GST Audit Support delivery for residential and retail firms across Medavakkam — on fixed, transparent fees
for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.
Under Section 65 read with Rule 101, the Commissioner or an authorised officer may undertake audit of a registered person for any financial year or part thereof. ADT-01 notice is issued at least 15 working days before commencement. The audit must be completed within 3 months from the date of commencement (extendable up to 6 months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded).
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Medavakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Where DRC-01 SCN escalates to a Section 73(9) or 74(9) demand order, Section 107 appeal is filed within 3 months with 10% pre-deposit. Personal hearing represented by qualified professionals.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Medavakkam client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Medavakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Medavakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Medavakkam Junction and feeder routes connecting Medavakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Medavakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Medavakkam businesses operate where the cluster of residential, retail, healthcare businesses that defines Medavakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Medavakkam: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Pre-show-cause-notice intimation by the proper officer of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; carries Part A with officer's quantification and Part B for registered person's reply
Intimation by the registered person of voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or Section 74(5); the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal proceedings
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 65 requires the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to inform the registered person within thirty days of the findings, the registered person's rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. The communication is issued in Form GST ADT-02. It is to be noted that the thirty-day window is mandatory and starts on the date of conclusion of audit, not the date of the audit report.
View sourceSection 36 directs every registered person required to keep and maintain books of account or other records under sub-section (1) of Section 35 to retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the year pertaining to such accounts and records. It is to be noted that where the records pertain to a matter that is the subject of an appeal, revision or any other proceeding, retention is required until one year after final disposal.
View sourceSection 73 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Sub-section (1) requires the proper officer to issue a show-cause notice at least three months prior to the time-limit specified for issuance of order under sub-section (10). It is to be noted that post-audit adjudication frequently routes through Section 73 unless suppression is alleged.
View sourceBecause PIN 600100 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Medavakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Approvals, acknowledgements and queries for Medavakkam businesses tie back to the Tambaram Division, so our GST Audit Support cadence accounts for how that office works. Medavakkam (PIN 600100) falls under the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. We keep a cycle-by-cycle record of how the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South handles Medavakkam filings and approvals.
Most commerce in Medavakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the GST Audit Support working file we maintain for clients here. Medavakkam reads as a fast growing residential retail pocket with medium commercial activity, anchored around Medavakkam Lake and fed by the Medavakkam Junction corridor. Freight and foot traffic from the Medavakkam Junction hub pull steady daily commerce through Medavakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this fast growing residential retail pocket. Each GST Audit Support cycle for Medavakkam reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Medavakkam Lake, expenses routed through the Medavakkam Junction freight network.
The retail firms we serve in Medavakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. For a retail business in Medavakkam, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. GST Audit Support for retail businesses in Medavakkam hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. The retail character of Medavakkam commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.
Document intake for Medavakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. The qualified-review step on every Medavakkam GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. Turnaround for Medavakkam GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. Fixed-fee scoping means a Medavakkam business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
From the same Medavakkam team we also serve Tambaram and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Proximity to Tambaram means a Medavakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. We treat Medavakkam and Tambaram as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. A client relocating between Medavakkam and Tambaram keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team.
Patterns we track for Medavakkam include healthcare documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Tambaram Division tends to raise. Common patterns in the Tambaram Division give Medavakkam businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Because we work repeatedly across Medavakkam, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. The longer we serve Medavakkam, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention.
Shifting principal place of business to Medavakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. A startup setting up near Medavakkam Junction in Medavakkam gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Tambaram Division from day one. First-time GST Audit Support for a Medavakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later. Incorporating in Medavakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Medavakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Medavakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Medavakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Suncraft Energy Pvt Ltd v Assistant Commissioner of the Calcutta High Court holds that input tax credit available to a bona fide recipient cannot be defeated solely on supplier-side default in GSTR-1 filing or tax payment, where the recipient holds valid invoices and discharged consideration including tax.
Union of India v Bharti Airtel of the Supreme Court recognises the right to rectification of bona fide errors in GSTR-3B. The ratio is invoked at audit stage to seek directions for portal-blocked corrections through DRC-03 where the succeeding-period route under Section 39(9) has lapsed.
Tvl Diya Agencies v State Tax Officer holds that supplier-side default cannot mechanically defeat recipient credit without enquiry into the supplier and a finding on the recipient's bona fides. The ratio is widely relied upon in audit replies and ADT-02 defences in {{area_name}}.
Madras High Court routinely entertains Article 226 writs where ADT-01 or ADT-02 shows want of recorded reasons or overlap with an earlier audit on the same period. Reliance is placed on GKN Driveshafts and Kranti Associates discipline for speaking-order foundation.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 reconciles input tax credit availed in GSTR-3B against credit appearing in GSTR-2A or static GSTR-2B for the financial year. It is the most common audit-checkpoint and variances must be supported by supplier-wise documentation at audit.
No. The Gujarat High Court in Aap and Co v Union of India holds that GSTR-3B is a return of self-assessment and a mere tabular variance against GSTR-1 does not establish suppression. Independent enquiry into underlying invoices is required before adverse findings.
What Medavakkam clients want to know before signing: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — in the fast-growing residential retail micro-market of Medavakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Medavakkam businesses operate where on the Velachery-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Medavakkam.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Section 65(5) empowers the audit team to verify the documents, ascertain the correctness of turnover declared, exemptions and deductions claimed, rate of tax applied, ITC availed and utilised, refund claimed, and other relevant compliance matters. The team can examine any of these dimensions and require any explanation. Section 65(6) imposes a corresponding obligation on the registered person to afford the necessary facility to verify the books of account, statements and other documents called for, and to furnish information and render assistance for the timely completion of the audit. Reasonable cooperation is the registered person's first-line defence — obstruction or non-cooperation can trigger Section 71 access provisions and escalate the matter into Section 67 inspection territory.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
Section 66(6) is a critical safeguard from the revenue's perspective — it provides that nothing in Section 66 shall be construed to debar the registered person from filing returns or paying tax, or to debar the proper officer from taking any action against the registered person under any other provision. The provision is non-derogating; a Section 66 special audit can be invoked even after a Section 65 departmental audit has been completed, where the proper officer forms a fresh opinion on value or credit complexity. Comparative jurisprudence in pre-GST excise (similar provision in Section 14A of the Central Excise Act before its omission) and service tax (Section 72A of the Finance Act 1994) had similar non-derogation features. The registered person's defence at the Section 66 stage rests primarily on the Section 75 opportunity-of-being-heard and the nature-of-complexity threshold.
The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.
Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.
Upon receipt of ADT-01, the registered person's first task is to map the document-schedule against actual maintained records and identify any gaps. Where records are incomplete (typically Rule 56 stock registers, Rule 89 refund working papers, or reverse-charge self-invoices under Section 31(3)(f)), the fifteen-day window is the opportunity for reconstruction. The Goetze (India) v CIT (2006) Supreme Court principle on the inability to make fresh claims outside the return framework (decided in the income-tax context) is sometimes invoked at the audit stage to deny ITC claims not appearing in original returns; the counter-position rests on Section 16(4) timeline arguments and the principle that audit is a verification not a re-assessment. Document submission within the fifteen-day window aligns the formal commencement of audit under Section 65(4) Explanation and tightens the three-month closure clock.
Where genuine grounds exist — pending statutory audit of financial statements, key personnel unavailability, or recent migration of accounting systems — the registered person can seek extension of the audit commencement date by written representation. The audit team has administrative discretion under Rule 101 to grant reasonable extensions, generally up to thirty additional days; longer extensions require Commissioner-level approval. The extension must be sought before the proposed commencement date and supported by documentary evidence (statutory auditor engagement letter, employee leave records, ERP migration plans). The OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks recognise such extensions as a taxpayer-rights safeguard, balanced against the audit-closure timeline.
ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.
What Medavakkam clients usually ask next: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Table 8 reconciliation is the working file built between the auto-populated GSTR-2A or 2B based ITC in Table 8A of GSTR-9 and the ITC availed and reported by the registered person in Table 8B and 8C, with the residual variance disclosed in Table 8D and an explanation parked in Table 8E or 8F.
Audit-readiness pack is the practitioner-prepared bundle delivered to the audit officer at commencement, typically containing turnover reconciliation, ITC reconciliation, RCM register, blocked credit working under Section 17(5), and a self-identified list of likely adverse findings with cure positions.
Block credit register is the internal ledger maintained by the registered person under good-practice (not statutorily prescribed) listing every input tax credit availed and separately the credits blocked under Section 17(5) categories such as motor vehicles, food and beverages, club memberships and personal consumption, with rationale.
RCM register is the internal ledger that tracks every transaction on which tax is payable under reverse charge by the recipient under Section 9(3) or 9(4) read with Notification 13/2017-CT, capturing GTA freight, legal fees, director sitting fees, security services, sponsorship and unregistered supplier purchases above thresholds.
Audit observation cure is the corrective workflow undertaken by the practitioner between the draft observation by the audit officer and issuance of formal ADT-02, by which a substantive demand position is reduced or eliminated through written submission, additional records, judicial precedent application and where appropriate voluntary DRC-03 payment.
Audit closure meeting is the final sitting between the registered person and the audit officer where the contents of the draft ADT-02 are walked through, accepted positions are confirmed for voluntary payment and contested positions are flagged for the formal reply track, ahead of the officer signing and issuing ADT-02.
Principal place mismatch is the practical situation where the registered person's principal place of business as declared in REG-06 differs from the location at which books of account are actually maintained, often resolved at audit commencement by treating the books-location as an additional place of business under Section 65(4) proviso.
Records reconstruction is the practitioner-led rebuilding of statutory registers under Rule 56 where the original electronic or physical records have been lost or corrupted, typically sourced from e-invoice portal IRN logs, banked-receipt trails, supplier statements and e-way-bill registers, with the reconstruction methodology disclosed in writing.
Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the tax authorities under Section 65 of the CGST Act. The Commissioner or any officer authorised by general or specific order undertakes the audit at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The substantive provision is Section 65 and the procedure is set out in Rule 101.
Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 of the CGST Act where the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The audit is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
ADT-01 is the statutory notice issued by the proper officer under sub-section (3) of Section 65 read with sub-rule (2) of Rule 101 informing the registered person of the institution of departmental audit. The notice must be served not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit and carries the period under audit, the place, the date and the records to be made available.
ADT-02 is the audit report under Section 65 communicated by the proper officer to the registered person within thirty days of conclusion of audit. It captures the findings of audit, the rights and obligations of the registered person, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 is the formal closure document of the departmental audit track.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Medavakkam businesses typically avoid these: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from Medavakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Medavakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Medavakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Medavakkam engagements look the way they do: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — the business activity radiating outward from Medavakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets; for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Medavakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our GST Audit Support clients in Medavakkam are spread right across the locality — along Pillayarkoil Street, 12th Street, 1st Cross Street, 3rd Cross Street and 3rd Street, and through the Medavakkam - Mambakkam - Sembakkam Road, Medavakkam Maempalam, Semmozhi Salai and Velachery Main Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional GST Audit Support in Medavakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.