Professional HUF Formation for Thoraipakkam businesses near OMR Toll Plaza — on fixed, transparent fees
Professional HUF Formation in Thoraipakkam (PIN 600097), Chennai by qualified experts with a 15+ year, zero-penalty record. Call 9566-068-468.
Yes for Section 44AD (small business presumptive at 6% / 8% of turnover up to ₹3 crore) — HUF is expressly an "eligible assessee" if resident. Section 44ADA (professional presumptive at 50% of gross receipts up to ₹75 lakh) is restricted to "resident individual, HUF or partnership firm (other than LLP)" — resident HUF is therefore eligible for 44ADA. Section 44AE (transport presumptive) is also available subject to vehicle ownership conditions.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert HUF in Thoraipakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
HUF deed records succession clause — on death of Karta, senior-most coparcener (male or female under post-2005 amendment) automatically becomes Karta. Bank mandate, PAN signatory and family signature panel pre-mapped for seamless succession.
HUF current or savings account opened at scheduled commercial bank — Karta KYC, Form 49A PAN, deed copy, member mandate. Net banking, FD nomination, cheque book and joint operation rules set up for Thoraipakkam families.
Partition pathway clearly documented — only total partition under Section 171(3) recognised; partial partitions after 31-Dec-1978 ignored under Section 171(9). Section 47(i) and Section 49(1)(i) tax effects pre-explained for future planning.
HUF defaults to new regime under Section 115BAC; Form 10-IEA opt-out available. FilingPro compares old vs new every year for the family — Chapter VI-A deductions (Section 80C, 80D, 80G, 24(b)) often tip the balance to old regime.
First year HUF return prepared — ITR-2 for capital gains, house property and other sources; ITR-3 for HUF business or profession. Section 80C (₹1.5L), Section 80D mediclaim and Section 24(b) interest claimed. Section 87A rebate correctly excluded (only resident individuals).
Share Karta's PAN / Aadhaar, member photos and corpus details on WhatsApp at 9566-068-468 — we draft deed, file PAN, open bank account entirely remotely. Thoraipakkam families work without a single office visit.
Every HUF Formation engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, and with quick access via Thoraipakkam Bus Stop and feeder routes connecting Thoraipakkam to the rest of Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Thoraipakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where the cluster of it services, e-commerce, residential businesses that defines Thoraipakkam's commercial fabric.
Deadline pressure points we see in Thoraipakkam: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
Application to assessing officer for recognition of total partition
Self-declaration for treaty benefits where HUF earns foreign income
Statement of Specified Financial Transactions by reporting entities involving HUF
Permanent Account Number application for newly created HUF
Foundational instrument declaring constitution of Hindu Undivided Family
Return of income for HUF without business income
Return for HUF having proprietary business or professional income
Tax audit report for HUF crossing prescribed turnover threshold
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Classifies Hindu Undivided Family as a distinct juridical person for income-tax assessment, separate from individual coparceners.
Defines taxable income of resident HUF including global income; non-resident HUF taxed only on Indian-sourced receipts.
Class I heirs hold preferential right when one heir proposes transfer of inherited HUF immovable asset.
Converts limited estate of Hindu woman into absolute ownership, impacting HUF property held by female members.
Post 2005 amendment confers equal coparcenary rights on daughters by birth, validated by Vineeta Sharma judgment 2020.
Property held by Karta or coparcener for benefit of family is excluded from benami transaction definition.
Records we prepare for Thoraipakkam carry the geo-zone 600xx tag and coordinates 12.9381, 80.2390, which map each submission back to this locality. Because PIN 600097 sits inside the Chennai South jurisdiction, the handling office for Thoraipakkam stays consistent across years, which matters when filings or approvals span cycles. Thoraipakkam (PIN 600097) falls under the Mylapore Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. The 600xx geo-zone covering Thoraipakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Most commerce in Thoraipakkam — invoices, expenses, purchases and statutory records — eventually surfaces in the HUF working file we maintain for clients here. Commercial activity in Thoraipakkam runs high, so HUF volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Thoraipakkam desk accordingly. Thoraipakkam reads as a it corridor residential and retail pocket with high commercial activity, anchored around Karapakkam-Thoraipakkam Road and fed by the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop corridor. Each HUF Formation cycle for Thoraipakkam reflects its commercial rhythm — invoices generated near Karapakkam-Thoraipakkam Road, expenses routed through the Thoraipakkam Bus Stop freight network.
