Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Trusted GST Audit Defence · Vanagaram Junction

GST Audit Support for Vanagaram Junction (PIN 600095)

Qualified GST Audit Support for Vanagaram Junction (PIN 600095) and adjacent Vanagaram — on fixed, transparent fees

Vanagaram Junction retail and auto services units around Vanagaram Junction by qualified experts with a 15+ year, zero-penalty record. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

Can ITC be denied during audit on the ground of supplier default in Vanagaram Junction, Chennai?

The Madras High Court in Tvl. Diya Agencies v. State Tax Officer (W.P. 16866/2023) and similar rulings have held that the recipient who has paid consideration with tax to the supplier and filed valid returns cannot be denied ITC merely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer — provided Section 16 conditions are otherwise met. Audit teams cannot mechanically reverse ITC on this ground alone.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Vanagaram Junction Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

Section 17(5) Workings Pre-Disclosed

Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.

RCM Register Reconstruction

Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.

E-Invoice IRN Logs Reconciled

For Vanagaram Junction businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.

ADT-02 Findings Replied With Case-Law

Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.

DRC-03 Voluntary Closure

Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.

Section 66 Special Audit Coordination

Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).

Key Benefits

What Vanagaram Junction Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Confidential Audit Defence
Audit working papers, ADT-02 findings and reconciliation evidence stored under access-controlled channels. Vanagaram Junction clients' audit data is never shared with third parties or used for cross-marketing.
Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Vanagaram Junction clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Vanagaram Junction clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
E-Way Bill Compliance Demonstrated
For consignments above ₹50000, e-way bill register with vehicle number and route details produced — Rule 138 compliance evidenced; no penalty under Section 122(1)(xiv) for non-issuance.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Vanagaram Junction businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Vanagaram Junction and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Vanagaram Junction Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Vanagaram Junction to the rest of Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Vanagaram Junction clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Vanagaram Junction businesses operate where the cluster of retail, auto services, restaurants businesses that defines Vanagaram Junction's commercial fabric.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Commencement of audit at the registered premises90 daysRecords walkthrough and reconciliationAudit ordinarily required to be completed within ninety days from commencement extendable by another ninety days by Commissioner for reasons recorded in writing.
Receipt of special audit report under Section 66(5)30 daysWritten representation and supporting documentsThe registered person should file a written representation on the report before the Commissioner initiates proceedings; opportunity of being heard under Section 66(6) must be granted before any material from the report is used against the registered person.
ADT-02 findings indicate short-paid tax or wrongly availed credit1095 daysSection 73 SCN window from due date of annual returnShow-cause notice under Section 73 may be issued at least three months prior to the time-limit for issuance of order; order may be passed within three years from the due date of annual return

Deadline pressure points we see in Vanagaram Junction: On the ground in Vanagaram Junction, for Vanagaram Junction businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

DRC-06Reply to show cause notice

Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing

Within the time allowed in the SCN, generally thirty days Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-07Summary of order

Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation

Issued along with the detailed adjudication order Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
APL-01First appeal to Appellate Authority

Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details

Within three months from the date of communication of the order; condonable by a further one month Common Portal (taxpayer) — addressed to Appellate Authority
RFD-01Refund application

Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order

Within two years from the relevant date under Section 54 Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-1Statement of outward supplies

Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow

11th of the next month (monthly) or 13th of the month following the quarter (QRMP) Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-3BSummary return

Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches

20th / 22nd / 24th of the next month based on State and turnover slab Common Portal (taxpayer)
GST ADT-01Notice for conduct of audit

Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available

Not less than fifteen working days prior to conduct of audit Jurisdictional proper officer not below the rank prescribed
GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)

GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction, Chennai 600095

Vanagaram Junction (PIN 600095) falls under the Saidapet Division of the Chennai West, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Vanagaram Junction is a major commercial node at the intersection of Vanagaram-Ambattur Road and the Porur-Maduravoyal corridor with dense retail and auto services. Records we prepare for Vanagaram Junction carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0644, 80.1633, which map each submission back to this locality. Every Vanagaram Junction engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600095, the Saidapet Division, and the coordinates 13.0644, 80.1633 that anchor the locality.

Freight and foot traffic from the Vanagaram Junction Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Vanagaram Junction, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this major commercial junction pocket. Vanagaram Junction sustains a high flow of commerce for a major commercial junction locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Most commerce in Vanagaram Junction — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Commercial activity in Vanagaram Junction runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Vanagaram Junction desk accordingly.

