanical or insufficiently-reasoned withholding orders. The judicial review jurisdiction provides the principal safeguard against routine application of the withholding power.
Where the Section 241A withholding is subsequently shown to have been unjustified by the eventual assessment confirming the refund, the Section 244A interest period continues to run through the withholding window, with the resulting compounding effect on the eventual refund disbursement. The taxpayer's economic position is therefore restored in interest terms, though the cash-flow opportunity cost during the withholding period is irrecoverable. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration 2018 paper on refund withholding identifies the Indian Section 241A architecture as a balanced model that combines revenue-protection with interest-restoration, though the discretionary nature of the adverse-revenue test continues to attract critique in academic commentary on tax administration design.
The taxpayer subjected to a Section 241A withholding order has multiple remedies. First, representation to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner who granted the approval, on the merits of the underlying assessment likelihood. Second, writ petition before the High Court under Article 226 challenging the withholding order on the grounds of mechanical reasons or absence of the adverse-revenue threshold. Third, expediting the Section 143(2) assessment cooperation to accelerate the withholding-release. The Section 153 outer limit on assessment completion (twenty-one months from the end of the assessment year) functions as the structural backstop on the withholding period, with the refund disbursement following automatic on assessment completion in the absence of a confirmed demand.
Section 245 empowers the Assessing Officer, in lieu of refunding the amount payable to the taxpayer, to set off such refund against any sum remaining payable under the Act by the taxpayer. The provision operates on the integrated-account principle that the State's outstanding receivable from the taxpayer should be netted against the State's payable to the taxpayer before disbursement. The Empowered Committee 2009 first discussion paper on tax administration identified the integrated-account architecture as the structural endpoint of consolidated tax-account management, with the Section 245 set-off being the operational manifestation of that principle in the income-tax framework. The corresponding goods-and-services-tax framework operates a similar Section 54 set-off architecture under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017.
Section 245 set-off requires the Assessing Officer to give an intimation in writing to the taxpayer of the proposed action, allowing thirty days for the taxpayer to respond. The intimation must specify the assessment year of the outstanding demand, the quantum proposed to be set off, and the residual refund balance after the set-off. The taxpayer's response may dispute the demand on substantive grounds (where appeal under Section 246A is pending) or on procedural grounds (where the demand has been incorrectly recorded). The CBDT through Instruction 1914 dated 2 December 1993 and the subsequent Office Memorandum dated 31 July 2017 provides the operational framework for handling Section 245 set-offs against disputed demands.
The interaction between Section 245 set-off and Section 246A appeal pendency has been judicially clarified through multiple High Court decisions. The principle emerging from the jurisprudence is that Section 245 set-off against a demand under appeal is not automatically barred, but the Assessing Officer must consider the appellate pendency as a factor in exercising the discretion. Where the appellant has obtained stay of demand under the CBDT Instruction 1914 framework (typically twenty percent deposit pending Section 250 disposal), Section 245 set-off against the stayed-portion is procedurally barred. The OECD 2017 working paper on dispute resolution identifies the stay-of-demand framework as the principal procedural safeguard during appellate pendency in tax administration design.
Where the refund-reissue request itself fails or remains unprocessed beyond the standard timeline, the escalation pathway operates through the e-nivaran grievance redressal mechanism on the e-filing portal. The grievance is logged against the assessment year and the failure category, with the CPC helpdesk providing tracking updates. Where the e-nivaran resolution is unsatisfactory, the taxpayer may escalate to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, who has supervisory authority over the CPC processing in respect of the taxpayer's PAN. The CBDT Citizen Charter prescribes service-level commitments for refund processing, with the escalation framework being the formal route for service-level enforcement where the timeline has been breached.
The Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru issues refund through the State Bank of India clearing layer, with the bank-account-credit being the operational endpoint. Refund failures arise from multiple sources. First, bank account closure or inoperative status due to non-compliance with the Know-Your-Customer revalidation requirements under the Reserve Bank of India Master Direction on KYC. Second, IFSC code change consequent on bank-branch merger or rationalisation. Third, account number-and-name mismatch arising from typographical errors in the return-filing stage. Fourth, account-type mismatch where a current account has been nominated for a personal refund. The structural mitigation is the e-filing portal bank-account-pre-validation utility introduced in 2019, which verifies the bank account before the return is even filed.
The refund-reissue procedure operates through the e-filing portal under Services then Refund Reissue. The taxpayer logs in with the PAN-based credentials, navigates to the assessment year showing the failed refund, selects the failure code displayed by the system, nominates a freshly validated bank account, and submits the reissue request. The submission acknowledgement is issued instantly, with the reissue processing typically completed within fifteen to thirty days of the request. Where the failure was due to KYC-inoperativeness, the taxpayer must first complete the KYC revalidation with the bank before the reissue can succeed. The OECD 2022 update on pre-filled returns identifies the Indian refund-reissue automation as a model digital-administration framework worth comparative study.
What Siruseri clients usually ask next: Closer to Siruseri, for Siruseri IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Form 16A is the certificate of TDS on non-salary payments issued under Section 203 read with Rule 31. It carries the deductor-wise quarterly breakdown drawn from TRACES. Reconciliation with Schedule TDS-2 of the return is the core check before claiming non-salary TDS in the refund computation.
