GST Audit Support cadence for Mannivakkam firms near Mannivakkam Bus Stop — backed by a 15+ year track record
for the professional and salaried population of Mannivakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST by qualified experts with a 15+ year, zero-penalty record. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires every registered person to retain books of account and other records for 6 years from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the taxpayer is party to an appeal, revision or any proceeding, records must be retained for one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Mannivakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
For Mannivakkam businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.
Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Mannivakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Mannivakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets. Practitioners note that with quick access via Mannivakkam Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Mannivakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Mannivakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Mannivakkam, the cluster of residential, retail, education businesses that defines Mannivakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Mannivakkam: Where Mannivakkam differs: for the professional and salaried population of Mannivakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSub-section (2) of Section 66 provides that the direction under sub-section (1) shall be issued in Form GST ADT-03 as prescribed under Rule 102. The nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant is named by the Commissioner; the registered person does not have a right to choose the auditor. It is to be noted that this is materially different from the statutory audit framework under the Companies Act where the management appoints the auditor.
View sourceSub-section (6) of Section 65 requires the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to inform the registered person within thirty days of the findings, the registered person's rights and obligations, and the reasons for such findings. The communication is issued in Form GST ADT-02. It is to be noted that the thirty-day window is mandatory and starts on the date of conclusion of audit, not the date of the audit report.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 35 obliges every registered person to keep and maintain, at his principal place of business, a true and correct account of production or manufacture of goods, inward and outward supply of goods or services, stock of goods, input tax credit availed, output tax payable and paid, and such other particulars as may be prescribed. It is to be noted that the records framework under this section is the substratum on which any audit, scrutiny or adjudication proceeds.
View sourceMannivakkam (PIN 600048) falls under the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. The 600xx geo-zone covering Mannivakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable. Because PIN 600048 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Mannivakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Mannivakkam is a residential growth pocket near Vandalur with mid-tier apartments and small-trade strips.
Each GST Audit Support cycle for Mannivakkam reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near GST Road, expenses routed through the Mannivakkam Bus Stop freight network. Freight and foot traffic from the Mannivakkam Bus Stop hub pull steady daily commerce through Mannivakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this residential growth pocket pocket. Mannivakkam sustains a medium flow of commerce for a residential growth pocket locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Commercial activity in Mannivakkam runs medium, so GST Audit Support volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Mannivakkam desk accordingly.
The retail character of Mannivakkam commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs. The retail firms we serve in Mannivakkam value a GST Audit Support partner who already understands their sector's compliance rhythm. The business mix in Mannivakkam centres on retail, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. Sector concentration matters: when Mannivakkam leans toward retail, the GST Audit Support risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle.
We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Mannivakkam so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. The qualified-review step on every Mannivakkam GST Audit Support file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. The Mannivakkam GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. Fixed-fee scoping means a Mannivakkam business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
We treat Mannivakkam and Vandalur as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. GST Audit Support clients in Vandalur are handled by the same practitioners who run our Mannivakkam desk. Proximity to Vandalur means a Mannivakkam engagement can extend across the locality cluster with no change in cadence. Serving Mannivakkam and Vandalur from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster.
The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Mannivakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Because we work repeatedly across Mannivakkam, we can benchmark a new client's GST Audit Support position against the locality norm. Patterns we track for Mannivakkam include education documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Tambaram Division tends to raise. Sector signals in Mannivakkam — seasonal education swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule GST Audit Support work.
Shifting principal place of business to Mannivakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. We onboard new Mannivakkam entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle. For a new business incorporating in Mannivakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, GST Audit Support setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Mudichur business expands into Mannivakkam, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600048 without disruption.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Mannivakkam businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Mannivakkam prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Mannivakkam businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
The audit unit is each GSTIN; assessment and book-keeping are GSTIN-specific even where the underlying PAN is common. The Tamil Nadu registration of a pan-India taxpayer is audited independently by the jurisdictional CGST or SGST authority covering that GSTIN.
ADT-02 is the audit-findings report under Rule 101(5) at the end of a Section 65 audit. DRC-01 is the show-cause notice issued under Section 73 or 74 read with Rule 142 to demand tax. ADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into a DRC-01 SCN separately.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation under Rule 142(2). It is used to discharge tax with interest before SCN to invoke Section 73(5) or 74(5) immunity, or to comply with ADT-02 findings. Closure follows through DRC-04 or DRC-05 as the case may be.
Section 73(5) permits payment of tax with interest before any show-cause notice is issued. Where so paid through DRC-03 referencing the audit ARN, no penalty is leviable and proceedings stand closed for that amount on issue of DRC-04 by the proper officer.
ADT-02 itself is a finding, not a demand. The demand crystallises only through a subsequent DRC-01 SCN and the consequential DRC-07 order. First appeal under Section 107 against that order lies within three months on a ten per cent pre-deposit of disputed tax.
Suncraft Energy Pvt Ltd v Assistant Commissioner of the Calcutta High Court holds that input tax credit available to a bona fide recipient cannot be defeated solely on supplier-side default in GSTR-1 filing or tax payment, where the recipient holds valid invoices and discharged consideration including tax.
What Mannivakkam clients want to know before signing: Where Mannivakkam differs: around the Mannivakkam Bus Stop catchment of Mannivakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Across Mannivakkam, around the Mannivakkam Bus Stop catchment of Mannivakkam.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Audit under Section 65 or 66 is conceptually distinct from assessment under Sections 61 (scrutiny of returns) and 62 (best-judgement assessment of non-filers) and from inspection / search / seizure under Section 67. Scrutiny under Section 61 is a desk-review of returns by the proper officer who issues ASMT-10 on discrepancies; the registered person responds in ASMT-11; closure or escalation follows. Audit is broader — Section 65(5) permits examination of the books, returns, statements, declarations and other documents to verify correctness of turnover declared, taxes paid, refund claimed and ITC availed, plus assessment of compliance with the Act. Inspection under Section 67 is targeted enforcement upon reason-to-believe of tax evasion and is invasive — premises access, seizure of records and goods. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration's compliance-pyramid model recommends graduated escalation from desk review to field audit to inspection, and the Indian framework broadly mirrors that design.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.
Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.
Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.
Where genuine grounds exist — pending statutory audit of financial statements, key personnel unavailability, or recent migration of accounting systems — the registered person can seek extension of the audit commencement date by written representation. The audit team has administrative discretion under Rule 101 to grant reasonable extensions, generally up to thirty additional days; longer extensions require Commissioner-level approval. The extension must be sought before the proposed commencement date and supported by documentary evidence (statutory auditor engagement letter, employee leave records, ERP migration plans). The OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks recognise such extensions as a taxpayer-rights safeguard, balanced against the audit-closure timeline.
ADT-01 intimations are not randomly issued; selection is driven by the GSTN risk engine combined with CBIC Audit Manual sectoral profiles. The risk engine factors include sharp variances between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Table 4(A), between GSTR-9 and audited financial statements (via GSTR-9C), unusually high refund claims, sector-specific red flags (e.g. inverted-duty sectors, real-estate developers under Notification 03/2019-CT(R)), and prior-audit findings. The risk-based architecture aligns with the GST Council 47th and 53rd meeting recommendations on focusing enforcement on high-risk taxpayer cohorts while reducing nuisance audits of compliant small taxpayers. Knowing one's risk-profile drivers helps the registered person anticipate audit topics and prepare working papers accordingly.
Form GST ADT-01 is the audit-initiation intimation prescribed under Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules 2017. The form is generated by the proper officer (or audit officer authorised by the Commissioner) and served on the registered person at least fifteen working days before the date proposed for commencement of audit. ADT-01 contains the GSTIN and legal name of the registered person, the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year), the place where audit will be conducted (place of business or office of the proper officer), the date of audit commencement, and a schedule of documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, returns including GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C, declarations, internal-audit reports, agreements material to the tax position, and any other document the audit team specifies. The fifteen-day window is a statutory taxpayer right under Section 65(3) read with Rule 101(2).
ADT-02 audit observations are structured around the verification heads — turnover under Section 9 read with Section 7, taxable value under Section 15, rate of tax under the rate notifications, ITC under Sections 16 to 21, refund under Sections 54 and 55, and miscellaneous compliance. Each observation typically includes the audit team's working, the discrepancy quantum, the section / rule under which the proposed addition is framed, and the proper officer's reasoning. The Kranti Associates v Masood Ahmed Khan (2010) Supreme Court principle on reasoned orders applies — the proper officer's reasoning must engage with the registered person's explanations and cannot be a mechanical reproduction of audit-team working. Where reasoning is absent or perfunctory, the registered person has stronger grounds in subsequent Section 73 / 74 proceedings or in a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226.
Section 73(5) of the CGST Act allows the registered person to pay the tax along with interest under Section 50 on the basis of own ascertainment or as ascertained by the proper officer and inform the proper officer of such payment in Form DRC-03 before service of an SCN under Section 73(1). Where the registered person agrees with the ADT-02 findings, voluntary payment under Section 73(5) avoids the SCN cycle entirely and limits the financial impact to tax plus interest, without penalty. Section 73(6) then mandates that no SCN shall be issued in respect of the amount paid. This voluntary-payment route is the preferred audit-closure mechanism for genuine ITC errors, classification mis-applications and minor valuation gaps, and is widely used in practice.
Where the registered person disagrees with one or more ADT-02 findings, the response options are: (a) file a Section 75 representation seeking re-consideration before the SCN stage; (b) await the SCN under Section 73 or 74 and contest at that stage; (c) where the audit findings are perceived as jurisdictionally infirm, file a writ petition before the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The writ remedy is typically reserved for jurisdictional infirmities — absence of Commissioner approval under Section 66, breach of the Section 65(4) timeline, denial of Section 75 opportunity of hearing — rather than for merit-based challenges. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) lines of authority offer guidance on writ-jurisdictional questions in audit and assessment matters.
What Mannivakkam clients usually ask next: Where Mannivakkam differs: for the professional and salaried population of Mannivakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Outward supply reconciliation is the comparison of turnover declared in GSTR-1, turnover declared in GSTR-3B, turnover declared in GSTR-9 and turnover as per audited financial statements. The reconciliation is the focal table of GSTR-9C and is a recurring audit observation area.
Sub-clause (aa) of sub-section (2) of Section 16 of the CGST Act conditions input tax credit on the details of the invoice or debit note being furnished by the supplier in GSTR-1 and communicated to the recipient. Departmental audit observations under this provision typically address ITC availed in respect of invoices not reflected in GSTR-2B.
Sub-section (5) of Section 17 of the CGST Act lists blocked credits — motor vehicles below thirteen-seater capacity, food and beverages, club membership, works contract for immovable property and others. Audit observations on Section 17(5) frequently require itemised reconciliation of ITC against the negative list.
Reverse charge audit is the subset of audit observations examining whether tax has been correctly paid by the recipient under sub-section (3) or (4) of Section 9 on notified supplies — goods transport agency, advocate services, sponsorship and others. The audit also tests whether ITC on RCM-paid tax has been availed only after payment of tax.
Composition audit is the audit of taxpayers paying tax under Section 10 of the CGST Act. The audit verifies turnover slabs, prohibited supplies (inter-State, e-commerce, ice-cream, pan masala, tobacco), maintenance of CMP filings and the rate of composition applied. CMP-08 quarterly statements and GSTR-4 annual return are the principal documents.
E-invoice audit examines compliance with the e-invoicing framework notified under sub-rule (4) of Rule 48 for taxpayers with aggregate turnover above the prescribed threshold. The audit traces invoice reference number (IRN), QR-code generation and reporting on the Invoice Registration Portal across the audited financial periods.
E-way bill audit is the examination of e-way bills generated under sub-rule (1) of Rule 138 for movement of goods of consignment value exceeding fifty thousand rupees. Audit observations typically address mismatches between e-way bill data, tax invoice data and GSTR-1 outward supply declarations.
Place of supply is determined under Chapter V of the IGST Act and dictates whether a supply is intra-State (CGST plus SGST) or inter-State (IGST). Audit observations on place of supply typically address services supplied to recipients in other States, goods movements without invoicing and exports without LUT.
Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the GST department under Section 65 of the CGST Act covering a registered person for one or more financial years, commenced by ADT-01 and concluded by ADT-02, usually completed at the registered place of business or office of the proper officer.
Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 by the Commissioner where the proper officer is of the opinion that the value or credit availed has not been correctly declared; it is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner and triggered by Form ADT-03.
ADT-01 is the statutory intimation of audit issued by the proper officer at least fifteen working days before the date on which the audit is proposed to commence, specifying the period, place and the documents required to be made available.
ADT-02 is the form in which the proper officer communicates the audit findings, rights and obligations to the registered person within thirty days of completion of the audit; observations in ADT-02 typically feed into a subsequent Section 73 or Section 74 demand notice if tax has not been voluntarily paid.
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Mannivakkam businesses typically avoid these: Where Mannivakkam differs: the business activity radiating outward from Mannivakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets. We see for the professional and salaried population of Mannivakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Mannivakkam, the business activity radiating outward from Mannivakkam Bus Stop and nearby commercial pockets.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Mannivakkam engagements look the way they do: Where Mannivakkam differs: the cluster of residential, retail, education businesses that defines Mannivakkam's commercial fabric. We see for the professional and salaried population of Mannivakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Mannivakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Across Mannivakkam we look after firms on Krishna Road, Muthuvelar Street, Nehru Main Road, Sarojini Street and Ambedkar Street as well as the Anna Street, Annai Theresa Street, Grand Southern Trunk Road and Perungalathur Maempalam corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.
Professional GST Audit Support in Mannivakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.