GST Audit Support cadence for Chepauk firms near Chepauk MRTS Station — with a documented, audit-ready process
Chepauk government and education units around MA Chidambaram Stadium — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
ADT-02 is the audit findings report issued under Rule 101(5) at the conclusion of a Section 65 audit. It records the findings of the proper officer along with reasons, taxpayer's rights and obligations, and any short-paid tax, wrong ITC or interest detected. ADT-02 is not a demand notice but a finding — demand follows separately via DRC-01 if findings are not accepted and discharged.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert GST Audit Support in Chepauk — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Our practice has handled departmental audits since the service tax and VAT era — deep institutional memory of jurisdictional CGST and SGST audit teams in Chennai, their typical findings and effective reply structures.
Every ADT-01 notice received by a Chepauk client is acknowledged within 24 hours and full records compilation begins under Rule 101(2). No last-minute scramble at audit start.
For audits conducted at the registered principal place of business, FilingPro consultants are present throughout — answering queries, producing records and protecting against adverse interpretations on the spot.
Table 8 of GSTR-9 — the reconciliation between GSTR-2A/2B and ITC availed in GSTR-3B — prepared in advance with documentary backup. Variances explained before audit team raises queries.
Motor vehicles for personal use, food and beverages, club memberships, works contract for immovable property and goods/services for personal use — all Section 17(5) blocked credits flagged and reversed in returns proactively.
Reverse charge on advocate fees, GTA, security services and director payments — register reconstructed for the audit period with cash payment evidence and ITC claim entries.
Every GST Audit Support engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Across Chepauk, the cluster of government, education, sports businesses that defines Chepauk's commercial fabric. Practitioners note that served by short connections to Triplicane and Royapettah and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Chepauk clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Across Chepauk, the business activity radiating outward from MA Chidambaram Stadium and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Chepauk: On the ground in Chepauk, for Chepauk businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.
Formal SCN summary served along with the detailed notice; captures the tax, interest and penalty proposed, the financial period and the grounds
Written reply by the registered person to a SCN issued in DRC-01; carries denial or admission, supporting documents and request for personal hearing
Summary of the adjudication order passed under Section 73 or 74 communicating the demand confirmed; the operative document for recovery and appeal computation
Memorandum of first appeal before the Appellate Authority against an order under Section 73, 74 or other adjudication arising from audit; carries grounds of appeal and pre-deposit details
Refund application used where audit closure or appellate decision results in pre-deposit refund or refund of tax paid in excess pursuant to favourable order
Monthly or quarterly statement of outward supplies — the primary source document for audit observations on tax payable, turnover declarations and B2B invoice flow
Monthly summary return capturing output tax, ITC availed and net tax payable — frequently the focus of audit observations on Table 4 ITC and Table 3 outward supply mismatches
Statutory notice issued by the proper officer informing the registered person of the institution of audit under Section 65; carries the period of audit, place, date and the records to be made available
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Sub-section (1) of Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by him through a general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, frequency and manner as may be prescribed. Sub-section (2) provides that the audit may be conducted either at the place of business of the registered person or at the office of the proper officer. It is to be noted that this provision is the substantive source of departmental audit jurisdiction and is read with Rule 101 for procedural mechanics.
View sourceSub-section (1) of Section 66 provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, the officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with prior approval of the Commissioner, direct the registered person to get the records including books of account examined and audited by a chartered accountant or a cost accountant nominated by the Commissioner.
View sourceSub-rule (1) of Rule 101 provides that the period of audit shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. Sub-rule (2) prescribes Form GST ADT-01 for the audit notice. Sub-rule (4) directs the proper officer, on conclusion of audit, to record the audit observations in his audit notes and to inform the registered person of the discrepancies, who may file his reply. Sub-rule (5) prescribes Form GST ADT-02 for communication of audit findings.
View sourceSection 74 governs the determination of tax not paid, short paid, erroneously refunded, or input tax credit wrongly availed by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. The limitation is extended to five years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year. Penalty equal to the tax demanded is leviable. It is to be noted that the higher penalty regime under this provision requires the proper officer to specifically allege and establish one of the three jurisdictional triggers.
