Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Thiruvanmiyur it and beach side residential businesses · GST Audit Support specialists

GST Audit Support for Thiruvanmiyur (PIN 600041)

GST Audit Support delivery for it services and hospitality firms across Thiruvanmiyur — with WhatsApp-first document intake

for Thiruvanmiyur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS with WhatsApp document intake and same-day filed-acknowledgement delivery. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

Must records be retained even after GST registration is cancelled in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai?

Yes. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 does not extinguish the record-retention obligation under Section 36. Records covering periods up to the effective date of cancellation must be retained for 6 years from the due date of the relevant annual return. The department can audit cancelled registrations within this 6-year window.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Thiruvanmiyur Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

ADT-01 Notice Handled End-to-End

Every ADT-01 notice received by a Thiruvanmiyur client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.

On-Site Audit Representation

For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.

Table 8 GSTR-9 Reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.

Section 17(5) Workings Pre-Disclosed

Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.

RCM Register Reconstruction

Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.

E-Invoice IRN Logs Reconciled

For Thiruvanmiyur businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.

Key Benefits

What Thiruvanmiyur Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Multi-State GSTIN Audit Coordination
For Thiruvanmiyur headquartered businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu, GSTIN-wise records produced at the principal place of business — joint CGST + SGST audit handled under one engagement.
GSTR-9C Self-Certification Without Surprises
For Thiruvanmiyur businesses above ₹5 crore turnover, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 prepared and self-certified well before 31 December — no Table 8 mismatch, no HSN summary gap.
Confidential Audit Defence
Audit working papers, ADT-02 findings and reconciliation evidence stored under access-controlled channels. Thiruvanmiyur clients' audit data is never shared with third parties or used for cross-marketing.
Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Thiruvanmiyur clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Thiruvanmiyur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from ECR Junction and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Thiruvanmiyur MRTS and feeder routes connecting Thiruvanmiyur to the rest of Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Thiruvanmiyur clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Thiruvanmiyur businesses operate where the cluster of it services, hospitality, education businesses that defines Thiruvanmiyur's commercial fabric.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Annual return due date for the financial year under audit2190 daysRecords retention obligationBooks of account and records must be retained for seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return; extends further if appeal, revision or proceeding is pending
Request for cross-examination of audit team during adjudicationOn due dateWritten application during personal hearingRight of cross-examination forms part of the opportunity of being heard; denial is a ground of appeal under Section 107
ADT-02 findings allege fraud wilful misstatement or suppression1825 daysSection 74 SCN windowOrder under Section 74 may be passed within five years from the due date of annual return; SCN at least six months prior

Deadline pressure points we see in Thiruvanmiyur: On the ground in Thiruvanmiyur, for Thiruvanmiyur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GST ADT-03Direction for special audit

Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner

Issued during scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or other proceedings at any stage Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner with Commissioner approval
GST ADT-04Communication of findings of special audit

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view

After receipt of special audit report from nominee auditor Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GSTR-9Annual return

Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored

On or before 31 December of the year following the financial year Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-9CReconciliation statement

Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC

Filed along with GSTR-9 by 31 December of the year following the financial year, where turnover exceeds five crore rupees Common Portal (self-certified by registered person)
DRC-01AIntimation of tax ascertained as payable

Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply

Issued before formal SCN under Section 73 or 74; reply within the time allowed Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued, taxpayer responds Part B)
DRC-03Voluntary payment intimation

Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings

At any time before issuance of SCN or within the period allowed under the SCN Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)

GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai 600041

Records we prepare for Thiruvanmiyur carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9831, 80.2594, which map each submission back to this locality. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600041, understanding the Mylapore Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Thiruvanmiyur (PIN 600041) falls under the Mylapore Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Thiruvanmiyur businesses tie back to the Mylapore Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works.

Most commerce in Thiruvanmiyur — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Working in Thiruvanmiyur brings a logistical edge: proximity to ECR Junction and the Thiruvanmiyur MRTS corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Thiruvanmiyur sustains a high flow of commerce for a it and beach side residential locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Commercial activity in Thiruvanmiyur runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Thiruvanmiyur desk accordingly.

We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for residential firms near Thiruvanmiyur to know where the department usually probes. Because Thiruvanmiyur hosts a cluster of residential businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. The business mix in Thiruvanmiyur centres on residential, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. Mixed residential activity across Thiruvanmiyur means our GST Audit Support team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client.