For a retail business in Thoraipakkam, the HUF Formation scope is rarely generic; we tailor the checklist to how that sector actually transacts. HUF Formation for retail businesses in Thoraipakkam hinges on getting the sector's recurring entries right the first time. The business mix in Thoraipakkam centres on retail, and that sector carries its own HUF Formation quirks we plan for in advance. Mixed retail activity across Thoraipakkam means our HUF team keeps sector playbooks ready rather than improvising per client.
Document intake for Thoraipakkam clients runs over WhatsApp, so there is no office visit and no paper shuffle for a HUF Formation engagement. Our Thoraipakkam HUF process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle. We keep a repeatable HUF checklist for Thoraipakkam so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Fixed-fee scoping means a Thoraipakkam business knows the HUF Formation cost up front, with no surprise additions mid-engagement.
Serving Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi from one team keeps HUF Formation turnaround identical across the cluster. We treat Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi as one catchment for HUF Formation, which keeps documentation and turnaround consistent. From the same Thoraipakkam team we also serve Kandanchavadi and other nearby localities without re-onboarding clients. Group companies spread across Thoraipakkam and Kandanchavadi consolidate their HUF under one engagement with us.
Patterns we track for Thoraipakkam include hospitality documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Mylapore Division tends to raise. Sector signals in Thoraipakkam — seasonal hospitality swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule HUF work. Each engagement in Thoraipakkam adds to a record of what the Chennai South jurisdiction expects, sharpening the next HUF file. Because we work repeatedly across Thoraipakkam, we can benchmark a new client's HUF Formation position against the locality norm.
For a new business incorporating in Thoraipakkam or shifting its principal place of business here, HUF Formation setup is one of the first things to get right. When a Perungudi business expands into Thoraipakkam, we extend its HUF setup to PIN 600097 without disruption. Incorporating in Thoraipakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and HUF steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. New retail ventures in Thoraipakkam lean on us to stand up HUF Formation correctly before the first deadline rather than after a notice.
HUF Formation in Thoraipakkam for Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh families is delivered with a Mitakshara-compliant HUF deed declaring Karta, members and coparceners (including post-Vineeta Sharma 2020 daughter coparceners), Form 49A PAN allotment, Section 56(2)(x) compliant corpus and bank account opening.
A dedicated HUF formation consultant in Thoraipakkam drafts the deed, files Form 49A PAN, opens the bank account, audits the family for Vineeta Sharma 2020 daughter-coparcener compliance, and maps Section 64(2) clubbing implications of any conversion of self-acquired property into HUF property.
For families considering total partition under Section 171 of the Income-tax Act, FilingPro drafts the partition deed, files the Section 171(2) application before the Assessing Officer for a Section 171(3) order, computes Section 47(i) and Section 49(1)(i) cost-of-acquisition treatment for distributed assets, and ensures partial partitions barred under Section 171(9) are not inadvertently triggered.
Karta declaration drafted with Hindu law authority — senior-most coparcener (post-2005 male or female under Vineeta Sharma) — and bank account opened in HUF name with Form 49A PAN, KYC of Karta, and authorised member mandate. Standing instructions, FD nomination and net banking access set up for Thoraipakkam families.
Yes, an HUF is entitled to Section 80D deduction up to the prescribed ceiling on health-insurance premium paid out of HUF funds for any member of the HUF, including the karta, his spouse and the coparceners; the deduction operates independently of individual claims.
An HUF cannot itself be a partner in a partnership firm; the karta may be a partner in his representative capacity for the HUF, and the share-of-profit is then assessable in the HUF's hands as the beneficial owner of the partnership interest.
If the HUF deed is lost, a fresh declaration may be executed reciting the family composition, corpus source and prior existence of the HUF with reference to bank, PAN and tax records evidencing continuity; the new declaration is archived as the operative document.
The karta cannot be unilaterally replaced; he may voluntarily resign from kartaship with the next senior coparcener assuming the role, or the family may by family settlement effect a transition; a karta-change deed records the transition for evidentiary purposes.
On the death of the sole male coparcener leaving only female members, the HUF cannot be perpetuated under Sandhya Rani Dutta unless an antecedent HUF with male coparceners existed; the assets devolve on the heirs under the Hindu Succession Act 1956.
Yes, an HUF can advance a loan to a member at an arm's-length rate of interest with proper documentation; the interest received is HUF income and the loan does not constitute a partial partition if structured as a documented financial transaction.
What Thoraipakkam clients want to know before signing: Closer to Thoraipakkam, on the Perungudi-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Thoraipakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Thoraipakkam businesses operate where on the Perungudi-Sholinganallur corridor that passes through Thoraipakkam.
Within the HUF structure, the law distinguishes between coparceners and members. Coparceners are persons who acquire a birth-right in the joint family property and who can demand partition; members are those who are part of the family but do not have this birth-right. Prior to the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005, only male descendants up to four generations from a common male ancestor were coparceners; female members such as wives, mothers, daughters and daughters-in-law were members but not coparceners. The 2005 amendment, which inserted Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act in its present form, made daughters coparceners by birth on the same footing as sons — including the right to demand partition, the right to dispose of their coparcenary share by will, and the obligation to be a party to any partition. The Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma (2020) 9 SCC 1 conclusively held that this right is retrospective and does not require the father coparcener to be alive on the date of the 2005 amendment.
Once recognised, the HUF is taxed as a person entirely separate from its Karta and members under Section 4 of the Income Tax Act, with its own Permanent Account Number, its own return of income under Section 139, and access to the basic exemption limit available to individuals (₹2.5 lakh under the old regime; ₹3 lakh under the default new regime as amended by Finance Act 2023). This separateness is the principal tax-planning rationale for forming an HUF: a family that earns income from ancestral property, joint investments, or a family-owned business can split that income between the individual Karta and the HUF, with each entity getting an independent slab benefit. However, the Supreme Court in CWT v Chander Sen (1986) 161 ITR 370 (SC) and the earlier decision in CIT v Sandhya Rani Dutta (2001) 248 ITR 201 (SC) significantly narrowed the scope of automatic HUF inheritance after the 1956 Hindu Succession Act, holding that property inherited under Section 8 of the 1956 Act is taken as individual property and not as HUF property.
The Hindu Undivided Family is one of the seven categories of persons enumerated in Section 2(31) of the Income Tax Act 1961, appearing specifically at clause (ii) immediately after individuals and before companies. Unlike the Companies Act 2013 or the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008, no statute creates the HUF — it is a creature of personal law derived from the Mitakshara and Dayabhaga schools of Hindu jurisprudence, which the Income Tax Act merely recognises as a separate assessable entity for the purpose of taxation. The Supreme Court in Surjit Lal Chhabda v CIT (1975) 101 ITR 776 (SC) held that a Hindu joint family is an entity of immemorial antiquity and that an HUF can come into existence in the moment of marriage of a male Hindu, with the family expanding upon birth of children. The Act does not define HUF itself but borrows the concept entirely from substantive Hindu law, which is why the formation of an HUF is governed by Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 1956 and the Hindu Succession Act 1956 rather than the Income Tax Act.
Once operational, an HUF must comply with the same calendar of Income Tax obligations as any other taxpayer: TDS payment by the 7th of the following month and TDS return filing quarterly under Rule 31A; advance tax in four instalments under Section 211 by 15 June (15 per cent), 15 September (45 per cent), 15 December (75 per cent) and 15 March (100 per cent) where annual tax exceeds ₹10,000; income tax return under Section 139(1) by 31 July (if no audit) or 31 October (if subject to tax audit under Section 44AB); tax audit by 30 September where applicable; and Form 10-IEA filing if the HUF wishes to opt out of the default new regime and continue under the old regime for the year. An HUF subject to tax audit must obtain DSC in the Karta's name for filing the audit report and return.
Opening a bank account in the HUF's name requires the HUF deed (declaration of formation), HUF PAN card, Karta's KYC documents (PAN and Aadhaar), photographs of the Karta and adult members, address proof of the HUF (typically the Karta's address), and a board resolution-equivalent — that is, a declaration by all adult coparceners authorising the Karta to operate the account. Most public sector banks and major private banks have standard HUF account opening forms. The account is operated by the Karta only — coparceners do not have independent signing authority unless specifically authorised by the Karta in writing. Internet banking, debit card and cheque book are issued in the Karta's name as authorised signatory of the HUF, with the HUF as the account holder.
Common errors in early HUF administration include: (1) treating the HUF account as the Karta's personal account and mixing personal expenses with HUF expenses, which during tax scrutiny may lead the Assessing Officer to treat the HUF as a sham entity and tax all income in the Karta's hands; (2) not maintaining separate books of account, asset registers and bank reconciliations for the HUF as required for any business or property-holding entity; (3) accepting gifts from non-relatives exceeding ₹50,000 without recognising the Section 56(2)(x) taxability; (4) treating salary income of the Karta as HUF income, which is impossible because salary is earned by a natural person against personal services; and (5) failure to file Form 10-IEA in time, resulting in mandatory taxation under the new regime even though the old regime would have been more beneficial.
Salary income under Section 15 of the Income Tax Act arises from an employer-employee relationship, which presupposes a natural person rendering personal services in exchange for remuneration. An HUF is a legal abstraction — it cannot perform personal services and cannot stand in an employer-employee relationship. Consequently, salary earned by the Karta or any coparcener is the personal income of that individual and cannot be diverted to the HUF. The Supreme Court in CIT v Kalu Babu Lal Chand (1959) 37 ITR 123 (SC) clarified that even where the Karta uses HUF property in carrying out his employment duties (such as a company director using HUF capital invested in the company), salary or director's remuneration earned by the Karta from the employer is the Karta's personal income and not HUF income. This is a fundamental limitation that families with primarily salary-based income should consider when assessing the value of forming an HUF.
Professional income under Section 28(i) read with Section 44AA — income from a profession requiring personal qualification such as medicine, law, chartered accountancy, architecture, engineering — cannot accrue to an HUF for the same reason as salary. The professional qualification attaches to the individual and not to the family. An HUF can however own assets used in a profession (such as clinic premises let to a doctor who pays rent to the HUF, or library and equipment used by a lawyer who pays user charges to the HUF), and the rent or user charges so received is taxable in the HUF's hands as house property or other income. The professional fees earned by the qualified individual remain his personal income subject to his own slab rates and Section 44ADA presumptive scheme.
A Karta's powers to gift HUF property are restricted under Hindu personal law — the Privy Council in Guramma v Mallappa (1964) and the Supreme Court in numerous subsequent decisions held that a Karta cannot gift coparcenary property except within narrow exceptions of marriage of female members (within reasonable limits), performance of indispensable religious duties, and benefit of the family. A Karta who gifts substantial HUF property outside these exceptions exposes the gift to challenge by coparceners and to reversal by court. For tax planning, this means an HUF cannot freely transfer assets to non-members or to charitable causes outside the scope of permitted gifts — unlike an individual who has full alienation rights over his own property subject only to inheritance law constraints.
An HUF is resident in India under Section 6(2) of the Income Tax Act if its control and management is wholly or partly in India during the relevant year; it is resident and ordinarily resident if the Karta has been resident in India in two out of the preceding ten years and has been present in India for 730 days or more in the preceding seven years. An HUF with an NRI Karta is therefore typically treated as resident if any control and management is exercised from India, but may be classified as resident but not ordinarily resident or as non-resident depending on the Karta's status and the actual locus of decision-making. This has implications for FEMA — an HUF with an NRI Karta is subject to specific reporting requirements for property purchases and bank accounts under the Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations 2018.
An HUF cannot itself be a partner in a partnership firm under the Indian Partnership Act 1932 — the Supreme Court in Rashiklal v CIT (1998) 229 ITR 458 (SC) confirmed that a partnership is a contractual relationship between individual persons, and an HUF is not a juristic person capable of entering into a contract of partnership. However, the Karta of an HUF can be a partner representing his HUF — in which case the share of profits and interest earned by the Karta in the partnership flows to the HUF as the real owner, while the Karta is the nominal partner for legal purposes. The remuneration earned by the Karta from the firm under Section 40(b) is however his personal income, not HUF income, by application of the Kalu Babu Lal Chand principle. This bifurcation between profit share (HUF income) and remuneration (Karta's personal income) is a settled and often litigated area.
An HUF can hold shares in a company in its own name through the Karta and is the registered shareholder for company law purposes — the Companies Act 2013 recognises an HUF as eligible to hold shares. Dividend received by the HUF is taxable in its hands at slab rates after the abolition of dividend distribution tax by Finance Act 2020. However, if the Karta is also a director or employee of the company in which the HUF holds shares, his director's sitting fees or executive remuneration is his personal income — even if his appointment as director was secured by virtue of the HUF's shareholding. The Supreme Court in CIT v D N Bhatlawande and similar cases consistently held that personal qualifications and personal services give rise to personal income regardless of how the appointment was arranged.
What Thoraipakkam clients usually ask next: Closer to Thoraipakkam, for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
The manager and head of HUF who represents the family in all dealings with outside world including tax authorities, banks, and contracts. Traditionally the senior-most male coparcener, but post 2016 Delhi HC and 2020 Vineeta Sharma SC rulings, the senior-most coparcener including female can be Karta. Karta has full authority but is accountable to other coparceners.
Persons in the HUF who are not coparceners but are entitled to maintenance and share on partition. Typically includes wives of coparceners and married daughters in pre-2005 era. Members cannot demand partition or become Karta but receive their share when partition is effected. Their share once received is tax exempt in their hands under Section 10(2).
Property inherited up to 4 generations of male lineage from father, grandfather, great-grandfather, and great-great-grandfather, automatically forming HUF property in which coparceners have right by birth. Distinct from self-acquired property which is owned absolutely by the acquirer. Ancestral property forms the natural corpus of HUF without triggering Section 64(2) clubbing.
Property acquired by an individual through his own efforts or skill or from sources unconnected with ancestral property. The owner has absolute right to dispose of it as he wishes. If self-acquired property is converted to HUF property without adequate consideration, Section 64(2) clubbing applies on all subsequent income from such property in the individual's hands.
Transfer of money or property by an individual to HUF without consideration. Under Section 56(2)(x) any gift above Rs 50000 from a non-relative is taxable. HUF is treated as relative of its members for this purpose. However gifts by member or coparcener of own self-acquired property to own HUF trigger Section 64(2) clubbing on subsequent income, defeating the benefit.
The act of an individual converting his self-acquired property into HUF property of which he is a member, also called throwing property into the common hotchpot. Section 64(2) treats this as a transfer for clubbing purposes: corpus stays with HUF but all income from converted property is clubbed in individual's hands permanently until partition.
The Income Tax Act provision recognising partition of HUF. Sub-section (3) requires the Assessing Officer to pass an order acknowledging the partition after enquiry. Only complete partition is recognised post 1980 amendment, partial partition under Section 171(9) is disallowed for tax purposes from 31-December-1978 onwards.