View sourceSub-section (4) of Section 65 prescribes that the audit shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of the audit. The proviso permits the Commissioner, where satisfied that the audit cannot be completed within three months for reasons to be recorded in writing, to extend the period by a further period not exceeding six months. The expression date of commencement is defined in the Explanation to mean the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later.
View sourceSub-section (3) of Section 65 provides that the registered person shall be informed by way of a notice not less than fifteen working days prior to the conduct of audit. The notice is issued in Form GST ADT-01 as prescribed under Rule 101(2). It is to be noted that the fifteen-working-day window is a substantive procedural safeguard; commencement of audit proceedings without compliance with this timeline is a jurisdictional infirmity that may be agitated under Article 226.
View sourceChepauk is a government and education-heavy enclave home to the iconic Chidambaram Stadium University of Madras and Tamil Nadu government estates. For GST Audit Support at PIN 600005, understanding the Mylapore Division's documentation norms removes most of the friction from the process. Businesses registered in Chepauk share the Chennai South jurisdiction, and their statutory matters route through the same Mylapore Division each time. Every Chepauk engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600005, the Mylapore Division, and the coordinates 13.0612, 80.2785 that anchor the locality.
Chepauk reads as a government and education sector hub pocket with medium commercial activity, anchored around MA Chidambaram Stadium and fed by the Chepauk MRTS Station corridor. Document pickup near MA Chidambaram Stadium is a same-hour errand for our Chepauk engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Working in Chepauk brings a logistical edge: proximity to MA Chidambaram Stadium and the Chepauk MRTS Station corridor keeps physical document handling fast. Freight and foot traffic from the Chepauk MRTS Station hub pull steady daily commerce through Chepauk, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this government and education sector hub pocket.
sports units around Chepauk share recurring GST Audit Support patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. A sports operator in Chepauk gets a GST Audit Support workflow shaped by sector norms, not a one-size-fits-all template. For a sports business in Chepauk, the GST Audit Support scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. The sports character of Chepauk commerce influences everything from invoice formats to the supporting documents a GST Audit Support review needs.
The Chepauk GST Audit Support workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. We keep a repeatable GST Audit Support checklist for Chepauk so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. A Chepauk client sees the same GST Audit Support cadence each cycle: intake, reconciliation, review, filing, acknowledgement. Fixed-fee scoping means a Chepauk business knows the GST Audit Support cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
GST Audit Support clients in Royapettah are handled by the same practitioners who run our Chepauk desk. Businesses straddling Chepauk and Royapettah get a single GST Audit Support point of contact rather than two. Serving Chepauk and Royapettah from one team keeps GST Audit Support turnaround identical across the cluster. From the same Chepauk team we also serve Royapettah and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients.
Each engagement in Chepauk adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next GST Audit Support file. The GST Audit Support mistakes we see most in Chepauk are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. The longer we serve Chepauk, the more precisely we predict where a GST Audit Support file needs attention. Common patterns in the Mylapore Division give Chepauk businesses an early-warning map we use to pre-empt GST Audit Support issues.
New sports ventures in Chepauk lean on us to stand up GST Audit Support correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice. Shifting principal place of business to Chepauk means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. Incorporating in Chepauk comes with jurisdiction, registration and GST Audit Support steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. First-time GST Audit Support for a Chepauk business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
Section 65 departmental audit and Section 66 special audit representation for Chepauk businesses — ADT-01 notice handling, on-site audit support, ADT-02 reply drafting and DRC-03 closure under Rule 101 of the CGST Rules.
A dedicated GST audit consultant in Chepauk prepares Table 8 GSTR-9 reconciliation, Section 17(5) workings, RCM register reconstruction and litigation-grade documentary backup for the full 6-year Section 36 retention window.
On receipt of ADT-01, all 12 months of returns plus audited financials, ITC ledger and e-invoice IRN logs are compiled within the 15 working days notice window — and ADT-02 findings are replied with Section 16 case-law backing including Tvl. Diya Agencies.
For Chepauk businesses with aggregate turnover above ₹5 crore, GSTR-9C reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 is self-certified and filed before 31st December along with full Table 8 ITC tie-up.
Audit teams test month-wise D1 and D2 formulae under Rule 42, the annual true-up under Rule 42(2) before September following, and the recomputation against audited exempt-turnover ratios. Short reversal is treated as Section 17(2) violation attracting interest and penalty.
Yes. Section 66(1) permits ordering a special audit at any stage of scrutiny, enquiry, investigation or any other proceeding under the Act. The threshold satisfaction on incorrect value or abnormal credit must be recorded in writing before issuing ADT-03.
Sub-section (3) of Section 66 mandates a fair hearing before any material drawn from the special audit can be turned against the taxpayer. This pre-decisional opportunity is treated as jurisdictional; breach is routinely cured through Article 226 writ jurisdiction of the Madras High Court.
No. Schedule III to the CGST Act 2017 lists activities or transactions that are treated as neither supply of goods nor services, including services by employees in the course of employment, high-sea sales by endorsement before clearance, and certain other specified transactions.
No. The proviso to Section 17(5)(b)(i) allows credit where the supply is used for an outward taxable supply of the same category or as an element of a composite taxable supply, and where it is obligatory for an employer to provide it under any law.
It can. Surrender or cancellation under Section 29 leaves the Section 36 retention duty intact; records for periods running up to the cancellation effective date must remain available for six years from the GSTR-9 due date for that year and can be examined within that window.
What Chepauk clients want to know before signing: On the ground in Chepauk, in the government and education sector hub micro-market of Chepauk.
Reading this guide locally — Across Chepauk, in the government and education sector hub micro-market of Chepauk.
Until Finance Act 2021 amendments, Section 35(5) had required certification of GSTR-9C by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant for registered persons whose aggregate turnover exceeded the prescribed threshold. The Finance Act 2021 substituted Section 35(5) and amended Section 44, shifting GSTR-9C to a self-certified reconciliation statement filed by the registered person without third-party attestation, effective FY 2020-21 onwards (Notification 29/2021-CT). The reconciliation in GSTR-9C between audited financial statements and GSTR-9 annual return is now an internal-control disclosure; it does not substitute for departmental audit under Section 65. Audit teams treat GSTR-9C self-certified reconciliations as primary working papers — Table 5 (turnover reconciliation), Table 9 (tax payable reconciliation) and Table 12-14 (ITC reconciliation) become the starting points of Section 65 audit interrogation.
Pre-GST, the VAT regime in Tamil Nadu (Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006) had an audit framework under Section 64 with mandatory CA audit certificates for dealers above prescribed turnover, and the Central Sales Tax framework had limited audit coverage focused on inter-State transactions. The GST framework consolidates and rationalises this — a single audit under Section 65 covers central, State and integrated tax dimensions; the cooperative-federal architecture under Article 246A and 279A means the audit can be conducted by either the central or State authority but not both (Section 6 cross-empowerment). The OECD International VAT/GST Guidelines emphasise audit-efficiency through risk-based selection and digital data analytics, both of which the Indian framework has incorporated through GSTN-driven analytics and the GSTR-9C self-certification feed.
The audit framework under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 is contained in Chapter XIII, comprising Sections 65, 66 and 71. Section 65 provides for departmental audit, Section 66 for special audit by a Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant nominated by the Commissioner, and Section 71 for access to business premises by an authorised officer. The Empowered Committee 2009 First Discussion Paper had envisaged audit as the principal verification layer in a self-assessment regime, replacing the pre-GST pattern of routine assessment under the VAT/CST framework. The architecture is risk-based: not every registered person is audited; selection is driven by Section 65(2) read with internal CBIC risk-management directions which factor in turnover scale, sectoral risk profile, prior compliance history and reconciliation gaps surfaced in GSTR-9C self-certification. The audit-process closure under Section 65(7) feeds either into a no-objection certificate, a voluntary DRC-03 payment, or an SCN under Section 73 or Section 74 depending on whether tax has been short-paid, short-collected or wrongly availed as ITC.
Where one or more ADT-02 findings are disputed, the registered person prepares for the SCN under Section 73 or Section 74. The SCN response should be filed within thirty days of receipt of DRC-01; extensions are available under Section 73(8) or 74(8). The response should address each allegation with: (i) the factual position; (ii) the legal position with cited provisions and circulars; (iii) cited case law (Goetze, Bharti Airtel, Suncraft Energy, Aap and Co, GKN Driveshafts, Kranti Associates, Pradeep Goyal, Tapas Dutta — only where load-bearing); (iv) the quantum-mitigation argument (Section 73 versus Section 74 framing, limitation, computational errors). The personal-hearing under Section 75(4) is the consolidation step. The DRC-07 order then issues; first appeal under Section 107 follows for adverse outcomes.
Where the ADT-02 findings, the SCN under Section 73/74, or the DRC-07 adjudication order suffers from jurisdictional infirmity — absence of Commissioner approval for Section 66 special audit, breach of Section 65(4) audit-completion timeline, denial of Section 75(4) opportunity of hearing, absence of Section 75(6) reasoned order, absence of DIN under Pradeep Goyal, breach of natural justice under audi alteram partem — the registered person can file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court. The Aap and Co v UoI (Gujarat HC) and Asahi India Glass v UoI (P&H HC) line of authority offers guidance on writ entertainability in tax matters. The writ remedy is extraordinary and reserved for jurisdictional questions, not for merit-based challenges which belong in the statutory appellate hierarchy.
Section 84 of the CGST Act provides for the continuance and validation of certain recovery proceedings; it does not provide a formal settlement scheme akin to the income-tax Settlement Commission framework which existed pre Finance Act 2021. However, the GST Council has periodically recommended amnesty schemes for specific compliance categories — Notification 03/2023-CT and the surrounding family of notifications on late-fee waiver, the GSTR-9 late-fee amnesty, the registration-revocation amnesty under Notification 03/2023-CT, and the periodic Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme equivalent for legacy excise / service tax cases. The registered person facing an adverse audit closure should monitor GST Council recommendations (47th Chandigarh, 50th, 53rd and subsequent meetings) for amnesty windows that may offer settlement at reduced penalty quantum. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration recognises amnesty-and-voluntary-disclosure programmes as compliance-architecture tools.
Section 65(1) of the CGST Act empowers the Commissioner, or any officer authorised by general or specific order, to undertake audit of any registered person for such period, at such frequency and in such manner as may be prescribed. Rule 101(2) of the CGST Rules read with Section 65(3) requires that the registered person be given not less than fifteen working days prior notice of audit through Form GST ADT-01. The ADT-01 intimation specifies the period proposed to be audited (typically one financial year, occasionally a longer span) and the documents to be made available — books of account, invoices, declarations, returns, GSTR-9C reconciliation statement, internal-audit reports if any. The fifteen-day window is the registered person's opportunity to gather records and seek extension on documented grounds; Rule 101(3) implicitly contemplates such extensions where genuinely warranted.
Section 65(2) provides that the audit shall be conducted at the place of business of the registered person or in the office of the proper officer. The period covered is generally one financial year; multi-year audits are permissible where risk parameters warrant. Rule 101(1) limits the audit to a financial year unless the Commissioner specifically directs otherwise. The frequency of audit selection is risk-driven — the CBIC's Audit Manual (2019, periodically updated) directs Commissionerates to combine GSTN risk-engine outputs with sectoral profiles and prior-audit findings. Persons whose aggregate turnover crosses prescribed risk thresholds, or who have triggered specific red flags (large refund claims, sharp ITC growth versus output growth, GSTR-2A versus GSTR-3B mismatches), are prioritised. The GST Council 47th Chandigarh meeting (June 2022) had recommended a more nuanced risk-based selection to reduce small-taxpayer compliance burden.
Section 65(4) requires that the audit under Section 65 shall be completed within three months from the date of commencement of audit. The Commissioner is empowered to extend this period by a further six months for reasons recorded in writing; the maximum total audit-cycle is therefore nine months from commencement. 'Commencement of audit' is defined in the Explanation to Section 65(4) as the date on which records and documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. This definition is significant for the registered person — timely document submission tightens the audit timeline and prevents prolonged uncertainty; the OECD Forum on Tax Administration best-practice benchmarks similarly emphasise audit-cycle time as a taxpayer-rights consideration.
The income-tax framework has a parallel under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961 — special audit can be directed where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the nature and complexity of the accounts, the volume of accounts, doubts about the correctness of the accounts, multiplicity of transactions in the accounts or specialised nature of business activity, is of the opinion that it is necessary in the interests of revenue. Pre-GST excise had Section 14A; service tax had Section 72A. The architectural unity across these provisions is that special audit is a complexity-triggered intervention requiring a substantive opinion plus a procedural safeguard. The OECD Forum on Tax Administration documents a similar 'specialist audit' tier in several mature tax jurisdictions, reserved for complex high-revenue cases.
Section 66(1) of the CGST Act provides that if at any stage of scrutiny, inquiry, investigation or any other proceedings, any officer not below the rank of Assistant Commissioner, having regard to the nature and complexity of the case and the interest of revenue, is of the opinion that the value has not been correctly declared or the credit availed is not within the normal limits, he may, with the prior approval of the Commissioner, direct such registered person by communication in writing to get his records including books of account examined and audited by a Chartered Accountant or a Cost Accountant as may be nominated by the Commissioner. The trigger requires both a substantive opinion (value mis-declaration or abnormal credit) and a procedural pre-condition (Commissioner's prior approval); the registered person can challenge either limb in a Section 75 representation.
Once the Section 66(1) opinion is formed and Commissioner's approval obtained, Section 66(2) requires the nominated Chartered Accountant or Cost Accountant to submit a report duly signed and certified, in such form as prescribed (Form ADT-04), within ninety days; this period can be extended by a further ninety days on application by the registered person or the CA/CMA, with the Commissioner's permission. Section 66(3) requires that the registered person be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on the basis of the special audit and proposed to be used in any proceeding against him. Section 66(4) clarifies that the expenses of the examination and audit, including remuneration of the CA/CMA, shall be determined and paid by the Commissioner. Section 66(5) preserves the proper officer's power to take further proceedings (SCN under Section 73 / 74) on the basis of the special audit findings.
What Chepauk clients usually ask next: On the ground in Chepauk, for Chepauk businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.
Date of commencement of audit is defined in the Explanation to sub-section (4) of Section 65. It is the date on which the records and other documents called for by the tax authorities are made available by the registered person, or the actual institution of audit at the place of business, whichever is later. The ninety-day completion clock runs from this date.
Conclusion of audit is the point at which the field-verification and records-examination work under Section 65 is finished. The thirty-day clock for issuance of ADT-02 under sub-section (6) of Section 65 starts running from conclusion. Conclusion is distinct from the date of communication of findings.
Period of audit under sub-rule (1) of Rule 101 shall be a financial year or part thereof or multiples thereof. A multi-year audit is permissible where the audit notice in ADT-01 specifies the periods covered. The earliest period audited typically corresponds to records retention horizon under Section 36.
Audit notes are the contemporaneous record maintained by the proper officer during the conduct of audit under Rule 101. Discrepancies recorded in the audit notes are communicated to the registered person under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101 with an opportunity to reply before the findings are crystallised in ADT-02.
Discrepancy memo is the informal communication, contemplated under sub-rule (4) of Rule 101, by which the proper officer informs the registered person of observations recorded during audit. The registered person files a written reply with supporting reconciliations before ADT-02 is issued.
Books of account refer to the records required to be maintained under sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the CGST Act — accounts of production or manufacture, inward and outward supply, stock, ITC availed, output tax payable and paid. Maintenance at the principal place of business is the default; additional places require records of the additional location.
Records retention under Section 36 is the obligation to preserve books of account and other records until the expiry of seventy-two months from the due date of furnishing the annual return for the financial year. Where appeal or revision is pending, retention extends until one year after final disposal of the proceeding.
Self-certification under Rule 80(3) is the framework that, with effect from 1 August 2021, replaced mandatory audit by a chartered accountant or cost accountant for GSTR-9C. The registered person self-certifies the reconciliation statement; the substantive content of GSTR-9C continues to be governed by the form.
Reconciliation statement is the document filed in Form GSTR-9C reconciling the value of supplies declared in the annual return with the audited annual financial statement. It also reconciles the tax payable as per the financial statement with the tax declared in the annual return and the input tax credit availed with the credit reflected in books.
DRC-01A is the pre-show-cause-notice intimation prescribed under sub-rule (1A) of Rule 142. Part A is the officer's quantification of tax ascertained as payable on the basis of audit observations; Part B is the registered person's reply or acceptance. DRC-01A is the principal off-ramp before formal proceedings under Section 73 or 74.
DRC-03 is the voluntary-payment intimation prescribed under sub-rule (2) and (3) of Rule 142. It is filed where the registered person makes voluntary payment of tax, interest or penalty including pre-SCN deposit under Section 73(5) or 74(5). DRC-03 is the principal vehicle for closing out audit observations without formal adjudication.
Section 73(5) deposit is the voluntary payment made by the registered person, on his own ascertainment or on ascertainment by the proper officer, before issuance of a show-cause notice. The deposit, when made along with applicable interest under Section 50, results in no penalty being leviable under Section 73(9).
Numerical examples showing tax + interest + penalty across common default scenarios.
How Chepauk businesses typically avoid these: On the ground in Chepauk, the cluster of government, education, sports businesses that defines Chepauk's commercial fabric; for Chepauk businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.
How the local trade mix shapes this — Across Chepauk, the cluster of government, education, sports businesses that defines Chepauk's commercial fabric.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Chepauk engagements look the way they do: On the ground in Chepauk, the cluster of government, education, sports businesses that defines Chepauk's commercial fabric; for Chepauk businesses balancing growth ambitions with tight statutory compliance.
“Received an ADT-01 audit notice for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22. FilingPro compiled all 24 months of returns, reconciled GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B vs books and prepared Table 8 GSTR-9 working before the audit team arrived. ADT-02 had only minor findings — closed via DRC-03 with no demand notice.”
“Our ITC of ₹38 lakh was being questioned because some suppliers had not filed GSTR-1. FilingPro defended the credit citing Tvl. Diya Agencies and demonstrated Section 16 compliance with payment evidence. Audit team accepted the position — full ITC retained.”
“Section 66 special audit was ordered for our trading business. FilingPro coordinated with the Commissioner-nominated CA, gave full record access, prepared Section 17(5) workings and RCM register. Final report had no adverse findings on valuation or ITC.”
“GSTR-9C self-certification for our ₹12 crore turnover business was handled by FilingPro for FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24. Reconciliation between audited financials and GSTR-9 was tight — no Table 8 difference, no HSN summary gap. Filed before 31 December both years.”
“E-way bill register was incomplete for 4 months during the audit period — a serious finding under Section 65. FilingPro reconstructed the register from transporter LRs and warehouse logs, presented documentary backup to the audit team and avoided what would have been a substantial penalty.”
“Audit demand of ₹6.5 lakh was raised on RCM not paid for advocate fees over 3 years. FilingPro filed Section 107 first appeal with 10% pre-deposit, defended that the advocate was salaried and not in independent practice. Demand was set aside at first appellate stage.”
Common questions from Chepauk clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Chepauk, from Babu Jagjivanram Salai, Bharathi Salai, Anna Salai (Mount Road), Kamarajar Salai and Napier Bridge to the Rajaji Salai, Besant Road, Blackers Road and Dr Natesan Road commercial pockets, with GST Audit Support handled end to end.
Professional GST Audit Support in Chepauk, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.