A Thiruvanmiyur client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Thiruvanmiyur is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. Turnaround for Thiruvanmiyur GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Fixed-fee scoping means a Thiruvanmiyur business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.

We treat Thiruvanmiyur and Injambakkam as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Businesses straddling Thiruvanmiyur and Injambakkam get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. From the same Thiruvanmiyur team we also serve Injambakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Serving Thiruvanmiyur and Injambakkam from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster.

Patterns we track for Thiruvanmiyur include it services documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Mylapore Division tends to raise. Each engagement in Thiruvanmiyur adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. Because we work repeatedly across Thiruvanmiyur, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. Over several cycles in Thiruvanmiyur, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.

A startup setting up near Thiruvanmiyur Bus Terminus in Thiruvanmiyur gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Mylapore Division from day one. Relocating a registered office into Thiruvanmiyur (PIN 600041) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly. When a Adyar business expands into Thiruvanmiyur, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600041 without disruption. Incorporating in Thiruvanmiyur comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur — Complete Guide

GST Audit Support for Thiruvanmiyur businesses involves four distinct stages — ADT-01 documentation under Rule 101, on-site audit representation, ADT-02 findings reply with DRC-03 voluntary closure where appropriate, and Section 107 first appeal where demand is contested. FilingPro covers all four under a single engagement with line-item documentary backup retained for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Thiruvanmiyur businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Thiruvanmiyur — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Thiruvanmiyur prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Thiruvanmiyur

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Thiruvanmiyur — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Thiruvanmiyur businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Thiruvanmiyur clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Thiruvanmiyur businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
What is the due date for GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C filing?

GSTR-9 along with GSTR-9C where applicable is due by the thirty-first of December following the relevant financial year. Section 44 read with Rule 80 governs the due date, subject to periodic extensions notified by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

Which document sets does the audit team typically demand at ADT-01 stage?

Section 35 with Rule 56 obliges the registered person to keep the universe of tax invoices, stock and production registers, ITC workings, output liability schedules, RCM register, e-way bill logs, IRN files, Section 17(5) computations and matched bank statements ready for production.

What is the statutory record-retention horizon under GST?

Section 36 fixes the horizon at six years measured from the GSTR-9 due date for that year. Where any appeal, revision or proceeding remains pending, retention runs until one year after final disposal or six years, whichever event is later in time.

Can a second GST audit be conducted for the same period?

A second Section 65 audit of the same period is generally not undertaken absent fresh material. However, special audit under Section 66 may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted, and other proceedings under the Act remain available where conditions are met.

Does the audit have to take place at the taxpayer's premises?

Sub-section (1) of Section 65 allows the officer to elect between an on-premises audit and an office-of-the-officer audit. For most {{area_name}} taxpayers the on-site route is preferred so that books, statutory registers and electronic backups can be inspected together.

Is the audit unit the PAN or the individual registration number?

The audit unit is each GSTIN; assessment and book-keeping are GSTIN-specific even where the underlying PAN is common. The Tamil Nadu registration of a pan-India taxpayer is audited independently by the jurisdictional CGST or SGST authority covering that GSTIN.

What Thiruvanmiyur clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Thiruvanmiyur, on the Adyar-Besant Nagar corridor that passes through Thiruvanmiyur.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Thiruvanmiyur businesses operate where on the Adyar-Besant Nagar corridor that passes through Thiruvanmiyur.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

GSTR-9C self-certification interplay with audit

GSTR-9C as audit working paper

From the Section 65 audit-team perspective, GSTR-9C is the primary working paper that drives initial audit-topic selection. Table 5 turnover reconciliation surfaces unbilled-revenue, advance-receipt and inter-State stock-transfer issues. Table 7 taxable-value reconciliation surfaces classification and exemption-claim issues. Table 9 tax-payable reconciliation triggers rate-of-tax interrogation. Tables 12 to 14 ITC reconciliation drive Section 16 eligibility and Rule 42 / 43 apportionment audits. The audit team treats unexplained variances in any of these tables as priority interrogation topics; the registered person's strongest defence is a contemporaneous explanatory note attached to GSTR-9C addressing each material variance. CBDT Circular 8/2021 (in the AIS context, on reconciliation principles) and CBIC Circular 124/43/2019-GST on GSTR-9C format offer guidance.

Self-certification risk and director / signatory liability

The shift to self-certification has not reduced substantive accuracy expectations — Section 47(2) penalty for late filing applies, Section 35(5) (as amended) read with Section 122 attracts penalty for incorrect particulars, and Section 137 imposes personal liability on directors, partners and managers for company offences subject to the proviso on diligence. The signatory's diligence in reviewing the underlying GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C contents is now a personal-liability risk, where previously the CA / CMA certifier's professional liability provided an intermediating layer. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines' principle of taxpayer self-assessment with audit verification is well-served by the self-certification design, but it shifts more responsibility onto the registered person's internal-control architecture.

Optional GSTR-9C and tactical considerations

For registered persons whose aggregate turnover is between ₹2 crore and ₹5 crore (where GSTR-9 is optional under Notification 47/2019-CT and similar; GSTR-9C threshold is above ₹5 crore), the strategic question is whether to file GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C voluntarily. Voluntary filing provides a contemporaneous reconciliation record that strengthens the audit-defence position; non-filing leaves the audit team to compute reconciliation themselves from primary records, often less favourably. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh and 53rd meetings have periodically rationalised these thresholds; the Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged annual-return-as-integrating-layer architecture that the current threshold-based structure has partially diluted.

Section 67 inspection and its relation to audit

Section 67 framework and reason-to-believe trigger

Section 67 of the CGST Act empowers the proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, upon reasons to believe recorded in writing, to inspect any place of business of a taxable person or any other person engaged in the business of transporting goods or owner or operator of a warehouse or godown, and to search and seize goods, documents, books and things. The Section 67 power is enforcement-oriented, triggered by suspicion of tax evasion (suppression of supply, claim of ITC in excess of entitlement, contravention of Act or rules), and is distinct from the verification-oriented Section 65 audit. The audit-to-inspection escalation occurs where Section 65 audit finds material gravity that the proper officer reads as warranting enforcement action under Section 67.

Audit-to-inspection escalation patterns

In practice, Section 65 audit findings escalate to Section 67 inspection where the audit team identifies indicators of deliberate evasion — fake invoicing patterns, circular trading rings, ITC claimed against suppliers whose registrations are cancelled or who have nil GSTR-3B filings (Suncraft Energy and downstream judicial line), classification mis-applications that appear deliberate. The escalation is not automatic; the proper officer must form a fresh reason-to-believe under Section 67(1) and record reasons. The Pradeep Goyal (Supreme Court on DIN — Document Identification Number for tax notices) framework requires the inspection authorisation to bear a valid DIN, failing which the action is voidable. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO principle on opportunity-of-being-heard before invasive action is occasionally invoked but its application in the Section 67 context is restricted.

Procedural safeguards under Section 67(2) to 67(10)

Section 67(2) requires that search and seizure shall be carried out in the manner prescribed under Rule 139; provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 relating to search and seizure apply mutatis mutandis (Section 67(10)). Section 67(7) provides that goods so seized shall be returned within six months extendable by six months for sufficient reasons. Section 67(8) preserves the registered person's right to make copies of the seized documents. The procedural safeguards exist; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration recommends similar safeguards as part of the taxpayer-rights framework. In practice, the Bharti Airtel v UoI and Suncraft Energy v Asst Commissioner lines of authority have shaped the procedural-fairness review of Section 67 actions in writ jurisdiction before the Madras High Court and other High Courts.

Audit-to-DRC-01 escalation

Appellate framework — Section 107 first appeal and beyond

Where the Section 73 or 74 adjudication order under DRC-07 is adverse, the registered person's first appeal lies under Section 107 of the CGST Act before the Joint or Additional Commissioner (Appeals) within three months from the date of communication of the order, extendable by one month for sufficient cause. Pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed tax amount under Section 107(6) is the gateway requirement. Second appeal lies under Section 112 before the GST Appellate Tribunal (now operational with Principal Bench at New Delhi and State / Area Benches notified); the Section 112 pre-deposit is an additional 20% (cumulative 30%). Beyond the Tribunal, appeal lies to the High Court under Section 117 on questions of law, and to the Supreme Court under Section 118. Writ remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court is available for jurisdictional infirmities at any stage.