The logistics firms we serve in Vanagaram Junction value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. Sector concentration matters: when Vanagaram Junction leans toward logistics, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. GST Audit Support for logistics businesses in Vanagaram Junction hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. Because Vanagaram Junction hosts a cluster of logistics businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality.

Our Vanagaram Junction GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Vanagaram Junction GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Vanagaram Junction is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. The qualified-review step on every Vanagaram Junction GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal.

From the same Vanagaram Junction team we also serve Porur and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Coverage from Vanagaram Junction naturally extends to Porur, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow. Businesses straddling Vanagaram Junction and Porur get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. Serving Vanagaram Junction and Porur from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster.

Because we work repeatedly across Vanagaram Junction, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Vanagaram Junction are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Each engagement in Vanagaram Junction adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. Over several cycles in Vanagaram Junction, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.

When a Vanagaram business expands into Vanagaram Junction, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600095 without disruption. Relocating a registered office into Vanagaram Junction (PIN 600095) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. A startup setting up near Vanagaram Junction in Vanagaram Junction gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Saidapet Division from day one. We onboard new Vanagaram Junction entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction — Complete Guide

At FilingPro we treat GST audit support as a continuous record-retention discipline, not a reactive scramble. Section 35 books, Section 36 6-year retention, monthly GSTR-2B downloads, RCM register, e-invoice IRN logs and Section 17(5) workings — all maintained through the year so that an ADT-01 notice can be answered with documentary completeness rather than reconstruction.

GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Vanagaram Junction businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Vanagaram Junction — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Vanagaram Junction prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Vanagaram Junction

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Vanagaram Junction — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Vanagaram Junction businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Vanagaram Junction clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Vanagaram Junction businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
What is the time limit for a Section 66 special audit report?

Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit the audit report within ninety days. The period is extendable by another ninety days on application by the auditor or on the department's own motion for sufficient reasons.

Who bears the auditor's professional fee under Section 66?

Under Section 66(5) the Commissioner determines and discharges the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. The registered person carries no fee burden for the special-audit professional, although internal representation costs remain to the taxpayer's account.

Has GSTR-9C self-certification continued to apply for the financial years since 2020-21?

Yes. Beginning the 2020-21 financial year, taxpayers crossing the five-crore aggregate-turnover mark in any year self-certify the reconciliation statement. Earlier external certification by a Chartered Accountant was dispensed with by the Finance Act 2021 amendments to Section 44.

What is the GSTR-9C turnover threshold from FY 2020-21?

The threshold is aggregate turnover above five crore rupees in the financial year, applied PAN-wise across all GSTINs. Persons below this threshold are not required to file GSTR-9C even where GSTR-9 filing is otherwise compulsory for them.

What is the due date for GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C filing?

GSTR-9 along with GSTR-9C where applicable is due by the thirty-first of December following the relevant financial year. Section 44 read with Rule 80 governs the due date, subject to periodic extensions notified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

Which document sets does the audit team typically demand at ADT-01 stage?

Section 35 with Rule 56 obliges the registered person to keep the universe of tax invoices, stock and production registers, ITC workings, output liability schedules, RCM register, e-way bill logs, IRN files, Section 17(5) computations and matched bank statements ready for production.

What Vanagaram Junction clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Vanagaram Junction, around the Vanagaram Junction catchment of Vanagaram Junction.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Vanagaram Junction businesses operate where on the Vanagaram-Maduravoyal corridor that passes through Vanagaram Junction.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Section 65 departmental audit framework

Audit period and frequency under Section 65(2)

Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.

Audit completion timeline under Section 65(4)

Section 65(4) requires that the audit under Section 65 shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of audit. The Commissioner is empowered to extend this period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing; the maximum total audit-cycle is therefore nine months from commencement. 'Commencement of audit' is defined in the Explanation to Section 65(4) as the date on which records and documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. This definition is significant for the registered person — timely document submission tightens the audit timeline and prevents prolonged uncertainty; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks similarly emphasise audit-cycle time as a taxpayer-rights consideration.

Powers of the audit team under Section 65(5) and Section 65(6)

Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.

Section 66 special audit by CA / CMA

Trigger conditions under Section 66(1)

Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.

Procedural sequence under Section 66(2) to 66(5)

Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.

Independence of Section 66 from prior audits or returns acceptance

Section 66(6) is a critical safeguard from the revenue's perspective — it provides that nothing in Section 66 shall be construed to debar the registered person from filing returns or paying tax, or to debar the proper officer from taking any action against the registered person under any other provision. The provision is non-derogating; a Section 66 special audit can be invoked even after a Section 65 departmental audit has been completed, where the proper officer forms a fresh opinion on value or credit complexity. Comparative jurisprudence in pre-GST excise (similar provision in Section 14A of the Central Excise Act before its omission) and service tax (Section 72A of the Finance Act 1994) had similar non-derogation features. The registered person's defence at the Section 66 stage rests primarily on the Section 75 opportunity-of-being-heard and the nature-of-complexity threshold.

ADT-01 intimation

Risk-engine selection and audit-pool composition

ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.

Form, contents and statutory basis

Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).

Responding to ADT-01 — documentation readiness

Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.

What Vanagaram Junction clients usually ask next: On the ground in Vanagaram Junction, for Vanagaram Junction businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

E-way bill audit

E-way bill audit is the examination of e-way bills generated under sub-rule (1) of Rule 138 for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees. Audit observations typically address mismatches between e-way bill data, tax invoice data and GSTR-1 outward supply declarations.

Place of supply

Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.

Departmental audit

Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.

Special audit

Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.

ADT-01 notice

ADT-01 is the statutory intimation of audit issued by the proper officer at least fifteen working days before the date on which the audit is proposed to commence, specifying the period, place and the documents required to be made available.

ADT-02 closure

ADT-02 is the form in which the proper officer communicates the audit findings, rights and obligations to the registered person within thirty days of completion of the audit; observations in ADT-02 typically feed into a subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 demand notice if tax has not been voluntarily paid.

ADT-03 direction

ADT-03 is the direction issued under Section 66(1) by the Commissioner to a registered person requiring submission to special audit by a nominated chartered or cost accountant; the audit report is to be submitted within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause.

Audit period

Audit period under Section 65(4) is the period from the date of commencement of audit at the registered person's premises or the date on which records are first made available, up to ninety days extendable by another ninety days by the Commissioner where the audit cannot be completed within the ordinary window.

Pre-ADT-02 window

Pre-ADT-02 window is the practical window between draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, during which the registered person can file a written reply, produce additional records and make voluntary DRC-03 payments under Section 73(5) to avoid penalty exposure.

Rule 56 records

Rule 56 of the CGST Rules prescribes the accounts and records that every registered person is required to maintain at the principal place of business — including registers of production, inward and outward supply, stock, advances, tax payable and paid, and credit and debit notes, retained for six years from the due date of the annual return.

Six-year retention

Six-year retention is the statutory obligation under Section 36 read with Rule 56(18) to keep books of account and other records until expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing of the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts and records, extended where the registered person is party to any appeal or proceeding.

Records walkthrough

Records walkthrough is the practitioner-led structured presentation of statutory registers, reconciliations and working notes to the audit officer at the commencement of audit, designed to substitute an unstructured document-request cycle and reduce overall audit duration.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Ocean-freight RCM ₹21,00,000 demanded at audit on CIF imports; Mohit Minerals defence sustainedNil (post-defence)NilNilNil
GTA forward-charge election challenged at audit; Annexure V missing for one transitional year₹3,00,000 (on ₹25,00,000 freight)₹81,000 (18% over 18 months)₹30,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹4,11,000
Section 50(3) interest on ineligible ITC of ₹9,00,000 utilised before reversal; audit-detected₹9,00,000 (reversal)₹1,62,000 (18% on utilisation period)₹90,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹11,52,000
Section 65 audit transitioning into Section 74 SCN of ₹26,00,000; downgraded to Section 73 on Kranti Associates ground₹26,00,000₹7,02,000 (18% over 18 months)₹2,60,000 (10% under Section 73(9) instead of 100% under Section 74(9))₹35,62,000
Section 107 appeal pre-deposit on ADT-02 maturing into ₹19,00,000 demand for restaurant chain₹19,00,000 (under dispute)Computed on confirmation10% subject to confirmationPre-deposit: ₹1,90,000
Section 122(2)(b) penalty proposed at audit on contractor for supplier-default ITC; defence sustainedReversal of ₹2,30,000 only₹41,400 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 122(2)(b) dropped on Diya Agencies)₹2,71,400

How Vanagaram Junction businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Vanagaram Junction, the business activity radiating outward from Vanagaram Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for Vanagaram Junction businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Vanagaram Junction

How the local trade mix shapes this — Vanagaram Junction businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Vanagaram Junction and nearby commercial pockets.

Retail
Common issue: Multi-outlet retail chains under audit face Section 65 queries on aggregate-turnover computation under Section 2(6) where PAN-wise consolidation across States surfaces inter-State stock transfers booked without IGST. Schedule I treats stock transfers between distinct persons (different GSTINs of the same PAN) as supply, and audit teams compute the omitted IGST as suppressed liability.
How we handle it: Reconcile branch transfer registers to outward GSTR-1 disclosures and inward GSTR-2A appearance at the recipient branch. Where Schedule I supplies were missed, voluntarily disclose via DRC-03 with the offsetting ITC claim at the recipient branch in the same audit cycle, leveraging Section 75(13) on simultaneous remedies to avoid cascading.
Logistics
Common issue: Goods Transport Agency (GTA) operators under Section 65 audit face the Notification 13/2017-CT(R) forward-charge versus reverse-charge election complexity. From 18 July 2022, GTAs have an annual option under Notification 03/2022-CT(R) to pay 12% with ITC (forward charge) by Annexure-V declaration; many GTAs missed the deadline and face audit additions for incorrect tax structure.
How we handle it: Reconstruct the Annexure-V filing position for each year; where the declaration was missed, default to reverse-charge by recipient and ensure invoices carry the prescribed RCM legend under Rule 46 proviso. Reconcile e-way bill data with GSTR-1 RCM disclosures; voluntarily disclose any forward-charge collections through DRC-03 if classification is incorrect.
Restaurants
Common issue: Restaurant operators on Zomato / Swiggy face Section 65 audit issues on Section 9(5) e-commerce-operator collection — from 1 January 2022 (Notification 17/2017-CT(R) amendment by Notification 17/2021-CT(R)), the aggregator collects 5% GST on behalf of the restaurant. Restaurants frequently double-disclose the same revenue in GSTR-1 leading to audit-stage reconciliation issues.
How we handle it: Reconcile aggregator settlement reports (Zomato MIS, Swiggy partner statements) to restaurant GSTR-1 disclosures; ensure Section 9(5) supplies are reported under the prescribed table without duplicating output. Maintain a daily aggregator-versus-own-channel revenue split; for own-channel (dine-in, takeaway, telephone) revenue, capture in GSTR-1 directly at 5% without ITC.
Logistics
Common issue: Courier and last-mile logistics players under audit face Section 65 reconciliation between e-way bill data, GSTR-1 outward supplies, and FASTag / toll-data trails. Where consignment movements appear on e-way bill portal but are missed in GSTR-1, the audit team treats the gap as suppressed turnover and proposes Section 74 fraud framing.
How we handle it: Reconcile e-way bill download (EWB-01 generated and received) monthly to GSTR-1; preserve consignor declarations under Rule 138 for inter-State movements. Where genuine gaps exist (e.g. consignment cancelled but e-way bill not voided), document the cancellation under Rule 138(9) and voluntarily disclose any residual revenue impact through DRC-03.
Manufacturing
Common issue: Small manufacturers in industrial estates undergoing audit struggle with Rule 56 stock-records adequacy. Rule 56(2) requires a true and correct account of production, raw materials, finished goods and waste, but many SMEs maintain only tally inventory without the legally required day-wise production register, opening the door to estimated-suppression additions under Section 73.
How we handle it: Reconstruct Rule 56(2) registers using Tally batch data, weighbridge slips and electricity-consumption normative ratios well before the ADT-01 intimation period closes. Bundle the reconstruction with a contemporaneous reconciliation note explaining the SOP gap; voluntary DRC-03 payment of any genuine differential closes the issue at audit stage rather than at SCN.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

ADT-02 negotiationLogistics

Audit-closure meeting where the officer agreed to drop ₹11 lakh after a partner-level review

Issue: A logistics company in Madhavaram with ₹31 crore turnover was at the draft-ADT-02 stage with five proposed adverse findings totalling ₹19 lakh. The earlier consultant had accepted three of them (₹8 lakh) and was about to accept the remaining two (₹11 lakh) — one on ITC on motor-vehicle repairs under Section 17(5)(ab) and another on GTA RCM mismatch. The client engaged us for a second opinion two days before the scheduled closure meeting.
Approach: We re-examined both findings overnight. On motor-vehicle repairs we showed that the vehicles in question were goods carriages of GVW > 7.5 tonnes used in 'transportation of goods' — squarely within the proviso to Section 17(5)(ab), making the credit eligible. On the GTA RCM mismatch we reconciled GSTR-3B Table 3.1(d) outward to the FCM/RCM split in the GTA's invoices and showed that the ₹6 lakh apparent mismatch was an FY-boundary timing issue not a substantive short-payment. We requested a partner-led closure meeting with documentary backup.
Outcome: At the closure meeting the audit officer agreed to drop both adverse findings; ADT-02 was issued with three observations totalling ₹8 lakh (the ones the earlier consultant had correctly accepted); the ₹11 lakh saved against ₹19 lakh proposed; the second-opinion engagement converted into a permanent audit-defence retainer; office now offers a standalone 'pre-closure-meeting review' service for clients who came in late.
Diya AgenciesHardware trading

Diya Agencies principle extended at Section 65 audit for a {{area_name}} hardware trader

Issue: A hardware-trading firm in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit covering two financial years with proposed credit reversal of approximately nine lakh rupees on supplier-side default. The audit team treated GSTR-2B absence as conclusive without testing the recipient's documentary trail.
Approach: We anchored the reply on the Madras High Court ratio in the Tvl Diya Agencies matter, which holds that supplier-side lapses cannot, in isolation, defeat recipient credit absent an enquiry against the supplier and a recorded finding on the recipient's good faith. Supplier-level enquiry trails and banking-channel payment evidence were filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the reversal to seventy-eight thousand rupees relating to two genuinely missing suppliers; the residual eight lakh rupees was preserved; the matter closed within five months without DRC-01.
Notification 14/2022Logistics

Notification 14/2022 cross-utilisation clarification used at audit for a {{area_name}} logistics firm

Issue: A logistics firm in {{area_name}} received an ADT-02 alleging incorrect cross-utilisation of IGST credit against CGST and SGST liability in a sequence that diverged from the order in Notification 14/2022-Central Tax read with Rule 88A, with a proposed interest demand of approximately four lakh rupees.
Approach: We mapped the electronic credit ledger utilisation sequence period by period, demonstrated compliance with the notified order, and where minor sequencing slippage was visible, reconstructed the corrected ledger and paid Section 50(3) interest through DRC-03 on the differential utilisation cost.
Outcome: ADT-02 was revised; interest demand confined to fifty-four thousand rupees on the genuine slippage period; the bulk was dropped; the sequencing discipline was made part of the monthly reconciliation routine.
GTA forward-chargeGoods transport

GTA forward-charge election defended at audit for a {{area_name}} transporter

Issue: A goods-transport agency in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on a contention that its forward-charge election under Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 3/2022 was invalid for the relevant year, with a proposed demand of approximately fifteen lakh rupees on a deemed RCM-only basis.
Approach: We produced the Annexure V declaration filed before the fifteenth of March of the preceding financial year, the corresponding GSTR-1 invoices issued under twelve per cent forward charge with ITC, and the recipient confirmations. The audit reply traced the notification chronology and the option-effect dates.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the forward-charge election; the fifteen lakh rupee deemed-RCM demand was dropped; subsequent year Annexure V was filed within window to preserve the election.

Why these Vanagaram Junction engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Vanagaram Junction, the business activity radiating outward from Vanagaram Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for Vanagaram Junction businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Client Reviews

What Vanagaram Junction Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Vanagaram Junction

Common questions from Vanagaram Junction clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

The Madras High Court in Tvl. Diya Agencies v. State Tax Officer (W.P. 16866/2023) and similar rulings have held that the recipient who has paid consideration with tax to the supplier and filed valid returns cannot be denied ITC merely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer — provided Section 16 conditions are otherwise met. Audit teams cannot mechanically reverse ITC on this ground alone.
Where the proper officer passes a demand order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) following an audit, the registered person can file an appeal under Section 107 to the Appellate Authority within 3 months (extendable by 1 month) along with a 10% pre-deposit of the disputed tax. Further appeals lie to the GST Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 once it is constituted.
A consultant who knows the Chennai West jurisdiction and how Vanagaram Junction businesses operate moves faster and spots issues an online-only provider would miss. We are reachable on a real Chennai number, 9566-068-468, and can meet you in person whenever a matter genuinely needs it.
Section 66(2) requires the nominated auditor to submit the special audit report within 90 days of the ADT-03 order. The Assistant Commissioner may, on application by the auditor or the registered person and on reasonable grounds, extend the period by a further 90 days — taking the maximum to 180 days from the ADT-03 order date.
ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
Yes. Every GST Audit Support engagement is handled with strict confidentiality — your documents and data are used only for your work and never shared. Vanagaram Junction clients deal with the same trusted team throughout, so your information stays in one place.
Section 35 read with Rule 56 requires maintenance of accounts of production, inward and outward supply, stock, ITC availed, output tax payable and paid, and other particulars. For audit, all of these plus tax invoices, bills of supply, delivery challans, credit/debit notes, e-way bills, e-invoice IRN logs, RCM register, Section 17(5) workings and bank statements covering the audit period must be produced.
Yes. Rule 102 of the CGST Rules deals with special audit under Section 66. Rule 102(1) prescribes Form ADT-03 as the direction for special audit, and Rule 102(2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of conclusion of the special audit. Rule 102 must be read together with Section 66 timelines and cost provisions.
We review GST Audit Support work carefully before submission to avoid errors in the first place. If a genuine issue ever arises on something we filed for a Vanagaram Junction client, we help set it right — standing behind our work is part of the service.
Section 65(1) gives the proper officer the power to conduct audit either at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. In practice for most Vanagaram Junction businesses the audit is conducted at the principal place of business so books, records and statutory registers can be inspected on-site.
Yes. GST audit is GSTIN-wise — each registration has its own books, returns and assessment. A Tamil Nadu GSTIN of a multi-state business is audited separately from its Karnataka or Telangana GSTIN by the respective state's CGST or SGST authority. Records must therefore be maintained GSTIN-wise even where the underlying ERP is consolidated.
Our main office is at Plot No. 6, Alapakkam Main Road (opposite KVB Bank), Maduravoyal – 600095, with a branch at No. 22 Reddy Street, Nerkundram – 600107. Both are an easy reach from Vanagaram Junction, and a third office at Nolambur is opening shortly. Most clients, though, never need to visit.
Yes. The Madras High Court in Tvl. Raja Stores v. Assistant Commissioner (W.P. 33099/2022) held that Section 65 audit jurisdiction must be exercised in compliance with the 15 working days notice requirement and the 3-month completion timeline; orders passed without following ADT-01 procedure can be set aside. Several High Courts have also held that audit findings cannot be used to deny ITC where Section 16 conditions are otherwise met.
If the registered person does not accept the findings or pay the short-paid tax with interest through DRC-03, the proper officer issues a show-cause notice in DRC-01 under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement). The taxpayer then has 30 days to file DRC-06 reply. Failing satisfactory reply, an adjudication order is passed under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating demand.
Recurring findings include — ITC mismatch between GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B, Section 17(5) blocked credits wrongly availed (motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships), RCM not paid on advocate fees and GTA, e-way bill missing for consignments above ₹50,000, e-invoice non-compliance for taxpayers above ₹5 crore AATO, HSN summary errors in GSTR-1 Table 12, and Schedule III adjustments not made for related-party transactions.
Rule 101 of the CGST Rules operationalises Section 65. Rule 101(2) prescribes ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance, Rule 101(3) covers verification of records and returns at the audit, Rule 101(4) sets out audit completion within 3 months extendable to 6 months, and Rule 101(5) requires findings communication via ADT-02 and closure via ADT-04.
GST Audit Support near Vanagaram Junction:

Our GST Audit Support clients in Vanagaram Junction are spread right across the locality — along 1st Avenue, bus stand street, 200 Feet Bypass Road, Irumbuliyur Ramp, Sri Ram Nagar Main Road and 2nd Street, and through the Chennai Bangalore Highway, Chennai Bypass Expressway, Maduravoyal Interchange and EVR Periyar Salai business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction?

Professional GST Audit Support in Vanagaram Junction, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp