End-to-end IT Refund for Selaiyur residential education pocket establishments — with a documented, audit-ready process
Professional Income Tax Refund in Selaiyur (PIN 600073), Chennai with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Refund credit fails when (a) the bank account is not pre-validated or has expired, (b) PAN is not linked at the bank's CBS, (c) the IFSC code has changed post bank merger, (d) account name does not match PAN name, (e) the account has become dormant or KYC-deficient, or (f) the account is closed. The failure is intimated on the e-filing portal and the assessee must add a fresh pre-validated account and raise a refund-reissue request.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert IT Refund in Selaiyur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Refund-reissue requests are filed on incometax.gov.in promptly upon credit failure. Selaiyur clients see refund credit in the next CPC disbursement cycle, with multiple reissue attempts where the bank requires fresh validation.
Time-barred refund claims (up to six years from the end of AY) are revived through Section 119(2)(b) condonation petitions before Pr.CCIT / CCIT / Pr.CIT depending on quantum thresholds, with genuine-hardship and bona fide-claim demonstration.
Where CPC Bengaluru does not act within Citizens Charter timelines, e-Nivaran grievance is filed and escalated through CPCITGRC, Income-tax Ombudsman and CBDT representation till the refund is released.
Where refund is wrongfully withheld and statutory remedies are exhausted, Article 226 writ petition is filed at the Madras HC. Selaiyur clients have on record successful interim orders directing release with Section 244A interest.
Share your Section 143(1) intimation, Form 26AS, AIS and bank pre-validation screen on WhatsApp at our number — we handle the rest. Selaiyur clients work with us entirely remotely from review to refund credit.
Each Section 143(1) intimation for Selaiyur clients is reviewed column-by-column — TDS, advance tax, SA tax, Section 89 relief, Section 90 / 91 FTC and Chapter VI-A deductions reconciled to the return claim before any rectification is filed.
Every Income Tax Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Selaiyur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from St Joseph's College of Engineering and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Selaiyur Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Selaiyur to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Selaiyur clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Selaiyur businesses operate where the cluster of education, residential, healthcare businesses that defines Selaiyur's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Selaiyur: Where Selaiyur differs: for the professional and salaried population of Selaiyur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Filed by the deductor on TRACES to claim refund of tax deducted in excess of liability; supported by an indemnity bond and the CIT(TDS) sanction
Triggered on the e-filing portal after a refund credit failure; requires a pre-validated and EVC-enabled bank account selection from My Bank Account
Standalone refund claim form used prior to the Finance Act 2019 amendment that integrated the refund claim into the return of income; retained for legacy or special-circumstances claims
Filed on the e-filing portal under Services > Rectification to correct an intimation that mis-stated tax credit, denied a deduction or omitted advance-tax payment
Manual application to the jurisdictional authority establishing genuine hardship; supported by reasons explaining the delay and proof of the underlying excess-tax payment
Filed on the e-filing portal under Pending Actions > Response to Outstanding Demand; permits agree, agree-partly or disagree with supporting documents
Escalation channel for refunds determined under Section 143(1) but not credited; raises a ticket against the jurisdictional Pr. CIT and the CPC
Captures the deductor-wise and challan-wise breakdown of tax credit claimed; ties to Form 26AS and AIS for summary processing reconciliation
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961 establishes the foundational right to a refund. It is to be noted that any person who satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him, or on his behalf, or treated as paid by him for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year is entitled to a refund of the excess. The entitlement is statutory and not discretionary; the role of the Assessing Officer is to verify, not to grant ex gratia.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 239 provides that every claim for refund under Chapter XIX shall be made by furnishing a return of income in accordance with the provisions of Section 139. The earlier requirement of filing a separate Form 30 stood substituted by the Finance Act 2019 — the return itself is treated as the refund claim. The limitation period is governed by Section 139 — for original returns up to the due date under sub-section (1), and for delayed claims through the updated-return route under sub-section (8A) where eligible. Refund claims outside these timelines require condonation under Section 119(2)(b).
