GST Refund cadence for Tharamani firms near Tharamani Bus Stop — with same-day acknowledgement delivery
Professional GST Refund in Tharamani (PIN 600113), Chennai — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 54 of the CGST Act recognises refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated unutilised ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89, accumulated ITC due to inverted duty structure under Rule 89(5), excess balance in the electronic cash ledger, refund on finalisation of provisional assessment, deemed exports refund, embassy/UN agency refund, and refund of tax paid by mistake. Each category has its own eligibility test and documentation set.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Refund in Tharamani — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where RFD-06 rejection is wrongful, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months at the First Appellate Authority — APL-01 drafted, 10% pre-deposit computed, hearing represented end-to-end.
For service exports, FIRC and BRC are coordinated with authorised dealer banks before RFD-01 filing — Section 2(6) IGST Act realisation proof complete from day one.
Share your shipping bills, FIRC, GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B on WhatsApp at our number — we handle the rest. Tharamani clients work with us entirely remotely from filing to sanction.
Every refund application is filed well within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation from the relevant date. Tharamani clients have zero time-bar rejections on record.
For Tharamani exporters under Rule 89, provisional refund of 90% is pursued in RFD-04 within 7 days of acknowledgement — releasing working capital while the balance 10% is processed in detail.
Every Statement-3 invoice line is tied to GSTR-1 Table 6A and shipping bill EGM data. Mismatches are amended via Table 9A in the next GSTR-1 before refund officer scrutiny.
Every GST Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Tharamani, the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric; served by short connections to Tidel Park and Kotturpuram and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Tharamani clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Tharamani, Tharamani businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation; the business activity radiating outward from IIT Madras Research Park and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Tharamani: Where Tharamani differs: supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar. We see for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Forms most asked about here — In Tharamani, where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
Final adjudicatory order on the refund claim — sanctions the eligible refund in full or in part, or rejects the claim on stated grounds; appealable under Section 107
Part A used for withholding refund under Section 54(10) or 54(11); Part B used to communicate adjustment of sanctioned refund against demand outstanding on the applicant
Show-cause notice issued by the proper officer where the officer proposes to reject the refund claim in whole or in part — the applicant gets an opportunity to file a reply in RFD-09 before the RFD-06 rejection order
Applicant's reply to the RFD-08 show-cause notice carrying defence, supporting case law, documentary clarifications and any supplementary computation
Quarterly refund claim by UIN holders — specialised agencies of the United Nations, multilateral financial institutions, consulates, embassies of foreign countries and notified categories under Section 55
Annual undertaking by an exporter under Rule 96A enabling shipment of goods or supply of services overseas without paying integrated tax — accumulated input tax credit is recovered through RFD-01 under Rule 89(4)
Annexure attached to RFD-01 capturing the Rule 89(5) computation period-wise — turnover of inverted-rated supply, Net ITC restricted to inputs, Adjusted Total Turnover and tax payable on the inverted supply
Annexure to RFD-01 for refund of IGST or accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies — invoice-wise details of exports including shipping bill number, port code, EGM reference, foreign currency value, INR value and tax claimed
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Statutory hooks that bite here — In Tharamani, Tharamani businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation; where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Section 54 is the parent provision governing every refund claim under the GST regime. Sub-section (1) of Section 54 provides that any person seeking refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him may make an application before the expiry of two years from the relevant date in the prescribed form. It is to be noted that the explanation to the section enumerates eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — exports of goods, supplies to SEZ, services exports, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment, refund consequential on appellate order, payment under mistake, and excess balance in cash ledger.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 54 carves out the only two situations where refund of accumulated unutilised credit is permitted — zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax (the LUT route) and credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies (inverted duty structure). It is to be noted that the proviso bars refund where the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, and a separate proviso excludes export of goods subjected to export duty.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 54 prescribes the outer limit for the proper officer to issue the final order — sixty days from the date of receipt of an application complete in all respects. The expiry of this window without an order being issued is the statutory trigger for the interest entitlement under Section 56. It is to be noted that the sixty-day clock runs from the date of acknowledgement in Form RFD-02 and not from the date of original submission of Form RFD-01.
View sourceSection 56 fastens the department with interest liability where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days from the receipt of a complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum from the date of expiry of sixty days till the date of refund. The proviso elevates this to nine per cent per annum where the refund flows from an order of an Appellate Authority, Appellate Tribunal or any Court which has attained finality. It is to be noted that this interest is not auto-credited by the system and must be expressly claimed by the applicant.
View sourceSection 16 of the IGST Act defines zero-rated supply to cover export of goods, export of services, and supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. Sub-section (3) of Section 16 grants the registered person two routes to recover the tax incidence — supply under a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 with subsequent refund of unutilised input tax credit under Rule 89, or supply on payment of integrated tax with refund of IGST under Rule 96. The choice is annual and lies with the exporter.
View sourceRule 89 is the procedural backbone for refund applications other than IGST on exports. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 prescribes Form GST RFD-01 as the application form. Sub-rule (2) lists the documentary evidence by category. Sub-rule (4) prescribes the formula for accumulated-credit refund on LUT-route zero-rated supplies. Sub-rule (5) prescribes the inverted-duty refund formula. Sub-rule (1A) deals with Section 77 wrong-head refunds.
View sourceWhich of these bite hardest in Tharamani: Where Tharamani differs: where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds. We see supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
Every Tharamani engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600113, the Velachery Division, and the coordinates 12.9842, 80.2461 that anchor the locality. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Velachery Division of the Chennai South handles Tharamani filings and approvals. For GST Refund at PIN 600113, understanding the Velachery Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. The 600xx geo-zone covering Tharamani groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Tharamani sustains a high flow of commerce for a it corridor anchor with research institutions locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Refund files we close here. Working in Tharamani brings a logistical edge: proximity to IIT Madras Research Park and the Tharamani Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Tharamani reads as a it corridor anchor with research institutions pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around IIT Madras Research Park and fed by the Tharamani Bus Stop corridor. The it corridor anchor with research institutions mix of Tharamani shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of residential activity and the commercial pulse around IIT Madras Research Park.
it services units around Tharamani share recurring GST Refund patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. The it services firms we serve in Tharamani value a GST Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. Because Tharamani hosts a cluster of it services businesses, we benchmark each new GST Refund engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. The it services character of Tharamani commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Refund review needs.
Every GST Refund file we open for Tharamani is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. We keep a repeatable GST Refund checklist for Tharamani so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. The Tharamani GST Refund workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Our Tharamani GST Refund process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
Businesses straddling Tharamani and Perungudi get a single GST Refund point of contact rather than two. Serving Tharamani and Perungudi from one team keeps GST Refund turnaround identical across the cluster. GST Refund clients in Perungudi are handled by the same practitioners who run our Tharamani desk. Proximity to Perungudi means a Tharamani engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence.
The longer we serve Tharamani, the more precisely we predict where a GST Refund file needs attention. Common patterns in the Velachery Division give Tharamani businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Refund issues. Over several cycles in Tharamani, the recurring GST Refund issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Because we work repeatedly across Tharamani, we can benchmark a new client's GST Refund position against the locality norm.
Relocating a registered office into Tharamani (PIN 600113) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Refund transition cleanly. When a Kotturpuram business expands into Tharamani, we extend its GST Refund setup to PIN 600113 without disruption. First-time GST Refund for a Tharamani business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. We onboard new Tharamani entities onto a GST Refund cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89 and inverted duty structure refund under Rule 89(5) for Tharamani businesses are filed in RFD-01 with Statement-3 within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation.
A dedicated GST refund consultant in Tharamani prepares RFD-01, replies RFD-03 deficiency memos within 15 days, follows up the 60-day RFD-06 sanction, and pursues Section 56 interest where the department delays disbursement.
Exporters in Tharamani are advised on the LUT (RFD-11) versus IGST-payment route, Rule 91 provisional refund of 90% within 7 days, and auto-disbursement of IGST refund on shipping bill once GSTR-1 Table 6A and EGM are aligned.
