Qualified GST Revocation for Valasaravakkam (PIN 600087) and adjacent Virugambakkam — handled by a qualified, in-house team
GST Revocation for Valasaravakkam firms under Chennai West (Poonamallee Division) — qualified review, a 7-year workpaper archive and fixed fees from day one. Call 9566-068-468.
Generally no — late fee paid for delayed returns leading to cancellation is not refundable. However, where a subsequent amnesty notification (e.g., Notification 07/2023) waives or caps late fee, the excess paid can be claimed as refund under Section 54 within the 2-year window, supported by the amnesty notification reference.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Revocation in Valasaravakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
All pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for the cancellation period are filed with ARN before REG-21. The portal Rule 23(1) block is pre-emptively cleared so the application sails through without rejection.
Section 47 late fee (₹50/day, ₹20/day NIL) and Section 50 interest at 18% per annum on net cash liability are computed period-by-period and discharged through PMT-06 / DRC-03 before REG-21 — eliminating the most common rejection ground.
For Valasaravakkam cases between 90 and 180 days, we draft the Commissioner extension request with a detailed sufficient cause affidavit covering illness, family bereavement, accountant default or business disruption — converting time-barred cases into within-window cases.
Where the officer issues REG-23 minded to reject, our reply is drafted and filed within the 7-working-day window with supporting evidence and case-law citations. Personal hearing representation under Rule 23(3) is included at no extra cost.
For Valasaravakkam cases beyond 180 days, we file a writ petition before the Madras HC under Article 226 citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021) and Aap and Co. natural justice principles to direct the department to consider belated revocation.
Notification 03/2023-Central Tax (read with 24/2023) provided amnesty for cancellation orders upto 31-Dec-2022. Where applicable, we leverage this notification to file REG-21 outside the regular window on amnesty conditions.
Every GST Revocation engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Valasaravakkam, the clusters of restaurants coaching centres and IT-workforce housing across Krishna Nagar Padmanabha Nagar and Sakthi Nagar; with direct Arcot Road access to Porur Junction Koyambedu Roundtana and Vadapalani.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Valasaravakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Valasaravakkam, Valasaravakkam's blend of TNHB layouts mid-tier apartments and SME service businesses.
Deadline pressure points we see in Valasaravakkam: On the ground in Valasaravakkam, for Valasaravakkam businesses operating in the mid-revenue service-firm bracket.
Notice issued by the proper officer where prima facie grounds exist to reject the REG-21 revocation application — typically incomplete returns, unpaid arrears, or insufficient reasoning for delay
Taxpayer's reply to REG-23 carrying clarifications, documentary proof of return-filing, payment challans, and submissions on reasonable cause for delay
Order of the proper officer rejecting the REG-21 revocation application after considering REG-24 reply or where no reply is received within the prescribed time
Cancellation order under Section 29(2) which is the order against which revocation under Section 30 is sought; the date of its communication starts the 90-day Section 30 clock
Show-cause notice preceding suo motu cancellation — addressing this at the REG-18 stage pre-empts the need for later revocation under Section 30
Taxpayer's reply to the REG-17 show-cause; filing of all defaulted returns during this window can lead to REG-20 dropping of proceedings
Order dropping cancellation proceedings where the REG-18 reply is satisfactory — typically because all pending returns have been filed with dues paid
Summary monthly return capturing output tax, ITC availed, and net tax paid; every defaulted GSTR-3B for the period up to cancellation must be filed before REG-21 can be entertained
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is the substantive provision empowering a registered person whose registration has been cancelled suo motu by the proper officer under Section 29(2) to seek restoration. Sub-section (1) of Section 30 provides that the application shall be filed in the prescribed manner within ninety days from the date of service of the cancellation order. The first proviso, as substituted by the Finance Act 2023, empowers the Commissioner or an officer authorised by him to extend the said period of ninety days by such further period not exceeding one hundred and eighty days. It is to be noted that revocation is available only against suo motu cancellation and not against voluntary cancellation under Section 29(1).
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 23 of the CGST Rules prescribes Form GST REG-21 as the application for revocation, filed electronically on the common portal. The application must accompany payment of all dues, filing of all pending returns and payment of late fee and interest. Sub-rule (2) requires the proper officer, on being satisfied, to revoke the cancellation in Form REG-22 within thirty days. Sub-rule (3) prescribes Form REG-23 as the show-cause where the officer proposes to reject the revocation application, calling for reply in Form REG-24 within seven working days.
View sourceRule 22 prescribes the procedure preceding suo motu cancellation under Section 29(2). Sub-rule (1) requires issuance of show-cause in Form REG-17, reply in Form REG-18 within seven working days, and order of cancellation in Form REG-19 within thirty days of reply. Sub-rule (4) is critical for revocation practice — if the taxpayer files all pending returns and pays the dues during the pendency of cancellation proceedings, the officer may drop the proceedings by passing an order in Form REG-20, obviating the need for revocation under Section 30 altogether.
View sourceSection 47 prescribes the late fee payable for delayed furnishing of returns under Section 39 read with Section 37. Sub-section (1) of Section 47 imposes a late fee of two hundred rupees per day (one hundred CGST and one hundred SGST) subject to a maximum of five thousand rupees per return. It is to be noted that the late fee is payable for every pending return that the taxpayer files as a precondition for the revocation application, and Notification 07/2023-Central Tax provides a specific cap for revocation cases where returns relate to financial years up to 2021-22.
View sourceThe Finance Act 2023 substituted the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 30 with effect from 1 October 2023. The earlier two-tier extension — sixty days by the Additional or Joint Commissioner and a further sixty days by the Commissioner — was replaced with a single outer extension of one hundred and eighty days exercisable by the Commissioner or an officer authorised by him. The total outer window from the date of cancellation order therefore stands at two hundred and seventy days, beyond which Section 30 itself ceases to be available and the taxpayer must apply for fresh registration in Form REG-01.
View sourceSection 75 contains general procedural safeguards applicable across adjudicatory exercises under the CGST Act. Sub-section (4) of Section 75 mandates that an opportunity of personal hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing or where any adverse decision is contemplated. It is to be noted that this principle has been imported by Madras High Court rulings into the revocation context — rejection of REG-21 without a personal hearing on the REG-23 show-cause is amenable to challenge under Article 226.
View sourceStatutory correspondence for Valasaravakkam businesses routes through the Poonamallee Division, so we align every GST Revocation engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Poonamallee Division of the Chennai West handles Valasaravakkam filings and approvals. Valasaravakkam is a settled residential locality along Arcot Road, with growing retail, small healthcare clinics and neighbourhood services. GST clients are typically retail, restaurants and small services. The 600xx geo-zone covering Valasaravakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Working in Valasaravakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to Karambakkam and the Valasaravakkam Bus Terminus corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Vendors and customers tied to the Valasaravakkam Bus Terminus network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Valasaravakkam GST Revocation clients. Valasaravakkam reads as a residential with retail growth pocket with medium commercial activity, anchored around Karambakkam and fed by the Valasaravakkam Bus Terminus corridor. Commercial activity in Valasaravakkam runs medium, so GST Revocation volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Valasaravakkam desk accordingly.
A small trade operator in Valasaravakkam gets a GST Revocation workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. Because Valasaravakkam hosts a cluster of small trade businesses, we benchmark each new GST Revocation engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. small trade units around Valasaravakkam share recurring GST Revocation patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. Mixed small trade activity across Valasaravakkam means our GST Revocation team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client.
Every GST Revocation file we open for Valasaravakkam is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Our Valasaravakkam GST Revocation process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. The Valasaravakkam GST Revocation workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. From the first GST Revocation cycle, a Valasaravakkam engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later.
GST Revocation clients in Maduravoyal are handled by the same practitioners who run our Valasaravakkam desk. We treat Valasaravakkam and Maduravoyal as one catchment for GST Revocation, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. A client relocating between Valasaravakkam and Maduravoyal keeps the same GST Revocation file and the same team. Group companies spread across Valasaravakkam and Maduravoyal consolidate their GST Revocation under one engagement with us.
The longer we serve Valasaravakkam, the more precisely we predict where a GST Revocation file needs attention. The GST Revocation mistakes we see most in Valasaravakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Each engagement in Valasaravakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Revocation file. Recurring gaps in Valasaravakkam retail records are the first thing our GST Revocation review closes out.
New small trade ventures in Valasaravakkam lean on us to stand up GST Revocation correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. For a new business incorporating in Valasaravakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Revocation setup is one of the first things to get right. Shifting principal place of business to Valasaravakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai West, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. First-time GST Revocation for a Valasaravakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
REG-21 revocation of suo motu cancelled GSTIN under Section 30 of the CGST Act for Valasaravakkam businesses, filed within the 90/180 day statutory window with all pending returns cleared and tax dues paid.
A dedicated GST revocation consultant in Valasaravakkam handles REG-19 cancellation order review, pending returns clearance, late fee and interest computation, REG-23 SCN reply and Commissioner extension requests beyond 90 days.
On-time REG-21 application within 90 days of the cancellation order in Valasaravakkam avoids the need for High Court writ remedy. Where the window has lapsed, Notification 03/2023 amnesty conditions and Tvl Suguna Cutpiece principles are invoked.
For time-barred cases beyond the 180-day outer limit in Valasaravakkam, writ remedy under Article 226 is pursued before the Madras High Court citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021) and Aap and Co. natural justice precedents.
REG-14 must be filed first to update the authorised signatory and the digital signature certificate. Only thereafter can REG-21 be filed under the new signatory. Without REG-14 update the portal will not accept the REG-21 submission.
Where the cancellation ground was Section 29(2)(b) non-conduct of business at the principal place, a fresh physical verification is typically directed. The applicant should keep the premises ready with signboard, lease deed, electricity bill and operating staff for the verification visit.
Composition-scheme cancellation under Rule 6 is distinct from GSTIN cancellation under Section 29. Where the composition option lapses and the GSTIN itself is cancelled for migration default, REG-21 must be combined with the regular-scheme tax-back computation and CMP-04 filing.
Yes. Section 50 of the CGST Act prescribes interest at eighteen per cent per annum on tax not paid by the due date. The interest accrues from the original due date until actual payment, even where the payment is contemporaneous with REG-21 filing.
Section 47 of the CGST Act prescribes late fee of fifty rupees per day for non-nil returns and twenty rupees per day for nil returns, subject to a notified ceiling per return. CBIC amnesty notifications periodically cap the cumulative late fee.
Yes. The legal heir files REG-14 to update proprietor particulars, files REG-21 with the death certificate and legal heir certificate, and files ITC-02 to transfer accumulated input tax credit. Section 18(3) of the CGST Act read with Rule 41 governs the credit transfer.
What Valasaravakkam clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Valasaravakkam, in the busy Arcot Road corridor of Valasaravakkam between Porur and Vadapalani.
Reading this guide locally — In Valasaravakkam, across Valasaravakkam's mid-density residential layouts and the AGS Colony commercial belt.
Revocation as a procedural remedy operates within the federal architecture of Article 246A which empowers both Parliament and State Legislatures to make laws on GST and Article 279A which constitutes the GST Council as the recommending body. The 47th GST Council meeting at Chandigarh, the 48th meeting and the 49th meeting iteratively refined the procedural timelines around Section 30, recognising that the original ninety-day Section 30(1) window had proved too tight for many registered persons whose books were disrupted by the cancellation itself. The Council recommendations translated into Notification 03/2023-Central Tax and Notification 23/2023-Central Tax amnesty schemes, evidencing that the Section 30 architecture is responsive to operational realities rather than rigidly statutory. The State-side concurrent provision in each State GST Act mirrors Section 30 of the CGST Act, so revocation operates uniformly across CGST, SGST and IGST limbs of the same registered person's identity.
The pre-GST indirect-tax regime under State VAT Acts and the Central Excise Act 1944 had no unified revocation architecture comparable to Section 30. State VAT cancellations were typically followed by fresh registration if the dealer wished to continue, with the prior credit balance generally forfeited. Central Excise registration under Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 was structurally tied to the manufacturing premises and rarely cancelled administratively. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper noted this gap as a friction point in the destination-based design and recommended a unified revocation pathway with input-credit-chain preservation. Section 30 in its present form is the direct legislative response to that recommendation, and the comparative jump from forfeiture-under-VAT to ledger-preservation-under-GST is conceptually significant for understanding why the revocation window matters so much to the credit-chain.
Revocation of cancellation of registration occupies a distinct conceptual space within the GST framework, separate from cancellation under Section 29 and separate from fresh registration under Section 25. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had treated the registration register as the foundational ledger of the destination-based design; Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 operationalises a recovery pathway when that ledger entry is removed administratively without the underlying business having ceased. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat registration continuity as essential to credit-chain integrity, and revocation is the mechanism by which an inadvertent break in that chain is reversed without forcing the registered person to begin afresh. The conceptual distinction matters because revocation preserves the original Goods and Services Tax Identification Number, the input tax credit ledger balance accumulated up to the cancellation date, the turnover history, and the customer-side invoice linkages already captured in GSTR-2B at the recipient end. Fresh registration under Section 25 would lose all four of these continuity advantages, which is why Section 30 sits as a discrete remedial section within Chapter VI of the CGST Act.
Section 107(6) of the CGST Act requires a pre-deposit before the appeal can be entertained. The pre-deposit is the full amount of tax, interest, fine, fee and penalty arising from the impugned order that the appellant has admitted plus ten percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute arising from the said order, subject to a cap. The pre-deposit operates as a procedural threshold rather than a substantive concession. In the context of revocation rejection under REG-05, the pre-deposit requirement is generally minimal because the underlying order is a procedural rejection of the revocation application rather than a tax-demand order. The Section 107(6) framework is nevertheless engaged and the pre-deposit calculation should be done before filing the appeal to avoid procedural delays.
The appellate review under Section 107 is on both law and facts. The Appellate Authority can confirm, modify, or annul the impugned order. In the context of revocation rejection, the appellate review typically focuses on whether the natural-justice requirements were met (was a REG-23 show cause notice issued, was a personal hearing offered, were the reasons for rejection recorded in writing in REG-05), and whether the Rule 23(1) precondition compliance was correctly evaluated. The Appellate Authority has discretion to remand the matter back to the proper officer for fresh consideration where the procedural record is incomplete. In practice, remand is the most common outcome where the underlying rejection was on procedural grounds rather than substantive non-compliance.
Beyond the first appeal under Section 107 lies the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 109 of the CGST Act read with subsequent amendments operationalising the Tribunal architecture. The Tribunal is the second appellate forum and reviews orders of the first Appellate Authority. As an alternate parallel route, where the rejection order suffers from a jurisdictional error or violates fundamental natural-justice principles, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the jurisdictional High Court is available. The writ route bypasses the appellate hierarchy but is generally invoked only where the appellate route is inadequate or where the question is of broader legal significance. The Section 107 first appeal remains the principal and most efficient remedy for ordinary revocation rejection orders.
Section 30(1) of the CGST Act, as originally enacted, provided that any registered person whose registration is cancelled by the proper officer on his own motion may apply to such officer for revocation of cancellation of the registration in the prescribed manner within thirty days reckoned from when the cancellation order is served. The provision underwent material amendment through the Finance Act 2023 which extended the base window from thirty days to ninety days subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be prescribed. The amendment was notified through Notification 22/2023-Central Tax and brought into force on a date appointed by the central government. The base window of ninety days therefore now represents the standard statutory entitlement, with the earlier thirty-day version surviving only in the historical record. Practical commentary still occasionally refers to the thirty-day window, which is no longer the operative position.
The first proviso to Section 30(1), inserted by the Finance Act 2020 with retrospective effect, empowered the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner, as the case may be, to extend the said period of thirty days on sufficient cause being shown. The Finance Act 2023 amendment carried this proviso forward in modified form aligned with the new ninety-day base. The extension under the first proviso can be granted for a period not exceeding thirty days, taking the cumulative window to one hundred and twenty days counted from when REG-19 was served on the registered person. The proviso operates on a sufficient-cause threshold, which the appellate authorities have interpreted to include documented circumstances such as the registered person being out of country, hospitalisation of the proprietor or authorised signatory, natural disasters affecting business premises, and other comparable operational disruptions, examined on a case-specific basis.
The second proviso to Section 30(1), also a Finance Act 2020 insertion read with Finance Act 2023 alignment, empowered the Commissioner to further extend the period referred to in the first proviso on sufficient cause being shown. The Commissioner extension can be granted for a period not exceeding thirty days, taking the cumulative window from one hundred and twenty days under the first proviso to one hundred and fifty days. The two-tier extension architecture is significant: the first thirty-day extension is at the Joint Commissioner or Additional Commissioner level and the second thirty-day extension is at the Commissioner level, providing administrative gradation in the sufficient-cause review. Where the registered person genuinely needs more than the base ninety-day window, the procedural strategy is to file the extension application under the first proviso within the ninety-day window and chain it with a second-proviso application within the cumulative one-twenty-day window if needed.
The ninety-day Section 30(1) window is conceptually shorter than the three-month appellate limitation under Section 107(1) of the CGST Act, but operationally they serve different remedial purposes. Section 30 is a return-filing-and-restoration route premised on the registered person accepting the underlying default and curing it; Section 107 is a merits-review route premised on contesting the cancellation itself. The comparative perspective matters when choosing the remedy: if the default is genuine and curable, Section 30 is the shorter and more reliable path; if the cancellation is itself contestable, for example where the consecutive-default count was wrongly computed or where the cancellation order is not a speaking order, Section 107 is the appropriate path even though it is procedurally longer. The two routes are not mutually exclusive; a registered person can pursue Section 30 first and reserve Section 107 as a fallback within its own limitation.
The ninety-day window under Section 30(1) runs from the day Form REG-19 is served on the registered person. Date of service is governed by Section 169 of the CGST Act which prescribes alternate modes including giving or tendering it directly, registered post or speed post with acknowledgement, communication through the email address provided at the time of registration, making it available on the common portal, publication in a newspaper, or affixing it in some conspicuous place. The most common mode for cancellation orders is portal-availability under Section 169(1)(d), with the date of service deemed to be the date on which the order is uploaded to the registered person's dashboard. The General Clauses Act 1897 principles on computation of period apply: the date of service is excluded from the count and the period ends at the close of the ninetieth day.
Operationally the ninety-day window must accommodate several discrete tasks before REG-21 can be filed. The Rule 23(1) precondition requires that all returns due for the cancellation default period are filed first along with payment of tax, interest, penalty and late fee. The reconstruction of GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for the default window typically takes between fifteen and thirty days depending on book quality and the length of the default period. The interest computation under Section 50 and late fee computation under Section 47 require head-wise tabulation. Practical milestone planning therefore allocates the first forty-five days to returns reconstruction and payment, the next fifteen days to REG-21 drafting and filing, and the residual thirty days as buffer for any REG-23 show cause notice that may be issued. Compressing the timeline below this allocation risks missed disclosures that translate into REG-23 queries.
What Valasaravakkam clients usually ask next: On the ground in Valasaravakkam, for Valasaravakkam businesses operating in the mid-revenue service-firm bracket.
Section 29(2)(c) is the most common cancellation trigger encountered in revocation practice — non-filing of returns by a regular taxpayer for a continuous period of six months. Revocation against this ground requires every defaulted GSTR-3B to be filed with tax, interest and late fee before REG-21 is accepted.
Section 29(2)(b) is the cancellation ground for a voluntary registrant under Section 25(3) who has not commenced business within six months from registration. Revocation requires positive proof of business commencement — invoices, GSTR-1 filings, bank receipts or commercial agreements.
Section 29(2)(e) is the cancellation ground for registrations obtained by fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Revocation in such cases is procedurally available but practically difficult — the taxpayer must demonstrate absence of fraud, and the matter often moves to appellate adjudication under Section 107.
Rule 22(4) drop refers to the dropping of cancellation proceedings by the proper officer in Form REG-20 where the taxpayer files all pending returns during the pendency of the REG-17 show-cause notice. This pre-empts the need for later revocation under Section 30 entirely.
Date of cancellation order is the date of service of Form REG-19 on the registered person, from which the 90-day Section 30 limitation begins to run. Service is effected through the common portal email and registered SMS, and the date is reflected in the portal application status.
Effective date of cancellation is the date from which the cancellation operates substantively — which may be retrospective under the proviso to Section 29(2) in fraud cases. This date determines the period for which returns must be filed before REG-21 can be entertained.
Aggregate dues refers to the consolidated amount of tax, interest under Section 50 and late fee under Section 47 that must be discharged through the Electronic Cash Ledger before REG-21 can be submitted. The portal validates the ECL balance against the dues at submission stage.
Late fee cap is the maximum late fee payable per return under Section 47, ordinarily five thousand rupees per return. Specific revocation amnesty notifications have prescribed lower caps for older period returns — Notification 07/2023-CT capped the late fee for the amnesty window.
Interest on cash component refers to the Section 50 interest computed only on the net cash liability discharged after ITC set-off, pursuant to the retrospective proviso to Section 50(1). For revocation arrears, this is the interest payable on the cash portion of each defaulted GSTR-3B.
Section 16(4) bar is the time limit on ITC availment — no ITC can be claimed in respect of any invoice or debit note after the 30th of November following the relevant financial year. The bar is a critical consideration when filing defaulted GSTR-3B during revocation, as ITC for older periods may already be lost.
Amnesty scheme refers to special notifications issued from time to time providing an extended window for filing revocation applications outside the Section 30 limitation, subject to filing of all pending returns and payment of dues. Notification 03/2023-CT and 23/2023-CT were the most recent examples, both now expired.
Common portal validation refers to the GSTN system-level checks that block submission of REG-21 unless every pending return is shown as filed and the Electronic Cash Ledger reflects the dues. The validation reduces officer-level rejection but increases pre-submission preparation work for the taxpayer.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Valasaravakkam businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Valasaravakkam, Valasaravakkam's blend of TNHB layouts mid-tier apartments and SME service businesses; for Valasaravakkam businesses operating in the mid-revenue service-firm bracket.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Valasaravakkam, the strong concentration of healthcare clinics chartered accountants and boutique retail along the Valasaravakkam Arcot Road stretch.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Valasaravakkam engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Valasaravakkam, Valasaravakkam's blend of TNHB layouts mid-tier apartments and SME service businesses; for Valasaravakkam businesses operating in the mid-revenue service-firm bracket.
“Our GSTIN was cancelled suo motu after we missed 8 months of GSTR-3B during a family medical emergency. FilingPro filed all pending returns, computed late fee and interest, and submitted REG-21 within the 90-day window. REG-22 came through in 14 working days. Saved our business from re-registration nightmare.”
“Our cancellation order was 6 months old when we approached FilingPro — well past the 90-day window. They drafted a Commissioner extension request with sufficient cause affidavit and got it allowed. REG-21 then went through. Genuinely impressed with their procedural depth.”
“Received REG-23 SCN after our REG-21 application. FilingPro drafted the reply within the 7-working-day window with supporting documents and case-law citations. The officer passed REG-22 after personal hearing. Strong drafting work.”
“Our case was 14 months past the cancellation order — completely time-barred. FilingPro filed a Madras HC writ petition citing Tvl Suguna Cutpiece (W.P. 25048/2021). The court directed the department to consider revocation. Eventually got REG-22 after filing all pending returns. Litigation-grade work.”
“FilingPro leveraged Notification 03/2023 amnesty for our 2021 cancellation order — would have been impossible otherwise. All pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B filed, late fee discharged, REG-21 went through under amnesty conditions. Excellent timing and knowledge.”
“After REG-22 was passed, FilingPro also handled the buyer-side ITC restoration — coordinated with our customers, ensured invoices flowed to their GSTR-2B and ITC was claimed within Section 16(4) limit. End-to-end revocation handling, not just a form filing.”
Common questions from Valasaravakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Valasaravakkam, from Mettukuppam Main road, Sri Devi Kuppam Main Road, 2nd Main Road, 3rd Main Road and Indira Gandhi Road to the Perumal Koil Street, Poothapedu Road, Radha Nagar Main Road and Sri Lakshmi Nagar 3rd Main Road commercial pockets, with GST Revocation handled end to end.
Professional GST Revocation in Valasaravakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.