View sourceSection 241A, inserted by the Finance Act 2017, empowers the Assessing Officer to withhold the refund determined under Section 143(1) where the case has been selected for scrutiny under sub-section (2) of Section 143, if the grant of refund is likely to adversely affect the revenue. It is to be noted that the withholding requires the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, and reasons in writing must be recorded. The provision is a check on automatic refund release where a scrutiny addition is reasonably anticipated, and the assessee retains the remedy under Section 244A for interest on any refund eventually granted.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 244A provides for simple interest at one-half of one percent per month, or part of a month, on the amount of refund. Clause (a) covers refunds arising from any tax collected at source, advance tax or self-assessment tax — interest runs from the first day of April of the assessment year to the date on which the refund is granted, provided the return is furnished within the time prescribed under Section 139(1). Clause (aa) was inserted by the Finance Act 2016 to address refunds out of self-assessment tax, running interest from the date of furnishing of return or date of payment, whichever is later. Clause (b) covers other refunds, with interest from the date of payment of tax.
View sourceSection 245 permits the Assessing Officer, Refund Banker or the Centralised Processing Centre, in lieu of payment of the refund, to set off the amount to be refunded against the sum which remains payable under the Act by the person to whom the refund is due. The first proviso requires an intimation in writing to such person of the action proposed, and the person must be given an opportunity to respond before the adjustment is made. The fifteen-day window for response is administered through Annexure E intimations issued by the CPC. Stale or stayed demands are not eligible for adjustment.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 143 prescribes the summary processing under which a refund is ordinarily determined. After the prima-facie adjustments listed in clauses (a) to (d) of the proviso, where the tax credit and self-assessment payments exceed the tax payable on the computed total income, the excess is refundable and an intimation under sub-section (1) is issued. The intimation must be sent before the expiry of nine months from the end of the financial year in which the return was furnished. Failure to issue the intimation within the time limit converts the return acknowledgement itself into an intimation under sub-section (1).
View sourceBusinesses registered in Selaiyur share the Chennai South jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Tambaram Division each time. For Income Tax Refund at PIN 600073, understanding the Tambaram Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Selaiyur businesses tie back to the Tambaram Division, so our IT Refund cadence accounts for how that office works. The 600xx geo-zone covering Selaiyur groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Document pickup near Selaiyur Lake is a same-hour errand for our Selaiyur engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Freight and foot traffic from the Selaiyur Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Selaiyur, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential education pocket pocket. Vendors and customers tied to the Selaiyur Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Selaiyur Income Tax Refund clients. The residential education pocket mix of Selaiyur shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of healthcare activity and the commercial pulse around Selaiyur Lake.
For a residential business in Selaiyur, the Income Tax Refund scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. residential units around Selaiyur share recurring IT Refund patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. The residential character of Selaiyur commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a Income Tax Refund review needs. The residential firms we serve in Selaiyur value a IT Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm.
From the first Income Tax Refund cycle, a Selaiyur engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later. The Selaiyur Income Tax Refund workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Working papers for Selaiyur Income Tax Refund engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Fixed-fee scoping means a Selaiyur business knows the Income Tax Refund cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
From the same Selaiyur team we also serve Tambaram and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Coverage from Selaiyur naturally extends to Tambaram, so group entities across the area share one Income Tax Refund workflow. Proximity to Tambaram means a Selaiyur engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. A client relocating between Selaiyur and Tambaram keeps the same IT Refund file and the same team.
Sector signals in Selaiyur — seasonal healthcare swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule IT Refund work. Because we work repeatedly across Selaiyur, we can benchmark a new client's Income Tax Refund position against the locality norm. The longer we serve Selaiyur, the more precisely we predict where a IT Refund file needs attention. Each engagement in Selaiyur adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next IT Refund file.
