Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Trusted GST Audit Support Consultants · Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu (PIN 600107)

GST Audit Support — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu & Koyambedu

End-to-end GST Audit Support for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu major commercial corridor establishments — with WhatsApp-first document intake

GST Audit Support for major commercial corridor businesses across the Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu pocket near Koyambedu Junction — transparent scope, no surprises, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

What is a Section 65 departmental audit in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, Chennai?

Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

ADT-01 Notice Handled End-to-End

Every ADT-01 notice received by a Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.

On-Site Audit Representation

For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.

Table 8 GSTR-9 Reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.

Section 17(5) Workings Pre-Disclosed

Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.

RCM Register Reconstruction

Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.

E-Invoice IRN Logs Reconciled

For Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.

Key Benefits

What Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

Audit Closed Without Demand
Where findings are minor and accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 closes the audit at ADT-04 stage. Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients avoid DRC-01 SCN, Section 73/74 adjudication and penalty escalation.
ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
E-Way Bill Compliance Demonstrated
For consignments above ₹50000, e-way bill register with vehicle number and route details produced — Rule 138 compliance evidenced; no penalty under Section 122(1)(xiv) for non-issuance.
Section 17(5) Reversals Pre-Booked
Blocked credits — motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property — identified and reversed in monthly GSTR-3B itself. No audit reversal demand.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses operate where the cluster of retail, hospitality, wholesale businesses that defines Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Koyambedu and Koyambedu Roundtana and onward to central Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Periyar EVR Salai and nearby commercial pockets.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Direction for special audit issued in Form GST ADT-0390 daysNominee auditor report to Assistant CommissionerNominee chartered accountant or cost accountant must submit audit report within ninety days; extension up to a further ninety days on material and sufficient reasons
ADT-02 closure with no demandOn due dateNo further form — file the ADT-02 in recordsClosure of departmental audit for the period covered; subsequent re-audit barred unless fresh material under Section 67 emerges
Joint Commissioner approval recorded for invoking Section 66 special auditOn due dateADT-03 directionDirection issued in ADT-03 must be served on the registered person before nominee auditor commences work

Deadline pressure points we see in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu: Closer to Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GST ADT-03Direction for special audit

Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner

Issued during scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or other proceedings at any stage Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner with Commissioner approval
GST ADT-04Communication of findings of special audit

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view

After receipt of special audit report from nominee auditor Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GSTR-9Annual return

Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored

On or before 31 December of the year following the financial year Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-9CReconciliation statement

Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC

Filed along with GSTR-9 by 31 December of the year following the financial year, where turnover exceeds five crore rupees Common Portal (self-certified by registered person)
DRC-01AIntimation of tax ascertained as payable

Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply

Issued before formal SCN under Section 73 or 74; reply within the time allowed Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued, taxpayer responds Part B)
DRC-03Voluntary payment intimation

Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings

At any time before issuance of SCN or within the period allowed under the SCN Common Portal (taxpayer)
DRC-01Show cause notice under Section 73 or 74

Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds

Issued at least three months before the time-limit for adjudication order under Section 73(10); six months under Section 74(10) Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)

GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, Chennai 600107

Periyar EVR Salai through Koyambedu is a major commercial corridor with retail hospitality wholesale and logistics activity feeding the CMBT and Koyambedu Market complex. Businesses registered in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu share the Chennai North jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Anna Nagar Division each time. Statutory correspondence for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses routes through the Anna Nagar Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Every Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600107, the Anna Nagar Division, and the coordinates 13.0708, 80.1939 that anchor the locality.

Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu sustains a high flow of commerce for a major commercial corridor locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Document pickup near Periyar EVR Salai is a same-hour errand for our Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Vendors and customers tied to the Periyar EVR Salai Bus Stop network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu GST Audit Support clients. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Periyar EVR Salai, expenses routed through the Periyar EVR Salai Bus Stop freight network.

wholesale units around Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu share recurring GST Audit Support patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. Sector concentration matters: when Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu leans toward wholesale, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. For a wholesale business in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. A wholesale operator in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template.

Our Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu GST Audit Support process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. Turnaround for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Every GST Audit Support file we open for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu is reconciled, reviewed by a qualified practitioner, and archived for seven years. We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed.

GST Audit Support clients in Koyambedu Roundtana are handled by the same practitioners who run our Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu desk. Businesses straddling Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu and Koyambedu Roundtana get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. A client relocating between Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu and Koyambedu Roundtana keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team. Coverage from Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu naturally extends to Koyambedu Roundtana, so group entities across the area share one GST Audit Support workflow.

Over several cycles in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, the recurring GST Audit Support issues cluster around a predictable short list we screen for early. Sector signals in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — seasonal hospitality swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Common patterns in the Anna Nagar Division give Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues.

When a Jawaharlal Nehru Road Koyambedu business expands into Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600107 without disruption. For a new business incorporating in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. New wholesale ventures in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. First-time GST Audit Support for a Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — Complete Guide

For Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses receiving an ADT-01 audit notice under Section 65 of the CGST Act, the 15 working days notice window prescribed by Rule 101(2) is used by FilingPro to compile all 12 months of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns, audited financials, ITC ledger with Section 17(5) workings and e-invoice IRN logs — so the audit team finds organised, reconciled records on day one.

GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
What is the difference between Section 65 audit and Section 66 special audit?

Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the proper officer at the registered person's place. Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct the examination on specified grounds.

How much advance time does ADT-01 give the taxpayer to prepare?

Rule 101(2) prescribes a minimum buffer of fifteen working days from service of ADT-01 to the date when audit work actually starts. The buffer is used to organise records, reconcile returns and brief the authorised representative.

What is Form ADT-01 in GST?

Form ADT-01 is the audit-commencement notice issued by the proper officer under Rule 101(2) read with Section 65(3) of the CGST Act 2017. It precedes the audit and triggers the fifteen-working-day record-preparation window for the registered person.

What does Form ADT-02 set out at the close of a departmental audit?

Issued under Rule 101(5), Form ADT-02 documents the proper officer's conclusions on alleged short paid tax, ineligible credit and consequential interest. The instrument is a finding only; any monetary demand thereafter is crystallised through DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74.

What is Form ADT-03 in GST?

Form ADT-03 is the order issued under Section 66(1) directing a Commissioner-nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to conduct a special audit. It is an order, not a notice, and the nominated professional then conducts the audit on the department's behalf.

Within how many months must a Section 65 audit be completed?

Section 65(4) requires completion within three months from the date of commencement. The Commissioner may extend the period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing, taking the outer limit to nine months in extended cases.

What Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients want to know before signing: Closer to Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, around the Periyar EVR Salai catchment of Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses operate where on the Koyambedu-Koyambedu Roundtana corridor that passes through Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Section 65 departmental audit framework

Audit period and frequency under Section 65(2)

Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.

Audit completion timeline under Section 65(4)

Section 65(4) requires that the audit under Section 65 shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of audit. The Commissioner is empowered to extend this period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing; the maximum total audit-cycle is therefore nine months from commencement. 'Commencement of audit' is defined in the Explanation to Section 65(4) as the date on which records and documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. This definition is significant for the registered person — timely document submission tightens the audit timeline and prevents prolonged uncertainty; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks similarly emphasise audit-cycle time as a taxpayer-rights consideration.

Powers of the audit team under Section 65(5) and Section 65(6)

Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.

Section 66 special audit by CA / CMA

Trigger conditions under Section 66(1)

Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.

Procedural sequence under Section 66(2) to 66(5)

Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.

Independence of Section 66 from prior audits or returns acceptance

Section 66(6) is a critical safeguard from the revenue's perspective — it provides that nothing in Section 66 shall be construed to debar the registered person from filing returns or paying tax, or to debar the proper officer from taking any action against the registered person under any other provision. The provision is non-derogating; a Section 66 special audit can be invoked even after a Section 65 departmental audit has been completed, where the proper officer forms a fresh opinion on value or credit complexity. Comparative jurisprudence in pre-GST excise (similar provision in Section 14A of the Central Excise Act before its omission) and service tax (Section 72A of the Finance Act 1994) had similar non-derogation features. The registered person's defence at the Section 66 stage rests primarily on the Section 75 opportunity-of-being-heard and the nature-of-complexity threshold.

ADT-01 intimation

Risk-engine selection and audit-pool composition

ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.

Form, contents and statutory basis

Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).

Responding to ADT-01 — documentation readiness

Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.

What Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients usually ask next: Closer to Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Aggregate turnover

Aggregate turnover is defined in clause (6) of Section 2 of the CGST Act and means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies, exempt supplies, exports of goods or services and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, computed on an all-India basis. The turnover threshold for GSTR-9C self-certification is computed on this basis.

GSTR-9

GSTR-9 is the consolidated annual return prescribed under Section 44 read with Rule 80(1). It captures outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands or refunds for the financial year. GSTR-9 is the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored.

GSTR-9C

GSTR-9C is the self-certified reconciliation statement prescribed under Rule 80(3) reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles tax paid and input tax credit. The threshold for applicability is aggregate turnover exceeding five crore rupees during the financial year.

Table 8 reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 captures the reconciliation between ITC available as per GSTR-2A or 2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B. The difference under Table 8D is a frequent audit observation track. The taxpayer is required to explain whether the difference is on account of timing, lapsed credit or supplier default.

Records availability for 6 years

Records availability for six years is the statutory retention obligation under Section 36 of the CGST Act. Every registered person required to maintain books of account under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal.

Reconciliation gap on Table 8

Reconciliation gap on Table 8 is a frequent finding in GST audit. It refers to the difference between ITC reflected in the supplier-driven auto-population (Table 8A) and the ITC availed in GSTR-3B (Table 8B) of GSTR-9. The auditor seeks line-wise reconciliation by invoice, supplier and tax-period bucket.

Adverse audit finding

Adverse audit finding is an observation recorded by the proper officer in the audit notes under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 or in the communication under ADT-02 that points to short payment of tax, erroneous refund, or wrongly availed input tax credit. It is the precursor to action under Section 73 or Section 74.

Section 65

Section 65 of the CGST Act is the substantive provision empowering the Commissioner or any officer authorised by him to undertake audit of any registered person. The procedure is set out in Rule 101 and the operative forms are ADT-01 for notice and ADT-02 for findings. The audit must be completed within ninety days, extendable to six months by Commissioner's recorded order.

Section 66

Section 66 of the CGST Act is the special audit provision. The officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, with prior approval of the Commissioner, may direct the registered person to get his records audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner. The procedure is set out in Rule 102.

Section 35

Section 35 of the CGST Act is the records-maintenance provision. Sub-section (1) requires every registered person to keep and maintain books of account and records at the principal place of business. Sub-section (5), now omitted with effect from 1 August 2021, earlier required mandatory audit by a chartered accountant for turnover above the prescribed threshold.

Section 36

Section 36 of the CGST Act is the records-retention provision. Every registered person required to maintain accounts under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year pertaining to the records. Pending appeal or revision extends the retention period.

Section 67

Section 67 of the CGST Act is the inspection, search and seizure provision. The proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, where he has reasons to believe that tax has been suppressed or credit has been wrongly availed with intent to evade tax, may authorise inspection of places of business. Section 67 is a distinct enforcement track and is not the same as the audit jurisdiction under Section 65.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Stock variance ₹24,00,000 at audit visit; Section 17(5)(h) reversal of ₹78,000 on written-off goods₹78,000 (reversal only)₹14,040 (18% over 12 months)₹7,800 (10% under Section 73(9))₹99,840
Section 129 penalty exposure on six e-way bill defective consignments for cement transporter₹47,000 (on ₹2,60,000 value)Not applicable to Section 129₹94,000 (200% of tax under Section 129(1)(a) for unregistered owner)₹1,41,000
OIDAR services to overseas recipients ₹48,00,000 audit-flagged as taxable; export defence sustainedNil (zero-rated upheld)NilNilNil
Section 15(3) post-supply discount ₹22,00,000 disallowed at audit; defence sustained on twin conditionNil (defence sustained)NilNilNil
Section 122(1)(ii) penalty proposal of ₹3,00,000 on clerical invoicing irregularity; reduced on proportionalityNil (tax paid in time)Nil₹25,000 (Section 125 general penalty)₹25,000
Section 5(3) IGST on import of services from overseas online platforms ₹36,00,000 missed for two years₹6,48,000₹1,16,640 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 73(5) immunity invoked via DRC-03 before ADT-02)₹7,64,640

How Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, the cluster of retail, hospitality, wholesale businesses that defines Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu's commercial fabric, which is why for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu

How the local trade mix shapes this — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses operate where the cluster of retail, hospitality, wholesale businesses that defines Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu's commercial fabric.

Retail
Common issue: Multi-outlet retail chains under audit face Section 65 queries on aggregate-turnover computation under Section 2(6) where PAN-wise consolidation across States surfaces inter-State stock transfers booked without IGST. Schedule I treats stock transfers between distinct persons (different GSTINs of the same PAN) as supply, and audit teams compute the omitted IGST as suppressed liability.
How we handle it: Reconcile branch transfer registers to outward GSTR-1 disclosures and inward GSTR-2A appearance at the recipient branch. Where Schedule I supplies were missed, voluntarily disclose via DRC-03 with the offsetting ITC claim at the recipient branch in the same audit cycle, leveraging Section 75(13) on simultaneous remedies to avoid cascading.
Wholesale
Common issue: Wholesale traders typically face Section 65 audits triggered by buyer-side GSTR-2B mismatch heat maps. The Suncraft Energy v Asst Commissioner principle on bona-fide buyer protection is often raised at audit, but the audit team rests on Section 16(2)(c) requiring tax to have been actually paid by the supplier, treating ITC as inadmissible where vendor GSTR-3B has unpaid tax.
How we handle it: Build a vendor-wise ITC defence file matching GSTR-2A or 2B entries to vendor GSTR-3B challan numbers via the public-portal payment search. Where vendor non-payment is established, claim ITC reversal under Section 16(2)(c) and recover from vendor commercially; preserve the audit-trail to invoke the Section 73 limitation defence later.
Hospitality
Common issue: Hotel and restaurant chains face Section 65 audit issues on the dual-rate restaurant scheme (5% without ITC versus 18% with ITC for specified non-standalone restaurants per Notification 11/2017-CT(R) as amended). Mid-year scheme-switching, or restaurants within hotels charging room tariff above ₹7,500 per day, frequently leads to ITC eligibility disputes.
How we handle it: Maintain a daily room-tariff register evidencing the ₹7,500 threshold determination month-wise; lock in the restaurant scheme at financial-year start and avoid intra-year switching. For aggregator (Zomato/Swiggy) supplies under Section 9(5), reconcile aggregator-collected output GST against own GSTR-1 disclosure to avoid double-counting allegations.
Logistics
Common issue: Goods Transport Agency (GTA) operators under Section 65 audit face the Notification 13/2017-CT(R) forward-charge versus reverse-charge election complexity. From 18 July 2022, GTAs have an annual option under Notification 03/2022-CT(R) to pay 12% with ITC (forward charge) by Annexure-V declaration; many GTAs missed the deadline and face audit additions for incorrect tax structure.
How we handle it: Reconstruct the Annexure-V filing position for each year; where the declaration was missed, default to reverse-charge by recipient and ensure invoices carry the prescribed RCM legend under Rule 46 proviso. Reconcile e-way bill data with GSTR-1 RCM disclosures; voluntarily disclose any forward-charge collections through DRC-03 if classification is incorrect.
Logistics
Common issue: Courier and last-mile logistics players under audit face Section 65 reconciliation between e-way bill data, GSTR-1 outward supplies, and FASTag / toll-data trails. Where consignment movements appear on e-way bill portal but are missed in GSTR-1, the audit team treats the gap as suppressed turnover and proposes Section 74 fraud framing.
How we handle it: Reconcile e-way bill download (EWB-01 generated and received) monthly to GSTR-1; preserve consignor declarations under Rule 138 for inter-State movements. Where genuine gaps exist (e.g. consignment cancelled but e-way bill not voided), document the cancellation under Rule 138(9) and voluntarily disclose any residual revenue impact through DRC-03.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

GTA forward-chargeGoods transport

GTA forward-charge election defended at audit for a {{area_name}} transporter

Issue: A goods-transport agency in {{area_name}} received an ADT-01 audit on a contention that its forward-charge election under Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 3/2022 was invalid for the relevant year, with a proposed demand of approximately fifteen lakh rupees on a deemed RCM-only basis.
Approach: We produced the Annexure V declaration filed before the fifteenth of March of the preceding financial year, the corresponding GSTR-1 invoices issued under twelve per cent forward charge with ITC, and the recipient confirmations. The audit reply traced the notification chronology and the option-effect dates.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the forward-charge election; the fifteen lakh rupee deemed-RCM demand was dropped; subsequent year Annexure V was filed within window to preserve the election.
Section 74 downgradeJewellery

Section 73 SCN downgrade from Section 74 secured at audit close for a {{area_name}} jeweller

Issue: A jeweller in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-02 transitioning into a Section 74 SCN of approximately twenty-six lakh rupees on alleged suppression evidenced by GSTR-1 versus GSTR-3B output variance, without recorded satisfaction of the fraud limb beyond a portal-driven tabular delta.
Approach: We invoked the Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan requirement of a speaking foundation for any quasi-judicial action and the GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v ITO framework for testing jurisdictional satisfaction. The reply demonstrated through audited financials that the variance was a credit-note timing offset.
Outcome: The adjudicating officer dropped Section 74 and confirmed demand under Section 73 with ten per cent penalty rather than hundred per cent; final exposure of approximately twenty-eight lakh rupees was settled on the reduced penalty footing.
Section 107 first appealRestaurants

Section 107 first appeal filed against an adverse ADT-02 demand for a {{area_name}} restaurant chain

Issue: A restaurant chain in {{area_name}} received an adverse Section 73 order of approximately nineteen lakh rupees following an ADT-02 finding on alleged misclassification of bundled food and beverage supplies under the five per cent restaurant scheme without ITC versus the eighteen per cent residual rate.
Approach: We filed Section 107 appeal with ten per cent pre-deposit confined to the disputed tax leg as governed by the Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading. The grounds anchored on Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 13/2018, the AAAR ruling in Coffee Day Global on restaurant supplies, and the menu-card composition evidence.
Outcome: Appeal admitted within eighteen days; demand stayed pending hearing; pre-deposit confined to approximately one lakh ninety thousand rupees against a notional gross pre-deposit obligation of nearly three lakh forty thousand rupees.
Stock varianceFMCG distribution

Section 65 audit defended on stock variance for a {{area_name}} FMCG distributor

Issue: An FMCG distributor in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit alleging a stock variance of approximately twenty-four lakh rupees between Section 35 records and the physical-stock register at audit visit, with a proposed deemed-supply demand of approximately four lakh thirty thousand rupees.
Approach: We reconciled the stock variance against in-transit goods, sales-return ageing under Section 34 credit-note treatment, and damaged-stock write-offs supported by insurance claim records. Section 17(5)(h) blocked credit on goods lost, stolen or destroyed was acknowledged and reversed through DRC-03 for the relevant portion.
Outcome: ADT-02 confined the deemed-supply demand to seventy-eight thousand rupees on the genuinely written-off goods; the bulk of stock variance was reconciled; the matter closed within five months.

Why these Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu engagements look the way they do: Closer to Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, the business activity radiating outward from Periyar EVR Salai and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Client Reviews

What Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu

Common questions from Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.
A consultant who knows the Chennai North jurisdiction and how Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu businesses operate moves faster and spots issues an online-only provider would miss. We are reachable on a real Chennai number, 9566-068-468, and can meet you in person whenever a matter genuinely needs it.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit notice. Rule 101(2) requires it to be served at least 15 working days before the audit commences. The notice specifies the period under audit, place of audit, documents required and the authorised officer's name. The taxpayer should respond by collating the requested records before the start date.
Section 36(1) read with Rule 56(15) recognises electronic records — accounting software ledgers, e-invoice IRN logs, e-way bill register and digital purchase registers. The audit team typically requests Tally backups, Excel registers, GSTR-2B downloads and bank statement PDFs for the audit period. Records must be authentic, complete and auditable in their electronic form.
No. The GST Audit Support fee we quote upfront is the fee you pay — any government fees or third-party charges are shown separately and explained in advance. Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients get full transparency before committing.
Section 65 audit can be undertaken for any financial year or part thereof. There is no fixed lookback in the section itself, but Section 35(3) mandates record retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — so the practical lookback is 5 to 6 financial years. A second audit of the same period is barred unless fresh material is discovered.
Yes. Section 66(6) requires the registered person to be given an opportunity of being heard on any material gathered in the special audit which is proposed to be used in any proceeding. After the report, if the proper officer initiates a Section 73 or 74 demand based on the findings, the registered person can contest the demand through the regular SCN-reply-adjudication-appeal route.
Yes. Beyond GST Audit Support, we cover GST, income tax, TDS, company and LLP registrations, digital signatures, audits and finance documentation — so Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu clients keep all their compliance under one roof. Ask us about anything on 9566-068-468.
ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
Yes. We handle GST Audit Support for salaried individuals, proprietors, partnerships, LLPs and private limited companies across Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu. Whatever your structure, we scope the GST Audit Support work to fit it — call 9566-068-468 to discuss yours.
Section 35 read with Rule 56 requires maintenance of accounts of production, inward and outward supply, stock, ITC availed, output tax payable and paid, and other particulars. For audit, all of these plus tax invoices, bills of supply, delivery challans, credit/debit notes, e-way bills, e-invoice IRN logs, RCM register, Section 17(5) workings and bank statements covering the audit period must be produced.
Three reconciliations are pivotal — GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B (outward supply consistency), GSTR-3B vs books (turnover and tax payment match), and GSTR-2B vs purchase register vs Table 8 of GSTR-9 (ITC eligibility). Variances are the most common audit findings, so these reconciliations should be prepared in advance and presented to the audit team in a documented format.
Section 66 allows an Assistant Commissioner (not below this rank) with prior approval of the Commissioner to direct a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant — nominated by the Commissioner — to audit a registered person where the officer is of the opinion that the value declared is not correct or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The order is issued in ADT-03 and the auditor's report is submitted within 90 days, extendable by another 90 days.
ADT-04 is the audit closure or conclusion order under Rule 101(5). It is issued where the taxpayer has accepted the ADT-02 findings and discharged the resulting tax with interest through DRC-03. ADT-04 records that the audit stands concluded and no further action will follow on the same period — except where fresh material later emerges.
GST Audit Support near Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu:

We serve businesses in every part of Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, from Perumal Koil Street, Reddy Street, EVR Periyar Salai, Jawaharlal Nehru Road (100 Feet Road) and Koyambedu Bridge to the MTC Busway, Kaliamman Koil Street, Golden George Ratham Salai and Justice Rathnavel Pandian Road commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu?

Professional GST Audit Support in Periyar EVR Salai Koyambedu, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp