Qualified HUF for Medavakkam (PIN 600100) and adjacent Velachery — and a zero-penalty filing record
Professional HUF Formation in Medavakkam (PIN 600100), Chennai — fixed fee, deterministic turnaround and archived working papers. Call 9566-068-468.
Section 171 of the Income-tax Act 1961 is the only mechanism by which partition of an HUF is recognised for tax purposes. Sub-section (1) requires that an HUF assessed as such continues to be assessed as HUF until an order under Section 171(3) records a total partition. Sub-section (9) (inserted by Finance (No. 2) Act 1980) abolishes recognition of partial partitions effected after 31 December 1978 — they are simply ignored, and income continues to be taxed in HUF's hands. Total partition must be in goods and area, not in income alone.
Fixed fees · Zero hidden charges · Call 9566-068-468 for a custom quote.
Swipe to see all plans
Prices exclude GST. For enterprise pricing, call 9566-068-468.
Expert HUF in Medavakkam — qualified professionals, 15+ years experience, zero-penalty track record.
Partition pathway clearly documented — only total partition under Section 171(3) recognised; partial partitions after 31-Dec-1978 ignored under Section 171(9). Section 47(i) and Section 49(1)(i) tax effects pre-explained for future planning.
HUF defaults to new regime under Section 115BAC; Form 10-IEA opt-out available. FilingPro compares old vs new every year for the family — Chapter VI-A deductions (Section 80C, 80D, 80G, 24(b)) often tip the balance to old regime.
First year HUF return prepared — ITR-2 for capital gains, house property and other sources; ITR-3 for HUF business or profession. Section 80C (₹1.5L), Section 80D mediclaim and Section 24(b) interest claimed. Section 87A rebate correctly excluded (only resident individuals).
Share Karta's PAN / Aadhaar, member photos and corpus details on WhatsApp at 9566-068-468 — we draft deed, file PAN, open bank account entirely remotely. Medavakkam families work without a single office visit.
Our team has formed and partitioned HUFs since the 2005 Amendment, through Vineeta Sharma 2020, and into the Section 115BAC era. Hindu law, Income-tax Act and Companies Act read together — treatment grounded in primary statutes and Supreme Court rulings, not internet templates.
HUF deed drafted on Mitakshara lines with Karta declaration, member roll (Karta, wife, sons, daughters, daughter-in-law, mother), coparcener list (sons + post-2005 daughters), corpus statement, and management clauses — executed on non-judicial stamp paper and notarised.
Every HUF Formation engagement delivers measurable, guaranteed outcomes — expert professionals, on time, every time.
Why this matters here — Medavakkam businesses operate where the cluster of residential, retail, healthcare businesses that defines Medavakkam's commercial fabric, and served by short connections to Velachery and Sholinganallur and onward to central Chennai.
Share documents via WhatsApp to 9566-068-468. No office visit required for Medavakkam clients.
Miss any of these and the next consequence kicks in automatically.
Deadlines in this neighbourhood — Medavakkam businesses operate where the business activity radiating outward from Medavakkam Junction and nearby commercial pockets.
Deadline pressure points we see in Medavakkam: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Foundational instrument declaring constitution of Hindu Undivided Family
Return of income for HUF without business income
Return for HUF having proprietary business or professional income
Tax audit report for HUF crossing prescribed turnover threshold
Quarterly statement of TDS on non-salary payments by HUF deductor
Declaration for nil TDS on interest income by HUF below threshold
Payment of self-assessment, advance and regular tax by HUF
Deposit of TDS deducted by HUF on contractor or rent payments
Every claim on this page can be traced back to a section or rule below.
Levies tax on total income of every HUF at slab rates applicable to individuals, with separate basic exemption.
Defines order of heirs when Hindu female dies intestate, relevant for ascertaining HUF assets devolution.
Declaration deed creating HUF requires payment of stamp duty as per state schedule, typically affidavit value.
Establishes valid Hindu marriage which is foundational requirement for constituting a Hindu Undivided Family unit.
Gifts exceeding fifty thousand received by HUF from non-relatives are taxable; gifts from members are excluded.
Governs devolution of self-acquired property on Class I heirs including widow, sons, daughters and mother equally.