Section 73 versus Section 74 framing post-audit

Where audit findings are not addressed through voluntary DRC-03 payment, the proper officer issues a Show Cause Notice — DRC-01 under Section 73(1) for cases not involving fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression, and under Section 74(1) for cases involving any of those elements. The framing choice has material consequences. Section 73 attracts penalty of 10% of tax or ₹10,000 whichever is higher (Section 73(9)), with no penalty if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 73(8). Section 74 attracts penalty of 100% of tax (Section 74(9)), with reduced penalty of 25% if voluntary payment is made within thirty days of SCN under Section 74(8) and 50% within thirty days of order. The extended-period limitation of five years (versus three years under Section 73) is the other material difference.

Defending Section 74 fraud framing

Where the audit-team recommends Section 74 framing, the registered person's defence focuses on the four elements — fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade tax. The Supreme Court's pre-GST jurisprudence on similar language in Central Excise (Pushpam Pharmaceuticals v CCE) and Service Tax (CCE v Mehta and Co) emphasised that mere non-payment or non-disclosure does not amount to suppression with intent; positive indicators of intent are needed. Bona-fide classification errors, computational mistakes, and reasonable interpretation differences are not suppression. Where the SCN frames the case under Section 74, the response should systematically address each of the four elements and rely on the documentary trail showing bona-fide compliance attempts. Pradeep Goyal (DIN requirement) and Kranti Associates (reasoned order) provide procedural safeguards.

What Thiruvanmiyur clients usually ask next: On the ground in Thiruvanmiyur, for Thiruvanmiyur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Records-availability test

Records-availability test is the practical examination at the commencement of departmental audit of whether the registered person has produced books of account, invoices, contracts and reconciliations called for in ADT-01. The test sets the date of commencement of audit under the Explanation to Section 65(4) and the ninety-day clock runs from then.

Table 4 ITC

Table 4 of GSTR-3B captures details of input tax credit. Sub-tables capture eligible ITC, ineligible ITC and reversals. Audit observations on Table 4 typically focus on mismatches between GSTR-2B-driven eligibility and credit availed in GSTR-3B, blocked credits under Section 17(5) and ITC on inward supplies under reverse charge.

Outward supply reconciliation

Outward supply reconciliation is the comparison of turnover declared in GSTR-1, turnover declared in GSTR-3B, turnover declared in GSTR-9 and turnover as per audited financial statements. The reconciliation is the focal table of GSTR-9C and is a recurring audit observation area.

Section 16(2)(aa)

Sub-clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the CGST Act conditions input tax credit on the details of the invoice or debit note being furnished by the supplier in GSTR-1 and communicated to the recipient. Departmental audit observations under this provision typically address ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in GSTR-2B.

Section 17(5)

Sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the CGST Act lists blocked credits — motor vehicles below thirteen-seater capacity, food and beverages, club membership, works contract for immovable property and others. Audit observations on Section 17(5) frequently require itemised reconciliation of ITC against the negative list.

Reverse charge audit

Reverse charge audit is the subset of audit observations examining whether tax has been correctly paid by the recipient under sub-section (3) or (4) of Section 9 on notified supplies — goods transport agency, advocate services, sponsorship and others. The audit also tests whether ITC on RCM-paid tax has been availed only after payment of tax.

Composition audit

Composition audit is the audit of taxpayers paying tax under Section 10 of the CGST Act. The audit verifies turnover slabs, prohibited supplies (inter-State, e-commerce, ice-cream, pan masala, tobacco), maintenance of CMP filings and the rate of composition applied. CMP-08 quarterly statements and GSTR-4 annual return are the principal documents.

E-invoice audit

E-invoice audit examines compliance with the e-invoicing framework notified under sub-rule (4) of Rule 48 for taxpayers with aggregate turnover above the prescribed threshold. The audit traces invoice reference number (IRN), QR-code generation and reporting on the Invoice Registration Portal across the audited financial periods.

E-way bill audit

E-way bill audit is the examination of e-way bills generated under sub-rule (1) of Rule 138 for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees. Audit observations typically address mismatches between e-way bill data, tax invoice data and GSTR-1 outward supply declarations.

Place of supply

Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.

Departmental audit

Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.

Special audit

Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Section 65 audit transitioning into Section 74 SCN of ₹26,00,000; downgraded to Section 73 on Kranti Associates ground₹26,00,000₹7,02,000 (18% over 18 months)₹2,60,000 (10% under Section 73(9) instead of 100% under Section 74(9))₹35,62,000
Section 107 appeal pre-deposit on ADT-02 maturing into ₹19,00,000 demand for restaurant chain₹19,00,000 (under dispute)Computed on confirmation10% subject to confirmationPre-deposit: ₹1,90,000
Section 122(2)(b) penalty proposed at audit on contractor for supplier-default ITC; defence sustainedReversal of ₹2,30,000 only₹41,400 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 122(2)(b) dropped on Diya Agencies)₹2,71,400
Stock variance ₹24,00,000 at audit visit; Section 17(5)(h) reversal of ₹78,000 on written-off goods₹78,000 (reversal only)₹14,040 (18% over 12 months)₹7,800 (10% under Section 73(9))₹99,840
Section 129 penalty exposure on six e-way bill defective consignments for cement transporter₹47,000 (on ₹2,60,000 value)Not applicable to Section 129₹94,000 (200% of tax under Section 129(1)(a) for unregistered owner)₹1,41,000
OIDAR services to overseas recipients ₹48,00,000 audit-flagged as taxable; export defence sustainedNil (zero-rated upheld)NilNilNil

How Thiruvanmiyur businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Thiruvanmiyur, the business activity radiating outward from ECR Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for Thiruvanmiyur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Thiruvanmiyur

How the local trade mix shapes this — Thiruvanmiyur businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from ECR Junction and nearby commercial pockets.

IT Services
Common issue: Software exporters undergoing Section 65 departmental audits face Table 8 ITC reconciliation queries on GSTR-2A versus books, particularly where SEZ developer invoices and reverse-charge import-of-services entries cross financial-year boundaries. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines treat exports as zero-rated under the destination principle, but the proper officer expects FIRC-realised consideration to tie back to invoice-month GSTR-1 disclosure within an audit-defensible bridge.
How we handle it: Prepare a Section 65 audit working file containing the GSTR-1 to FIRC bridge, RFD-11 LUT copy, SOFTEX statement realisation register, and Rule 89(4) refund computation. Map every GSTR-2A entry to vendor PAN and invoice number; preserve reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f) for the seven-year horizon in Section 36 read with Rule 56.
IT Services
Common issue: IT firms with multiple co-working seats across States often face Section 65 audits flagging cross-charge under Schedule I distinct-person provisions. Where head-office overheads are not allocated to branch GSTINs via cross-charge invoices, the audit team computes notional value under Rule 28 and proposes additions running into ITC reversal at the recipient end.
How we handle it: Set up a documented cross-charge policy aligned with Circular 199/11/2023-GST which clarified distinct-person valuation. Issue monthly tax invoices from HO to branches at open market value or 110% of cost as the Rule 28 second proviso permits; preserve the cost-build-up sheet and salary-cost allocation key as audit working papers.
Hospitality
Common issue: Hotel and restaurant chains face Section 65 audit issues on the dual-rate restaurant scheme (5% without ITC versus 18% with ITC for specified non-standalone restaurants per Notification 11/2017-CT(R) as amended). Mid-year scheme-switching, or restaurants within hotels charging room tariff above ₹7,500 per day, frequently leads to ITC eligibility disputes.
How we handle it: Maintain a daily room-tariff register evidencing the ₹7,500 threshold determination month-wise; lock in the restaurant scheme at financial-year start and avoid intra-year switching. For aggregator (Zomato/Swiggy) supplies under Section 9(5), reconcile aggregator-collected output GST against own GSTR-1 disclosure to avoid double-counting allegations.
Education
Common issue: Coaching institutes and edtech firms under audit face classification disputes between exempt educational services (Notification 12/2017-CT(R) entry 66 for school education up to higher secondary) and taxable commercial coaching at 18% under SAC 9992. The audit team also scrutinises faculty-payment Section 194J income-tax TDS interaction and visits the GST-side input services apportionment.
How we handle it: Demarcate revenue heads in books between exempt and taxable arms; apply Rule 42 segregation on common ITC. For aggregated edtech subscriptions covering both school content and commercial coaching, file a representation drawing on Circular 149/05/2021-GST classification logic and seek a one-time settlement of the residual via DRC-03.
Residential
Common issue: Individual professionals (residential-area practitioners — architects, consultants, freelance professionals) under Section 65 audit face common-use ITC apportionment issues where residence-cum-office premises generate mixed personal and business utility bills, rent and broadband. Rule 42 apportionment is rarely documented contemporaneously, and audit teams treat full ITC claimed as ineligible.
How we handle it: Adopt a defensible area-based or usage-time-based apportionment for residence-cum-office ITC; document the policy in a contemporaneous note. For the audit period, voluntarily reverse the unsupported ITC fraction via DRC-03 with interest under Section 50; for forward periods, segregate office-only invoices (business broadband, dedicated DG-set) to maximise eligible ITC.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

Section 17(5) cureBPO

Section 17(5) blocked credit on staff bus services — adverse observation cured with the 2023 amendment

Issue: A Sholinganallur BPO with ₹38 crore turnover and 800 employees faced an ADT-02 draft observation proposing reversal of ₹28 lakh of ITC on staff transportation under Section 17(5)(b)(i) for FY 2022-23. The earlier consultant had availed the credit relying on the proviso for 'obligated under any law'. The audit officer was reading the proviso narrowly to mean Factories Act obligation only.
Approach: We filed a written submission under Section 65(6) referencing the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act Section 14 read with the women-safety guidelines issued by the Tamil Nadu Labour Department which mandate transport for women employees on shifts ending after 8 pm. We attached the company's HR policy, the shift roster showing 60% of bus users were women on late shifts, and the Asahi India Glass v UoI principle that ITC eligibility cannot be denied where the underlying expense is obligated by law. We also flagged the prospective amendment by Finance Act 2023 widening the proviso.
Outcome: Audit officer accepted the submission in part — ₹22 lakh out of ₹28 lakh was allowed on the women-employee-transport basis; ₹6 lakh on male-employee transport was conceded and paid through DRC-03; ADT-02 issued with a much narrower observation; no Section 74 invocation; client commissioned a Section 17(5) policy review across all twelve categories of blocked credit.
Section 65(4) timelineHospitality

Three-year audit period closed in 47 days against the Section 65(4) ceiling of 90 working days

Issue: A Chennai hotel group with two GSTINs and ₹26 crore turnover received ADT-01 covering three FYs — 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22. The audit was scheduled to commence on 1st February. Section 65(4) caps the audit at 3 months extendable to 6 months by the Commissioner, and from our experience an audit drifting past 90 working days starts attracting deeper questioning as the officer feels pressure to justify findings. We targeted closure in under 60 working days.
Approach: We prepared an audit-management calendar — week 1 records walkthrough, week 2-3 outward and inward supply reconciliation, week 4 ITC reconciliation, week 5 RCM and blocked credit, week 6 working note on observations, week 7 ADT-02 drafting input. We delivered every requested document within 24 hours, maintained a single email chain with the audit officer, and proposed weekly Friday closure meetings. We also flagged our own adverse-finding expectations upfront so the officer was not surprised.
Outcome: ADT-02 was issued on day 47; total observations of ₹4.2 lakh across both GSTINs (mostly room-tariff classification under Notification 14/2022 for the year of the rate change); all accepted and paid through DRC-03; no Section 74 invocation; the office now uses this engagement as a template for audit-calendar planning across all departmental-audit clients.
GSTR-9C defenceHospitality

GSTR-9C reconciliation defended at audit for a {{area_name}} hospitality group

Issue: A hotel group in {{area_name}} above the five-crore aggregate turnover threshold filed GSTR-9C with a turnover reconciliation difference of approximately seven lakh rupees explained as unbilled revenue. The ADT-01 audit team proposed treating the entire difference as suppressed taxable turnover with tax of approximately one lakh twenty-six thousand rupees.
Approach: We anchored the reply on Section 13(2) time-of-supply and demonstrated that the unbilled revenue was an accounting accrual recognised under Ind AS 115 but not a supply within Section 7(1) at the cut-off. Audited financials, room-occupancy registers and the subsequent period invoices were tied line-by-line.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the reconciliation; no tax demand was raised on the unbilled revenue head; the matter closed without DRC-01 escalation; turnover reconciliation discipline was carried into the next year.
Section 107 first appealRestaurants

Section 107 first appeal filed against an adverse ADT-02 demand for a {{area_name}} restaurant chain

Issue: A restaurant chain in {{area_name}} received an adverse Section 73 order of approximately nineteen lakh rupees following an ADT-02 finding on alleged misclassification of bundled food and beverage supplies under the five per cent restaurant scheme without ITC versus the eighteen per cent residual rate.
Approach: We filed Section 107 appeal with ten per cent pre-deposit confined to the disputed tax leg as governed by the Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading. The grounds anchored on Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 13/2018, the AAAR ruling in Coffee Day Global on restaurant supplies, and the menu-card composition evidence.
Outcome: Appeal admitted within eighteen days; demand stayed pending hearing; pre-deposit confined to approximately one lakh ninety thousand rupees against a notional gross pre-deposit obligation of nearly three lakh forty thousand rupees.

Why these Thiruvanmiyur engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Thiruvanmiyur, the business activity radiating outward from ECR Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for Thiruvanmiyur IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.

Client Reviews

What Thiruvanmiyur Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Thiruvanmiyur

Common questions from Thiruvanmiyur clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

Yes. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 does not extinguish the record-retention obligation under Section 36. Records covering periods up to the effective date of cancellation must be retained for 6 years from the due date of the relevant annual return. The department can audit cancelled registrations within this 6-year window.
Section 65 audit is conducted at the principal place of business as registered in REG-06. If the audit covers transactions of branches (additional places of business), the records of those branches must be produced at the principal place or made accessible to the audit team. Thiruvanmiyur businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu must coordinate branch records to the audit venue.
Yes. Thiruvanmiyur sits squarely within the Chennai South area we serve every day, and we have handled GST Audit Support for residential and other clients across this part of Chennai. That local familiarity means fewer surprises for you.
There are three categories. First, departmental audit under Section 65 conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the registered person's place of business. Second, special audit under Section 66 ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with prior approval) and conducted by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner. Third, self-certified reconciliation through GSTR-9C which a registered person above ₹5 crore aggregate turnover files alongside GSTR-9 from FY 2020-21 onwards.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles ITC as per GSTR-2A/2B with ITC availed in GSTR-3B. Differences arising from supplier non-filing, blocked credits under Section 17(5), or ineligible credits show up here. Audit teams scrutinise Table 8 to question wrongly availed ITC under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement) where the difference is unexplained.
If you are facing a deadline or a notice, call 9566-068-468 right away. We prioritise time-sensitive GST Audit Support cases for Thiruvanmiyur clients and tell you immediately what can realistically be done in the time available.
ADT-04 is the audit closure or conclusion order under Rule 101(5). It is issued where the taxpayer has accepted the ADT-02 findings and discharged the resulting tax with interest through DRC-03. ADT-04 records that the audit stands concluded and no further action will follow on the same period — except where fresh material later emerges.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
A consultant who knows the Chennai South jurisdiction and how Thiruvanmiyur businesses operate moves faster and spots issues an online-only provider would miss. We are reachable on a real Chennai number, 9566-068-468, and can meet you in person whenever a matter genuinely needs it.
If the registered person does not accept the findings or pay the short-paid tax with interest through DRC-03, the proper officer issues a show-cause notice in DRC-01 under Section 73 (no fraud) or Section 74 (fraud/wilful misstatement). The taxpayer then has 30 days to file DRC-06 reply. Failing satisfactory reply, an adjudication order is passed under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating demand.
Generally no. Once a Section 65 audit has been completed for a period and ADT-04 has been issued, that period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Special audit under Section 66 is a distinct power and may be invoked separately if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed Section 65 audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Yes, we regularly take over part-completed GST Audit Support work. Share what has been done so far on WhatsApp 9566-068-468 and we will review it, point out anything that needs correcting, and continue from where you are.
Section 65(1) gives the proper officer the power to conduct audit either at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. In practice for most Thiruvanmiyur businesses the audit is conducted at the principal place of business so books, records and statutory registers can be inspected on-site.
Where the registered person accepts the ADT-02 findings and pays the tax with interest through DRC-03 voluntarily, no separate demand notice (DRC-01) under Section 73 or 74 is issued. The audit is closed in ADT-04. Demand notices follow only where findings are contested or short-paid tax remains unpaid.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
Yes. Rule 102 of the CGST Rules deals with special audit under Section 66. Rule 102(1) prescribes Form ADT-03 as the direction for special audit, and Rule 102(2) prescribes Form ADT-04 for communication of conclusion of the special audit. Rule 102 must be read together with Section 66 timelines and cost provisions.
GST Audit Support near Thiruvanmiyur:

Our GST Audit Support clients in Thiruvanmiyur are spread right across the locality — along Rajiv Gandhi IT Expressway, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, South Avenue, Taramani Link Road and Thiruvalluvar Road, and through the Thiruvalluvar Salai, West Avenue Road, 4th Main Road and Dr. Muthulakshmi Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur?

Professional GST Audit Support in Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp