Rated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areasRated 4.9/5 by 312+ Chennai clientsZero penalty record across all filings24-hour response · WhatsApp-first supportOffices: Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)15+ years of expert tax & compliance consulting500+ active clients across 243 Chennai areas
Egmore · near Egmore Railway Station · GST Audit Support desk

GST Audit Support in Egmore, Chennai

Qualified GST Audit Support for Egmore (PIN 600008) and adjacent Nungambakkam — with same-day acknowledgement delivery

GST Audit Support for healthcare legal commercial central hub businesses across the Egmore pocket near Government Museum with on-time portal submission and full statutory reconciliation. Call 9566-068-468.

4.9
312+ Reviews
15+ Years
Zero Penalties
500+ Clients
Quick Answer

Who pays the cost of a Section 66 special audit in Egmore, Chennai?

Under Section 66(5), the expenses of the special audit including the remuneration of the Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated for the audit are determined and paid by the Commissioner — not by the taxpayer. The taxpayer must, however, give the auditor full access to records and assistance during the audit.

Transparent Pricing

GST Audit Support in Egmore — Plans & Pricing

Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.

MonthlyAnnualSave 2 Months
Nill
Basic ADT-01 documentation
₹5,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Summary level
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Starter
On-site audit support 1 day
₹15,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (12 months)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (1 day)
  • ADT-02 Reply Drafting
  • Audit Period Coverage: 1 financial year
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (1 session)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Most Popular ⭐
Professional
Full audit representation + ADT-02 reply
₹35,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 5 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 5 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Line-item with documentary backup
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Section 66 Special Audit Handling
  • Section 107 Appeal Filing
Premium
Section 66 special audit + Section 107 appeal
₹85,000/per engagement

  • ADT-01 Notice Review
  • Audit Document Checklist
  • Records Compilation Support (up to 6 years)
  • GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs Books Reconciliation
  • On-site Audit Representation (full audit)
  • ADT-02 Findings Reply
  • Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC Reconciliation
  • Section 17(5) Workings
  • RCM Register Reconstruction
  • DRC-03 Closure Filing
  • Section 66 Special Audit Coordination with Nominated CA
  • DRC-01 SCN Reply (Section 73/74)
  • Section 107 First Appeal Filing with 10% Pre-deposit
  • Personal Hearing Representation
  • Audit Period Coverage: Up to 6 financial years
  • Reconciliation Depth: Litigation-grade with case-law backing
  • WhatsApp Document Support
  • GST Advisory Calls (Unlimited)
  • Dedicated Audit Manager
  • Priority 24-Hour Support

Swipe to see all plans

Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.

Why FilingPro?

Why Egmore Clients Choose FilingPro

Expert GST Audit Support in Egmore — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.

RCM Register Reconstruction

Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.

E-Invoice IRN Logs Reconciled

For Egmore businesses above ₹5 crore AATO, IRN logs from the Invoice Registration Portal reconciled to GSTR-1 monthly — establishing compliance with mandatory e-invoicing from 1-Aug-2023.

ADT-02 Findings Replied With Case-Law

Where audit team proposes ITC reversal on supplier-default grounds or audit jurisdiction is exercised without proper notice, ADT-02 reply cites the Madras High Court rulings to defend the taxpayer's position.

DRC-03 Voluntary Closure

Where findings are accepted, voluntary payment via DRC-03 with reference to the audit ARN gets ADT-04 closure issued — no DRC-01 SCN under Section 73 or 74, no penalty escalation.

Section 66 Special Audit Coordination

Where Section 66 special audit is ordered via ADT-03, FilingPro liaises with the nominated CA, ensures full record access and tracks the 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days under Section 66(2)).

6-Year Records Retention Maintained

All audit working papers, GSTR-2B downloads, RCM workings and reconciliation sheets retained for 6 years from the due date of the annual return — meeting Section 36 read with Rule 56 record-retention obligations.

Key Benefits

What Egmore Clients Get

Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.

ITC Defended Against Supplier Default
ITC questioned solely because the supplier did not pay tax to the exchequer is defended with Section 16 compliance evidence and Madras HC precedent — credits retained without reversal.
Table 8 Mismatch Demand Avoided
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — historically the most-litigated audit finding — prepared with line-item backup so audit team has no basis to propose ITC reversal under Rule 36(4) or Section 16(2)(aa).
RCM Demand Pre-Empted
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA and director payments — paid in cash, ITC reclaimed in same period, fully documented. Egmore clients face no surprise RCM demand at audit stage.
E-Way Bill Compliance Demonstrated
For consignments above ₹50000, e-way bill register with vehicle number and route details produced — Rule 138 compliance evidenced; no penalty under Section 122(1)(xiv) for non-issuance.
Section 17(5) Reversals Pre-Booked
Blocked credits — motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property — identified and reversed in monthly GSTR-3B itself. No audit reversal demand.
Special Audit Cost Borne by Department
Where Section 66 special audit is ordered, the cost of the nominated CA is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5) — not by the taxpayer. Egmore clients pay only FilingPro's coordination and representation fee.
Comparison

Section 65 (Departmental) vs Section 66 (Special)

Why this matters here — In Egmore, the business activity radiating outward from Egmore Railway Station and nearby commercial pockets; with quick access via Egmore Railway Junction and feeder routes connecting Egmore to the rest of Chennai.

AspectSection 65 (Departmental)Section 66 (Special)
Who bears the audit costCost is borne by the department; no professional fee burden falls on the registered personExpenses including remuneration of the nominated professional are determined and paid by the Commissioner under Section 66(5)
Permissible defence themesReconciliation completeness, supplier-side bona fide credit per Suncraft Energy, jurisdictional discipline on procedural lapsesChallenge to recorded satisfaction of mis-declaration, opportunity of hearing under Section 66(3), Kranti Associates speaking-order standard
Onward escalation pathwayADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into DRC-01 then DRC-07; first appeal lies under Section 107 with ten per cent pre-depositADT-04 report feeds into Section 73 or 74 proceedings; final order is appealable under Section 107 on the same pre-deposit basis
Operative provisionSub-section (1) of Section 65 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 101 of the CGST RulesSub-section (1) of Section 66 of the CGST Act 2017 read with Rule 102 of the CGST Rules
Authority who orders the auditCommissioner or any officer empowered by general or specific authorisation drives the audit through internal departmental staffOfficer ranked Assistant Commissioner or above, on the Commissioner's prior approval, directs an externally nominated professional
Person who conducts the examinationDepartmental proper officer either visits the registered place or summons books to the officeAn external professional, drawn from the CA or CMA pool and nominated by the Commissioner, examines records for the department
Triggering preconditionSelection on risk parameters; no satisfaction of mis-declaration is required to commenceOpinion that value declared is not correct or credit availed is not within normal limits, recorded with reasons
Initiating form and notice windowForm ADT-01 served at least fifteen working days before commencement per Rule 101(2)Form ADT-03 issued as a direction; no fifteen-day buffer is prescribed since the audit is by a nominated professional
Time limit to completeThree months from commencement, extendable by six months by the Commissioner for reasons recorded in writingNinety days for submission of report by the nominated professional, extendable by another ninety days on application
Stage at which the engagement beginsAny time during the record-retention window under Section 36, generally any complete financial yearAt any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act per Section 66(1)
Concluding instrumentForm ADT-02 records findings; demand if any follows separately through DRC-01 under Section 73 or Section 74Form ADT-04 records the nominated auditor's report; subsequent action proceeds under Section 73 or Section 74 as appropriate
Bar on a second audit of the same periodDepartmental audit does not preclude action under other provisions; fresh material is generally needed to revisitSpecial audit may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted on the same period
Documents Required

Documents for GST Audit Support

Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Egmore clients.

12 months of GSTR-1 GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns for the audit period
Audited financial statements with Schedule III balance sheet and P&L
ITC ledger with Section 17(5) blocked-credit reversals and Table 8 GSTR-9 working
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 (for AATO above ₹5 crore)
E-way bill register for consignments above ₹50000 with vehicle and route details
RCM register — advocate fees GTA security director payments cash-paid and ITC-claimed
Ready to Get Started?
WhatsApp your documents to 9566-068-468 — our team begins within 24 hours. No office visit needed.
Share Documents on WhatsApp Call @ 9566-068-468 Send Enquiry Online
Statutory Deadlines

Compliance deadlines that matter

Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.

Deadlines in this neighbourhood — In Egmore, the cluster of healthcare, legal chambers, hospitality businesses that defines Egmore's commercial fabric.

Trigger eventDaysFormConsequence
Receipt of audit intimation in Form GST ADT-01 from the proper officer15 daysRecords preparation and place-of-business readinessAudit commences at the place of business or office of proper officer with or without taxpayer-side preparation; observations under Rule 101(4) may proceed on incomplete records
Date of commencement of audit under Explanation to Section 65(4)90 daysAudit completion by proper officerAudit must be completed within ninety days; extension up to six months by Commissioner-recorded order is the only safety valve
Conclusion of audit by the proper officer30 daysGST ADT-02 (findings communication)Proper officer must communicate findings, rights and obligations and reasons within thirty days; non-compliance vitiates the closure step
Service of ADT-01 by the proper officer15 daysRecords production at registered placeAudit commences on the date specified after the fifteen working day minimum notice; non-availability of records can trigger Section 122 proceedings for failure to maintain.
Direction for special audit by Commissioner90 daysADT-03 and audit reportNominated chartered accountant or cost accountant to submit the special audit report within ninety days extendable by another ninety days for sufficient cause shown by the auditor or the registered person.
Annual return due date for the financial year under audit2190 daysRecords retention obligationBooks of account and records must be retained for seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return; extends further if appeal, revision or proceeding is pending
Commencement of audit at the registered premises90 daysRecords walkthrough and reconciliationAudit ordinarily required to be completed within ninety days from commencement extendable by another ninety days by Commissioner for reasons recorded in writing.
Joint Commissioner approval recorded for invoking Section 66 special auditOn due dateADT-03 directionDirection issued in ADT-03 must be served on the registered person before nominee auditor commences work

Deadline pressure points we see in Egmore: Closer to Egmore, for Egmore businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Forms Library

Forms used in this engagement

GSTR-1Statement of outward supplies

Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow

11th of the next month (monthly) or 13th of the month following the quarter (QRMP) Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-3BSummary return

Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches

20th / 22nd / 24th of the next month based on State and turnover slab Common Portal (taxpayer)
GST ADT-01Notice for conduct of audit

Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available

Not less than fifteen working days prior to conduct of audit Jurisdictional proper officer not below the rank prescribed
GST ADT-02Audit report under Section 65

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of audit, rights and obligations and reasons for the findings; the formal closure document of departmental audit

Within thirty days of conclusion of audit Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GST ADT-03Direction for special audit

Direction issued by the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, to the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner

Issued during scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or other proceedings at any stage Officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner with Commissioner approval
GST ADT-04Communication of findings of special audit

Communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66; carries the nominee auditor's observations and the officer's view

After receipt of special audit report from nominee auditor Jurisdictional proper officer (officer-issued)
GSTR-9Annual return

Consolidated annual return capturing outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands/refunds; the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored

On or before 31 December of the year following the financial year Common Portal (taxpayer)
GSTR-9CReconciliation statement

Self-certified reconciliation between the value of supplies declared in the annual return and the audited annual financial statement, along with reconciliation of tax paid and ITC

Filed along with GSTR-9 by 31 December of the year following the financial year, where turnover exceeds five crore rupees Common Portal (self-certified by registered person)

GST Audit Support in Egmore, Chennai 600008

Egmore (PIN 600008) falls under the Egmore Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Statutory correspondence for Egmore businesses routes through the Egmore Division, so we align every GST Audit Support engagement to that jurisdiction from the start. Records we prepare for Egmore carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 13.0791, 80.2605, which map each submission back to this locality. Businesses registered in Egmore share the Chennai South jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Egmore Division each time.

The healthcare legal commercial central hub mix of Egmore shapes what lands in our workpapers — a blend of hospitality activity and the commercial pulse around Government Museum. Egmore sustains a high flow of commerce for a healthcare legal commercial central hub locality, and that flow is the raw material for the GST Audit Support files we close here. Freight and foot traffic from the Egmore Railway Junction hub pull steady daily commerce through Egmore, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this healthcare legal commercial central hub pocket. Vendors and customers tied to the Egmore Railway Junction network show up across the invoice trail we reconcile for Egmore GST Audit Support clients.

The business mix in Egmore centres on jewellery, and that sector carries its own GST Audit Support quirks we plan for in advance. jewellery units around Egmore share recurring GST Audit Support patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. We have closed enough GST Audit Support files for jewellery firms near Egmore to know where the department usually probes. The jewellery character of Egmore commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.

Document intake for Egmore clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a GST Audit Support engagement. Fixed-fee scoping means a Egmore business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement. Turnaround for Egmore GST Audit Support is deterministic — fixed fee, a scoped timeline, and a same-business-day acknowledgement once filed. From the first GST Audit Support cycle, a Egmore engagement is set up to be audit-ready rather than reconstructed under pressure later.

From the same Egmore team we also serve Nungambakkam and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. A client relocating between Egmore and Nungambakkam keeps the same GST Audit Support file and the same team. Serving Egmore and Nungambakkam from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. We treat Egmore and Nungambakkam as one catchment for GST Audit Support, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent.

The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Egmore are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Common patterns in the Egmore Division give Egmore businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues. Patterns we track for Egmore include government documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Egmore Division tends to raise. Recurring gaps in Egmore government records are the first thing our GST Audit Support review closes out.

A startup setting up near Egmore Railway Station in Egmore gets a GST Audit Support foundation built for the Egmore Division from day one. We onboard new Egmore entities onto a GST Audit Support cadence that is audit-ready from the very first cycle. When a Kilpauk business expands into Egmore, we extend its GST Audit Support setup to PIN 600008 without disruption. Relocating a registered office into Egmore (PIN 600008) changes the assessing division, and we handle that GST Audit Support transition cleanly.

4.9★
Average Rating
15+
Years Experience
500+
Active Clients
Zero
Penalty Instances
Expert Guide

GST Audit Support in Egmore — Complete Guide

For Egmore businesses receiving an ADT-01 audit notice under Section 65 of the CGST Act, the 15 working days notice window prescribed by Rule 101(2) is used by FilingPro to compile all 12 months of GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-9 returns, audited financials, ITC ledger with Section 17(5) workings and e-invoice IRN logs — so the audit team finds organised, reconciled records on day one.

GST Audit Support in Egmore, Chennai

Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Egmore businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.

GST Audit Consultant in Egmore — Section 65 and Section 66 Expert

A dedicated GST audit consultant in Egmore prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.

ADT-01 Notice Reply and ADT-02 Findings Defence in Egmore

On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.

GSTR-9C Self-Certification Expert in Egmore — Above ₹5 Crore Turnover

For Egmore businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.

Get Expert Help Today
Qualified professionals handle your GST Audit Support in Egmore. WhatsApp documents — we begin within 24 hours. From ₹5,000/one-time. Free consultation.
WhatsApp for Free Consultation Call @ 9566-068-468
From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming)
Key Facts — GST Audit Support in Egmore
Section 65 departmental audit handled end-to-end for Egmore clients — ADT-01 to ADT-04 closure with zero adverse demand.
15 working days notice window under Rule 101(2) used for full records compilation — no last-minute scramble at audit start.
GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books reconciliation prepared in advance — variances explained before the audit team raises queries.
Table 8 GSTR-9 ITC reconciliation tied line-item to GSTR-2B and audited books — no Table 8 mismatch demand.
Section 17(5) blocked-credit workings — motor vehicles personal use, food and beverages, club membership, works contract — pre-disclosed in audit file.
RCM register reconstructed for advocate, GTA, security and director payments — Section 9(3) compliance demonstrated to audit team.
E-invoice IRN logs reconciled with GSTR-1 for Egmore businesses above ₹5 crore AATO — Notification 10/2023 compliance evidenced.
ADT-02 findings replied with Tvl. Diya Agencies and Tvl. Raja Stores case-law where supplier-default ITC reversal is proposed.
DRC-03 voluntary closure filed where findings accepted — ADT-04 closure obtained without DRC-01 SCN escalation under Section 73/74.
Section 66 special audit coordination with Commissioner-nominated CA — 90-day report timeline managed with full record access.
People Also Ask — GST Audit Support in Egmore
What is the difference between Section 65 and Section 66 GST audit?
Section 65 is a departmental audit conducted by the Commissioner or an authorised officer at the place of business, with ADT-01 notice 15 working days in advance and 3-month completion (extendable to 6 months). Section 66 is a special audit ordered by an Assistant Commissioner (with Commissioner's approval) and conducted by an external Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, with 90-day report timeline (extendable by 90 days). Section 66 audit cost is borne by the Commissioner under Section 66(5).
How long must GST records be kept for audit?
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires retention for 6 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the registered person is party to any appeal, revision or proceeding, retention extends to one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later. Cancellation of registration does not extinguish this obligation.
What happens if I do not respond to ADT-01 audit notice?
Non-response leads to ex-parte audit on the basis of available returns and information. Findings communicated via ADT-02 will be unfavourable since the taxpayer's books and reconciliations are absent. The proper officer can then issue DRC-01 under Section 73 or 74 followed by adjudication order under Section 73(9) or 74(9) creating tax demand with interest and penalty.
Can I voluntarily pay tax based on audit findings?
Yes. Where ADT-02 findings are accepted, the short-paid tax along with interest under Section 50 (and applicable penalty) can be voluntarily paid through Form DRC-03 on the GST portal. The proper officer then issues ADT-04 closure order. Voluntary payment under DRC-03 also helps avoid the DRC-01 SCN route under Section 73 or 74.
Is GSTR-9C audit by a CA still mandatory?
No. From FY 2020-21 onwards (Finance Act 2021 amendments) GSTR-9C is self-certified by the registered person, not certified by an external CA. The reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is prepared and filed by the taxpayer alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December, where aggregate turnover exceeds ₹5 crore in the financial year.
Can the same period be audited twice under GST?
Generally no. Once Section 65 audit is completed and ADT-04 closure order is issued, the same period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Section 66 special audit is a separate power and may be ordered if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Which document sets does the audit team typically demand at ADT-01 stage?

Section 35 with Rule 56 obliges the registered person to keep the universe of tax invoices, stock and production registers, ITC workings, output liability schedules, RCM register, e-way bill logs, IRN files, Section 17(5) computations and matched bank statements ready for production.

What is the statutory record-retention horizon under GST?

Section 36 fixes the horizon at six years measured from the GSTR-9 due date for that year. Where any appeal, revision or proceeding remains pending, retention runs until one year after final disposal or six years, whichever event is later in time.

Can a second GST audit be conducted for the same period?

A second Section 65 audit of the same period is generally not undertaken absent fresh material. However, special audit under Section 66 may be ordered even where Section 65 audit was earlier conducted, and other proceedings under the Act remain available where conditions are met.

Does the audit have to take place at the taxpayer's premises?

Sub-section (1) of Section 65 allows the officer to elect between an on-premises audit and an office-of-the-officer audit. For most {{area_name}} taxpayers the on-site route is preferred so that books, statutory registers and electronic backups can be inspected together.

Is the audit unit the PAN or the individual registration number?

The audit unit is each GSTIN; assessment and book-keeping are GSTIN-specific even where the underlying PAN is common. The Tamil Nadu registration of a pan-India taxpayer is audited independently by the jurisdictional CGST or SGST authority covering that GSTIN.

What is the difference between ADT-02 and DRC-01?

ADT-02 is the audit-findings report under Rule 101(5) at the end of a Section 65 audit. DRC-01 is the show-cause notice issued under Section 73 or 74 read with Rule 142 to demand tax. ADT-02 findings, if disputed, mature into a DRC-01 SCN separately.

What Egmore clients want to know before signing: Closer to Egmore, in the healthcare legal commercial central hub micro-market of Egmore.

Expert Guide

A complete walkthrough — Gst Audit Support

Reading this guide locally — In Egmore, around the Egmore Railway Station catchment of Egmore.

What is a GST audit and where does it sit in the compliance architecture

Self-certification under GSTR-9C and its audit interplay

Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.

Comparative framework — VAT/CST audits versus GST audit

Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.

Statutory framework under Chapter XIII of the CGST Act

The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.

Rule 56 stock records

Reconstruction of stock records during audit

Where stock records under Rule 56(2) are incomplete or absent — a common scenario in SME manufacturing and trading — reconstruction during the ADT-01 fifteen-day window is the standard response. The reconstruction sources include purchase invoices and GSTR-2A entries (for inward stock), GSTR-1 outward supplies (for sales), e-way bill data (for stock movements), bank statements (for cash purchases or sales not invoiced through GST channels), and stock-take working papers from the statutory audit under the Companies Act or Section 44AB income tax audit. Reconstruction must be contemporaneous with the original transaction dates; backdated reconstruction is treated as fabrication by the audit team. The Tapas Dutta v UoI line of authority on retrospective records is occasionally invoked, but registered persons should not rely on it as a safe harbour.

Stock-difference treatment under Section 35(6) and Section 17(5)(h)

Where audit identifies stock differences — physical stock at audit visit differing from book stock — two provisions operate. Section 35(6) deems the unaccounted goods to have been supplied and attracts tax under Sections 73 / 74. Section 17(5)(h) blocks ITC on goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off, or disposed of by way of gift or free sample, requiring reversal of the ITC originally claimed. The audit team typically computes both legs — output tax on the deemed supply, and ITC reversal on the inward leg — leading to a double-impact. Voluntary disclosure of stock-differences with documented reasons (e.g. shrinkage, wastage, theft with FIR copy) limits the exposure; the audit team's discretion under Section 75 allows mitigation where reasons are substantiated.

Sectoral application of Rule 56(18) — jewellery, precious metals

Rule 56(18) applies to a narrow but high-revenue-risk band of trades — precious metals, precious stones, jewellery — where stock-record granularity is essential because of the high unit-value and pilferage-risk profile. The daily quantity-wise register must capture purity (in carats for gold), weight (in grams or pennyweights), make-charges component, hallmarking certificate references (BIS hallmark unique identification), and customer-wise sale-bill traces. Family-run jewellery businesses in particular often default to consolidated weekly or monthly stock summaries; this gap is the most common audit finding in jewellery-sector Section 65 audits in Tamil Nadu. Coordinated compliance with TCS under Section 206C(1F) at 1% on sales above ₹2 lakh adds an income-tax overlay to the stock-records architecture.

GSTR-9C self-certification interplay with audit

Self-certification regime from FY 2020-21

Notification 29/2021-CT and the Finance Act 2021 substitution of Section 35(5) shifted GSTR-9C from CA / CMA attested certification to self-certification by the registered person, effective from financial year 2020-21 onwards. The reconciliation statement now bears the signature of the registered person or the authorised signatory; the previous Part B CA-CMA certification has been dropped. The substantive contents of GSTR-9C — Part A (reconciliation between audited financial statements and GSTR-9, covering turnover Table 5, taxable value Table 7, tax payable Table 9, ITC Tables 12-14) and Part B (auditor certification, now omitted) — are otherwise broadly retained. The threshold for GSTR-9C continues to be aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, per Notification 16/2022-CT.

GSTR-9C as audit working paper

From the Section 65 audit-team perspective, GSTR-9C is the primary working paper that drives initial audit-topic selection. Table 5 turnover reconciliation surfaces unbilled-revenue, advance-receipt and inter-State stock-transfer issues. Table 7 taxable-value reconciliation surfaces classification and exemption-claim issues. Table 9 tax-payable reconciliation triggers rate-of-tax interrogation. Tables 12 to 14 ITC reconciliation drive Section 16 eligibility and Rule 42 / 43 apportionment audits. The audit team treats unexplained variances in any of these tables as priority interrogation topics; the registered person's strongest defence is a contemporaneous explanatory note attached to GSTR-9C addressing each material variance. CBDT Circular 8/2021 (in the AIS context, on reconciliation principles) and CBIC Circular 124/43/2019-GST on GSTR-9C format offer guidance.

Self-certification risk and director / signatory liability

The shift to self-certification has not reduced substantive accuracy expectations — Section 47(2) penalty for late filing applies, Section 35(5) (as amended) read with Section 122 attracts penalty for incorrect particulars, and Section 137 imposes personal liability on directors, partners and managers for company offences subject to the proviso on diligence. The signatory's diligence in reviewing the underlying GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C contents is now a personal-liability risk, where previously the CA / CMA certifier's professional liability provided an intermediating layer. The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines' principle of taxpayer self-assessment with audit verification is well-served by the self-certification design, but it shifts more responsibility onto the registered person's internal-control architecture.

Section 67 inspection and its relation to audit

Comparative framework — pre-GST excise / service tax and current GST

Pre-GST, the Central Excise Act Section 14 provided summons power, Section 18 search power, and Section 12F seizure power. Service tax under the Finance Act 1994 had similar provisions under Sections 82 (search) and 73 (recovery). The GST framework consolidates these into Section 67 with unified procedural architecture. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged a single-window enforcement architecture replacing the fragmented pre-GST regime; Section 67 substantively delivers that design. Comparative OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise that enforcement powers should be calibrated to the gravity of the suspected evasion, and the Indian framework's reason-to-believe-plus-Joint-Commissioner-rank gating mechanism aligns with that principle.

Section 67 framework and reason-to-believe trigger

Section 67 of the CGST Act empowers the proper officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner, upon reasons to believe recorded in writing, to inspect any place of business of a taxable person or any other person engaged in the business of transporting goods or owner or operator of a warehouse or godown, and to search and seize goods, documents, books and things. The Section 67 power is enforcement-oriented, triggered by suspicion of tax evasion (suppression of supply, claim of ITC in excess of entitlement, contravention of Act or rules), and is distinct from the verification-oriented Section 65 audit. The audit-to-inspection escalation occurs where Section 65 audit finds material gravity that the proper officer reads as warranting enforcement action under Section 67.

Audit-to-inspection escalation patterns

In practice, Section 65 audit findings escalate to Section 67 inspection where the audit team identifies indicators of deliberate evasion — fake invoicing patterns, circular trading rings, ITC claimed against suppliers whose registrations are cancelled or who have nil GSTR-3B filings (Suncraft Energy and downstream judicial line), classification mis-applications that appear deliberate. The escalation is not automatic; the proper officer must form a fresh reason-to-believe under Section 67(1) and record reasons. The Pradeep Goyal (Supreme Court on DIN — Document Identification Number for tax notices) framework requires the inspection authorisation to bear a valid DIN, failing which the action is voidable. The GKN Driveshafts (India) v ITO principle on opportunity-of-being-heard before invasive action is occasionally invoked but its application in the Section 67 context is restricted.

What Egmore clients usually ask next: Closer to Egmore, for Egmore businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Glossary

Plain-English glossary for this service

Departmental audit

Departmental audit is the audit conducted by the tax authorities under Section 65 of the CGST Act. The Commissioner or any officer authorised by general or specific order undertakes the audit at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. The substantive provision is Section 65 and the procedure is set out in Rule 101.

Special audit

Special audit is the audit ordered under Section 66 of the CGST Act where the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The audit is conducted by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.

ADT-01

ADT-01 is the statutory notice issued by the proper officer under sub-section (3) of Section 65 read with sub-rule (2) of Rule 101 informing the registered person of the institution of departmental audit. The notice must be served not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit and carries the period under audit, the place, the date and the records to be made available.

ADT-02

ADT-02 is the audit report under Section 65 communicated by the proper officer to the registered person within thirty days of conclusion of audit. It captures the findings of audit, the rights and obligations of the registered person, and the reasons for such findings. ADT-02 is the formal closure document of the departmental audit track.

ADT-03

ADT-03 is the direction issued under sub-section (1) of Section 66 read with sub-rule (1) of Rule 102 by which the proper officer, with prior approval of the Commissioner, directs the registered person to get his records examined and audited by a chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.

ADT-04

ADT-04 is the communication by the proper officer to the registered person of the findings of the special audit conducted under Section 66. It carries the observations of the nominee chartered accountant or cost accountant and the officer's view, and is the formal closure document of the special-audit track.

Nominee auditor

Nominee auditor is the chartered accountant or cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner under Section 66 to conduct the special audit. The registered person does not have a right to choose the nominee. The remuneration of the nominee is determined and paid by the Commissioner and such determination is final.

Aggregate turnover

Aggregate turnover is defined in clause (6) of Section 2 of the CGST Act and means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies, exempt supplies, exports of goods or services and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, computed on an all-India basis. The turnover threshold for GSTR-9C self-certification is computed on this basis.

GSTR-9

GSTR-9 is the consolidated annual return prescribed under Section 44 read with Rule 80(1). It captures outward and inward supplies, ITC availed and reversed, taxes paid and demands or refunds for the financial year. GSTR-9 is the primary statutory return on which audit observations are anchored.

GSTR-9C

GSTR-9C is the self-certified reconciliation statement prescribed under Rule 80(3) reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles tax paid and input tax credit. The threshold for applicability is aggregate turnover exceeding five crore rupees during the financial year.

Table 8 reconciliation

Table 8 of GSTR-9 captures the reconciliation between ITC available as per GSTR-2A or 2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B. The difference under Table 8D is a frequent audit observation track. The taxpayer is required to explain whether the difference is on account of timing, lapsed credit or supplier default.

Records availability for 6 years

Records availability for six years is the statutory retention obligation under Section 36 of the CGST Act. Every registered person required to maintain books of account under Section 35(1) must retain them until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal.

Cost of Non-Compliance

Real-world penalty exposure

Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.

ScenarioBase taxInterestPenaltyTotal
Section 122(1)(ii) penalty proposal of ₹3,00,000 on clerical invoicing irregularity; reduced on proportionalityNil (tax paid in time)Nil₹25,000 (Section 125 general penalty)₹25,000
Section 5(3) IGST on import of services from overseas online platforms ₹36,00,000 missed for two years₹6,48,000₹1,16,640 (18% over 12 months)Nil (Section 73(5) immunity invoked via DRC-03 before ADT-02)₹7,64,640
Section 47 late fee on GSTR-9 delayed by 90 days for ₹12 crore turnover entity; audit-flaggedNilNil₹18,000 (₹200 per day capped at 0.04% of turnover per Notification 7/2023)₹18,000
Records under Section 36 not retained for six years; ADT-01 audit unable to access two financial years of source data₹4,80,000 (best-judgement reconstruction)₹1,29,600 (18% over 18 months)₹25,000 (Section 125 general penalty)₹6,34,600
GSTR-9C self-certification not filed for FY 2021-22 by registered person above ₹5 crore aggregate turnoverNil (reconciliation only)Nil₹50,000 (₹25,000 CGST + ₹25,000 SGST under Section 47(2) capped)₹50,000
RCM on advocate fees of ₹14,00,000 under Section 9(3) not discharged across three financial years; audit-detected₹2,52,000₹68,040 (18% over 18 months)₹25,200 (10% of tax under Section 73(9) post-ADT-02)₹3,45,240

How Egmore businesses typically avoid these: Closer to Egmore, the business activity radiating outward from Egmore Railway Station and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Egmore businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

By Industry

Industry-specific patterns in Egmore

How the local trade mix shapes this — In Egmore, the business activity radiating outward from Egmore Railway Station and nearby commercial pockets.

Healthcare
Common issue: Hospitals and diagnostic chains face Section 65 audit complexity on the exempt healthcare versus taxable pharmacy and cafeteria arms. Rule 42 apportionment of common ITC between exempt healthcare services (Notification 12/2017-CT(R) entry 74) and taxable pharmacy supplies is frequently mis-computed using turnover ratio without segregating direct ITC, leading to large Rule 42(2) annual reversal proposals.
How we handle it: Adopt the two-step Rule 42 mechanism: identify D1 (exclusively exempt-use ITC) and D2 (exclusively taxable-use ITC) at invoice level and apply turnover ratio only on the common-use residual. Document the segregation policy as a board-approved SOP; reconcile annual Rule 42(2) reversal in GSTR-9 Table 7H and report in GSTR-9C.
Hospitality
Common issue: Hotel and restaurant chains face Section 65 audit issues on the dual-rate restaurant scheme (5% without ITC versus 18% with ITC for specified non-standalone restaurants per Notification 11/2017-CT(R) as amended). Mid-year scheme-switching, or restaurants within hotels charging room tariff above ₹7,500 per day, frequently leads to ITC eligibility disputes.
How we handle it: Maintain a daily room-tariff register evidencing the ₹7,500 threshold determination month-wise; lock in the restaurant scheme at financial-year start and avoid intra-year switching. For aggregator (Zomato/Swiggy) supplies under Section 9(5), reconcile aggregator-collected output GST against own GSTR-1 disclosure to avoid double-counting allegations.
Jewellery
Common issue: Jewellers under Section 65 audit face Rule 56(18) stock-register adequacy scrutiny — daily quantity-wise opening, additions, deductions and closing stock entries are mandated for precious metals and stones. Many family-run jewellers maintain only sale-bill registers, and the audit team computes notional value under Rule 28 for unreconciled stock differences.
How we handle it: Reconstruct Rule 56(18) registers using purchase bills, hallmarking-centre receipts, BIS-licence batch traces and karigar challans. Reconcile to the income-tax-side stock-statement filed in audited accounts; voluntarily disclose any genuine differential through DRC-03. Capture TCS under Section 206C(1F) at 1% above ₹2 lakh in parallel income-tax compliance.
Government
Common issue: Government-establishment vendors face Section 65 audits with REG-07 deductor mismatches as the primary trigger. Where the deductor captured a wrong GSTIN or omitted Section 51 TDS deduction, the vendor's cash ledger does not show the expected credit; audit teams treat the gap as suppressed output liability rather than as a deductor-side default.
How we handle it: Maintain a contract-wise REG-07 / GSTR-7 reconciliation register; pursue deductors for corrections through Section 51(3) certificate amendments. Cite Notification 50/2018-CT for the threshold and procedural framework; where deductor non-compliance is established, file a Section 75 representation explaining the gap as a third-party-non-compliance rather than vendor concealment.
Manufacturing
Common issue: Small manufacturers in industrial estates undergoing audit struggle with Rule 56 stock-records adequacy. Rule 56(2) requires a true and correct account of production, raw materials, finished goods and waste, but many SMEs maintain only tally inventory without the legally required day-wise production register, opening the door to estimated-suppression additions under Section 73.
How we handle it: Reconstruct Rule 56(2) registers using Tally batch data, weighbridge slips and electricity-consumption normative ratios well before the ADT-01 intimation period closes. Bundle the reconstruction with a contemporaneous reconciliation note explaining the SOP gap; voluntary DRC-03 payment of any genuine differential closes the issue at audit stage rather than at SCN.
Case Studies

Anonymised engagements we have handled

Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.

GSTR-9C defenceHospitality

GSTR-9C reconciliation defended at audit for a {{area_name}} hospitality group

Issue: A hotel group in {{area_name}} above the five-crore aggregate turnover threshold filed GSTR-9C with a turnover reconciliation difference of approximately seven lakh rupees explained as unbilled revenue. The ADT-01 audit team proposed treating the entire difference as suppressed taxable turnover with tax of approximately one lakh twenty-six thousand rupees.
Approach: We anchored the reply on Section 13(2) time-of-supply and demonstrated that the unbilled revenue was an accounting accrual recognised under Ind AS 115 but not a supply within Section 7(1) at the cut-off. Audited financials, room-occupancy registers and the subsequent period invoices were tied line-by-line.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the reconciliation; no tax demand was raised on the unbilled revenue head; the matter closed without DRC-01 escalation; turnover reconciliation discipline was carried into the next year.
Section 107 first appealRestaurants

Section 107 first appeal filed against an adverse ADT-02 demand for a {{area_name}} restaurant chain

Issue: A restaurant chain in {{area_name}} received an adverse Section 73 order of approximately nineteen lakh rupees following an ADT-02 finding on alleged misclassification of bundled food and beverage supplies under the five per cent restaurant scheme without ITC versus the eighteen per cent residual rate.
Approach: We filed Section 107 appeal with ten per cent pre-deposit confined to the disputed tax leg as governed by the Madras High Court ratio in Tvl Sri Murugan Trading. The grounds anchored on Notification 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as amended by Notification 13/2018, the AAAR ruling in Coffee Day Global on restaurant supplies, and the menu-card composition evidence.
Outcome: Appeal admitted within eighteen days; demand stayed pending hearing; pre-deposit confined to approximately one lakh ninety thousand rupees against a notional gross pre-deposit obligation of nearly three lakh forty thousand rupees.
Rule 42 reversalHealthcare

Section 17(2) common-credit reversal under Rule 42 defended at audit for a {{area_name}} mixed-supply hospital

Issue: A multi-specialty hospital in {{area_name}} faced an ADT-01 audit on alleged short reversal under Rule 42 of common credits relating to taxable pharmacy and exempt healthcare supplies, with a proposed reversal of approximately thirteen lakh rupees over a thirty-six-month window.
Approach: We reconstructed Rule 42 workings month by month using the prescribed D1 and D2 formulae, reconciled exempt-turnover ratios with audited financials, and demonstrated annual reconciliation under Rule 42(2) carried out before the September-following deadline. The Madras HC ruling on healthcare exemption under Notification 12/2017-CT(R) Sl 74 was filed.
Outcome: ADT-02 accepted the Rule 42 reconciliation; residual reversal of approximately one lakh eight thousand rupees on minor period slippages was paid through DRC-03; the bulk of thirteen lakh rupees was dropped.
Section 65(4) timelineHospitality

Three-year audit period closed in 47 days against the Section 65(4) ceiling of 90 working days

Issue: A Chennai hotel group with two GSTINs and ₹26 crore turnover received ADT-01 covering three FYs — 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22. The audit was scheduled to commence on 1st February. Section 65(4) caps the audit at 3 months extendable to 6 months by the Commissioner, and from our experience an audit drifting past 90 working days starts attracting deeper questioning as the officer feels pressure to justify findings. We targeted closure in under 60 working days.
Approach: We prepared an audit-management calendar — week 1 records walkthrough, week 2-3 outward and inward supply reconciliation, week 4 ITC reconciliation, week 5 RCM and blocked credit, week 6 working note on observations, week 7 ADT-02 drafting input. We delivered every requested document within 24 hours, maintained a single email chain with the audit officer, and proposed weekly Friday closure meetings. We also flagged our own adverse-finding expectations upfront so the officer was not surprised.
Outcome: ADT-02 was issued on day 47; total observations of ₹4.2 lakh across both GSTINs (mostly room-tariff classification under Notification 14/2022 for the year of the rate change); all accepted and paid through DRC-03; no Section 74 invocation; the office now uses this engagement as a template for audit-calendar planning across all departmental-audit clients.

Why these Egmore engagements look the way they do: Closer to Egmore, the cluster of healthcare, legal chambers, hospitality businesses that defines Egmore's commercial fabric, which is why for Egmore businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.

Client Reviews

What Egmore Clients Say

Ramanathan K
GST Audit Support
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Sundararajan M
GST Audit Support
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
3 months agoVerified Client
Kavitha S
GST Audit Support
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
6 weeks agoVerified Client
Venkatraman P
GST Audit Support
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
1 month agoVerified Client
Prabhakaran T
GST Audit Support
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
2 months agoVerified Client
Lakshmi V
GST Audit Support
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
4 months agoVerified Client
4.9
312+ reviews
500+
Active Clients
15+
Years Exp
5★
4★
3★
Common Questions

GST Audit Support FAQ — Egmore

Common questions from Egmore clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.

Under Section 66(5), the expenses of the special audit including the remuneration of the Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated for the audit are determined and paid by the Commissioner — not by the taxpayer. The taxpayer must, however, give the auditor full access to records and assistance during the audit.
Yes. Section 66(6) requires the registered person to be given an opportunity of being heard on any material gathered in the special audit which is proposed to be used in any proceeding. After the report, if the proper officer initiates a Section 73 or 74 demand based on the findings, the registered person can contest the demand through the regular SCN-reply-adjudication-appeal route.
Egmore (PIN 600008) falls under the Egmore Division, Chennai South commissionerate. Getting the jurisdiction right matters because registrations, filings and notices are routed through the correct office. We confirm and handle the right jurisdiction for every Egmore engagement.
Yes. Cancellation of registration under Section 29 does not extinguish the record-retention obligation under Section 36. Records covering periods up to the effective date of cancellation must be retained for 6 years from the due date of the relevant annual return. The department can audit cancelled registrations within this 6-year window.
Section 65 audit is conducted at the principal place of business as registered in REG-06. If the audit covers transactions of branches (additional places of business), the records of those branches must be produced at the principal place or made accessible to the audit team. Egmore businesses with branches outside Tamil Nadu must coordinate branch records to the audit venue.
Yes, we regularly take over part-completed GST Audit Support work. Share what has been done so far on WhatsApp 9566-068-468 and we will review it, point out anything that needs correcting, and continue from where you are.
GSTR-9C is the reconciliation statement between GSTR-9 annual return figures and the audited financial statements. From FY 2020-21 onwards, registered persons with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore in a financial year must self-certify and file GSTR-9C alongside GSTR-9 by 31st December of the following year. The earlier requirement of CA certification was withdrawn through the Finance Act 2021 amendments.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
Our work is led by Ravivarman R, a tax practitioner with 15+ years and 500+ engagements, backed by specialists in compliance and GST. We base every GST Audit Support recommendation on current law and your actual facts — not generic templates — and we are happy to explain the reasoning.
Generally no. Once a Section 65 audit has been completed for a period and ADT-04 has been issued, that period cannot be re-audited under Section 65. Special audit under Section 66 is a distinct power and may be invoked separately if the Assistant Commissioner forms an opinion on incorrect valuation or excess credit. Re-opening a closed Section 65 audit requires fresh material and is exceptional.
Yes — under Section 6 of the CGST Act and corresponding SGST provisions, cross-empowerment allows either CGST or SGST officers to conduct audit, and joint audits are increasingly common to avoid duplication. Where audit has been initiated by one authority, the same period generally cannot be audited again by the other authority for the same issues.
Yes. Every GST Audit Support engagement comes with a GST invoice and copies of all filings, acknowledgements and challans for your records. Egmore clients receive a clean, documented trail they can rely on later.
Section 66 allows an Assistant Commissioner (not below this rank) with prior approval of the Commissioner to direct a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant — nominated by the Commissioner — to audit a registered person where the officer is of the opinion that the value declared is not correct or the credit availed is not within the normal limits. The order is issued in ADT-03 and the auditor's report is submitted within 90 days, extendable by another 90 days.
ADT-03 is the order under Section 66(1) directing a special audit by a nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant. ADT-01 in contrast is the Section 65 departmental audit notice issued before the proper officer commences audit. ADT-03 is therefore an order — not a notice — and the audit is conducted by an external professional, not departmental officers.
Section 36 of the CGST Act read with Rule 56 requires every registered person to retain books of account and other records for 6 years from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the relevant financial year. Where the taxpayer is party to an appeal, revision or any proceeding, records must be retained for one year after final disposal or 6 years — whichever is later.
Three reconciliations are pivotal — GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B (outward supply consistency), GSTR-3B vs books (turnover and tax payment match), and GSTR-2B vs purchase register vs Table 8 of GSTR-9 (ITC eligibility). Variances are the most common audit findings, so these reconciliations should be prepared in advance and presented to the audit team in a documented format.
GST Audit Support near Egmore:

Across Egmore we look after firms on Adithanar Road, Arunachalam Street, Arunachallam Street, Casa Major Road and Dr Alagappa Road as well as the EVK Sampath Salai, Egmore High Road, EVR Periyar Salai and Gangadeeshwar Koil Street corridors — local GST Audit Support without the cross-city travel.

Free Consultation Available

Ready for Expert GST Audit Support in Egmore?

Professional GST Audit Support in Egmore, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.

From ₹5,000/one-time
15+ years experience
Zero penalties guaranteed
Maduravoyal · Nerkundram · Nolambur (upcoming)
Call Now WhatsApp