Partition of only some HUF assets or among only some members keeping HUF in existence for the rest. Section 171(9) inserted by Finance (No.2) Act 1980 deems such partial partition as never having taken place for tax purposes. The income from partitioned property continues to be assessed in HUF hands. Only complete partition gives tax relief.
An HUF that automatically comes into existence within a larger HUF when a coparcener gets married and starts his own coparcenary line. The smaller HUF consists of the married coparcener, his wife, and any children. It can have separate PAN and ITR if documented properly. Existence is by operation of law but documentation through deed and separate PAN is essential for tax recognition.
Synonym for smaller HUF, the HUF formed by a male descendant within a larger ancestral HUF along with his own wife and children. Each branch can have its own assessment as separate entity. The corpus of the branch HUF typically comes from the share received on partial or complete partition of the parent HUF, or from independent ancestral inheritance.
The school of Hindu law that governs Hindus across most of India except Bengal and Assam. It creates coparcenary by birth where sons (and post 2005 amendment also daughters) acquire right in ancestral property at the moment of birth. This birthright is the foundation of HUF as separate assessable entity for income tax purposes.
The school of Hindu law that traditionally governs Hindus in Bengal and Assam region. Coparcenary arises only on death of father, sons have no birthright in ancestral property during father's lifetime. This creates difficulty for income tax HUF status during Karta's lifetime since there is no coparcenary to assess separately. Mitakshara declaration is often adopted for tax purposes.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Thoraipakkam engagements look the way they do: Closer to Thoraipakkam, the business activity radiating outward from OMR Toll Plaza and nearby commercial pockets, which is why for Thoraipakkam IT-services firms managing export-LUT cycles alongside payroll and TDS.
“Wanted to form HUF for our textile family business. FilingPro drafted the deed on Mitakshara lines, included my daughter as coparcener under Vineeta Sharma 2020, filed Form 49A and opened the HUF current account at ICICI. Saved ₹62,000 in tax in the very first year through HUF basic exemption and 80C.”
“Inherited ancestral property from my late father. FilingPro confirmed it qualified as HUF property under Mitakshara, drafted the HUF deed declaring me as Karta with my wife and two children as members, filed PAN in HUF name. Now rental income is taxed in HUF separately — clean structure.”
“After my husband's demise, I needed clarity on whether I could be Karta of our HUF. FilingPro walked me through Vineeta Sharma 2020 — confirmed I am the senior-most coparcener and can be Karta. Updated the deed, changed bank mandate, filed ITR-2 in HUF name. Deeply grateful for the patient guidance.”
“Was about to "throw" my mutual fund portfolio into HUF for tax savings. FilingPro flagged Section 64(2) clubbing — the LTCG would still be taxed in my hands until partition. Saved me from a costly mistake and instead structured corpus through my father's gift — fully Section 56(2)(x) exempt.”
“Our family wanted to do a partial partition of one rental property out of the HUF. FilingPro showed us Section 171(9) — partial partitions after 1978 are not recognised. Restructured as a total partition application under Section 171(2), AO passed Section 171(3) order, every member got definite shares. No Section 64 surprises later.”
“Our HUF was filing ITR for years but no formal deed existed. Banks were asking for documentation. FilingPro drafted retrospective HUF deed declaring corpus from my father-in-law's gift in 2014, notarised, opened proper HUF account at HDFC. Compliance gaps closed cleanly.”
Common questions from Thoraipakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
Our HUF clients in Thoraipakkam are spread right across the locality — along Eshwaran Koil Street, Eswaran Kovil Street, Kumaran Kudil Main Road, Pillaiyar Kovil Street and Raju Nagar 3rd Street, and through the Raju Nagar 6th Street, Sakthi Srinivasan Salai Main Road, Secretariat Colony Main Road and Subramanya Nagar Street Road business stretches — so wherever your premises sit, expert help is close by.
Professional HUF Formation in Thoraipakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.