Schedule TR is the schedule in the return capturing tax relief under Section 90, Section 90A or Section 91 for foreign-tax credit. Refunds claimed against foreign-tax credit require Form 67 furnished within the timeline prescribed under Rule 128, failing which the credit is denied at summary processing and the refund quantum is reduced.
Form 67 is the statement of foreign-tax credit furnished under Rule 128. The form must be filed on or before the due date for furnishing the return under Section 139(1). Refunds embedding foreign-tax credit are processed only on the strength of a timely Form 67; late filing draws denial of credit and rectification disputes.
MAT credit is the credit of minimum alternate tax paid by a company under Section 115JB, available for set-off in subsequent years under Section 115JAA when the regular tax exceeds the MAT. Set-off of accumulated MAT credit can result in a refund where the regular tax is reduced post the set-off and earlier advance-tax has been paid.
AMT credit is the credit of alternate minimum tax paid by a non-corporate assessee under Section 115JC, carried forward and set off in a subsequent year when the regular tax exceeds the AMT. The set-off mechanism is analogous to the MAT credit framework and can drive refunds in LLP and partnership cases.
Section 90 relief is the bilateral foreign-tax relief available under a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Where the foreign tax paid on doubly-taxed income exceeds the Indian tax on that income, the resident can claim relief in the return; the resulting refund is processed against Form 67 evidencing the foreign-tax payment.
Section 91 unilateral relief is the foreign-tax relief available where India does not have a DTAA with the source country. The relief is the lower of the Indian tax rate and the foreign tax rate, applied on the doubly-taxed income. Refund claims under Section 91 are subjected to closer summary-processing scrutiny on credentials of the foreign tax payment.
Section 199 deems the tax deducted at source as tax paid on behalf of the deductee, allowing credit in the assessment of the deductee. Rule 37BA carries the operational framework. The deeming under Section 199 is the statutory foundation for treating TDS as a refundable credit when in excess of the assessed liability.
Rule 31AB of the Income-tax Rules 1962 prescribes the annual tax credit statement in Form 26AS. The rule was substituted to integrate with TRACES and to include the wider data set introduced under the AIS framework. Rule 31AB is the rule-level anchor for the Form 26AS reconciliation discipline in any refund engagement.
Section 246A appeal is the first-appeal remedy before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) against an intimation under Section 143(1), an assessment under Section 143(3) or 144, and other orders enumerated. Where summary processing wrongly denies refund and rectification fails, the Section 246A appeal is the protected statutory channel.
Article 226 of the Constitution of India confers writ jurisdiction on the High Courts. Refund-related writs before the Madras High Court are common where rectification under Section 154 is not disposed of within the Section 154(8) six-month window or where Section 241A withholding is patently outside the statutory scheme. The remedy is supplementary, not parallel.
Section 144B prescribes the faceless assessment scheme, operating through the National Faceless Assessment Centre, the Assessment Units, the Verification Units, the Technical Units and the Review Units. Refund determinations or revisions arising from faceless assessment carry the same Section 244A interest entitlement and the same Section 245 set-off discipline.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Siruseri businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Siruseri, the cluster of it services, residential, hospitality businesses that defines Siruseri's commercial fabric, which is why for Siruseri IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Siruseri, the cluster of it services, residential, hospitality businesses that defines Siruseri's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Siruseri engagements look the way they do: Closer to Siruseri, the business activity radiating outward from SIPCOT IT Park and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Siruseri IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“My AY 2022-23 refund of ₹1.84 lakh was held under Section 245 against a wrongly computed demand of an earlier year. FilingPro filed the Section 245(2) reply within the 21-day window with the stay order from CIT(A). Refund credited within 6 weeks with full Section 244A interest. Surgical work.”
“TDS of ₹47,500 deducted by my tenant did not reflect in Form 26AS because they had quoted my PAN incorrectly. CPC denied the credit in the Section 143(1) intimation. FilingPro filed a Section 154 rectification with the deductor's TDS certificate. Refund recomputed and credited in 11 weeks.”
“My refund kept failing for three reissue attempts because my bank account had become PAN-de-linked after the Aadhaar-PAN deadline. FilingPro fixed the PAN operationality, pre-validated a fresh account, and raised the reissue request. Refund credited the very next cycle.”
“For AY 2017-18 the return was missed. Refund of ₹62,000 was clearly due based on Form 16 TDS. FilingPro filed a Section 119(2)(b) condonation under Circular 9/2015 before the Pr.CIT explaining the bona fide hardship. Condonation was granted, return filed, refund received with interest. Outstanding work.”
“Refund of ₹2.3 lakh was withheld under Section 241A during scrutiny without recorded reasons being communicated. FilingPro filed a writ petition before the Madras HC. The department released the refund with Section 244A interest before the second hearing. Strong professional advocacy.”
“My Section 143(1) intimation showed an addition under Section 143(1)(a)(vi) for an AIS entry that was actually duplicated. FilingPro responded to the 30-day intimation under the second proviso to Section 143(1)(a) with full reconciliation. The adjustment was dropped and the original refund of ₹1.12 lakh was issued.”
Common questions from Siruseri clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Siruseri, from First main road, Natham - Egattur Road, SIPCOT-Thalambur Rd, Annai Theresa St and Annai Theresa Street to the Buckingham Boulevard, Sixth Cross Road, Street Number 1 and Veeranam Rd commercial pockets, with IT Refund handled end to end.
Professional Income Tax Refund in Siruseri, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.