For Tharamani manufacturers facing inverted rates, Rule 89(5) refund is computed on Net ITC on inputs (Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio applied), Statement-1 prepared period-wise and unjust-enrichment exception under Section 54(8)(b) invoked.
Provisional refund under Rule 91 is sanctioned within seven days of acknowledgement. Final sanction in RFD-06 is within sixty days under Section 54(7). PFMS credit typically follows within seven to fifteen days of sanction provided bank account particulars are pre-validated.
Yes. Statement-1 is prepared period-wise and the rate schedule applicable to each tax period is applied. Retrospective change of rate by notification is generally prospective unless the notification expressly states otherwise, and the Rule 89(5) formula is run period by period.
RFD-01 acknowledgement, Statement-1 or Statement-3, RFD-03 deficiency memo and cure, RFD-08 show cause and RFD-09 reply, RFD-06 sanction order, FIRC or BRC, shipping bills, EGM confirmation, GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for the period, and bank credit advice — retained for seven years.
RFD-01 is filed on the GST portal under the taxpayer's login with DSC or EVC authentication. A CA cannot file on the taxpayer's behalf as authorised representative for the filing itself but can prepare the workings, draft the application content and represent in proceedings.
Section 54 of the CGST Act 2017 is the principal provision governing refunds, supplemented by Rules 89 to 97A of the CGST Rules. Section 56 deals with interest on delayed refund and Section 77 with wrong-head adjustments.
Section 54(1) requires the refund application to be filed within two years from the relevant date, which is defined separately for each refund category in the Explanation to Section 54. Excess cash ledger balance refund has no limitation.
What Tharamani clients want to know before signing: Where Tharamani differs: in the it corridor anchor with research institutions micro-market of Tharamani. We see where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Localised for Tharamani, Chennai — where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Reading this guide locally — In Tharamani, on the Tidel Park-Kotturpuram corridor that passes through Tharamani; Tharamani businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation.
GST refund in India is governed primarily by Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Sections 55 and 56 and the procedural framework in Rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Section 54(1) is the operative provision permitting any person to claim refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by such person by making an application in the prescribed form within two years from the relevant date. The architecture deliberately distinguishes between categories — refund of unutilised input tax credit under Section 54(3) is permitted only in two limbs (zero-rated supplies without payment of tax, and accumulated credit on account of rate inversion), whereas refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger flows through a different procedural channel without the two-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat timely refund as an integral element of the destination principle in a credit-method consumption tax, and the Indian construct in Section 54 closely mirrors that recommended template. The Tharamani registered person engaging with refund must first identify which limb governs the claim before any further procedural step.
Before the rollout of GST in July 2017, refund of indirect taxes was scattered across multiple central and State legislations — Central Excise refund flowed through Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944, Service Tax refund through Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Notification 27/2012-Central Excise NT, VAT refund through diverse State VAT statutes, and customs drawback through the All Industry Rates schedule. The Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers in its 2009 First Discussion Paper on GST identified this fragmented refund landscape as a major source of working-capital lockup for exporters and inverted-duty producers, and recommended consolidation into a unified refund regime. Section 54 represents that consolidation. The single national framework allows a manufacturer-exporter to claim refund across the entire input chain in one application, whereas the pre-GST regime would have required separate applications under three or four legislations. The Tharamani taxpayer working under Section 54 therefore benefits from a structurally simplified refund pathway compared to the pre-2017 era.
Section 54 read with Rule 89(2) and the explanation to Section 54 recognises several distinct refund categories — IGST paid on export of goods refunded under Rule 96; accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies without payment of tax claimed through Rule 89(4); accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure claimed through Rule 89(5); the surplus carried in the electronic cash ledger; tax mistakenly remitted under the wrong head per Section 77 read alongside Section 19 IGST Act; deemed-export supplies notified through Notification 48/2017-Central Tax; supplies to SEZ developers and units; finalisation of provisional assessment under Section 60; specified embassies and UN agencies under Section 55; and amounts arising from orders of an appellate forum, the tribunal or the courts. Each category embodies a distinct statutory schema with its own eligibility test, document set and procedural cadence. The Tharamani entity must first determine its applicable category before designing the refund workflow.
The sequencing of deficiency memos and provisional refunds in the procedural cadence is important. RFD-04 provisional refund of ninety percent is granted only after acknowledgement of a complete and proper RFD-01, and a defective application giving rise to an RFD-03 deficiency memo does not qualify for the provisional refund at all. The applicant must rectify the deficiency and file a fresh RFD-01 before any provisional refund consideration. This makes the original RFD-01 quality critical — a clean first filing unlocks the seven-day Rule 91 window, whereas a deficient first filing pushes the entire timeline beyond the next deficiency-memo cycle. The Tharamani exporter optimising working capital should therefore invest in original-filing accuracy rather than rely on the deficiency-memo remediation route.
Rule 90(3) of the CGST Rules empowers the proper officer to issue a deficiency memo in Form RFD-03 within fifteen days of the original RFD-01 filing where the application is found incomplete or improperly filed. The deficiency memo specifies the items that need rectification — typically missing Statement-3 entries, GSTR-2B mismatches, FIRC non-availability or computational errors. The application is treated as not filed for limitation purposes, and a fresh RFD-01 must be filed addressing the memo. The Section 54(1) two-year limitation continues to run during the deficiency-memo cycle, and the practice of waiting until close to the limitation horizon to file the original RFD-01 leaves no margin for deficiency-memo remediation. The Tharamani applicant should therefore file with a comfortable limitation cushion.
Rule 91 of the CGST Rules permits grant of provisional refund of ninety percent of the claimed amount within seven days of acknowledgement, for refund applications arising from zero-rated supplies under Rule 89(4). The provisional refund is granted in Form RFD-04, with the balance ten percent processed in detail through the RFD-06 sanction within the sixty-day Section 54(7) window. Rule 91(2) imposes a bar — the applicant must not have been prosecuted for tax evasion exceeding two and a half crore rupees in the five years preceding the application. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration in its work on VAT refund timeliness identifies provisional-refund mechanisms as the principal tool to address exporter cash-flow concerns. The Tharamani exporter qualifying under Rule 89(4) should pursue Rule 91 actively rather than treat it as automatic — the seven-day window often slips without active follow-up.
During the COVID-19 disruption period, the Supreme Court in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation passed orders extending statutory limitations across legislations, and Notification 13/2022-Central Tax operationalised these extensions in the GST context. The extensions cover limitation periods expiring between 1 March 2020 and 28 February 2022, with the limitation reset to ninety days from 1 March 2022 or the original limitation end date, whichever is later. Refund applications whose two-year horizon fell within this window benefit from the extension. The Tharamani taxpayer revisiting historical refund opportunities should map the relevant date to the COVID-extension window before assuming time-bar, since several otherwise time-barred claims may still be live under the extension framework.
Certain refund categories under Section 54 are not subject to the two-year limitation. Refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger has no limitation since it does not arise from tax paid but from amounts deposited beyond requirement. Refund consequent on appellate or tribunal or court orders is computed from the date of the order. Refund of tax paid by mistake under wrong head under Section 77 read with Section 19 IGST Act has no Section 54(1) limitation since it is governed by its own provision. The Tharamani applicant identifying refund opportunity outside the inverted-duty and zero-rated routes should test whether the category falls under a no-limitation framework, since the working-capital recovery calendar relaxes considerably in such cases.
The two-year limitation under Section 54(1) has been treated by High Courts as a substantive condition rather than a procedural one, with strict construction generally applied. Applications filed beyond the two-year window are time-barred even where the substantive eligibility is clear, and the Department's position is that no condonation power exists since the statute itself fixes the period. The Gujarat High Court in Aap and Co v Union of India and the Madras High Court in several rulings have explored whether the limitation can be extended in equity, with the broad consensus that statutory limitation cannot be overridden absent legislative amendment. The Tharamani applicant must therefore treat the limitation calendar as inviolable and structure compliance cadence to file well within it.
Following the legislative entrenchment of Section 16(2)(aa) and the substitution of Rule 36(4) through Notification 39/2021-Central Tax, the recipient's input tax credit is admissible only to the extent reflected in the recipient's GSTR-2B. The shift from the earlier flexible Rule 36(4) (which permitted credit up to a percentage in excess of GSTR-2B-reflected amount) to a strict GSTR-2B anchor has tightened the refund-officer scrutiny considerably. Refund applications now require Net ITC to be entirely traceable to GSTR-2B entries, with no provisional credit. The Tharamani applicant should reconcile every supplier-side filing through the GST portal's supplier-history view before including the corresponding credit in any refund application.
Where defects are discovered in GSTR-1 Table 6A export entries after filing, Table 9A of the subsequent GSTR-1 permits amendment within the Section 39(9) cut-off (30th November of the following financial year). Amendments to invoice number, invoice date, port code or shipping bill data flow through the Table 9A mechanism, and timely amendment cures otherwise refund-defeating mismatches with shipping-bill data at ICEGATE. Failure to amend within the Section 39(9) window forecloses the correction, and the underlying refund may be permanently lost to mismatch grounds. The Tharamani exporter should reconcile monthly against ICEGATE shipping-bill data and route corrections through Table 9A in the next return period rather than wait.
Where a supplier whose invoice forms part of the Net ITC pool has not filed GSTR-1 or has filed but not discharged the corresponding GSTR-3B liability, the credit may not appear in the recipient's GSTR-2B. Several High Courts have held — notably the Calcutta High Court in Suncraft Energy v Assistant Commissioner — that the recipient cannot be denied credit solely on supplier-side non-compliance where the substantive transaction is genuine and tax has been paid. The Department's standing position at the refund stage however remains GSTR-2B-anchored, and the recipient must either pursue supplier remediation or contest the denial through Section 107 appeal. The Tharamani applicant facing such facts should document the supplier-payment trail thoroughly to support the substantive eligibility argument.
What Tharamani clients usually ask next: Where Tharamani differs: supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar. We see where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Terms you will hear in this area — In Tharamani, where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Adjusted Total Turnover is the denominator in the Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5) formulae. It covers the turnover in a State or Union territory as defined in Section 2(112) minus turnover of services for which refund is claimed and the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies. The formula effectively dilutes the refund where domestic taxable turnover dominates.
Inverted Duty Structure is a scenario where the GST rate on inputs is higher than the GST rate on the output supply, resulting in accumulated unutilised input tax credit that cannot be set off against output liability. Section 54(3)(ii) permits refund of such accumulation. Rule 89(5) prescribes the formula. Common sectors include fabrics, footwear, fertilisers and some pharmaceutical inputs.
Zero-Rated Supply is defined in Section 16 of the IGST Act and covers export of goods, export of services and supply to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. The supply attracts a nil tax rate but the supplier is entitled to claim refund of taxes paid on inputs and input services — either by exporting under LUT and claiming accumulated ITC refund, or by paying IGST and claiming IGST refund.
LUT Route refers to the export option under Rule 96A whereby the exporter furnishes a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 and exports goods or services without paying integrated tax. Input tax credit accumulates and is recovered through a Rule 89(4) refund claim filed in RFD-01. The LUT route preserves working capital because no IGST cash outflow occurs at the export stage.
IGST-Payment Route is the export option under Rule 96 whereby the exporter pays integrated tax on the export and the system auto-refunds the IGST once Table 6A of GSTR-1 plus GSTR-3B are filed and the carrier has confirmed the EGM. The shipping bill is itself the refund application. Faster realisation but requires IGST cash outflow at the export stage.
VKC Footsteps Ruling refers to the Supreme Court judgment in Union of India versus VKC Footsteps India Private Limited reported in 2021. The Court upheld Rule 89(5) restricting refund of accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure — only credit on input goods qualifies; input services as well as capital goods stand excluded. The ratio continues to govern every inverted-duty refund computation.
Provisional Refund is the ninety-per-cent advance refund granted under Section 54(6) read with Rule 91 for refund claims arising from zero-rated supplies. It is sanctioned in Form RFD-04 within seven days of acknowledgement and routed through PFMS to the applicant's bank account. The balance ten per cent is settled in the final RFD-06 after detailed scrutiny.
Deficiency Memo is the Form RFD-03 communication issued by the proper officer under Rule 90(3) where the original RFD-01 is found defective on documentary or computational grounds. The original is treated as never having been validly submitted. The applicant must rectify and file a fresh RFD-01. Circular 125/44/2019 limits the department to one such memo per claim.
Sanction Order is the final adjudicatory order in Form RFD-06 passed by the proper officer either sanctioning the refund (in full or in part) or rejecting it. Section 54(7) prescribes a sixty-day window from receipt of complete application. Sanction orders are appealable under Section 107 within three months. Where part-rejection is proposed, RFD-08 SCN precedes the RFD-06 order.
PFMS is the Public Financial Management System of the Office of the Controller General of Accounts — the central platform through which all GST refunds are disbursed. PFMS performs name-match, IFSC validation and account-active checks against the bank account linked to the GSTIN. A PFMS rejection prevents refund credit despite an RFD-06 sanction order being in place.
FIRC is the Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate issued by an authorised dealer bank confirming receipt of foreign exchange against an export of services. It is the realisation proof required under Section 2(6) of the IGST Act for a service export to qualify as zero-rated and to trigger the Section 54 refund entitlement. Banks now issue an electronic FIRC (e-FIRC).
BRC is the Bank Realisation Certificate issued by authorised dealer banks for export of goods, confirming realisation of foreign exchange. Although not always insisted upon at refund stage for goods exports (where shipping bill and EGM suffice), BRC is the gold-standard evidence and is requested where refund quantum is large or where the export-realisation period under FEMA is in question.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
Penalty exposure typical of this micro-market — In Tharamani, Tharamani businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation; supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
How Tharamani businesses typically avoid these: Where Tharamani differs: the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric. We see for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Tharamani, where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
A flavour of cases we handle nearby — In Tharamani, where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; Tharamani businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation.
Why these Tharamani engagements look the way they do: Where Tharamani differs: the cluster of it services, r&d, education businesses that defines Tharamani's commercial fabric. We see for Tharamani IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“We export auto components from Ambattur and had ₹38 lakh of accumulated ITC stuck for 14 months under the LUT route. FilingPro filed RFD-01 with Statement-3 cleanly tied to our shipping bills and GSTR-1 Table 6A. Provisional 90% sanctioned in 9 days, balance in 47 days. No deficiency memo.”
“Our textile unit faced inverted duty structure for 18 months — output at 5% on fabric, inputs at 12% on yarn. FilingPro applied the Rule 89(5) formula correctly post-VKC Footsteps and recovered ₹22 lakh in cash. Statement-1 was airtight; the officer sanctioned RFD-06 without a single query.”
“Department issued RFD-03 deficiency memo on a technicality — they wanted realised value matched in INR rather than foreign currency on Statement-3. FilingPro filed the corrected RFD-01 within 11 days. Sanction came through in the 60-day window. Limitation was preserved.”
“Refund of ₹6.4 lakh for excess balance in cash ledger — sanctioned by jurisdictional officer in 41 days flat. No unjust-enrichment hassle since this category is exempt under Section 54(8). FilingPro handled documentation, ARN tracking and bank credit advice end-to-end.”
“IGST refund on goods exports was stuck because of GSTR-1 Table 6A vs shipping bill mismatch on port code. FilingPro identified the mismatch, filed amendment in next month's GSTR-1 (Table 9A), and the system auto-disbursed ₹14 lakh under Rule 96 within the next cycle.”
“Our refund was rejected in RFD-06 on grounds of unjust enrichment. FilingPro drafted Section 107 appeal within 80 days, computed 10% pre-deposit correctly, and represented at the First Appellate Authority hearing. Order set aside and refund sanctioned with Section 56 interest at 9%.”
Common questions from Tharamani clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
From Thiruvalluvar Road, Thiruvalluvar Salai, West Avenue Road, 4th Main Road and Dr MGR Main Road through to Dr. Muthulakshmi Road, Kalki Krishnamurty Road, Lattice Bridge and Old Mahapalipuram Road, our team covers GST Refund for businesses right across Tharamani and its main commercial roads.
Professional GST Refund in Tharamani, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.