Medavakkam is a fast-growing south-Chennai residential pocket with expanding retail along the Velachery-Tambaram Road, IT-adjacent residential demand and growing healthcare clinics. GST clients are typically retail, restaurants and small services. Medavakkam (PIN 600100) falls under the Tambaram Division of the Chennai South, the jurisdiction that handles statutory matters for businesses at this PIN. Every Medavakkam engagement we open begins with the basics: PIN 600100, the Tambaram Division, and the coordinates 12.9197, 80.1953 that anchor the locality. The 600xx geo-zone covering Medavakkam groups several locality clusters under common administration, keeping documentation expectations predictable.
Medavakkam sustains a medium flow of commerce for a fast growing residential retail locality, and that flow is the raw material for the HUF files we close here. Commercial activity in Medavakkam runs medium, so HUF volumes scale through peak months and we staff the Medavakkam desk accordingly. Document pickup near Medavakkam Junction is a same-hour errand for our Medavakkam engagements rather than the half-day a typical Chennai client expects. Freight and foot traffic from the Medavakkam Junction hub pull steady daily commerce through Medavakkam, so there is rarely a quiet filing month in this fast growing residential retail pocket.
healthcare units around Medavakkam share recurring HUF patterns — input-credit timing, vendor reconciliation, and sector-specific documentation. Sector concentration matters: when Medavakkam leans toward healthcare, the HUF risks cluster around the same few line items each cycle. Because Medavakkam hosts a cluster of healthcare businesses, we benchmark each new HUF Formation engagement against patterns we already track for the locality. The business mix in Medavakkam centres on healthcare, and that sector carries its own HUF Formation quirks we plan for in advance.
The Medavakkam HUF Formation workflow is documented end-to-end: WhatsApp document intake, a working file, qualified review, and a filed acknowledgement back to you. The qualified-review step on every Medavakkam HUF file is where errors get caught before they reach the portal. We keep a repeatable HUF checklist for Medavakkam so nothing in the cycle is improvised or missed. Our Medavakkam HUF process is built to be predictable, documented, and on time, cycle after cycle.
HUF Formation clients in Sholinganallur are handled by the same practitioners who run our Medavakkam desk. Group companies spread across Medavakkam and Sholinganallur consolidate their HUF under one engagement with us. Businesses straddling Medavakkam and Sholinganallur get a single HUF point of contact rather than two. Coverage from Medavakkam naturally extends to Sholinganallur, so group entities across the area share one HUF Formation workflow.
The longer we serve Medavakkam, the more precisely we predict where a HUF file needs attention. The HUF Formation mistakes we see most in Medavakkam are avoidable with disciplined intake, which our checklist enforces. Sector signals in Medavakkam — seasonal education swings and peak-period volumes — shape how we schedule HUF work. Patterns we track for Medavakkam include education documentation gaps, timing mismatches, and the questions the Tambaram Division tends to raise.
Relocating a registered office into Medavakkam (PIN 600100) changes the assessing division, and we handle that HUF Formation transition cleanly. Incorporating in Medavakkam comes with jurisdiction, registration and HUF steps that we sequence so nothing stalls the launch. Shifting principal place of business to Medavakkam means updating jurisdiction to the Chennai South, and we manage the paperwork end-to-end. First-time HUF Formation for a Medavakkam business is where getting the basics right saves years of cleanup later.
HUF Formation in Medavakkam for Hindu, Buddhist, Jain and Sikh families is delivered with a Mitakshara-compliant HUF deed declaring Karta, members and coparceners (including post-Vineeta Sharma 2020 daughter coparceners), Form 49A PAN allotment, Section 56(2)(x) compliant corpus and bank account opening.
A dedicated HUF formation consultant in Medavakkam drafts the deed, files Form 49A PAN, opens the bank account, audits the family for Vineeta Sharma 2020 daughter-coparcener compliance, and maps Section 64(2) clubbing implications of any conversion of self-acquired property into HUF property.
For families considering total partition under Section 171 of the Income-tax Act, FilingPro drafts the partition deed, files the Section 171(2) application before the Assessing Officer for a Section 171(3) order, computes Section 47(i) and Section 49(1)(i) cost-of-acquisition treatment for distributed assets, and ensures partial partitions barred under Section 171(9) are not inadvertently triggered.
Karta declaration drafted with Hindu law authority — senior-most coparcener (post-2005 male or female under Vineeta Sharma) — and bank account opened in HUF name with Form 49A PAN, KYC of Karta, and authorised member mandate. Standing instructions, FD nomination and net banking access set up for Medavakkam families.
Gifts from members of the HUF to the HUF are excluded from Section 56(2)(x) under the relative-definition explanation; however, Section 64(2) clubbing may apply on the income from the gifted property where the conversion is without adequate consideration.
Yes, an HUF can carry on business as a distinct assessable person, claim all ordinary business expense deductions under Chapter IV-D and even claim the karta's reasonable remuneration as a deductible expense where supported by a bona fide arrangement.
Yes, the Supreme Court in Jugal Kishore Baldeo Sahai v CIT (1967) 63 ITR 238 held that the karta's remuneration under a bona fide arrangement for services rendered is deductible as a business expenditure of the HUF; the same amount is taxable in the karta's hands.
Yes, an HUF can register under GST as a person under Section 2(84) of the CGST Act 2017 with the karta as authorised signatory; HUF PAN, the HUF deed and the karta's identity proof are the foundational documents for the REG-01 application.
Yes, an HUF with income above the basic exemption limit is required to file a separate return on its own PAN, typically Form ITR-2 or ITR-3 depending on the income heads; the karta verifies the return on behalf of the HUF.
On full partition under Section 171, each coparcener takes the asset at the cost step-in under Section 49(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act 1961, namely the cost at which the asset was held by the HUF; the holding period also carries over for capital-gain computation.
What Medavakkam clients want to know before signing: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — in the fast-growing residential retail micro-market of Medavakkam.
Reading this guide locally — Medavakkam businesses operate where around the Medavakkam Junction catchment of Medavakkam.
The Hindu Undivided Family is one of the seven categories of persons enumerated in Section 2(31) of the Income Tax Act 1961, appearing specifically at clause (ii) immediately after individuals and before companies. Unlike the Companies Act 2013 or the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008, no statute creates the HUF — it is a creature of personal law derived from the Mitakshara and Dayabhaga schools of Hindu jurisprudence, which the Income Tax Act merely recognises as a separate assessable entity for the purpose of taxation. The Supreme Court in Surjit Lal Chhabda v CIT (1975) 101 ITR 776 (SC) held that a Hindu joint family is an entity of immemorial antiquity and that an HUF can come into existence in the moment of marriage of a male Hindu, with the family expanding upon birth of children. The Act does not define HUF itself but borrows the concept entirely from substantive Hindu law, which is why the formation of an HUF is governed by Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act 1956 and the Hindu Succession Act 1956 rather than the Income Tax Act.
Indian Hindu personal law operates under two distinct schools: the Mitakshara school, which applies across India except West Bengal and Assam, and the Dayabhaga school, which applies in West Bengal and Assam. Under Mitakshara law, a son acquires an interest in ancestral property by birth itself — coparcenary is created the moment a male child is born into the family, and after the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005, daughters too acquire coparcenary status by birth. Under Dayabhaga law, no interest by birth is recognised; a son acquires rights in ancestral property only on the death of the father. This distinction matters for HUF taxation because under Mitakshara, an HUF can include the Karta, his wife, sons, daughters (post-2005) and their descendants up to three generations as coparceners. The Income Tax Department in its Circular No 717 of 1995 and subsequent administrative interpretation has consistently followed the Mitakshara framework for Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and other southern states.
Within the HUF structure, the law distinguishes between coparceners and members. Coparceners are persons who acquire a birth-right in the joint family property and who can demand partition; members are those who are part of the family but do not have this birth-right. Prior to the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005, only male descendants up to four generations from a common male ancestor were coparceners; female members such as wives, mothers, daughters and daughters-in-law were members but not coparceners. The 2005 amendment, which inserted Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act in its present form, made daughters coparceners by birth on the same footing as sons — including the right to demand partition, the right to dispose of their coparcenary share by will, and the obligation to be a party to any partition. The Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma (2020) 9 SCC 1 conclusively held that this right is retrospective and does not require the father coparcener to be alive on the date of the 2005 amendment.
An HUF should be considered for partition and closure when the family relationships have deteriorated to the extent that joint decision-making is no longer feasible, when the original purpose of forming the HUF (such as holding a specific business or property) has ceased, when the children have moved to different countries and joint Indian residence-based planning is no longer efficient, when the tax-saving rationale has weakened (for example, after the increase in basic exemption under the new regime which has reduced the marginal value of slab-splitting for many taxpayers), or when a substantial Section 64(2) clubbing risk has been identified that frustrates the HUF's tax planning purpose. Partition under Section 171 is the only recognised exit route, and its consequences in terms of capital gains exemption (Section 47(i)), cost basis for the recipient (Section 49(1)(i)), and joint and several liability for pre-partition tax (Section 171(6)) should be carefully evaluated before initiating the process.
An HUF can be dissolved only through total partition recognised under Section 171(3) of the Income Tax Act — there is no equivalent of voluntary winding up that applies to companies or LLPs. A partition may be effected by an instrument in writing recognised by the family (partition deed registered under Section 17 of the Registration Act 1908 where immovable property is involved), by a decree of court in a partition suit, by family settlement followed by mutual transfer of assets, or by oral arrangement followed by separate enjoyment of allotted shares (though oral partition of immovable property faces evidentiary difficulties and may not be honoured by tax authorities without supporting documentation). Once partition is recognised and recorded by the Assessing Officer under Section 171(3), the HUF ceases to exist as an assessable entity from the date of partition.
An HUF has perpetual existence in principle — new members join automatically by birth, marriage or adoption, and the HUF continues as long as there is at least one coparcener and at least one other member (or even just one coparcener post-Vineeta Sharma, since a sole surviving coparcener can constitute the HUF with the prospect of future expansion). On the death of the Karta, the next senior coparcener becomes the Karta without any formal change in the HUF's identity — the PAN remains the same, the bank account continues with a change in operating signatory, and the income tax record continues without interruption. The HUF's continuity through generations is one of its principal differentiating features from a partnership (which dissolves on death of any partner under Section 42 of the Partnership Act unless otherwise agreed) or a trust (which terminates when the trust property is exhausted or the trust period ends).
A third route to HUF formation is through a gift or testamentary bequest made expressly to a person and his family or to the HUF of a specific Karta. The donor must clearly express the intention that the property is given to the donee as HUF property and not as individual property — case law from CIT v M K Stremann (1965) 56 ITR 62 (Madras) and CIT v Arvind Narottam (1969) 76 ITR 419 (Gujarat) holds that the donor's intention is decisive. A gift from a father to his son specifying that the gift is for the son and his branch of the family will create HUF property in the son's hands, even if no HUF previously existed in the son's name. Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act provides important relief: gifts received by an HUF from any of its members are not treated as income in the HUF's hands, which is the cornerstone of HUF-based tax planning through corpus formation by way of member gifts.
Although Hindu personal law does not require any deed to bring an HUF into existence, in practice a written HUF deed is essential for opening a bank account, obtaining PAN, registering for GST, dealing with property transactions and demonstrating the existence of the HUF to third parties including the Income Tax Department. A typical HUF deed is a declaration executed by the Karta on stamp paper of appropriate value (₹100 to ₹500 depending on State stamp law), reciting the date and place of marriage of the Karta, names and relationships of all coparceners and members, the source of the initial corpus (whether self-acquired contribution, ancestral property, gift received, or partition allocation), the appointment of the Karta and his powers, and the address of the family. The deed is typically notarised though not compulsorily registered under the Registration Act 1908 unless it deals with immovable property. The deed is evidentiary and not constitutive of the HUF.
The most common and least disputed method of HUF formation is automatic creation by operation of law upon the marriage of a male Hindu. The Supreme Court in Gowli Buddanna v CIT (1966) 60 ITR 293 (SC) held that a single male and his wife constitute a Hindu Undivided Family even before the birth of any child, and the Apex Court in Surjit Lal Chhabda reaffirmed that a man may have an HUF for income-tax purposes consisting only of himself and his wife. No deed, registration or declaration is required for this automatic formation — the HUF is born when the marriage is solemnised under the Hindu Marriage Act 1955. However, for tax compliance purposes the HUF must obtain its own PAN under Section 139A by filing Form 49A in the name of the HUF, with the Karta signing as the authorised person. Without a PAN, the HUF cannot open a bank account, cannot file a return, and cannot enter into any contractual relationship in its own name.
The Karta has wide powers of management over HUF property — he can carry on family business, contract debts for legal necessity, manage agricultural operations, and enter into ordinary transactions. However, his powers are not absolute. For alienation of immovable HUF property by sale, mortgage or gift, the Karta must establish either legal necessity, benefit of the estate, or performance of indispensable religious duties — the trilogy of grounds laid down by the Privy Council in Hunooman Persaud v Mussumat Babooee (1856) and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Sunil Kumar v Ram Prakash (1988) 2 SCC 77. A Karta cannot gift HUF property to a member except within reasonable limits for marriage or religious purposes. Karta's transactions in the ordinary course bind the HUF and all coparceners, but for sale of immovable property the principle of legal necessity remains a precondition that a purchaser is expected to verify.
For income tax purposes, the Karta is the authorised signatory for the HUF under Rule 12 of the Income Tax Rules read with Section 140(b) of the Act. The Karta signs and verifies the return of income on behalf of the HUF; in his absence, where the Karta is mentally incapacitated or out of India, any other adult member of the family may verify the return. The Karta also represents the HUF in all proceedings before tax authorities under Section 282 read with Section 286, receives all notices in the HUF's name, and is the person liable to pay any tax demand though such liability is limited to the HUF property in his hands. For GST registration under Section 25 of the CGST Act, the Karta files Form REG-01 in the HUF's name with his PAN and Aadhaar for KYC, and Digital Signature Certificate or Electronic Verification Code for authentication.
The Karta's personal liability for HUF debts is limited to the extent of his coparcenary interest in the HUF property, subject to the doctrine of pious obligation which has been substantially modified by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005. Section 6(4) of the amended Hindu Succession Act expressly abolishes the doctrine of pious obligation in respect of debts contracted after 20 December 2004, meaning sons are no longer liable for their father's debts on grounds of pious obligation for any such post-amendment debt. For income tax demands raised against the HUF, Section 171(6) provides that on partition of the HUF, every member becomes jointly and severally liable for the tax assessed for the period before partition, but each member's share of liability is in proportion to the share of joint family property allotted to him on partition.
What Medavakkam clients usually ask next: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
Synonym for smaller HUF, the HUF formed by a male descendant within a larger ancestral HUF along with his own wife and children. Each branch can have its own assessment as separate entity. The corpus of the branch HUF typically comes from the share received on partial or complete partition of the parent HUF, or from independent ancestral inheritance.
The school of Hindu law that governs Hindus across most of India except Bengal and Assam. It creates coparcenary by birth where sons (and post 2005 amendment also daughters) acquire right in ancestral property at the moment of birth. This birthright is the foundation of HUF as separate assessable entity for income tax purposes.
The school of Hindu law that traditionally governs Hindus in Bengal and Assam region. Coparcenary arises only on death of father, sons have no birthright in ancestral property during father's lifetime. This creates difficulty for income tax HUF status during Karta's lifetime since there is no coparcenary to assess separately. Mitakshara declaration is often adopted for tax purposes.
Supreme Court 3-judge bench judgment dated 11-August-2020 in Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma holding that daughters have coparcenary rights in ancestral property by birth equally with sons, and the Hindu Succession Amendment Act 2005 is declaratory and retrospective. Daughter's right exists regardless of whether father was alive on 9-September-2005, overruling earlier Prakash vs Phulavati 2015 view.
Daughter recognised as coparcener under amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act 2005 with same rights as a son including the right to claim partition, right to demand share, and right to become Karta of HUF if eldest coparcener. Post Vineeta Sharma 2020 ruling, this right is by birth and applies even to daughters born before 2005 amendment.
Companies (Significant Beneficial Owner) Rules 2018 require disclosure of natural person who is SBO of company shareholders. When HUF holds shares, the HUF itself cannot be reported as SBO because it is not a natural person. Lookthrough is mandatory: the Karta or controlling coparcener as natural person is reported in BEN-2. HUF entity name is not the SBO.
Exemption available to a member of HUF for any sum received as share from HUF income or on partition. Rationale is that HUF has already paid tax on such income at HUF level, taxing it again in member's hands would be double taxation. Exemption is limited to the share itself, subsequent income earned on the share in member's hands is fully taxable in his slab.
HUF gets the same Section 80C deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh per year as an individual, available against investments by HUF in PPF (only existing accounts, no new), ELSS, life insurance on member's life, tax-saver FD, NSC, and principal repayment of housing loan in HUF name. Basic exemption is Rs 2.5 lakh and slab structure mirrors individual under old regime. New regime Section 115BAC is also available to HUF.
HUF files ITR-2 if it has only income from house property, capital gains, other sources, and salary (rare for HUF). ITR-3 is filed if HUF carries business or profession with regular books. ITR-4 is filed if HUF opts for presumptive taxation under Section 44AD or 44ADA. Wrong form selection invalidates return and triggers defective return notice under Section 139(9).
Joint family consisting of all persons lineally descended from common ancestor including wives and unmarried daughters, recognised as taxable entity.
Senior most male or female member who manages affairs of the HUF and represents the family in legal and tax matters.
Member who acquires interest in ancestral property by birth, holding right to demand partition under Mitakshara school principles.
Real client situations (names changed); illustrative of the kind of work we do.
Why these Medavakkam engagements look the way they do: For Medavakkam engagements specifically — the cluster of residential, retail, healthcare businesses that defines Medavakkam's commercial fabric; for the professional and salaried population of Medavakkam navigating personal-tax and home-office GST.
“Wanted to form HUF for our textile family business. FilingPro drafted the deed on Mitakshara lines, included my daughter as coparcener under Vineeta Sharma 2020, filed Form 49A and opened the HUF current account at ICICI. Saved ₹62,000 in tax in the very first year through HUF basic exemption and 80C.”
“Inherited ancestral property from my late father. FilingPro confirmed it qualified as HUF property under Mitakshara, drafted the HUF deed declaring me as Karta with my wife and two children as members, filed PAN in HUF name. Now rental income is taxed in HUF separately — clean structure.”
“After my husband's demise, I needed clarity on whether I could be Karta of our HUF. FilingPro walked me through Vineeta Sharma 2020 — confirmed I am the senior-most coparcener and can be Karta. Updated the deed, changed bank mandate, filed ITR-2 in HUF name. Deeply grateful for the patient guidance.”
“Was about to "throw" my mutual fund portfolio into HUF for tax savings. FilingPro flagged Section 64(2) clubbing — the LTCG would still be taxed in my hands until partition. Saved me from a costly mistake and instead structured corpus through my father's gift — fully Section 56(2)(x) exempt.”
“Our family wanted to do a partial partition of one rental property out of the HUF. FilingPro showed us Section 171(9) — partial partitions after 1978 are not recognised. Restructured as a total partition application under Section 171(2), AO passed Section 171(3) order, every member got definite shares. No Section 64 surprises later.”
“Our HUF was filing ITR for years but no formal deed existed. Banks were asking for documentation. FilingPro drafted retrospective HUF deed declaring corpus from my father-in-law's gift in 2014, notarised, opened proper HUF account at HDFC. Compliance gaps closed cleanly.”
Common questions from Medavakkam clients. Call 9566-068-468 for specific queries.
We serve businesses in every part of Medavakkam, from Semmozhi Salai, Velachery Main Road, Velachery Mudhanmai Salai, Velachery Tambaram Road and Pillaiyar Kovil Street to the Pillayarkoil Street, 12th Street, 1st Cross Street and 3rd Cross Street commercial pockets, with HUF handled end to end.
Professional HUF Formation in Medavakkam, Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming). 15+ years experience, 4.9★ rated.
FilingPro Chennai — 15+ Years of Expert Tax & Business Consulting. Offices at Maduravoyal, Nerkundram & Nolambur (upcoming), Chennai. Call @ 9566-068-468. Disclaimer: Information on this page is for general guidance only and does not constitute legal, financial or tax advice. Consult a qualified professional for specific advice.