the cluster of residential, retail, education businesses that defines Tambaram East's commercial fabric — with WhatsApp-first document intake
Handling GST Audit Support for Tambaram East and Tambaram clients with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Yes. ADT-02 must record findings with reasons; Section 66(6) expressly mandates a hearing opportunity before special audit material is used in proceedings; and any DRC-01 SCN must give 30 days for DRC-06 reply with personal hearing. Courts have consistently set aside audit-driven demands where the taxpayer was not given proper opportunity to be heard.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Tambaram East — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Tambaram East client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Tambaram East businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — In Tambaram East, the business activity radiating outward from Tambaram Railway Station East and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Tambaram East Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Tambaram East to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Tambaram East clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Tambaram East, the cluster of residential, retail, education businesses that defines Tambaram East's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Tambaram East: On the ground in Tambaram East, for the professional and salaried population of Tambaram East navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (7) of Section 65 provides that where the audit results in detection of tax not paid or short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilised, the proper officer may initiate action under Section 73 or Section 74. It is to be noted that this sub-section is the statutory bridge between the audit conclusion and adjudication proceedings.
View sourceSub-section (5) of Section 35, as it stood prior to amendment by the Finance Act 2021, required every registered person whose turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold to get his accounts audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant and submit a copy of the audited annual accounts, the reconciliation statement and other documents in the prescribed form. The Finance Act 2021 omitted this sub-section with effect from 1 August 2021. It is to be noted that the GSTR-9C reconciliation statement is now a self-certified document under Rule 80.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 66 provides that the expenses of the examination and audit, including the remuneration of the nominee auditor, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination shall be final. It is to be noted that the registered person does not bear the cost of the special audit even though the audit is conducted on records furnished by him.
View sourceBecause PIN 600059 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Tambaram East stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Tambaram East is a fast-growing residential and commercial pocket east of Tambaram Railway Station with retail healthcare and education anchors. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Tambaram East businesses tie back to the Tambaram Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Every Tambaram East engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600059, the Tambaram Division, and the coordinates 12.9281, 80.1183 that anchor the locality.
The businesses clustered around MEPZ-Tambaram in Tambaram East drive the bulk of the GST Audit Support workload we see each cycle. Commercial activity in Tambaram East runs high, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Tambaram East desk accordingly. Working in Tambaram East brings a logistical edge: proximity to MEPZ-Tambaram and the Tambaram East Bus Stop corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Document pickup near MEPZ-Tambaram is a same-hour errand for our Tambaram East engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects.
For a healthcare business in Tambaram East, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. Because Tambaram East hosts a cluster of healthcare businesses, we benchmark each new GST Audit Support engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. The business mix in Tambaram East centres on healthcare, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for healthcare firms near Tambaram East to know where the department usually probes.
Our Tambaram East GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Tambaram East GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Document intake for Tambaram East clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. The Tambaram East GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you.
From the same Tambaram East team we also serve Chromepet and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. We treat Tambaram East and Chromepet as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. Group companies spread across Tambaram East and Chromepet consolidate their GST Audit Support under one engagement with us. GST Audit Support clients in Chromepet are handled by the same practitioners who run our Tambaram East desk.
Patterns we track for Tambaram East include residential documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Tambaram Division tends to raise. Each engagement in Tambaram East adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The longer we serve Tambaram East, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Over several cycles in Tambaram East, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early.
For a new business incorporating in Tambaram East or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. Incorporating in Tambaram East comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. A startup setting up near Camp Road in Tambaram East gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Tambaram Division from day one. We onboard new Tambaram East entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Tambaram East businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Tambaram East prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Tambaram East businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Sub-section (3) of Section 66 mandates a fair hearing before any material drawn from the special audit can be turned against the taxpayer. This pre-decisional opportunity is treated as jurisdictional; breach is routinely cured through Article 226 writ jurisdiction of the Madras High Court.
No. Schedule III to the CGST Act 2017 lists activities or transactions that are treated as neither supply of goods nor services, including services by employees in the course of employment, high-sea sales by endorsement before clearance, and certain other specified transactions.
No. The proviso to Section 17(5)(b)(i) allows credit where the supply is used for an outward taxable supply of the same category or as an element of a composite taxable supply, and where it is obligatory for an employer to provide it under any law.
It can. Surrender or cancellation under Section 29 leaves the Section 36 retention duty intact; records for periods running up to the cancellation effective date must remain available for six years from the GSTR-9 due date for that year and can be examined within that window.
Form ADT-04 is the order conveying the special audit report to the registered person under Rule 102, marking the conclusion of the Section 66 process. Subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or 74 of the CGST Act 2017 if any short payment is established.
Yes, but Section 74 requires recorded satisfaction of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Where ADT-02 findings rest on tabular variance alone without these ingredients, the proceedings are vulnerable to downgrade to Section 73 on Kranti Associates speaking-order grounds.
What Tambaram East clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Tambaram East, on the Tambaram-Selaiyur corridor that passes through Tambaram East.
Reading this guide locally — In Tambaram East, on the Tambaram-Selaiyur corridor that passes through Tambaram East.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Section 75(5) provides that the proper officer shall, if sufficient cause is shown by the person chargeable with tax, grant time to that person and adjourn the hearing for reasons to be recorded in writing; provided that no such adjournment shall be granted for more than three times to a person during the proceedings. The three-adjournment cap is a calibration between procedural fairness and proceeding-efficiency. In practice, registered persons facing complex audit findings should plan their adjournment requests strategically — use the first adjournment to gather documents, the second for representation-counsel engagement, and reserve the third for final consolidation. Beyond three adjournments, the proper officer is empowered to proceed ex-parte under Section 75(5) and pass the order on best-judgement basis.
Section 75(6) provides that the proper officer, in his order, shall set out the relevant facts and the basis of his decision. The reasoned-order requirement is a substantive procedural right that traces to the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on natural-justice-derived reasoned orders. Pradeep Goyal v UoI (Supreme Court on DIN — document identification number for all CBIC communications) supplements this by requiring procedural identifiability of the order. The registered person facing an order that does not engage with the response, does not cite the relevant provisions, or merely reproduces the SCN allegations, has strong grounds for either Section 107 first-appeal challenge or Article 226 writ challenge.
Section 75(11) provides that an issue on which the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court has given its decision which is prejudicial to the interest of revenue in some other proceedings, and an appeal to the appellate authority or Appellate Tribunal or High Court or Supreme Court against such decision is pending, the period of stay shall be excluded in computing the limitation period. The provision permits the revenue to preserve its position pending appeal; the corresponding taxpayer protection is the principle that the proper officer is bound by appellate decisions on the same issue unless distinguished. Where the registered person can cite a binding precedent on the same issue from the Madras High Court or AAR Tamil Nadu, the proper officer is obliged to apply it.
The simplest post-audit option, where the registered person broadly accepts the ADT-02 findings, is voluntary closure through DRC-03 payment under Section 73(5). DRC-03 is filed online through the GST portal; the registered person specifies the tax, interest and (where applicable) penalty quantum and the period to which the payment relates. Section 73(6) bars subsequent SCN on the amount paid. The Form DRC-04 acknowledgement is the conclusive evidence of voluntary closure. This route is widely used in practice — Chennai Commissionerate audit-closure data through the GST Council 53rd meeting briefing materials indicates that over 60% of Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu close through voluntary DRC-03 without progressing to SCN stage.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
What Tambaram East clients usually ask next: On the ground in Tambaram East, for the professional and salaried population of Tambaram East navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Reconciliation statement is the document filed in Form GSTR-9C reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles the tax payable as per the financial statement with the tax declared in the annual return and the input tax credit availed with the credit reflected in books.
DRC-01A is the pre-show-cause-notice intimation prescribed under sub-rule (1A) of Rule 142. Part A is the officer's quantification of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; Part B is the registered person's reply or acceptance. DRC-01A is the principal off-ramp before formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation prescribed under sub-rule (2) and (3) of Rule 142. It is filed where the registered person makes voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or 74(5). DRC-03 is the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal adjudication.
Section 73(5) deposit is the voluntary payment made by the registered person, on his own ascertainment or on ascertainment by the proper officer, before issuance of a show-cause notice. The deposit, when made along with applicable interest under Section 50, results in no penalty being leviable under Section 73(9).
Audit jurisdiction refers to the statutory authority of the Commissioner under sub-section (1) of Section 65 to authorise any officer to undertake audit of a registered person. Authorisation may be by general or specific order. A challenge to audit jurisdiction is typically agitated at the threshold under Article 226 before the High Court.
Section 67 search is the enforcement-track action distinct from departmental audit. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, with reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise in writing any officer to inspect places of business and seize goods or documents.
Best-judgment assessment is the framework under Section 62 or Section 63 by which the proper officer, where a registered person fails to furnish returns or where an unregistered person is liable, assesses the tax liability to the best of his judgment. Audit non-cooperation can be a trigger for invoking Section 62.
Aggregate of demands captures the total tax, interest and penalty proposed in DRC-01 or confirmed in DRC-07 arising from audit observations. The aggregate determines the appellate forum, the pre-deposit obligation under Section 107(6) and the merits of pursuing rectification under Section 161.
Pre-deposit under sub-section (6) of Section 107 is the mandatory deposit of ten percent of the remaining amount of tax in dispute, subject to a maximum of twenty crore rupees, required for the appeal to be maintainable before the Appellate Authority. The pre-deposit is in addition to admitted tax, interest, fine and penalty.
First appeal under sub-section (1) of Section 107 lies before the Appellate Authority against any decision or order passed under the CGST Act by an adjudicating authority. The appeal must be filed within three months from the date of communication of the order, condonable by a further one month on sufficient cause.
Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is the remedy for any error apparent on the face of record in any decision, order, notice, certificate or any other document. Rectification may be undertaken suo motu by the authority or on application by the registered person within three months of the document.
ITC reversal is the substantive consequence of an audit observation that input tax credit has been wrongly availed or utilised. Reversal is effected through Table 4(B) of GSTR-3B with interest under Section 50(3) and, in some cases, penalty under Section 73(9) or 74(9) depending on the nature of the lapse.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Tambaram East businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Tambaram East, the business activity radiating outward from Tambaram Railway Station East and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Tambaram East navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — In Tambaram East, the business activity radiating outward from Tambaram Railway Station East and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Tambaram East engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Tambaram East, the cluster of residential, retail, education businesses that defines Tambaram East's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Tambaram East navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Tambaram East clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Tambaram East are spread right across the locality — along Airforce Station road, Bharadwajar street, Bharathmatha Street, Kalidasar Street and Karpaga Vinayagar Koil street, and through the Grand Southern Trunk Road, Major Mukund Varadharajan Salai, Tambaram - Mudichur - Sriperumbudur Road and Velachery Mudhanmai Salai business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Tambaram East, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.