GST Refund delivery for residential and retail firms across Kattupakkam — handled by a qualified, in-house team
Kattupakkam residential and retail units around Kattupakkam Bus Stop with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
No, interest under Section 56 is not auto-credited. The taxpayer must claim it expressly. Where the principal refund is sanctioned beyond 60 days, the taxpayer files a separate request or includes the interest claim in subsequent correspondence. Interest is computed at 6% (or 9% on appellate order) on the principal from day 61 till actual disbursement.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Refund in Kattupakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
For Kattupakkam exporters under Rule 89, provisional refund of 90% is pursued in RFD-04 within 7 days of acknowledgement — releasing working capital while the balance 10% is processed in detail.
Every Statement-3 invoice line is tied to GSTR-1 Table 6A and shipping bill EGM data. Mismatches are amended via Table 9A in the next GSTR-1 before refund officer scrutiny.
Where the refund officer issues a deficiency memo, RFD-03 is replied with a fresh RFD-01 within 15 days under Rule 90(3) — limitation under Section 54(1) preserved, fresh ARN obtained promptly.
For inverted duty refunds in Kattupakkam, Rule 89(5) is applied with the Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio — Net ITC restricted to input goods only, excluding input services and capital goods.
Each refund file is tracked till RFD-06 sanction order. Where the 60-day Section 54(7) window is breached, Section 56 interest at 6% (or 9% on appellate orders) is claimed expressly.
9% appellate
Every GST Refund engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Kattupakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Kattupakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Kattupakkam Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Kattupakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Kattupakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Kattupakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Kattupakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Kattupakkam: Closer to Kattupakkam, for the professional and salaried population of Kattupakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Annexure to RFD-01 for refund of IGST or accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies — invoice-wise details of exports including shipping bill number, port code, EGM reference, foreign currency value, INR value and tax claimed
First appeal against an RFD-06 order rejecting refund in whole or in part — also used to contest quantum of sanctioned refund where the applicant believes more is due
Primary refund application covering all refund categories under Section 54 — accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies, inverted duty refund, excess cash ledger balance, wrong-head tax under Section 77, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment and others
Legacy manual filing format used during the early GST years before RFD-01 went fully online — retained for transitional and historic claims; current filings use RFD-01
System-generated acknowledgement once the proper officer is satisfied that the application is complete in all respects — starts the sixty-day Section 54(7) sanction clock and the seven-day Rule 91 provisional refund clock
Memo issued by the proper officer where the RFD-01 application is found defective on documentary or computational grounds — the application is treated as not filed and a fresh RFD-01 is required after rectification
Order sanctioning ninety per cent of the claimed refund amount on a provisional basis for zero-rated supply categories — the balance ten per cent is sanctioned in the final RFD-06 after detailed scrutiny
Payment advice generated post-sanction (provisional or final) routed to PFMS for credit to the applicant's GSTIN-linked bank account
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Section 54 is the parent provision governing every refund claim under the GST regime. Sub-section (1) of Section 54 provides that any person seeking refund of tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by him may make an application before the expiry of two years from the relevant date in the prescribed form. It is to be noted that the explanation to the section enumerates eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — exports of goods, supplies to SEZ, services exports, deemed exports, finalisation of provisional assessment, refund consequential on appellate order, payment under mistake, and excess balance in cash ledger.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 54 carves out the only two situations where refund of accumulated unutilised credit is permitted — zero-rated supplies made without payment of tax (the LUT route) and credit accumulation on account of rate of tax on inputs being higher than rate of tax on output supplies (inverted duty structure). It is to be noted that the proviso bars refund where the output supply is nil-rated or fully exempt, and a separate proviso excludes export of goods subjected to export duty.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 54 prescribes the outer limit for the proper officer to issue the final order — sixty days from the date of receipt of an application complete in all respects. The expiry of this window without an order being issued is the statutory trigger for the interest entitlement under Section 56. It is to be noted that the sixty-day clock runs from the date of acknowledgement in Form RFD-02 and not from the date of original submission of Form RFD-01.
View sourceSection 56 fastens the department with interest liability where the principal refund is not disbursed within sixty days from the receipt of a complete application. The ordinary rate is six per cent per annum from the date of expiry of sixty days till the date of refund. The proviso elevates this to nine per cent per annum where the refund flows from an order of an Appellate Authority, Appellate Tribunal or any Court which has attained finality. It is to be noted that this interest is not auto-credited by the system and must be expressly claimed by the applicant.
View sourceSection 16 of the IGST Act defines zero-rated supply to cover export of goods, export of services, and supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. Sub-section (3) of Section 16 grants the registered person two routes to recover the tax incidence — supply under a Letter of Undertaking in Form RFD-11 with subsequent refund of unutilised input tax credit under Rule 89, or supply on payment of integrated tax with refund of IGST under Rule 96. The choice is annual and lies with the exporter.
View sourceRule 89 is the procedural backbone for refund applications other than IGST on exports. Sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 prescribes Form GST RFD-01 as the application form. Sub-rule (2) lists the documentary evidence by category. Sub-rule (4) prescribes the formula for accumulated-credit refund on LUT-route zero-rated supplies. Sub-rule (5) prescribes the inverted-duty refund formula. Sub-rule (1A) deals with Section 77 wrong-head refunds.
View sourceRecords we prepare for Kattupakkam carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0436, 80.1450, which map each submission back to this locality. Businesses registered in Kattupakkam share the Chennai West jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Poonamallee Division each time. Kattupakkam (PIN 600056) falls under the Poonamallee Division of the Chennai West, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Every Kattupakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600056, the Poonamallee Division, and the coordinates 13.0436, 80.1450 that anchor the locality.
Working in Kattupakkam brings a logistical edge: proximity to Mount-Poonamallee Road and the Kattupakkam Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Vendors and customers tied to the Kattupakkam Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Kattupakkam GST Refund clients. Freight and foot traffic from the Kattupakkam Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Kattupakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential growth pocket pocket. Commercial activity in Kattupakkam runs medium, so GST Refund volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Kattupakkam desk accordingly.
The business mix in Kattupakkam centres on it services, and that sector carries its own GST Refund quirks we plan for in advance. For a it services business in Kattupakkam, the GST Refund scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. The it services firms we serve in Kattupakkam value a GST Refund partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. GST Refund for it services businesses in Kattupakkam hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time.
Document intake for Kattupakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Refund engagement. Turnaround for Kattupakkam GST Refund is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Working papers for Kattupakkam GST Refund engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Fixed-fee scoping means a Kattupakkam business knows the GST Refund cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
Coverage from Kattupakkam naturally extends to Porur, so group entities across the area share one GST Refund workflow. Businesses straddling Kattupakkam and Porur get a single GST Refund point of contact rather than two. Proximity to Porur means a Kattupakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. We treat Kattupakkam and Porur as one catchment for GST Refund, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.
Each engagement in Kattupakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Refund file. The GST Refund mistakes we see most in Kattupakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Patterns we track for Kattupakkam include residential documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Poonamallee Division tends to raise. Common patterns in the Poonamallee Division give Kattupakkam businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Refund issues.
A startup setting up near Kattupakkam Bus Stop in Kattupakkam gets a GST Refund foundation built for the Poonamallee Division from day one. Relocating a registered office into Kattupakkam (PIN 600056) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Refund transition cleanly. When a Iyyappanthangal business expands into Kattupakkam, we extend its GST Refund setup to PIN 600056 without disruption. New it services ventures in Kattupakkam lean on us to stand up GST Refund correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice.
Refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96, accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies under Rule 89 and inverted duty structure refund under Rule 89(5) for Kattupakkam businesses are filed in RFD-01 with Statement-3 within the Section 54(1) 2-year limitation.
A dedicated GST refund consultant in Kattupakkam prepares RFD-01, replies RFD-03 deficiency memos within 15 days, follows up the 60-day RFD-06 sanction, and pursues Section 56 interest where the department delays disbursement.
Exporters in Kattupakkam are advised on the LUT (RFD-11) versus IGST-payment route, Rule 91 provisional refund of 90% within 7 days, and auto-disbursement of IGST refund on shipping bill once GSTR-1 Table 6A and EGM are aligned.
For Kattupakkam manufacturers facing inverted rates, Rule 89(5) refund is computed on Net ITC on inputs (Supreme Court VKC Footsteps ratio applied), Statement-1 prepared period-wise and unjust-enrichment exception under Section 54(8)(b) invoked.
RFD-01 is the main application form; RFD-03 is the deficiency memo; RFD-04 is the provisional refund order; RFD-06 is the final sanction or rejection order; RFD-08 is the show cause; RFD-09 is the reply; RFD-11 is the LUT.
Statement-3 is the export invoice listing annexed to RFD-01 when the LUT route is used and accumulated input credit is being claimed back. Each row carries invoice particulars, recipient or destination country, and the value attributable to the period.
Statement-1 is the tax-period-wise computation submitted with RFD-01 for inverted duty refund. It captures Net ITC on inputs, turnover of inverted rated supply, Adjusted Total Turnover, and the maximum refund amount per the Rule 89(5) formula.
Form RFD-11 is the annual undertaking that allows zero-rated supplies to leave India without an upfront IGST charge. Rule 96A read with CBIC Circular 37/11/2018-GST sets the eligibility — no past prosecution beyond the ₹2.5 crore evasion threshold within five years.
No. The realisation proof — FIRC or BRC from the authorised dealer bank — is a statutory ingredient of Section 2(6) IGST Act. Where part of the invoice value is unrealised at the limitation date, the refund is capped at the realised portion.
INR receipt is generally not treated as convertible foreign exchange for Section 2(6) IGST Act. However Notification 16/2020-CT and the RBI Vostro arrangements extend the convertible foreign exchange concept to specified INR receipts. RBI permission and Vostro credit advice are required.
What Kattupakkam clients want to know before signing: Closer to Kattupakkam, in the residential growth pocket micro-market of Kattupakkam.
Reading this guide locally — In Kattupakkam, on the Iyyappanthangal-Poonamallee corridor that passes through Kattupakkam.
Section 54 read with Rule 89(2) and the explanation to Section 54 recognises several distinct refund categories — IGST paid on export of goods refunded under Rule 96; accumulated ITC on zero-rated supplies without payment of tax claimed through Rule 89(4); accumulated ITC under inverted duty structure claimed through Rule 89(5); the surplus carried in the electronic cash ledger; tax mistakenly remitted under the wrong head per Section 77 read alongside Section 19 IGST Act; deemed-export supplies notified through Notification 48/2017-Central Tax; supplies to SEZ developers and units; finalisation of provisional assessment under Section 60; specified embassies and UN agencies under Section 55; and amounts arising from orders of an appellate forum, the tribunal or the courts. Each category embodies a distinct statutory schema with its own eligibility test, document set and procedural cadence. The Kattupakkam entity must first determine its applicable category before designing the refund workflow.
The policy rationale for the refund mechanism in Section 54 traces back to the destination principle in consumption taxation, articulated in the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines and adopted by India through the GST Council architecture under Article 246A and Article 279A of the Constitution. The destination principle requires that tax burden rest with the jurisdiction of consumption, not production. For exports, since consumption occurs outside India, the entire embedded tax must be refunded for the supply to be genuinely zero-rated. For inverted-duty structures, the accumulated credit represents tax that the consumer has not borne, and retention by the State would amount to a hidden tax on the supplier. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper explicitly identified both situations as warranting refund to preserve the credit-method neutrality. The GST Council in its 47th meeting at Chandigarh reaffirmed this rationale when revising the refund formula for inverted-duty under Rule 89(5). The Kattupakkam taxpayer thus exercises a constitutionally-grounded entitlement rather than a discretionary concession.
GST refund in India is governed primarily by Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with Sections 55 and 56 and the procedural framework in Rules 89 to 97 of the CGST Rules. Section 54(1) is the operative provision permitting any person to claim refund of any tax, interest, penalty, fees or any other amount paid by such person by making an application in the prescribed form within two years from the relevant date. The architecture deliberately distinguishes between categories — refund of unutilised input tax credit under Section 54(3) is permitted only in two limbs (zero-rated supplies without payment of tax, and accumulated credit on account of rate inversion), whereas refund of excess balance in the electronic cash ledger flows through a different procedural channel without the two-year horizon. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat timely refund as an integral element of the destination principle in a credit-method consumption tax, and the Indian construct in Section 54 closely mirrors that recommended template. The Kattupakkam registered person engaging with refund must first identify which limb governs the claim before any further procedural step.
The grounds typically raised in refund appeals include — wrongful application of Section 54(3) eligibility tests, mechanical reduction of Net ITC without supporting analysis, denial on time-bar grounds where deficiency-memo cycles ought to have been factored, denial on supplier-non-compliance grounds notwithstanding Suncraft Energy and similar rulings, mechanical application of Section 54(8) unjust-enrichment without testing the categorical exclusions, and procedural infirmity in the RFD-06 order itself (unreasoned conclusions, no hearing afforded, no consideration of taxpayer submissions). Each ground requires specific factual development and pleading. The Kattupakkam applicant drafting the appeal should align each ground to the specific facts of the RFD-06 order rather than rely on generic templates.
Where the first appellate authority dismisses or partially allows the appeal, the second-stage remedy is an appeal to the GST Appellate Tribunal — the forum constituted under Section 112 — once the benches are operational. Pending Tribunal operationalisation, the writ jurisdiction of the jurisdictional High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution remains available. Madras High Court in several recent rulings has entertained writ petitions on refund denials where the Tribunal route was unavailable. The pre-deposit for Tribunal appeal is twenty percent of the disputed amount (over and above the ten percent at first appeal stage) capped at fifty crore rupees CGST plus fifty crore rupees SGST. The Kattupakkam applicant facing first-appeal adverse order should evaluate both Tribunal and writ pathways based on relief urgency and merits.
Where the appeal succeeds and the refund flows out of the appellate, Tribunal or court order, Section 56 read with its proviso prescribes interest at nine percent per annum, computed from the expiry of sixty days reckoned from the day the consequent application lands with the Department. The nine-percent rate is higher than the six-percent rate applicable to ordinary delayed refunds, recognising the additional time investment by the applicant in pursuing appellate remedy. The interest is not auto-disbursed and must be claimed expressly through correspondence or a separate refund application. The Kattupakkam successful appellant should compute the Section 56 interest from day sixty-one of the appellate-consequent application and pursue the supplementary order through the jurisdictional officer.
Refund of surplus funds parked in the electronic cash ledger flows through Section 54 read with the explanation, but the two-year limitation under Section 54(1) does not apply since the balance reflects amounts deposited yet not absorbed against any tax, interest, penalty or fee liability — the deposit itself does not constitute tax paid. The application is filed in RFD-01 under the category Excess Balance in Cash Ledger. Documentation is minimal — only the cash-ledger statement extract and bank-account details. The refund is generally sanctioned within the sixty-day Section 54(7) window without unjust-enrichment scrutiny under Section 54(8)(a) since cash-ledger excess is expressly excluded from the unjust-enrichment test. The Kattupakkam applicant with cash-ledger excess should pursue this refund route as the least friction-laden category.
Section 49(10) read with Form PMT-09 permits transfer of balances between heads (IGST, CGST, SGST, cess, interest, late fee, penalty) within the electronic cash ledger. Where the balance is fragmented across heads, PMT-09 consolidation should be performed before any refund application — refund of consolidated excess is procedurally cleaner than head-wise refunds, and avoids partial sanctions that reopen the file for officer queries. PMT-09 itself does not require any approval and flows through immediately on submission. The Kattupakkam applicant identifying cash-ledger excess across multiple heads should sequence PMT-09 first and RFD-01 only after the consolidated balance is visible in the desired head.
Excess cash-ledger balance can either be refunded under Section 54 or carried forward and offset against future tax liability — the choice is the taxpayer's. The refund route releases working capital immediately but consumes administrative effort. The offset route conserves the balance for future liability but locks the funds with the Department. For taxpayers with steady future output liability the offset route is generally preferable, whereas for taxpayers winding down or with seasonal nil-liability quarters the refund route releases capital productively. The Kattupakkam taxpayer should evaluate both routes against working-capital projections rather than default to refund, recognising the procedural cost of any refund application.
The two-year limitation under Section 54(1) applies to deemed-export refund. The relevant date is the date of return relating to the tax period in which the deemed-export supply was made, as clarified in the explanation to Section 54 read with Notification 49/2017. The limitation runs strictly, and quarterly filing is the recommended cadence. Where the supplier and recipient are coordinating to determine the claimant, time consumed in undertaking-document negotiation must be factored into the limitation calendar. The Kattupakkam applicant should not wait for the full annual cycle before filing, since the deemed-export documentation chain is more elaborate than ordinary domestic refund and remediation cycles can consume the limitation cushion.
Notification 48/2017-Central Tax notifies four categories of supplies as deemed exports — supply of goods by a registered person against advance authorisation, supply of capital goods by a registered person against EPCG authorisation, supply of goods to Export Oriented Units, and supply of gold by a bank or PSU specified in Notification 50/2017-Customs against advance authorisation. The deemed-export framework permits refund of GST paid on such supplies under Section 54 read with Rule 89(2)(g), recognising that the goods are eventually used in physical exports. The policy rationale aligns with the destination principle articulated in the OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines — tax should not embed in supplies that ultimately leave the country. The Kattupakkam supplier servicing advance-authorisation holders, EOUs or EPCG-route importers should consider the deemed-export refund route systematically.
Notification 49/2017-Central Tax operationalises the deemed-export refund procedure. Either the supplier-side or the recipient-side party is entitled to claim the refund, provided the non-claimant furnishes an undertaking that no parallel claim will be pursued on the same supply. The application is filed in RFD-01 under the Deemed Exports category with Statement-5B capturing invoice-wise details. Supporting documentation includes the advance authorisation or EPCG authorisation copy, the recipient's undertaking, the EOU registration document where applicable, and the GSTR-2B reflection. The Kattupakkam applicant should coordinate with the counterparty at the engagement stage to determine which side claims the refund and to obtain the undertaking on letterhead, avoiding last-minute documentation issues at refund-application time.
What Kattupakkam clients usually ask next: Closer to Kattupakkam, for the professional and salaried population of Kattupakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Section 56 of the CGST Act provides for interest at six percent per annum where the refund is not paid within 60 days from the date of acknowledgment of a complete application. The rate goes up to nine percent where the refund arises out of an order of the appellate authority or court and is not paid within 60 days.
Excess balance in the electronic cash ledger can be refunded under Section 49(6) read with Section 54 by filing RFD-01 in the 'excess balance' category. This is the simplest refund route as it does not involve Rule 89 turnover formulae and is not subject to the unjust-enrichment doctrine.
Doctrine codified in Section 54(8) requiring the applicant to prove that the incidence of the tax claimed as refund has not been passed on to the buyer. A chartered accountant's certificate is required where the claim exceeds two lakh rupees; otherwise a self-declaration suffices. Excess cash-ledger and zero-rated refunds are statutorily exempt.
Fund constituted under Section 57 to which refunds otherwise sanctioned are credited if the applicant fails the unjust-enrichment test. Refunds that survive the test are paid to the applicant; those that fail are deposited to the CWF and not returned to the applicant.
RFD-08 is the show-cause notice issued by the proper officer where the refund application has been found prima facie inadmissible after acknowledgment. The applicant has 15 days to reply in RFD-09 with supporting documents before a rejection order in RFD-06 is passed.
RFD-06 is the final refund sanction or rejection order. Sanction triggers payment advice in RFD-05 to the bank account on the GSTIN record. The order must be passed within 60 days of acknowledgment; failure triggers Section 56 interest liability on the department.
Where a taxpayer has paid CGST plus SGST on a transaction subsequently held to be inter-State, or vice versa, Section 77 of the CGST Act and Section 19 of the IGST Act allow refund of the wrong-head tax without interest demand on the period of wrong payment. The two-year limitation runs from the correct-head payment date per Notification 35/2021-CT.
Relevant Date is the statutorily defined trigger from which the two-year limitation under Section 54(1) begins to run. The Explanation to Section 54 lists eight distinct relevant-date scenarios — for export of goods the trigger is the date the ship leaves India; for service exports the trigger is receipt of payment in convertible foreign exchange or the invoice date (whichever falls later); for inverted-duty claims the trigger is the due date for filing the return covering that tax period.
Net ITC is the input tax credit availed on inputs (and input services for zero-rated supply refunds) during the relevant period, reduced by ineligible credit under Section 17. For inverted-duty refunds under Rule 89(5), following the Supreme Court verdict in the VKC Footsteps matter, Net ITC is restricted to credit on inputs only. It is the numerator that drives the refund formula in both Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5).
Adjusted Total Turnover is the denominator in the Rule 89(4) and Rule 89(5) formulae. It covers the turnover in a State or Union territory as defined in Section 2(112) minus turnover of services for which refund is claimed and the value of exempt supplies other than zero-rated supplies. The formula effectively dilutes the refund where domestic taxable turnover dominates.
Inverted Duty Structure is a scenario where the GST rate on inputs is higher than the GST rate on the output supply, resulting in accumulated unutilised input tax credit that cannot be set off against output liability. Section 54(3)(ii) permits refund of such accumulation. Rule 89(5) prescribes the formula. Common sectors include fabrics, footwear, fertilisers and some pharmaceutical inputs.
Zero-Rated Supply is defined in Section 16 of the IGST Act and covers export of goods, export of services and supply to a Special Economic Zone developer or unit. The supply attracts a nil tax rate but the supplier is entitled to claim refund of taxes paid on inputs and input services — either by exporting under LUT and claiming accumulated ITC refund, or by paying IGST and claiming IGST refund.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Kattupakkam businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Kattupakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Kattupakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Kattupakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Kattupakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Kattupakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Kattupakkam engagements look the way they do: Closer to Kattupakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Kattupakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for the professional and salaried population of Kattupakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“We export auto components from Ambattur and had ₹38 lakh of accumulated ITC stuck for 14 months under the LUT route. FilingPro filed RFD-01 with Statement-3 cleanly tied to our shipping bills and GSTR-1 Table 6A. Provisional 90% sanctioned in 9 days, balance in 47 days. No deficiency memo.”
“Our textile unit faced inverted duty structure for 18 months — output at 5% on fabric, inputs at 12% on yarn. FilingPro applied the Rule 89(5) formula correctly post-VKC Footsteps and recovered ₹22 lakh in cash. Statement-1 was airtight; the officer sanctioned RFD-06 without a single query.”
“Department issued RFD-03 deficiency memo on a technicality — they wanted realised value matched in INR rather than foreign currency on Statement-3. FilingPro filed the corrected RFD-01 within 11 days. Sanction came through in the 60-day window. Limitation was preserved.”
“Refund of ₹6.4 lakh for excess balance in cash ledger — sanctioned by jurisdictional officer in 41 days flat. No unjust-enrichment hassle since this category is exempt under Section 54(8). FilingPro handled documentation, ARN tracking and bank credit advice end-to-end.”
“IGST refund on goods exports was stuck because of GSTR-1 Table 6A vs shipping bill mismatch on port code. FilingPro identified the mismatch, filed amendment in next month's GSTR-1 (Table 9A), and the system auto-disbursed ₹14 lakh under Rule 96 within the next cycle.”
“Our refund was rejected in RFD-06 on grounds of unjust enrichment. FilingPro drafted Section 107 appeal within 80 days, computed 10% pre-deposit correctly, and represented at the First Appellate Authority hearing. Order set aside and refund sanctioned with Section 56 interest at 9%.”
Common questions from Kattupakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Refund clients in Kattupakkam are spread right across the locality — along 1st Cross Sreett, 1st street, 2nd Cross Street, 2nd street and 3rd street, and through the Chennai Bypass Expressway, Porur Bridge, Mount - Poonamallee - Avadi Road and Chettiar Agaram School Street business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Refund in Kattupakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.