For a new business incorporating in Selaiyur or shifting its principal place of business here, Income Tax Refund setup is one of the first things to get right. New residential ventures in Selaiyur lean on us to stand up Income Tax Refund correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. A startup setting up near St Joseph's College of Engineering in Selaiyur gets a IT Refund foundation built for the Tambaram Division from day one. We onboard new Selaiyur entities onto a Income Tax Refund cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Refund processing, Section 154 rectification, Section 245 set-off reply and Section 244A interest claim for Selaiyur taxpayers handled by qualified professionals through CPC Bengaluru and the jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
A dedicated refund consultant in Selaiyur reviews the Section 143(1) intimation, reconciles Form 26AS and AIS, files Section 154 rectification within 4 years, and computes Section 244A interest at 0.5% per month from 1 April of the AY.
Section 245(2) prior intimations are replied within the 21-day window in Selaiyur, and Section 241A withholding orders during scrutiny are challenged where the recorded reasons do not establish revenue prejudice.
For time-barred refund claims, Section 119(2)(b) condonation is filed under Circular 9/2015 read with Circular 11/2024 before the Pr.CCIT / CCIT / Pr.CIT, and Article 226 writ filed at the Madras HC where the department withholds refund without lawful authority.
Form 26AS reflects tax credits only; AIS additionally reflects high-value information receipts (interest, dividend, securities transactions) that the system pre-fills in returns and uses for Section 143(1)(a) prima-facie adjustments before granting refund.
Centralised Processing Centre Bengaluru processes all returns under Section 143(1), issues intimations, computes refunds and forwards them to State Bank of India for credit; jurisdictional AOs intervene only on rectification, scrutiny or appeal-effect orders.
No — Section 237 read with Section 139 makes a valid return a precondition to refund; even where total income is below taxable limit, a return must be filed within Section 139(4) belated-window or via Section 119(2)(b) condonation route.
Section 139 read with the e-verification rules treats an unverified return as invalid; CPC cannot process an invalid return; verify within 30 days of submission through Aadhaar OTP, net banking, bank EVC or by mailing signed ITR-V to CPC Bengaluru.
Log in to incometax.gov.in, navigate to 'Pending Actions then Worklist', open the Section 245 intimation, mark agreement or disagreement with the outstanding demand within 30 days, upload supporting documents where disputed; non-response is deemed consent.
Yes — file ITR claiming the TDS reflected in Form 16 and Form 26AS against your final liability; the differential is refundable; if employer made excess deduction in March, ensure your return captures the full TDS for credit.
What Selaiyur clients want to know before signing: Where Selaiyur differs: in the residential education pocket micro-market of Selaiyur.
Reading this guide locally — Selaiyur businesses operate where in the residential education pocket micro-market of Selaiyur.
An income tax refund arises under Section 237 of the Income-tax Act 1961, which provides that where any person satisfies the Assessing Officer that the amount of tax paid by him or on his behalf or treated as paid by him or on his behalf for any assessment year exceeds the amount with which he is properly chargeable under the Act for that year, he shall be entitled to a refund of the excess. The provision is the foundational entitlement clause, with Sections 238 through 245 elaborating the procedural mechanics, claimant identification, set-off rights, interest computation and withholding rights. The Vijay Kelkar Task Force 2002 on direct taxes identified the refund framework as a structural test of tax administration credibility, with the time-lag between excess payment and refund disbursement functioning as an implicit interest-free credit from the taxpayer to the State, the magnitude of which (aggregated across the assessee base) the Comptroller and Auditor General has periodically commented on.
Refund situations arise across multiple structural scenarios. Excess TDS withholding under Section 192 on salary occurs where the employer applies slab-rate deduction without crediting subsequent Chapter VI-A investments by the employee. Excess advance tax under Section 211 occurs where the cumulative instalments at the four prescribed dates exceed the actual self-assessment tax under Section 140A. Excess TDS under Sections 194 to 196D occurs where the payer applies the section-specific rate on gross receipts while the deductee's actual tax liability on net profits is lower. Excess self-assessment tax under Section 140A occurs where the taxpayer over-estimates the liability at the return-filing stage. Section 244A interest is payable on refunds in each of these scenarios, with the interest period commencing from the first day of April of the assessment year for prepaid taxes, and from the date of payment for self-assessment over-payments.
Section 238 prescribes who is entitled to make the refund claim. Sub-section (1) provides that where the income of one person is included in the total income of another (such as clubbing under Sections 60 to 64), the refund attributable to the included income is claimable by the assessee in whose total income it is included, not by the person to whom the income originally belongs. Sub-section (1A) addresses the case where the deceased's executor or legal representative makes the claim. Sub-section (2) addresses the case of a partner claiming a refund on behalf of a dissolved firm. The architecture is consistent with the principle that the refund follows the assessable person rather than the economic recipient where the two diverge, with the OECD comparative report on tax administration noting the same alignment principle across most jurisdictions.
Where the refund-reissue request itself fails or remains unprocessed beyond the standard timeline, the escalation pathway operates through the e-nivaran grievance redressal mechanism on the e-filing portal. The grievance is logged against the assessment year and the failure category, with the CPC helpdesk providing tracking updates. Where the e-nivaran resolution is unsatisfactory, the taxpayer may escalate to the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, who has supervisory authority over the CPC processing in respect of the taxpayer's PAN. The CBDT Citizen Charter prescribes service-level commitments for refund processing, with the escalation framework being the formal route for service-level enforcement where the timeline has been breached.
The Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru issues refund through the State Bank of India clearing layer, with the bank-account-credit being the operational endpoint. Refund failures arise from multiple sources. First, bank account closure or inoperative status due to non-compliance with the Know-Your-Customer revalidation requirements under the Reserve Bank of India Master Direction on KYC. Second, IFSC code change consequent on bank-branch merger or rationalisation. Third, account number-and-name mismatch arising from typographical errors in the return-filing stage. Fourth, account-type mismatch where a current account has been nominated for a personal refund. The structural mitigation is the e-filing portal bank-account-pre-validation utility introduced in 2019, which verifies the bank account before the return is even filed.
The refund-reissue procedure operates through the e-filing portal under Services then Refund Reissue. The taxpayer logs in with the PAN-based credentials, navigates to the assessment year showing the failed refund, selects the failure code displayed by the system, nominates a freshly validated bank account, and submits the reissue request. The submission acknowledgement is issued instantly, with the reissue processing typically completed within fifteen to thirty days of the request. Where the failure was due to KYC-inoperativeness, the taxpayer must first complete the KYC revalidation with the bank before the reissue can succeed. The OECD 2022 update on pre-filled returns identifies the Indian refund-reissue automation as a model digital-administration framework worth comparative study.
Rule 37BA of the Income-tax Rules 1962 prescribes the framework for TDS credit allocation. Sub-rule (1) provides that the credit is given to the person from whose income the deduction has been made, even if the deduction is recorded against a different PAN. Sub-rule (2) addresses the case of joint ownership (multiple deductees), allowing apportionment among co-owners by declaration to the deductor. Sub-rule (3) addresses the timing of credit, providing that credit is given in the assessment year in which the corresponding income is assessable. The Rule 37BA framework is the principal procedural anchor for resolving Form 26AS reconciliation discrepancies, with the deductor-side correction operating through Rule 37BA-aligned revised return filing.
Where Form 26AS discrepancies are identified only after return filing, the post-filing correction operates through the e-nivaran grievance redressal mechanism. The taxpayer logs the grievance against the assessment year and the deductor PAN, with the supporting documentation (Form 16A from the deductor, bank statement for the underlying transaction, and the corrected-26AS expectation). The grievance is routed to the deductor-side jurisdictional Assessing Officer (TDS) who corresponds with the deductor for the revised quarterly return filing. Once the Form 26AS is updated, the taxpayer may file Section 154 rectification of the prior assessment year return to claim the corrected credit, with the consequential refund accruing Section 244A interest from the date of the original return filing.
Form 26AS reconciliation is the foundational pre-filing exercise for refund-claim accuracy. The taxpayer downloads the latest Form 26AS from the e-filing portal under My Account then View Form 26AS, with the statement covering Part A (TDS), Part B (TCS), Part C (advance tax and self-assessment tax), Part D (refunds in the year), Part E (high-value financial transactions under Section 285BA where applicable) and the historical-information sections. The reconciliation against the taxpayer's primary records (Form 16 from employers, Form 16A from non-salary deductors, bank statements for advance tax challan acknowledgements, and Section 140A self-assessment challan acknowledgement) is conducted line by line, with discrepancies escalated to the deductor for correction before return-filing.
The AIS feedback mechanism allows the taxpayer to submit responses under five categories. Category 1 (information is correct) confirms the AIS entry. Category 2 (information is not fully correct) flags partial inaccuracy with explanation. Category 3 (information relates to other person) flags PAN-misallocation. Category 4 (information is duplicate) flags repeated entries from the same source. Category 5 (information is denied) flags non-existent transactions. The feedback updates the Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS) which feeds the pre-fill of the next return. The CBDT in Circular 8/2021 paragraph 8 explicitly clarified that AIS-reported values are informational and the taxpayer's primary records remain authoritative, with the AIS feedback mechanism providing the formal channel for correction.
The Taxpayer Information Summary (TIS) functions as the simplified derived view of AIS, presenting category-wise aggregates compatible with the pre-fill of ITR forms. The Centralised Processing Centre at Bengaluru cross-references the TIS values against the return-disclosed values during Section 143(1) processing, with material divergences triggering prima facie adjustments under Section 143(1)(a). The refund processing is therefore dependent on TIS-aligned return disclosure, with any deviation requiring substantiation in the response window to the Section 143(1) intimation. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration 2022 update on pre-filled returns identifies the AIS-TIS-pre-fill architecture as a leading example of informational integration in modern tax administration design.
Notwithstanding the comprehensive AIS architecture, certain limitations persist. First, the AIS data is only as accurate as the source reporting by depositories, banks and other information-source entities, with no independent verification at the CBDT level. Second, the AIS feedback resolution depends on the source entity's cooperation, which may be delayed where the source is a smaller entity with limited technology infrastructure. Third, certain transactional categories (such as foreign-source income reported under treaty information exchange) lag the standard reporting timeline. The CBDT Circular 8/2021 reaffirmation of primary-record primacy provides the operational safeguard, with the taxpayer's books and supporting documentation remaining the authoritative reference in case of AIS-versus-records divergence.
What Selaiyur clients usually ask next: Where Selaiyur differs: for the professional and salaried population of Selaiyur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Section 119(2)(b) condonation is the relief granted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, or its delegated authority, to admit a refund claim filed beyond the statutory limitation. The application demonstrates genuine hardship, absence of culpable delay and proof of the underlying overpayment, subject to the monetary thresholds and six-year outer limit in CBDT Circular 9 of 2015.
Genuine hardship is the standard used by CBDT under Section 119(2)(b) and by appellate authorities under Section 220(6) to evaluate condonation and stay requests. The phrase has been judicially construed to mean real and substantial inconvenience to the assessee, not necessarily insolvency, and is informed by surrounding circumstances on the record.
Outstanding demand is the amount payable by the assessee under any provision of the Income-tax Act 1961, as reflected on the Outstanding Demand register maintained on the e-filing portal. The demand may be raised on processing, scrutiny, penalty, interest or appellate giving-effect; it is the eligible counterpart for Section 245 set-off against a determined refund.
Stay of demand is the order under Section 220(6), or by CIT(A), ITAT or a higher court, restraining the recovery proceedings against an outstanding demand. The stay protects the demand from being adjusted under Section 245 against a determined refund, provided the stay order is uploaded with the response.
Faceless assessment under Section 144B is the e-Proceedings framework where the Assessing Unit, Verification Unit, Technical Unit and Review Unit operate through the National Faceless Assessment Centre. Refund determinations arising from faceless scrutiny are subject to the same Section 244A interest rules and Section 245 set-off framework as regular assessments.
Section 143(1)(a) adjustments are the prima-facie corrections made by CPC during summary processing — arithmetical errors, incorrect claims apparent from the return, denial of loss claim in belated return, denial of expenditure shown in audit report but not in computation, and inclusion of AIS or Form 26AS income not reported. These adjustments reduce refund quantum.
Form 26B is the TRACES form filed by a deductor to claim refund of TDS deposited in excess of liability. The application requires an indemnity bond, must be supported by the CIT(TDS) sanction where the amount exceeds prescribed thresholds, and is processed after settlement of any outstanding deductor defaults on TRACES.
TDS credit is the credit for tax deducted at source available to the deductee under Section 199, read with Rule 37BA. The credit is claimable in the assessment year in which the income subjected to deduction is assessable. Mismatches between Form 26AS and the return drive summary disallowance and refund shrinkage.
Advance tax is the tax payable in instalments during the financial year by an assessee whose tax liability after TDS exceeds ₹10,000, under Sections 207 to 211. Overpayment of advance tax against the assessed liability gives rise to a refund eligible for Section 244A(1)(a) interest from 1 April of the assessment year.
Self-assessment tax is the balance tax paid by the assessee under Section 140A while furnishing the return, after taking credit for TDS, TCS and advance tax. Where the eventual assessment reduces the liability, the self-assessment payment becomes refundable; Section 244A(1)(aa) governs the interest from the date of payment or furnishing of return, whichever is later.
Tax Collected at Source is the tax collected by a seller from the buyer under Section 206C on specified transactions — sale of scrap, motor vehicles above ₹10 lakh, foreign-remittance under LRS and similar. TCS credit is claimable by the buyer in the return; excess TCS over the buyer's liability is refundable under the Section 237 framework.
Schedule TDS-1 is the schedule within the income-tax return where deductor-wise breakdown of salary TDS is reported. Entries here are matched against Part A of Form 26AS during summary processing. Mismatches in deductor TAN, name or amount trigger Section 143(1)(a)(iii) adjustments and consequent refund reduction.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Selaiyur businesses typically avoid these: Where Selaiyur differs: the business activity radiating outward from St Joseph's College of Engineering and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Selaiyur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Selaiyur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from St Joseph's College of Engineering and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Selaiyur engagements look the way they do: Where Selaiyur differs: the cluster of education, residential, healthcare businesses that defines Selaiyur's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Selaiyur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“My AY 2022-23 refund of ₹1.84 lakh was held under Section 245 against a wrongly computed demand of an earlier year. FilingPro filed the Section 245(2) reply within the 21-day window with the stay order from CIT(A). Refund credited within 6 weeks with full Section 244A interest. Surgical work.”
“TDS of ₹47,500 deducted by my tenant did not reflect in Form 26AS because they had quoted my PAN incorrectly. CPC denied the credit in the Section 143(1) intimation. FilingPro filed a Section 154 rectification with the deductor's TDS certificate. Refund recomputed and credited in 11 weeks.”
“My refund kept failing for three reissue attempts because my bank account had become PAN-de-linked after the Aadhaar-PAN deadline. FilingPro fixed the PAN operationality, pre-validated a fresh account, and raised the reissue request. Refund credited the very next cycle.”
“For AY 2017-18 the return was missed. Refund of ₹62,000 was clearly due based on Form 16 TDS. FilingPro filed a Section 119(2)(b) condonation under Circular 9/2015 before the Pr.CIT explaining the bona fide hardship. Condonation was granted, return filed, refund received with interest. Outstanding work.”
“Refund of ₹2.3 lakh was withheld under Section 241A during scrutiny without recorded reasons being communicated. FilingPro filed a writ petition before the Madras HC. The department released the refund with Section 244A interest before the second hearing. Strong professional advocacy.”
“My Section 143(1) intimation showed an addition under Section 143(1)(a)(vi) for an AIS entry that was actually duplicated. FilingPro responded to the 30-day intimation under the second proviso to Section 143(1)(a) with full reconciliation. The adjustment was dropped and the original refund of ₹1.12 lakh was issued.”
Common questions from Selaiyur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Selaiyur we look after firms on Madambakkam Road, Maraimalai Adigal Street, Pamban Swamigal Salai, V.O.C. Street and Sundaram Smart city phase 1 as well as the 1st Street, 2nd Cross Street, Camp Salai and Velachery Mudhanmai Salai corridors — local IT Refund without the cross-city travel.
Professional Income Tax Refund in Selaiyur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.