the business activity radiating outward from SIPCOT IT Park and nearby commercial pockets — on fixed, transparent fees
Handling GST Refund for Sholinganallur and Perungudi clients — qualified review, a 7-year workpaper archive and fixed fees from day one. Call 9566-068-468.
LUT in Form GST RFD-11 allows export of goods or services without payment of IGST under Rule 96A. It is filed annually by exporters who have not been prosecuted for tax evasion above ₹2.5 crore. Under LUT, the exporter claims refund of accumulated ITC under Rule 89; without LUT, the exporter pays IGST and claims refund under Rule 96.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Refund in Sholinganallur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
9% appellate
For Sholinganallur exporters we evaluate the LUT (RFD-11) route versus IGST-payment route each year — recommending the option that minimises working capital lock and accelerates refund realisation.
Net ITC for Rule 89(4) refund computation is taken only from GSTR-2B-verified invoices. Sholinganallur clients face zero supplier-non-filing-led rejections at the refund officer's scrutiny.
Where RFD-06 rejection is wrongful, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months at the First Appellate Authority — APL-01 drafted, 10% pre-deposit computed, hearing represented end-to-end.
For service exports, FIRC and BRC are coordinated with authorised dealer banks before RFD-01 filing — Section 2(6) IGST Act realisation proof complete from day one.
Share your shipping bills, FIRC, GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B on WhatsApp at our number — we handle the rest. Sholinganallur clients work with us entirely remotely from filing to sanction.
Every GST Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Sholinganallur businesses operate where the cluster of it services, sez, e-commerce businesses that defines Sholinganallur's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Perungudi and Thoraipakkam and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Sholinganallur clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Sholinganallur businesses operate where Sholinganallur businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation, and the business activity radiating outward from SIPCOT IT Park and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Sholinganallur: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar; for Sholinganallur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Forms most asked about here — Sholinganallur businesses operate where where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds, and supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
Final adjudicatory order on the refund claim — sanctions the eligible refund in full or in part, or rejects the claim on stated grounds; appealable under Section 107
Part A used for withholding refund under Section 54(10) or 54(11); Part B used to communicate adjustment of sanctioned refund against demand outstanding on the applicant
Show-cause notice issued by the proper officer where the officer proposes to reject the refund claim in whole or in part — the applicant gets an opportunity to file a reply in RFD-09 before the RFD-06 rejection order
Applicant's reply to the RFD-08 show-cause notice carrying defence, supporting case law, documentary clarifications and any supplementary computation
Quarterly refund claim by UIN holders — specialised agencies of the United Nations, multilateral financial institutions, consulates, embassies of foreign countries and notified categories under Section 55
Annual undertaking by an exporter under Rule 96A enabling shipment of goods or supply of services overseas without paying integrated tax — accumulated input tax credit is recovered through RFD-01 under Rule 89(4)
Annexure attached to RFD-01 capturing the Rule 89(5) computation period-wise — turnover of inverted-rated supply, Net ITC restricted to inputs, Adjusted Total Turnover and tax payable on the inverted supply
Annexure to RFD-01 for refund of IGST or accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies — invoice-wise details of exports including shipping bill number, port code, EGM reference, foreign currency value, INR value and tax claimed
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Statutory hooks that bite here — Sholinganallur businesses operate where Sholinganallur businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation, and where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Section 54 is the parent provision governing every refund claim under the GST regime. Sub-section (1) of Section 54 provides that any person seeking refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him may make an application before the expiry of two years from the relevant date in the prescribed form. It is to be noted that the explanation to the section enumerates eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — exports of goods, supplies to SEZ, services exports, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment, refund consequential on appellate order, payment under mistake, and excess balance in cash ledger.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 54 carves out the only two situations where refund of accumulated unutilised credit is permitted — zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax (the LUT route) and credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies (inverted duty structure). It is to be noted that the proviso bars refund where the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, and a separate proviso excludes export of goods subjected to export duty.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 54 prescribes the outer limit for the proper officer to issue the final order — sixty days from the date of receipt of an application complete in all respects. The expiry of this window without an order being issued is the statutory trigger for the interest entitlement under Section 56. It is to be noted that the sixty-day clock runs from the date of acknowledgement in Form RFD-02 and not from the date of original submission of Form RFD-01.
View sourceSection 56 fastens the department with interest liability where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days from the receipt of a complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum from the date of expiry of sixty days till the date of refund. The proviso elevates this to nine per cent per annum where the refund flows from an order of an Appellate Authority, Appellate Tribunal or any Court which has attained finality. It is to be noted that this interest is not auto-credited by the system and must be expressly claimed by the applicant.
View sourceSection 16 of the IGST Act defines zero-rated supply to cover export of goods, export of services, and supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. Sub-section (3) of Section 16 grants the registered person two routes to recover the tax incidence — supply under a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 with subsequent refund of unutilised input tax credit under Rule 89, or supply on payment of integrated tax with refund of IGST under Rule 96. The choice is annual and lies with the exporter.
View sourceRule 89 is the procedural backbone for refund applications other than IGST on exports. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 prescribes Form GST RFD-01 as the application form. Sub-rule (2) lists the documentary evidence by category. Sub-rule (4) prescribes the formula for accumulated-credit refund on LUT-route zero-rated supplies. Sub-rule (5) prescribes the inverted-duty refund formula. Sub-rule (1A) deals with Section 77 wrong-head refunds.
View sourceWhich of these bite hardest in Sholinganallur: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Sholinganallur businesses tie back to the Mahabalipuram Division, so our GST Refund cadence accounts for how that office works. Records we prepare for Sholinganallur carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9010, 80.2279, which map each submission back to this locality. Every Sholinganallur engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600119, the Mahabalipuram Division, and the coordinates 12.9010, 80.2279 that anchor the locality. Sholinganallur (PIN 600119) falls under the Mahabalipuram Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN.
Sholinganallur reads as a it corridor sez growth zone pocket with very high commercial activity, anchored around OMR Toll and fed by the Sholinganallur Junction corridor. Freight and foot traffic from the Sholinganallur Junction hub pull steady daily commerce through Sholinganallur, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this it corridor sez growth zone pocket. Vendors and customers tied to the Sholinganallur Junction network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Sholinganallur GST Refund clients. Each GST Refund cycle for Sholinganallur reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near OMR Toll, expenses routed through the Sholinganallur Junction freight network.
it services units around Sholinganallur share recurring GST Refund patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. Sector concentration matters: when Sholinganallur leans toward it services, the GST Refund risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. Mixed it services activity across Sholinganallur means our GST Refund team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client. The it services firms we serve in Sholinganallur value a GST Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm.
The qualified-review step on every Sholinganallur GST Refund file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. We keep a repeatable GST Refund checklist for Sholinganallur so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Every GST Refund file we open for Sholinganallur is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Our Sholinganallur GST Refund process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
Businesses straddling Sholinganallur and Kelambakkam get a single GST Refund point of contact rather than two. From the same Sholinganallur team we also serve Kelambakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. A client relocating between Sholinganallur and Kelambakkam keeps the same GST Refund file and the same team. Group companies spread across Sholinganallur and Kelambakkam consolidate their GST Refund under one engagement with us.
The longer we serve Sholinganallur, the more precisely we predict where a GST Refund file needs attention. Common patterns in the Mahabalipuram Division give Sholinganallur businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Refund issues. Sector signals in Sholinganallur — seasonal startups swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Refund work. Recurring gaps in Sholinganallur startups records are the first thing our GST Refund review closes out.
When a Thoraipakkam business expands into Sholinganallur, we extend its GST Refund setup to PIN 600119 without disruption. We onboard new Sholinganallur entities onto a GST Refund cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle. Relocating a registered office into Sholinganallur (PIN 600119) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Refund transition cleanly. First-time GST Refund for a Sholinganallur business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
Refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89 and inverted duty structure refund under Rule 89(5) for Sholinganallur businesses are filed in RFD-01 with Statement-3 within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation.
A dedicated GST refund consultant in Sholinganallur prepares RFD-01, replies RFD-03 deficiency memos within 15 days, follows up the 60-day RFD-06 sanction, and pursues Section 56 interest where the department delays disbursement.
Exporters in Sholinganallur are advised on the LUT (RFD-11) versus IGST-payment route, Rule 91 provisional refund of 90% within 7 days, and auto-disbursement of IGST refund on shipping bill once GSTR-1 Table 6A and EGM are aligned.
For Sholinganallur manufacturers facing inverted rates, Rule 89(5) refund is computed on Net ITC on inputs (Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio applied), Statement-1 prepared period-wise and unjust-enrichment exception under Section 54(8)(b) invoked.
Statement-1 is the tax-period-wise computation submitted with RFD-01 for inverted duty refund. It captures Net ITC on inputs, turnover of inverted rated supply, Adjusted Total Turnover, and the maximum refund amount per the Rule 89(5) formula.
Form RFD-11 is the annual undertaking that allows zero-rated supplies to leave India without an upfront IGST charge. Rule 96A read with CBIC Circular 37/11/2018-GST sets the eligibility — no past prosecution beyond the ₹2.5 crore evasion threshold within five years.
No. The realisation proof — FIRC or BRC from the authorised dealer bank — is a statutory ingredient of Section 2(6) IGST Act. Where part of the invoice value is unrealised at the limitation date, the refund is capped at the realised portion.
INR receipt is generally not treated as convertible foreign exchange for Section 2(6) IGST Act. However Notification 16/2020-CT and the RBI Vostro arrangements extend the convertible foreign exchange concept to specified INR receipts. RBI permission and Vostro credit advice are required.
Rule 96(10) bars refund of IGST paid on exports for taxpayers who have availed inputs under advance authorisation, EOU or other concessional notifications. The accumulated ITC refund route under Rule 89 may still be available subject to eligibility and switching to LUT prospectively.
Maximum Refund = (Turnover of inverted-rated supply x Net ITC) / Adjusted Total Turnover minus the output tax on such inverted-rated supply. Per the VKC Footsteps ratio, Net ITC takes inputs only. Statement-1 captures the run period by period.
What Sholinganallur clients want to know before signing: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — on the Perungudi-Thoraipakkam corridor that passes through Sholinganallur; where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Localised for Sholinganallur, Chennai — where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Reading this guide locally — Sholinganallur businesses operate where in the it corridor sez growth zone micro-market of Sholinganallur, and Sholinganallur businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation.
GST refund in India is governed primarily by Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Sections 55 and 56 and the procedural framework in Rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Section 54(1) is the operative provision permitting any person to claim refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by such person by making an application in the prescribed form within two years from the relevant date. The architecture deliberately distinguishes between categories — refund of unutilised input tax credit under Section 54(3) is permitted only in two limbs (zero-rated supplies without payment of tax, and accumulated credit on account of rate inversion), whereas refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger flows through a different procedural channel without the two-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat timely refund as an integral element of the destination principle in a credit-method consumption tax, and the Indian construct in Section 54 closely mirrors that recommended template. The Sholinganallur registered person engaging with refund must first identify which limb governs the claim before any further procedural step.
Before the rollout of GST in July 2017, refund of indirect taxes was scattered across multiple central and State legislations — Central Excise refund flowed through Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944, Service Tax refund through Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Notification 27/2012-Central Excise NT, VAT refund through diverse State VAT statutes, and customs drawback through the All Industry Rates schedule. The Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers in its 2009 First Discussion Paper on GST identified this fragmented refund landscape as a major source of working-capital lockup for exporters and inverted-duty producers, and recommended consolidation into a unified refund regime. Section 54 represents that consolidation. The single national framework allows a manufacturer-exporter to claim refund across the entire input chain in one application, whereas the pre-GST regime would have required separate applications under three or four legislations. The Sholinganallur taxpayer working under Section 54 therefore benefits from a structurally simplified refund pathway compared to the pre-2017 era.
Section 54 read with Rule 89(2) and the explanation to Section 54 recognises several distinct refund categories — IGST paid on export of goods refunded under Rule 96; accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies without payment of tax claimed through Rule 89(4); accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure claimed through Rule 89(5); the surplus carried in the electronic cash ledger; tax mistakenly remitted under the wrong head per Section 77 read alongside Section 19 IGST Act; deemed-export supplies notified through Notification 48/2017-Central Tax; supplies to SEZ developers and units; finalisation of provisional assessment under Section 60; specified embassies and UN agencies under Section 55; and amounts arising from orders of an appellate forum, the tribunal or the courts. Each category embodies a distinct statutory schema with its own eligibility test, document set and procedural cadence. The Sholinganallur entity must first determine its applicable category before designing the refund workflow.
Following RFD-06 sanction and PFMS disbursement, the applicant must retain the complete refund file under Rule 56 of the CGST Rules for at least seventy-two months from the due date of the annual return for the relevant year. The file includes the original RFD-01, supporting Statements (1 or 3), GSTR-2B reconciliation working papers, FIRC or BRC for service exports, shipping bills for goods exports, Section 54 declaration documents, deficiency-memo correspondence if any, the RFD-06 sanction order, and the bank credit advice. The retention period covers the seventy-two-month Section 65 audit horizon and any subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 re-opening. The Sholinganallur applicant should retain in both physical and digital form with backup to support any future scrutiny.
Section 54(7) obliges the proper officer to issue the adjudicatory order in Form RFD-06, either allowing or denying the claim, within sixty days reckoned from the day a properly completed application is received. The sixty-day horizon runs from acknowledgement under Rule 90(2), not from the original RFD-01 submission, and the deficiency-memo cycle under Rule 90(3) effectively restarts the clock with each fresh filing. Where the officer fails to pass the RFD-06 within sixty days, interest at six percent per annum is statutorily due under Section 56, computed from the day after that horizon lapses until the actual date of disbursement. The Sholinganallur applicant should calendar the sixty-day horizon precisely and document the interest-claim working paper before approaching the officer.
Form RFD-06 captures the final adjudication on the refund application — the sanctioned amount, the rejected amount with reasons, the apportionment between CGST, SGST, IGST, interest and penalty heads, and the bank account to which disbursement will flow through PFMS. The order is appealable under Section 107 of the CGST Act if rejection or scale-down is contested. The order must be reasoned — bare conclusions without reference to the application material attract scrutiny under the Supreme Court ruling in Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan that mandates speaking orders in administrative adjudication. The Sholinganallur applicant receiving an inadequately reasoned RFD-06 has a clear path to appellate intervention.
Provisional refunds disbursed under Rule 91 (ninety percent within seven days) are particularly exposed to clawback if the subsequent RFD-06 examination finds the substantive eligibility lacking. The provisional disbursement is treated as an interim payment, and Section 54(11) recovery operates on the gap between provisional and final eligibility. Interest under Section 50(3) runs from the date of provisional disbursement, not from the date of any later recovery order. The Sholinganallur applicant relying on Rule 91 provisional refund for working capital should therefore not treat the disbursement as final, and should set aside reserves for potential clawback until the RFD-06 sanction confirms the entire ninety percent.
Where the applicant subsequently identifies that a sanctioned refund was overstated — whether through internal review, statutory audit or tax-counsel re-examination — voluntary disclosure through Form DRC-03 is the recommended remediation pathway. DRC-03 permits payment of the differential with interest under Section 50(3) before any departmental proceeding crystallises. The voluntary route avoids the higher Section 74 penalty exposure that fraudulent-suppression characterisation would attract. Circular 134/04/2020-GST has clarified the voluntary-disclosure framework. The Sholinganallur applicant should treat DRC-03 as a strategic tool rather than a procedural last resort, especially where post-audit cycles or supplier-side reconciliations are likely to surface the issue.
Refunds sanctioned through RFD-06 are subject to post-audit by the jurisdictional Commissioner's office under Section 65 of the CGST Act read with Rule 101. The post-audit examines whether the refund was correctly computed, whether the eligibility under Rule 89(4) or 89(5) was correctly tested, whether the documentation was adequate and whether any unjust enrichment under Section 54(8) ought to have triggered. Departmental Circulars including Circular 24/24/2017-GST and subsequent clarifications have framed the post-audit cadence. Where the post-audit identifies that the refund was erroneously sanctioned, Section 54(11) read with Section 73 or 74 permits recovery. The Sholinganallur applicant should treat the post-audit horizon as an extension of the original refund examination and retain documentation accordingly.
The grounds typically raised in refund appeals include — wrongful application of Section 54(3) eligibility tests, mechanical reduction of Net ITC without supporting analysis, denial on time-bar grounds where deficiency-memo cycles ought to have been factored, denial on supplier-non-compliance grounds notwithstanding Suncraft Energy and similar rulings, mechanical application of Section 54(8) unjust-enrichment without testing the categorical exclusions, and procedural infirmity in the RFD-06 order itself (unreasoned conclusions, no hearing afforded, no consideration of taxpayer submissions). Each ground requires specific factual development and pleading. The Sholinganallur applicant drafting the appeal should align each ground to the specific facts of the RFD-06 order rather than rely on generic templates.
Where the first appellate authority dismisses or partially allows the appeal, the second-stage remedy is an appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal — the forum constituted under Section 112 — once the benches are operational. Pending Tribunal operationalisation, the writ jurisdiction of the jurisdictional High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution remains available. Madras High Court in several recent rulings has entertained writ petitions on refund denials where the Tribunal route was unavailable. The pre-deposit for Tribunal appeal is twenty percent of the disputed amount (over and above the ten percent at first appeal stage) capped at fifty crore rupees CGST plus fifty crore rupees SGST. The Sholinganallur applicant facing first-appeal adverse order should evaluate both Tribunal and writ pathways based on relief urgency and merits.
Where the appeal succeeds and the refund flows out of the appellate, Tribunal or court order, Section 56 read with its proviso prescribes interest at nine percent per annum, computed from the expiry of sixty days reckoned from the day the consequent application lands with the Department. The nine-percent rate is higher than the six-percent rate applicable to ordinary delayed refunds, recognising the additional time investment by the applicant in pursuing appellate remedy. The interest is not auto-disbursed and must be claimed expressly through correspondence or a separate refund application. The Sholinganallur successful appellant should compute the Section 56 interest from day sixty-one of the appellate-consequent application and pursue the supplementary order through the jurisdictional officer.
What Sholinganallur clients usually ask next: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar; where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds; for Sholinganallur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Terms you will hear in this area — Sholinganallur businesses operate where where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds.
Unjust Enrichment is the doctrine codified in Section 54(8) that bars a refund where the economic burden of the tax has effectively been transferred onto a downstream party, save for specified excluded categories. For non-zero-rated refunds above two lakh rupees, a chartered accountant's certificate is required; below two lakh a self-declaration suffices. Excess cash ledger and Section 77 refunds are outside the test.
Consumer Welfare Fund is the corpus established under Section 57 of the CGST Act into which refund amounts that fail the unjust-enrichment test are credited. The fund is used for activities for the welfare of consumers as notified by the Government. Section 58 governs its administration. A refund credited to the fund is not lost forever — applications can be made for utilisation.
RFD-08 Show Cause Notice is the procedural notice issued by the proper officer under Rule 92(3) where the officer proposes to reject the refund claim in whole or in part. It precedes the final RFD-06 rejection order and grants the applicant fifteen days to file a reply in Form RFD-09. Non-reply within the window leads to an ex parte adverse RFD-06.
RFD-07 Withholding Order is the order under Section 54(10) or Section 54(11) where the refund is sanctioned but disbursement is withheld pending cure of return-filing default or pending an appellate order that may affect the refund. Part A covers withholding and Part B covers adjustment against existing demand. The order is appealable.
Refund of Pre-Deposit covers the refund claim that arises when a taxpayer succeeds in appeal and the ten-per-cent pre-deposit made under Section 107(6) at first appeal stage (or further pre-deposit at Tribunal stage under Section 112(8)) becomes refundable. Interest at six per cent under Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act (read into GST by way of analogy) is generally claimed.
Circular 125/44/2019-GST is the consolidated CBIC clarification on procedural aspects of refund applications. It harmonised disclosure norms across categories, prescribed standardised undertakings, limited deficiency memos to one per claim and clarified the running of limitation post deficiency memo. Continues to be the procedural touchstone for refund officers nationally.
Circular 135/05/2020-GST clarified that refund of accumulated ITC under Rule 89(4) on zero-rated supplies is admissible only where the tax invoice issued by the supplier reflects in the recipient's GSTR-2A or GSTR-2B. The supplier-non-filing risk on refund quantum is operationalised through this circular. Subsequent jurisprudence (Suncraft Energy, Calcutta HC) has tempered the rigour of this position.
Notification 48/2017-Central Tax notifies the categories of supplies deemed to be exports for purposes of Section 147 read with Section 54 — supplies to EOU/STP/EHTP units, supplies against advance authorisation, supplies of capital goods against EPCG, supplies to UN agencies and notified bilateral arrangements. Refund of tax paid on such supplies is claimable by either the supplier or the recipient.
Notification 49/2017-Central Tax notifies the documentary evidence required to be furnished by a supplier of deemed export goods for claiming refund of tax paid on such supplies — acknowledgement of receipt by the recipient, undertaking by the recipient that it will not claim refund or ITC and undertaking that the supply is for authorised operations as the case may be.
Notification 37/2017-Central Tax extends the facility of furnishing a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 to every registered exporter who has not been prosecuted for evasion of two hundred and fifty lakh rupees or more during the preceding five-year window. The LUT replaces the earlier bond-and-bank-guarantee requirement and dramatically simplified the export workflow.
QRMP Refund Cycle is the timing constraint for refund claimants under the Quarterly Return Monthly Payment scheme. Since GSTR-1 is filed quarterly under QRMP, the Table 6A export-invoice data also becomes available only quarterly. IGST refunds under Rule 96 therefore disburse on a quarterly rhythm rather than monthly for QRMP taxpayers.
Section 107 Appeal is the statutory first appellate remedy against any decision or order passed under the CGST Act by an adjudicating authority — including RFD-06 rejection of refund. The appeal lies to the Appellate Authority (Joint or Additional Commissioner Appeals) within three months, extendable by one further month on sufficient cause shown.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
Penalty exposure typical of this micro-market — Sholinganallur businesses operate where Sholinganallur businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation, and supporting the IT-services workforce that commutes here from OMR Velachery and Anna Nagar.
How Sholinganallur businesses typically avoid these: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — the cluster of it services, sez, e-commerce businesses that defines Sholinganallur's commercial fabric; for Sholinganallur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Sholinganallur businesses operate where where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds, and the cluster of it services, sez, e-commerce businesses that defines Sholinganallur's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
A flavour of cases we handle nearby — Sholinganallur businesses operate where where IT consultancies and software-services arms file GST predominantly under SAC 9983 and claim export-of-services LUT refunds, and Sholinganallur businesses in the it services arm find that businesses here routinely handle export-of-services GST refunds under Rule 89 and SOFTEX form reconciliation.
Why these Sholinganallur engagements look the way they do: For Sholinganallur engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from SIPCOT IT Park and nearby commercial pockets; for Sholinganallur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“We export auto components from Ambattur and had ₹38 lakh of accumulated ITC stuck for 14 months under the LUT route. FilingPro filed RFD-01 with Statement-3 cleanly tied to our shipping bills and GSTR-1 Table 6A. Provisional 90% sanctioned in 9 days, balance in 47 days. No deficiency memo.”
“Our textile unit faced inverted duty structure for 18 months — output at 5% on fabric, inputs at 12% on yarn. FilingPro applied the Rule 89(5) formula correctly post-VKC Footsteps and recovered ₹22 lakh in cash. Statement-1 was airtight; the officer sanctioned RFD-06 without a single query.”
“Department issued RFD-03 deficiency memo on a technicality — they wanted realised value matched in INR rather than foreign currency on Statement-3. FilingPro filed the corrected RFD-01 within 11 days. Sanction came through in the 60-day window. Limitation was preserved.”
“Refund of ₹6.4 lakh for excess balance in cash ledger — sanctioned by jurisdictional officer in 41 days flat. No unjust-enrichment hassle since this category is exempt under Section 54(8). FilingPro handled documentation, ARN tracking and bank credit advice end-to-end.”
“IGST refund on goods exports was stuck because of GSTR-1 Table 6A vs shipping bill mismatch on port code. FilingPro identified the mismatch, filed amendment in next month's GSTR-1 (Table 9A), and the system auto-disbursed ₹14 lakh under Rule 96 within the next cycle.”
“Our refund was rejected in RFD-06 on grounds of unjust enrichment. FilingPro drafted Section 107 appeal within 80 days, computed 10% pre-deposit correctly, and represented at the First Appellate Authority hearing. Order set aside and refund sanctioned with Section 56 interest at 9%.”
Common questions from Sholinganallur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
From 10th Cross Street, 12th Cross Street, 1st Main Road, 2nd Main Road and Kalaingar Karunanidhi Salai through to Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Semmozhi Salai, ELCOT Back Gate Road and Elcot SEZ Main road, our team covers GST Refund for businesses right across Sholinganallur and its main commercial roads.
Professional GST Refund in Sholinganallur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.