Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Trusted GST Audit Support Consultants · Thiruverkadu Pudur (PIN 600077)

GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur, Chennai

GST Audit Support delivery for residential and retail firms across Thiruverkadu Pudur — on fixed, transparent fees

Handling GST Audit Support for Thiruverkadu Pudur and Thiruverkadu clients — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

What is GSTR-9C and who must self-certify it in Thiruverkadu Pudur, Chennai?

GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Thiruverkadu Pudur Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

ADT-01 Notice Handled End-to-End

Every ADT-01 notice received by a Thiruverkadu Pudur client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.

On-Site Audit Representation

For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.

Table 8 GSTR-9 Reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.

Section 17(5) Workings Pre-Disclosed

Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.

RCM Register Reconstruction

Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.

E-Invoice IRN Logs Reconciled

For Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.

Key Benefits

What Thiruverkadu Pudur Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Without Surprises
For Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses above ₹5 crore turnover, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 prepared and self-certified well before 31 December — no Table 8 mismatch, no HSN summary gap.
Confidential Audit Defence
Audit working papers, ADT-02 findings and reconciliation evidence stored under access-controlled channels. Thiruverkadu Pudur clients' audit data is never shared with third parties or used for cross-marketing.
Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Thiruverkadu Pudur clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Thiruverkadu Pudur clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Across Thiruverkadu Pudur, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Thiruverkadu Pudur's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Thiruverkadu and Devi Karumariamman Temple Thiruverkadu and onward to central Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Thiruverkadu Pudur clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Thiruverkadu Pudur, the business activity radiating outward from Thiruverkadu Pudur Junction and nearby commercial pockets.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Records availability for 6 years tested at audit commencementOn due dateSection 36 records compendiumFailure to produce records attracts adverse inference; may trigger best-judgment route or Section 67 search
Pre-SCN intimation in Form DRC-01A served by proper officer post-audit30 daysDRC-01A Part B reply or DRC-03 paymentAcceptance route closes after thirty days; matter proceeds to formal SCN under Section 73 or 74
Adjudication order under Section 73 or 74 served90 daysAPL-01 first appealRight of appeal lapses if first appeal under Section 107 is not filed within three months from communication of order

Deadline pressure points we see in Thiruverkadu Pudur: On the ground in Thiruverkadu Pudur, for the professional and salaried population of Thiruverkadu Pudur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
DRC-06Reply to show cause notice

Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing

Within the time allowed in the SCN, generally thirty days Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-07Summary of order

Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation

Issued along with the detailed adjudication order Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
APL-01First appeal to Appellate Authority

Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details

Within three months from the date of communication of the order; condonable by a further one month Common Portal (taxpayer) — addressed to Appellate Authority
RFD-01Refund application

Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order

Within two years from the relevant date under Section 54 Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-1Statement of outward supplies

Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow

11th of the next month (monthly) or 13th of the month following the quarter (QRMP) Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-3BSummary return

Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches

20th / 22nd / 24th of the next month based on State and turnover slab Common Portal (taxpayer)
GST ADT-01Notice for conduct of audit

Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available

Not less than fifteen working days prior to conduct of audit Jurisdictional proper officer not below the rank prescribed

GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur, Chennai 600077

Records we prepare for Thiruverkadu Pudur carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0867, 80.1033, which map each submission back to this locality. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses tie back to the Avadi Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Thiruverkadu Pudur is a residential growth pocket with mid-tier housing neighbourhood retail and small-trade activity. Every Thiruverkadu Pudur engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600077, the Avadi Division, and the coordinates 13.0867, 80.1033 that anchor the locality.

Document pickup near Thiruverkadu Pudur Junction is a same-hour errand for our Thiruverkadu Pudur engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Thiruverkadu Pudur reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Thiruverkadu Pudur Junction, expenses routed through the Thiruverkadu Pudur Bus Stop freight network. The businesses clustered around Thiruverkadu Pudur Junction in Thiruverkadu Pudur drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. Vendors and customers tied to the Thiruverkadu Pudur Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Thiruverkadu Pudur GST Audit Support clients.

Because Thiruverkadu Pudur hosts a cluster of residential businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. Sector concentration matters: when Thiruverkadu Pudur leans toward residential, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. The business mix in Thiruverkadu Pudur centres on residential, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. For a residential business in Thiruverkadu Pudur, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts.

The Thiruverkadu Pudur GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Working papers for Thiruverkadu Pudur GST Audit Support engagements stay archived and retrievable, which makes any later notice or query straightforward to answer. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Thiruverkadu Pudur is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Our Thiruverkadu Pudur GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.

Serving Thiruverkadu Pudur and Pallavaram Thiruvallur High Road from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. A client relocating between Thiruverkadu Pudur and Pallavaram Thiruvallur High Road keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team. From the same Thiruverkadu Pudur team we also serve Pallavaram Thiruvallur High Road and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Group companies spread across Thiruverkadu Pudur and Pallavaram Thiruvallur High Road consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us.

The longer we serve Thiruverkadu Pudur, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Common patterns in the Avadi Division give Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Each engagement in Thiruverkadu Pudur adds to a record of what the Chennai West jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. Recurring gaps in Thiruverkadu Pudur coaching records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.

First-time GST Audit Support for a Thiruverkadu Pudur business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. New residential ventures in Thiruverkadu Pudur lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Incorporating in Thiruverkadu Pudur comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. For a new business incorporating in Thiruverkadu Pudur or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur — Complete Guide

For Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses crossing the ₹5 crore aggregate turnover threshold, GSTR-9C self-certification under Section 44 read with Rule 80 is filed alongside GSTR-9. Where the Commissioner directs a Section 66 special audit through ADT-03, FilingPro coordinates with the nominated Chartered Accountant, gives full record access and ensures the 90-day report timeline is managed without prejudice to the taxpayer's position.

GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Thiruverkadu Pudur — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Thiruverkadu Pudur prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Thiruverkadu Pudur

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Thiruverkadu Pudur — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Thiruverkadu Pudur clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
What is the Madras High Court ruling in Tvl Diya Agencies on ITC?

Tvl Diya Agencies v State Tax Officer holds that supplier-side default cannot mechanically defeat recipient credit without enquiry into the supplier and a finding on the recipient's bona fides. The ratio is widely relied upon in audit replies and ADT-02 defences in {{area_name}}.

How does the Madras HC approach jurisdictional review of audit notices?

Madras High Court routinely entertains Article 226 writs where ADT-01 or ADT-02 shows want of recorded reasons or overlap with an earlier audit on the same period. Reliance is placed on GKN Driveshafts and Kranti Associates discipline for speaking-order foundation.

What is Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciliation?

Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B against credit appearing in GSTR-2A or static GSTR-2B for the financial year. It is the most common audit-checkpoint and variances must be supported by supplier-wise documentation at audit.

Can audit team rely solely on GSTR-3B versus GSTR-1 variance?

No. The Gujarat High Court in Aap and Co v Union of India holds that GSTR-3B is a return of self-assessment and a mere tabular variance against GSTR-1 does not establish suppression. Independent enquiry into underlying invoices is required before adverse findings.

What is the role of the e-invoice IRN log in GST audit?

The e-invoice IRN log generated on the Invoice Registration Portal is reconciled against GSTR-1 outward supplies for entities above the Notification 10/2023-Central Tax threshold. Audit teams test cancellation-window slippages, credit-note IRNs and auto-population deltas between IRP and GSTN.

Are reverse-charge entries tested at GST audit?

Yes. Reverse charge under Section 9(3) on advocate fees, goods-transport agency services, security services and director payments, and under Section 5(3) of the IGST Act on import of services, is reconstructed from purchase ledgers and bank statements at audit.

What Thiruverkadu Pudur clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Thiruverkadu Pudur, on the Thiruverkadu-Devi Karumariamman Temple Thiruverkadu corridor that passes through Thiruverkadu Pudur.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Across Thiruverkadu Pudur, around the Thiruverkadu Pudur Junction catchment of Thiruverkadu Pudur.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

ADT-03 cost recovery

Determination of remuneration and challenges

The Commissioner determines the remuneration of the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant under Section 66(4) based on rates broadly aligned with the ICAI and ICMAI minimum recommended scales for special-audit work. The registered person typically has no direct say in either the selection of the CA/CMA or the remuneration determination — both are administrative decisions of the Commissioner. Challenges to ADT-03 cost-recovery are rare in practice and usually focus on the underlying Section 66 nomination itself rather than the quantum. Where the Section 66 nomination was procedurally infirm (no Commissioner approval, no opportunity of being heard, no recorded reasons), the consequential ADT-03 cost-recovery similarly becomes vulnerable in writ proceedings. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents this cost-recovery pattern as common across jurisdictions that use specialist-audit tiers.

Payment timeline and Section 79 recovery framework

Once ADT-03 is served, the cost-recovery amount becomes payable within the timeline specified in the form (typically thirty days). Non-payment triggers Section 79 of the CGST Act — the Government dues recovery framework — which empowers the proper officer to recover the amount through modes including deduction from any amount due to the registered person, sale of any movable or immovable property, attachment of bank accounts under Section 83 provisional attachment, and recovery as land revenue arrears. The registered person can apply for instalment-payment under Section 80 read with Rule 158 where genuine financial hardship exists; the Commissioner has discretion to allow up to twenty-four monthly instalments subject to interest under Section 50.

Cost-recovery in practice — pattern from Tamil Nadu Commissionerates

In practice, ADT-03 cost-recovery determinations issued by Tamil Nadu Commissionerates have ranged from modest amounts (₹50,000-₹2 lakh for limited-scope special audits) to substantial amounts (₹10 lakh and above for multi-year complex audits involving multiple GSTINs). The pattern correlates with the audit-scope — broad valuation or ITC-eligibility audits at large multi-State entities typically yield higher cost-recovery quantums. Registered persons under Section 66 nomination are well-advised to engage with the CA/CMA on a documented scope-limitation memorandum to control the quantum; reasonableness of the determination is reviewable in writ jurisdiction though the threshold for interference is high.

Records retention under Section 35

Statutory framework and retention horizon

Section 35(1) of the CGST Act requires every registered person to keep and maintain, at his principal place of business and at every additional place of business mentioned in the certificate of registration, a true and correct account of production or manufacture of goods, inward and outward supply of goods or services or both, stock of goods, input tax credit availed, output tax payable and paid, and such other particulars as may be prescribed. Section 36 mandates that every registered person required to keep books and accounts under Section 35 shall retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts. The seventy-two-month (six-year) retention horizon aligns with the Section 73 normal-period limitation of three years from the due date of the annual return, and the Section 74 extended-period limitation of five years, with a safety margin.

Specific records prescribed under Rules 56 to 58

Rule 56 of the CGST Rules elaborates the records to be maintained under Section 35 — accounts of goods or services received and supplied, stock of goods (with opening balance, receipt, supply, goods lost stolen destroyed written off or disposed of by way of gift or free sample, balance), particulars of ITC availed, output tax payable and paid, names and complete addresses of suppliers and customers, complete addresses of premises where goods are stored including goods stored during transit, monthly production accounts (for manufacturers) showing quantitative details of raw materials and goods produced, and accounts of advances received and paid. Rule 57 provides for maintenance through electronic means with prescribed safeguards. Rule 58 covers transporter, owner and operator of warehouse records. The records-architecture is granular and audit teams systematically map registered-person records against the Rule 56 schema during Section 65 audits.

Consequences of failure to maintain records

Failure to maintain accounts and records as prescribed under Section 35 read with Rule 56 attracts consequences under multiple provisions. Section 35(6) empowers the proper officer to determine the tax payable on the goods or services or both not accounted for as if such goods or services or both had been supplied by such person, and the provisions of Sections 73 or 74 shall apply for determination of such tax. Section 122 provides for penalty for various offences including failure to maintain records — up to ₹10,000 or the amount of tax evaded, whichever is higher. The audit team's working assumption in cases of inadequate records is that the burden shifts to the registered person to demonstrate the correctness of declared turnover and ITC; this evidentiary shift is the most material consequence in practice.

Rule 56 stock records

Sectoral application of Rule 56(18) — jewellery, precious metals

Rule 56(18) applies to a narrow but high-revenue-risk band of trades — precious metals, precious stones, jewellery — where stock-record granularity is essential because of the high unit-value and pilferage-risk profile. The daily quantity-wise register must capture purity (in carats for gold), weight (in grams or pennyweights), make-charges component, hallmarking certificate references (BIS hallmark unique identification), and customer-wise sale-bill traces. Family-run jewellery businesses in particular often default to consolidated weekly or monthly stock summaries; this gap is the most common audit finding in jewellery-sector Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu. Coordinated compliance with TCS under Section 206C(1F) at 1% on sales above ₹2 lakh adds an income-tax overlay to the stock-records architecture.

Stock-record obligations under Rule 56(2) and Rule 56(18)

Rule 56(2) of the CGST Rules requires every registered person, other than a person paying tax under Section 10 (composition), to maintain accounts of stock in respect of goods received and supplied — showing opening balance, receipt, supply, goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free sample, and balance of stock including raw materials, finished goods, scrap and wastage. Rule 56(18) imposes a higher-granularity obligation on registered persons dealing in goods of the kinds notified — currently primarily precious metals, precious stones and jewellery — requiring daily quantity-wise and value-wise stock registers. The granularity differential between Rule 56(2) and Rule 56(18) reflects the sector-specific revenue-risk assessment that has been part of Indian indirect-tax administration since pre-GST excise.

Reconstruction of stock records during audit

Where stock records under Rule 56(2) are incomplete or absent — a common scenario in SME manufacturing and trading — reconstruction during the ADT-01 fifteen-day window is the standard response. The reconstruction sources include purchase invoices and GSTR-2A entries (for inward stock), GSTR-1 outward supplies (for sales), e-way bill data (for stock movements), bank statements (for cash purchases or sales not invoiced through GST channels), and stock-take working papers from the statutory audit under the Companies Act or Section 44AB income tax audit. Reconstruction must be contemporaneous with the original transaction dates; backdated reconstruction is treated as fabrication by the audit team. The Tapas Dutta v UoI line of authority on retrospective records is occasionally invoked, but registered persons should not rely on it as a safe harbour.

What Thiruverkadu Pudur clients usually ask next: On the ground in Thiruverkadu Pudur, for the professional and salaried population of Thiruverkadu Pudur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

ITC reversal

ITC reversal is the substantive consequence of an audit observation that input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised. Reversal is effected through Table 4(B) of GSTR-3B with interest under Section 50(3) and, in some cases, penalty under Section 73(9) or 74(9) depending on the nature of the lapse.

Interest under Section 50

Interest under Section 50 is the statutory consequence of delayed payment of tax or wrong availment and utilisation of input tax credit. Sub-section (1) prescribes interest at the rate of eighteen percent per annum on delayed payment, and sub-section (3) prescribes interest at the rate of twenty-four percent for wrongful utilisation of ITC.

Personal hearing

Personal hearing under sub-section (4) of Section 75 is the opportunity granted by the proper officer or appellate authority to the registered person to present his case orally. Three adjournments at the option of the person sought to be heard are permitted on sufficient cause. Denial of personal hearing is a procedural infirmity.

Cross-examination

Cross-examination is the right of the registered person, as part of the opportunity of being heard, to examine the witnesses or officers whose statements are relied on against him in adjudication. The right is sought through a written application during personal hearing. Denial is a recognised ground in first appeal under Section 107.

Reasons to believe

Reasons to believe is the jurisdictional threshold under sub-section (1) of Section 67 for inspection, search and seizure, and is invoked also in the special-audit context. The reasons must be recorded in writing and must rest on tangible material; subjective satisfaction without material is open to challenge.

Commissioner approval

Commissioner approval is the substantive condition for invoking special audit under sub-section (1) of Section 66. The proposing officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner must obtain prior approval of the Commissioner before issuing the direction in ADT-03. Approval without recorded reasons is open to challenge.

Officer not below the rank

Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner is the designation threshold under sub-section (1) of Section 66 for proposing the special audit. The rank requirement is a jurisdictional condition; a direction issued by a lower-ranked officer is vitiated for want of authority.

Records-availability test

Records-availability test is the practical examination at the commencement of departmental audit of whether the registered person has produced books of account, invoices, contracts and reconciliations called for in ADT-01. The test sets the date of commencement of audit under the Explanation to Section 65(4) and the ninety-day clock runs from then.

Table 4 ITC

Table 4 of GSTR-3B captures details of input tax credit. Sub-tables capture eligible ITC, ineligible ITC and reversals. Audit observations on Table 4 typically focus on mismatches between GSTR-2B-driven eligibility and credit availed in GSTR-3B, blocked credits under Section 17(5) and ITC on inward supplies under reverse charge.

Outward supply reconciliation

Outward supply reconciliation is the comparison of turnover declared in GSTR-1, turnover declared in GSTR-3B, turnover declared in GSTR-9 and turnover as per audited financial statements. The reconciliation is the focal table of GSTR-9C and is a recurring audit observation area.

Section 16(2)(aa)

Sub-clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the CGST Act conditions input tax credit on the details of the invoice or debit note being furnished by the supplier in GSTR-1 and communicated to the recipient. Departmental audit observations under this provision typically address ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in GSTR-2B.

Section 17(5)

Sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the CGST Act lists blocked credits — motor vehicles below thirteen-seater capacity, food and beverages, club membership, works contract for immovable property and others. Audit observations on Section 17(5) frequently require itemised reconciliation of ITC against the negative list.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
GTA forward-charge election challenged at audit; Annexure V missing for one transitional year₹3,00,000 (on ₹25,00,000 freight)₹81,000 (18% over 18 months)₹30,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹4,11,000
Section 50(3) interest on ineligible ITC of ₹9,00,000 utilised before reversal; audit-detected₹9,00,000 (reversal)₹1,62,000 (18% on utilisation period)₹90,000 (10% under Section 73(9))₹11,52,000
Section 65 audit transitioning into Section 74 SCN of ₹26,00,000; downgraded to Section 73 on Kranti Associates ground₹26,00,000₹7,02,000 (18% over 18 months)₹2,60,000 (10% under Section 73(9) instead of 100% under Section 74(9))₹35,62,000
Section 107 appeal pre-deposit on ADT-02 maturing into ₹19,00,000 demand for restaurant chain₹19,00,000 (under dispute)Computed on confirmation10% subject to confirmationPre-deposit: ₹1,90,000
Section 122(2)(b) penalty proposed at audit on contractor for supplier-default ITC; defence sustainedReversal of ₹2,30,000 only₹41,400 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 122(2)(b) dropped on Diya Agencies)₹2,71,400
Stock variance ₹24,00,000 at audit visit; Section 17(5)(h) reversal of ₹78,000 on written-off goods₹78,000 (reversal only)₹14,040 (18% over 12 months)₹7,800 (10% under Section 73(9))₹99,840

How Thiruverkadu Pudur businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Thiruverkadu Pudur, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Thiruverkadu Pudur's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Thiruverkadu Pudur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Thiruverkadu Pudur

How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Thiruverkadu Pudur, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Thiruverkadu Pudur's commercial fabric.

Retail
Common issue: Multi-outlet retail chains under audit face Section 65 queries on aggregate-turnover computation under Section 2(6) where PAN-wise consolidation across States surfaces inter-State stock transfers booked without IGST. Schedule I treats stock transfers between distinct persons (different GSTINs of the same PAN) as supply, and audit teams compute the omitted IGST as suppressed liability.
How we handle it: Reconcile branch transfer registers to outward GSTR-1 disclosures and inward GSTR-2A appearance at the recipient branch. Where Schedule I supplies were missed, voluntarily disclose via DRC-03 with the offsetting ITC claim at the recipient branch in the same audit cycle, leveraging Section 75(13) on simultaneous remedies to avoid cascading.
Small Trade
Common issue: Micro-traders below ₹40 lakh / ₹1.5 crore composition threshold who voluntarily registered face Section 65 audits where the regular-scheme compliance overhead has been poorly maintained — particularly GSTR-2B reconciliation and Rule 42 / Rule 43 ITC reversals. The audit team treats poorly-documented ITC as ineligible and the cumulative reversal can be sizable.
How we handle it: For ongoing voluntary registrations, evaluate switching to composition under Section 10 (1% goods / 5% restaurant / 6% other services) at the next financial year via CMP-02. For the audit period, reconstruct ITC working papers vendor-wise; voluntarily reverse unsubstantiated ITC via DRC-03 to close the audit cycle without SCN escalation.
Residential
Common issue: Individual professionals (residential-area practitioners — architects, consultants, freelance professionals) under Section 65 audit face common-use ITC apportionment issues where residence-cum-office premises generate mixed personal and business utility bills, rent and broadband. Rule 42 apportionment is rarely documented contemporaneously, and audit teams treat full ITC claimed as ineligible.
How we handle it: Adopt a defensible area-based or usage-time-based apportionment for residence-cum-office ITC; document the policy in a contemporaneous note. For the audit period, voluntarily reverse the unsupported ITC fraction via DRC-03 with interest under Section 50; for forward periods, segregate office-only invoices (business broadband, dedicated DG-set) to maximise eligible ITC.
Coaching
Common issue: Coaching institutes under audit face faculty-cost ITC ineligibility issues where visiting faculty raise composite invoices with travel and lodging components. Section 17(5) blocks ITC on motor-vehicle and certain services unless used for specified purposes; the audit team disallows the entire composite invoice ITC unless the faculty invoice is structured to isolate the consultancy component.
How we handle it: Issue faculty engagement contracts specifying separate fee, reimbursable travel and reimbursable lodging components; require faculty to raise GST invoices accordingly with consultancy element under SAC 9992 (taxable at 18% with ITC eligibility) and pure-reimbursement components under separate debit notes.
Manufacturing
Common issue: Manufacturers undertaking SEZ supplies under LUT face Section 65 audit scrutiny on Rule 96A timeline compliance for export realisation. Where SEZ payment realisation crosses fifteen months, the IGST recovery proposal under Rule 96A(1) provisos can be sizable, and the audit team often invokes interest under Section 50(1) from the original supply date.
How we handle it: Maintain a SEZ-LoA wise realisation tracker tied to RBI FIRC and SOFTEX certificates. For consignments exceeding fifteen months, file a representation citing the relaxations notified under various Notifications during FY 2020-21 (78/2020-CT etc.) and the GST Council 47th Chandigarh recommendations on realisation timelines.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

Stock varianceFMCG distribution

Section 65 audit defended on stock variance for a {{area_name}} FMCG distributor

Issue: An FMCG distributor in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit alleging a stock variance of approximately twenty-four lakh rupees between Section 35 records and the physical-stock register at audit visit, with a proposed deemed-supply demand of approximately four lakh thirty thousand rupees.
Approach: We reconciled the stock variance against in-transit goods, sales-return ageing under Section 34 credit-note treatment, and damaged-stock write-offs supported by insurance claim records. Section 17(5)(h) blocked credit on goods lost, stolen or destroyed was acknowledged and reversed through DRC-03 for the relevant portion.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the deemed-supply demand to seventy-eight thousand rupees on the genuinely written-off goods; the bulk of stock variance was reconciled; the matter closed within five months.
Section 34 credit-noteConsumer electronics

Section 65 audit on credit-note disclosure defended for a {{area_name}} consumer electronics distributor

Issue: A consumer electronics distributor in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on alleged non-disclosure of Section 34 credit notes of approximately twenty-nine lakh rupees in GSTR-1 within the September-following outer date, with a proposed deemed-supply demand of approximately five lakh twenty thousand rupees.
Approach: We mapped each credit note against the recipient acknowledgement of ITC reversal under Section 34(2) proviso, demonstrated that the recipient had reversed the credit in the corresponding GSTR-3B, and showed that the supplier-side credit note adjustment was therefore permitted. Original tax invoices and recipient confirmations were filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the credit-note treatment; the five lakh twenty thousand rupee demand was dropped; the recipient-acknowledgement template was rolled forward as standard practice.
Section 15(3) discountsConsumer durables

Section 65 audit on Section 15(3) discount treatment defended for a {{area_name}} consumer durables seller

Issue: A consumer durables seller in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on alleged non-deduction of post-supply discounts of approximately twenty-two lakh rupees from taxable value, with a proposed differential tax demand of approximately three lakh ninety-six thousand rupees.
Approach: We mapped each post-supply discount against the Section 15(3)(b) twin condition of pre-supply agreement linkage and recipient ITC reversal proof. Recipient credit-note acknowledgements and the underlying dealership agreement were filed. CBIC Circular 92/11/2019 on discounts and Circular 105/24/2019 (subsequently rescinded) were placed in context.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the discount treatment; the three lakh ninety-six thousand rupee differential was dropped; the dealership agreement clauses were tightened to capture future discount-conditions formally.
Diya AgenciesHardware trading

Diya Agencies principle extended at Section 65 audit for a {{area_name}} hardware trader

Issue: A hardware-trading firm in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit covering two financial years with proposed credit reversal of approximately nine lakh rupees on supplier-side default. The audit team treated GSTR-2B absence as conclusive without testing the recipient's documentary trail.
Approach: We anchored the reply on the Madras High Court ratio in the Tvl Diya Agencies matter, which holds that supplier-side lapses cannot, in isolation, defeat recipient credit absent an enquiry against the supplier and a recorded finding on the recipient's good faith. Supplier-level enquiry trails and banking-channel payment evidence were filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the reversal to seventy-eight thousand rupees relating to two genuinely missing suppliers; the residual eight lakh rupees was preserved; the matter closed within five months without DRC-01.

Why these Thiruverkadu Pudur engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Thiruverkadu Pudur, the cluster of residential, retail, small trade businesses that defines Thiruverkadu Pudur's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Thiruverkadu Pudur navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.

Client Reviews

What Thiruverkadu Pudur Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Thiruverkadu Pudur

Common questions from Thiruverkadu Pudur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.
Recurring findings include — ITC mismatch between GSTR-2B and GSTR-3B, Section 17(5) blocked credits wrongly availed (motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships), RCM not paid on advocate fees and GTA, e-way bill missing for consignments above ₹50,000, e-invoice non-compliance for taxpayers above ₹5 crore AATO, HSN summary errors in GSTR-1 Table 12, and Schedule III adjustments not made for related-party transactions.
Yes — we handle GST Audit Support for individuals and businesses across Thiruverkadu Pudur (PIN 600077) and nearby Devi Karumariamman Temple Thiruverkadu. The work is done end-to-end by our own team, with documents collected online over WhatsApp or email and in-person meetings available at our Maduravoyal and Nerkundram offices. Call 9566-068-468 to begin.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
Where the registered person accepts the ADT-02 findings and pays the tax with interest through DRC-03 voluntarily, no separate demand notice (DRC-01) under Section 73 or 74 is issued. The audit is closed in ADT-04. Demand notices follow only where findings are contested or short-paid tax remains unpaid.
Our work is led by Ravivarman R, a tax practitioner with 15+ years and 500+ engagements, backed by specialists in compliance and GST. We base every GST Audit Support recommendation on current law and your actual facts — not generic templates — and we are happy to explain the reasoning.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
The Madras High Court in Tvl. Diya Agencies v. State Tax Officer (W.P. 16866/2023) and similar rulings have held that the recipient who has paid consideration with tax to the supplier and filed valid returns cannot be denied ITC merely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer — provided Section 16 conditions are otherwise met. Audit teams cannot mechanically reverse ITC on this ground alone.
Yes. Along with Thiruverkadu Pudur, we serve Devi Karumariamman Temple Thiruverkadu and the wider Chennai West belt for GST Audit Support. Wherever you are in this part of Chennai, the process and our 9566-068-468 line stay the same.
Generally no. Once a Section 65 audit has been completed for a period and ADT-04 has been issued, that period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Special audit under Section 66 is a distinct power and may be invoked separately if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed Section 65 audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Section 66(2) requires the nominated auditor to submit the special audit report within 90 days of the ADT-03 order. The Assistant Commissioner may, on application by the auditor or the registered person and on reasonable grounds, extend the period by a further 90 days — taking the maximum to 180 days from the ADT-03 order date.
Turnaround depends on the service and how quickly you share documents. Once we have a complete set, GST Audit Support for Thiruverkadu Pudur clients moves without avoidable delay, and we keep you posted at each stage. We give a realistic timeline upfront rather than an optimistic one.
Yes. Rule 102 of the CGST Rules deals with special audit under Section 66. Rule 102(1) prescribes Form ADT-03 as the direction for special audit, and Rule 102(2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of conclusion of the special audit. Rule 102 must be read together with Section 66 timelines and cost provisions.
On receipt of ADT-01, immediately collate — 12 months of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns, audited financial statements, GSTR-2B downloads month-wise, ITC ledger with Section 17(5) reversals, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register, RCM register and DSC. Prepare GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation, Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation and a Section 17(5) workings sheet before the audit team arrives.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles ITC as per GSTR-2A/2B with ITC availed in GSTR-3B. Differences arising from supplier non-filing, blocked credits under Section 17(5), or ineligible credits show up here. Audit teams scrutinise Table 8 to question wrongly availed ITC under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement) where the difference is unexplained.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
GST Audit Support near Thiruverkadu Pudur:

From Mount - Poonamallee - Avadi Road, 4th Main Road, Melpakkam – Kannampalayam Road, 4th Cross Road and 4th Street through to 7th Street, Agraharam Street, Anna Salai and Hazel Street, our team covers GST Audit Support for businesses right across Thiruverkadu Pudur and its main commercial roads.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur?

Professional GST Audit Support in Thiruverkadu Pudur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp